Ga. Code Ann. § 9-11-56

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Roberson v. Leone · filed 2012-03-22(c)

At the outset, we note that “[s]ummary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA, INC. v. Smith · filed 2012-03-26(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) authorizes summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hearn v. DOLLAR RENT a CAR, INC. · filed 2012-03-26(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Stonemill Church, Inc. v. RBC Bank (USA) Inc. · filed 2012-03-26(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Erturk v. Geico General Insurance · filed 2012-03-29(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

BETHANY GROUP, LLC v. Grobman · filed 2012-03-29(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Haarhoff v. Jefferson at Perimeter, L.P. · filed 2012-03-29(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) allows summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hadley v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. · filed 2012-03-30(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate only when the evidence shows that “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. v. Myers · filed 2012-06-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper where there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Feldman v. Arcadis US, Inc. · filed 2012-06-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Myers · filed 2012-06-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper where there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts and all inferences, viewed for the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Perkins v. Kranz · filed 2012-06-12(c)

This court conducts a de novo review of the grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment. To prevail, the moving party must show that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the undisputed facts and all inferences and conclusions drawn from them, when viewed in the light most favorable to Kranz as the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Abundant Animal Care, LLC v. April Gray · filed 2012-06-13(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

685 Penn, LLC v. Stabilis Fund I, L. P. · filed 2012-06-14(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

3 West Investments, LLC v. Hamilton State Bank · filed 2012-06-14(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed for the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Mountain Heritage Bank v. Rogers · filed 2012-06-21

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Latimore v. Vatacs Group, Inc. · filed 2012-06-26(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

O'Neill v. Reininger · filed 2012-06-28(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Reininger v. O'Neill · filed 2012-06-28(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Barrett Properties, LLC v. Nichols Transport · filed 2012-06-29(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Barrett Properties, LLC v. Roberts Capitol, Inc. · filed 2012-06-29(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Kouche v. Farr · filed 2012-07-02(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Capital City Developers, LLC v. Bank of North Ga · filed 2012-07-05(c)

A grant of summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Capital City Developers, LLC v. Bank of North Georgia · filed 2012-07-05(c)

A grant of summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Martin v. Herrington Mill, LP · filed 2012-07-09(c)

At the outset, we note that summary judgment is proper “when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Greenway v. Northside Hospital, Inc. · filed 2012-07-31(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must establish no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed for the nonmovant, demand judgment as a matter of law.

Anderson v. Canup · filed 2012-08-30(c)

To prevail on summary judgment, the moving party must establish that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Grot v. Capital One Bank · filed 2012-09-19(c)

Summary judgment is proper when the pleadings and evidence show that there are no genuine issues of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See OCGA § 9-11-56 (c); Melman, supra, 312 Ga. App. at 270.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed for the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Marietta Brown v. Seaboard Construction Company · filed 2012-09-25(c)

“[T]he moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.” (Punctuation omitted.) Lau’s Corp. v. Haskins, 261 Ga. 491 (405 SE2d 474) (1991); see OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Thomas v. McMillan · filed 2012-10-02(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) authorizes summary judgment when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Kovacs v. Cornerstone National Insurance · filed 2012-10-19(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings and evidence “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law.

Ward v. Morgan County Board of Tax Assessors · filed 2012-10-24(c)

To succeed on a motion for summary judgment, the movant must show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that he or she is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law.

Morgan County Board of Tax Assessors v. Ward · filed 2012-10-24(c)

To succeed on a motion for summary judgment, the movant must show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that he or she is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Dixie Roadbuilders, Inc. v. Sallet · filed 2012-10-26(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Maxum Indemnity Company v. Jimenez · filed 2012-11-20(c)

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Parker v. All American Quality Foods, Inc. · filed 2012-11-20(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Maxum Indemnity Co. v. Jimenez · filed 2012-11-20(c)

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).”

Subsection (c) warrants summary judgment when the pleadings and record evidence show undisputed material facts that entitle the moving party to judgment as a matter of law.

Old Republic National Title Insurance v. Darryl J. Panella, LLC · filed 2012-11-20(c)

The standard for summary judgment is familiar and settled: summary judgment is warranted when the material facts, as shown by the pleadings and record evidence, are undisputed and these facts entitle the moving party to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Samuels v. Cbocs, Inc. · filed 2012-11-27(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Reaves v. State Farm Mutual Automobile · filed 2012-11-27(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Reaves v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance · filed 2012-11-27(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the pleadings and undisputed evidence show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Savko v. Ankerich · filed 2012-11-28(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings and the undisputed evidence show that there exists no genuine issue as to any material fact, and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the pleadings and undisputed evidence show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Ankerich v. Savko · filed 2012-11-28(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings and the undisputed evidence show that there exists no genuine issue as to any material fact, and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Renaissance Recovery Solutions, LLC v. Monroe Guaranty Insurance Company · filed 2012-11-30(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Parsons v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Company · filed 2013-01-30(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Parsons v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance · filed 2013-01-30(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Geico General Insurance Company v. Hospital Authority of Clarke County · filed 2013-02-13(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Geico General Insurance v. Hospital Authority · filed 2013-02-13(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Oduok v. Wedean Properties, Inc. · filed 2013-02-19(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed for the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Walter Terrell Henderson, Jr. v. Sugarloaf Residential Property Owners Association, Inc. · filed 2013-03-20

“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.”

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed for the nonmovant, demand judgment as a matter of law.

Floyd County v. Scott · filed 2013-03-20

In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must show that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed for the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Bourff v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC · filed 2013-03-20(c)

To prevail at summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the pleadings and undisputed evidence show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Wilann Properties I, LLC v. Georgia Power Company · filed 2013-03-25(c)

“Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings and the undisputed evidence show that there exists no genuine issue as to any material fact, and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).”

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed for the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Zurich American Insurance Company v. Heard · filed 2013-03-28(c)

“[T]he moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. [Cit.]”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the pleadings and undisputed evidence show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

uwork.com, Inc. v. Paragon Technologies, Inc. · filed 2013-03-29(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings and the undisputed evidence show that there exists no genuine issue as to any material fact, and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Southern Telecom, Inc. v. Tw Telecom Inc. of Georgia, L. P. F/K/A Time Warner Telecom of Georgia, L. P. · filed 2013-03-29(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when the pleadings and evidence “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the pleadings and undisputed evidence show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Paragon Technologies, Inc. v. uwork.com, Inc. · filed 2013-03-29(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings and the undisputed evidence show that there exists no genuine issue as to any material fact, and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Hughes · filed 2013-05-10(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. O.C.G.A. § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Hughes · filed 2013-05-10(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) authorizes summary judgment when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Bobick v. Community & Southern Bank · filed 2013-05-22(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings and evidence “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

McGraw v. Ids Property & Casualty Insurance Company · filed 2013-06-27(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hanna v. First Citizens Bank and Trust Company, Inc. · filed 2013-06-27(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hanna v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. · filed 2013-06-27(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Herren v. Mitchell Electric Membership Corp. · filed 2013-07-12(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Boone v. Gilbert Udoto D/B/A Sandtrap Club & Lounge · filed 2013-07-15(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Boone v. Udoto · filed 2013-07-15(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

McGee v. Patterson · filed 2013-07-16(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hunter v. Emory - Adventist, Inc. D/B/A Adventist Hospital · filed 2013-07-16(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Thompson v. Lafarge Building Materials, Inc. · filed 2013-07-16(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Morrisroe · filed 2013-07-16(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. O.C.G.A. § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Morrisroe · filed 2013-07-16(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hunter v. Emory-Adventist, Inc. · filed 2013-07-16(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Houston v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L. P. · filed 2013-10-03(c)

Summary judgment is proper if the pleadings and evidence “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Patel v. Ameris Bank · filed 2013-10-10(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. O.C.G.A. § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Stillwater Enterprises, Inc. v. Hanson Pipe & Precast, LLC · filed 2013-11-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Dawson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. · filed 2013-11-12(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that undisputed facts viewed favorably to the nonmovant warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Hewitt v. Community & Southern Bank · filed 2013-11-14

Further, to prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Dodson v. Sykes Industrial Holdings, LLC · filed 2013-11-20(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Denis S. Atkinson, Jr. v. City of Atlanta · filed 2013-11-21(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Crabapple Lake Park Community Association, Inc. v. Circeo · filed 2013-11-21(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Atkinson v. City of Atlanta · filed 2013-11-21(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Crabapple Lake Parc Community Ass'n v. Circeo · filed 2013-11-21(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

L & K Enterprises, LLC v. City National Bank, N.A. · filed 2014-03-10(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

SCROCCA v. ASHWOOD CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. · filed 2014-03-13(c)

Summary judgment is properly granted when the pleadings and evidence “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the record reveals no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

STRAUS v. RENASANT BANK · filed 2014-03-14(c)

Summary judgment is proper when the record reveals no genuine issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Olde Towne Tyrone, LLC v. Multibank 2009-1 Cre Venture, LLC · filed 2014-03-18(c)

Summary judgment is proper where the pleadings and evidence demonstrate “that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

McLeod v. Clements · filed 2014-03-20(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Goodwin v. Allstate Insurance Company · filed 2014-03-21(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Kim v. First Intercontinental Bank · filed 2014-03-21(c)

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Theodore "Ted" Jackson, Sheriff v. Payne · filed 2014-03-26(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Jackson v. Payne · filed 2014-03-26(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment ... as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the record reveals no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

The Medical Center of Central Georgia, Inc. v. the City of MacOn, Georgia · filed 2014-03-27(c)

Summary judgment is proper when the record reveals no genuine issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Eshleman v. Key · filed 2014-03-28(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hines v. Railserve, Inc. · filed 2014-03-28(c)

summary adjudication is only proper when “there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” ... see OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Roca Properties, LLC v. Dance Hotlanta, Inc. · filed 2014-06-24(c)

Summary judgment is proper only if the pleadings and evidence show “that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Gmac Mortgage, LLC v. Pharis · filed 2014-07-09(c)

A trial court may grant summary judgment when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Marvin Hewatt Enterprises, Inc. v. Butler Capital Corporation · filed 2014-07-31(c)

A trial court may grant summary judgment when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Thompson v. Lovett · filed 2014-07-31(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

ZALDIVAR v. PRICKETT Et Al. · filed 2014-07-31(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Pnc Bank v. Tidwell · filed 2014-07-31(c)

A trial court may grant summary judgment when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Courtland Hotel, LLC D/B/A Sheraton Atlanta Hotel v. Evan Joshua Salzer A/K/A Evan Salzer · filed 2014-10-06(c)

A trial court may grant summary judgment when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Thomas v. Jere Summers · filed 2014-10-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Thomas v. Summers · filed 2014-10-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

HAYEK Et Al. v. CHASTAIN PARK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. · filed 2014-10-09(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hill v. VNS Corp. · filed 2014-10-15(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

PENNINGTON Et Al. v. GWINNETT COUNTY · filed 2014-10-17(c)

A trial court may grant summary judgment when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

SWOPE v. GREENBRIAR MALL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Et Al. · filed 2014-11-19(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) authorizes summary judgment when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine material factual issue and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Brazeal v. Newpoint Media Group, LLC. · filed 2015-03-10(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings and evidence “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Buttacavoli v. Owen, Gleaton, Egan, Jones & Sweeney LLP · filed 2015-03-11(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine material factual issue and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Smith v. Nt Nails, LLC · filed 2015-03-11(c)

Summary judgment is properly granted when the pleadings and evidence “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Gaslowitz v. Stabilis Fund I, Lp · filed 2015-03-12(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine material factual issue and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Roberts III v. Community & Southern Bank · filed 2015-03-19(c)

Summary judgment is proper if the pleadings and evidence “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed for the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

TUCKER v. PEARCE Et Al. · filed 2015-04-10

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Tuohy v. City of Atlanta · filed 2015-04-10(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia v. Winter · filed 2015-04-10(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact as to each element of its claim and that undisputed facts viewed favorably to the nonmovant warrant judgment as a matter of law.

EMC Corporation v. Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas And Ken Paxton, Attorney General of · filed 2015-04-30(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under O.C.G.A. § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact as to each element of its claim and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed for the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

KIM v. PARK Et Al. · filed 2015-05-20

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine material factual issue and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF AUGUSTA, LLC Et Al. v. ALICEA · filed 2015-06-22(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate only if the pleadings and evidence “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine material factual issue and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. COOK Et Al.; And Vice Versa · filed 2015-07-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper if the pleadings and evidence “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

CARAWAY Et Al. v. SPILLERS · filed 2015-07-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine material factual issue and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Vernon v. Assurance Forensic Accounting, LLC · filed 2015-07-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper only if the pleadings and evidence “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) entitles a party to summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Black v. Bland Farms, LLC · filed 2015-07-08(c)

A party is entitled to summary judgment if there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Patrick Malloy Communities, LLC v. Community & Southern Bank · filed 2015-10-06(c)

“[S]ummary judgment is appropriate when the moving party can show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Guice v. Brown · filed 2015-10-22(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Venable v. Suntrust Bank · filed 2015-11-23(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Garvin v. Atlanta Gas Light Company · filed 2015-11-23(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Gaskins v. Berry's Boat Dock · filed 2015-11-23(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Global Ship Systems, LLC v. Riverhawk Group, LLC · filed 2015-11-23(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

JIM TIDWELL FORD, INC. v. BASHUK Et Al. · filed 2016-02-18(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Heany v. Bennett Street Properties, Lp · filed 2016-03-11(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Sheats v. the Kroger Co. · filed 2016-03-21(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Mma Capital Corporation v. Alr Oglethorpe, LLC · filed 2016-03-23(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Mjq Concourse, Inc. v. Arch Specialty Insurance Company · filed 2016-03-25(c)

Summary judgment is proper ... when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

ELDER v. HAYES Et Al. · filed 2016-07-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Edel v. Southtowne Motors of Newnan II, Inc. · filed 2016-07-12(c)

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

EDEL Et Al. v. SOUTHTOWNE MOTORS OF NEWNAN II, INC. · filed 2016-07-12(c)

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Northside Bank v. Mountainbrook of Bartow Homeowners Association, Inc. · filed 2016-07-14(c)

Summary judgment is proper only if the pleadings and evidence “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Morris v. Byrd · filed 2016-08-18(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Moss · filed 2016-09-07(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings and evidence “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

STROUD Et Al. v. HALL COUNTY · filed 2016-10-20(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Greenberg Farrow Architecture, Inc. v. Jmls 1422, LLC · filed 2016-10-20(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Allen v. McGuire · filed 2016-10-28(c)

Summary judgment is [only] proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Bryant v. Optima International Inc. · filed 2016-11-15(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Ray Mashburn Homes, LLC v. Charterbank · filed 2016-11-16(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Gadd v. Warwick · filed 2016-11-16(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact, and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits affirmance when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Midville River Tract LLC v. Central of Georgia Railroad Company · filed 2016-11-17(c)

We construe the evidence in the light most favorable to Midville, and we affirm if “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and . . . the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) entitles a party to summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Bibler Masonry Contractors, Inc. v. J. T. Turner Construction Co., Inc. · filed 2017-03-06(c)

A party is entitled to summary judgment if there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

POPHAM v. LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY Et Al. · filed 2017-03-09(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56(c).

Subsection (c) entitles a defendant to summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

EVERSON v. PHOEBE SUMTER MEDICAL CENTER, INC. F/K/A SUMTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, INC. · filed 2017-03-14(c)

A defendant such as Jordan is entitled to summary judgment if the evidence shows “that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that [he] is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law[.]” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) entitles a defendant to summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

EVERSON Et Al. v. PHOEBE SUMTER MEDICAL CENTER, INC. Et Al.; JORDAN v. EVERSON Et Al. · filed 2017-03-14(c)

A defendant such as Jordan is entitled to summary judgment if the evidence shows “that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that [he] is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law[.]” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).