Ga. Code Ann. § 9-11-56

Section 9-11-56 requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the nonmoving party.

Dorsey v. Atlanta Board of Education · filed 2002-04-17(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Ham v. Ham · filed 2002-09-17(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) allows summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Pryor v. CCEC, INC. · filed 2002-09-18(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter óf law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the nonmovant.

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. F. S. Associates, L.P. · filed 2002-09-20(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Waddell v. Bhat · filed 2002-09-24(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Nelson v. Glynn-Brunswick Hospital Authority · filed 2002-09-24(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hinson v. Black · filed 2002-09-27(c)

Applying that standard, summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the nonmovant.

Conley v. Dawson · filed 2002-10-01(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56 (c), the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Clark v. Prison Health Services, Inc. · filed 2002-10-09(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) makes summary judgment proper when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Tittle v. Corso · filed 2002-10-15(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the nonmoving party.

Cowart v. Crown American Properties, L.P. · filed 2002-10-15(c)

To prevail by summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Bateast v. Dekalb County · filed 2002-10-22(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Durham v. Mathis · filed 2002-10-25(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) makes summary judgment proper when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Crouch v. Federated Mutual Insurance · filed 2002-09-26(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact, and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of ... law.

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the nonmoving party.

Yon v. Shimeall · filed 2002-10-10(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hudson v. Dobson · filed 2003-03-20(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the nonmoving party.

Griffin v. Fowler · filed 2003-03-20(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue as to any material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Anderson v. Medical Center, Inc. · filed 2003-03-26(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) authorizes summary judgment when the pleadings and record evidence show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law.

Capitol Indemnity, Inc. v. Brown · filed 2003-03-27(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when the “pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to ... any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Cincinnati Insurance v. Sherman & Hemstreet, Inc. · filed 2003-03-28(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Brown v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc. · filed 2003-04-09(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Munoz v. Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd. · filed 2003-05-13(c)

Summary judgment is proper when, there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires affirmance when evidence viewed favorably to the nonmovant presents no genuine material-fact issue and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Ass'n v. Department of Revenue · filed 2003-05-23(c)

In reviewing the grant of DOR’s motion for summary judgment, we affirm if the evidence, viewed in the Association’s favor, presents no genuine issue of material fact and, under those facts, the DOR is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the opposing party.

Smith v. Bulloch County Board of Commissioners · filed 2003-05-30(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Canales v. Wilson Southland Insurance Agency · filed 2003-06-05(c)

Summary judgment, is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the opposing party.

Lodgenet Entertainment Corp. v. Heritage Inn Associates · filed 2003-06-06(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the nonmoving party.

Mitchell v. Austin · filed 2003-06-10(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hynes v. Cagle · filed 2003-11-26(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the opposing party.

Bonem v. Golf Club of Georgia, Inc. · filed 2003-12-05(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the nonmoving party.

Gwinnett Health System, Inc. v. Delu · filed 2003-12-18(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Canal Indemnity Co. v. Greene · filed 2003-12-18(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

ABF Capital Corp. v. Yancey · filed 2003-12-18(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the opposing party.

Greenwald v. Kersh · filed 2004-01-16(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the nonmoving party.

O'Connell v. Historic Investments of the South, Inc. · filed 2004-01-23(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the opposing party.

Marquis Towers, Inc. v. Highland Group · filed 2004-01-30(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Gerber & Gerber, P.C. v. Regions Bank · filed 2004-02-13(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) allows summary judgment only when no genuine material-fact issue exists and facts viewed favorably to the nonmoving party warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Blackwell v. Potts · filed 2004-02-17(c)

It is axiomatic that summary judgment is appropriate only when no genuine issues of material fact exist and when those facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) makes summary judgment appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact remains and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Taylor v. Kennestone Hospital, Inc. · filed 2004-02-17(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact remains and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Cooper v. Binion · filed 2004-02-18(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

White v. Georgia Power Co. · filed 2004-02-18(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Friar v. Friar · filed 2004-02-18(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Porter Communications Co. v. Southtrust Bank · filed 2004-06-18(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) makes summary judgment appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Rathbone v. Ward · filed 2004-07-01(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where the evidence of record “show[s] that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Espanol v. Allstate Insurance · filed 2004-07-06(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when the record shows that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Spivey v. Hembree · filed 2004-07-14(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Kesco, Inc. v. Brand Banking Co. · filed 2004-07-16(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Cornwell v. Kirwan · filed 2004-07-19(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) makes summary judgment appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Resnick v. Meybohm Realty, Inc. · filed 2004-07-21(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Waller v. Economic & Community Development Department · filed 2004-07-26(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires summary judgment when the record shows no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Home Depot U. S. A., Inc. v. Miller · filed 2004-07-27(c)

Summary judgment shall be rendered where the record shows that there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the opposing party.

Beasley v. a Better Gas Co., Inc. · filed 2004-08-05(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) authorizes summary judgment only when the record materials show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Osburn v. Goldman · filed 2004-08-13(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate only ‘if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.’

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Cordell v. Mohawk Industries, Inc. · filed 2004-08-18(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

USA Manufacturing Corp. v. Perfection-Schwank, Inc. · filed 2005-02-15(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Bradley Plywood Corp. v. MAYOR & ALDERMEN OF CITY OF SAVANNAH · filed 2005-03-01(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Chamblin v. K-Mart Corp. · filed 2005-03-03(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact remains for jury resolution and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Albany Bone & Joint Clinic, P.C. v. Hajek · filed 2005-03-11(c)

Summary judgment is proper when no genuine issue of material fact remains for jury resolution and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) makes summary judgment appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact exist and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hamblin v. City of Albany · filed 2005-03-17(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when there are no genuine issues of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the nonmoving party.

Owens v. General Motors Corp. · filed 2005-03-17(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56(c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Johnson v. Allen · filed 2005-03-24(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

McKissick v. Giroux · filed 2005-03-25(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

J. Smith Lanier & Co. v. Acceptance Indemnity Insurance · filed 2005-03-29(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Fraker v. C. W. Matthews Contracting Co. · filed 2005-03-30(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Auto-Owners Insurance v. Karan, Inc. · filed 2005-03-31(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Rabun v. McCoy · filed 2005-04-12(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

AdvanceMe, Inc. v. Finley · filed 2005-09-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the opposing party.

Nuckolls v. Atlanta Marine, Inc. · filed 2005-09-28(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Rainier Holdings, Inc. v. Tatum · filed 2005-10-17(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Ahmad v. Excell Petroleum, Inc. · filed 2005-10-18(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

VATACS Group, Inc. v. HomeSide Lending, Inc. · filed 2005-10-31(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Atlanta Sand & Supply Co. v. Citizens Bank · filed 2005-10-31(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) makes summary judgment appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Rabun & Associates Construction, Inc. v. Berry · filed 2005-11-21(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

McReynolds v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America · filed 2005-11-23(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Progressive Casualty Insurance v. Evans · filed 2005-12-01(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Padgett v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance · filed 2005-12-12(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Section 9-11-56 requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the nonmoving party.

Shuman v. ILA LOCAL 1414 · filed 2005-12-16(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists as to an essential claim element and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Snellgrove v. Hyatt Corp. · filed 2006-01-03(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact as to any essential element of a claim and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Cox v. Athens Regional Medical Center, Inc. · filed 2006-05-26(c)

Summaryjudgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) makes summary judgment appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hale v. Scarborough · filed 2006-06-01(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where the moving party can show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Rogers & Sons, Inc. v. Santee Risk Managers, LLC · filed 2006-06-05(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hartsock v. Rich's Employees Credit Union · filed 2006-06-12(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the nonmoving party.

Grumet v. Bunt · filed 2006-06-12(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

IH RIVERDALE, LLC v. McChesney Capital Partners, LLC · filed 2006-06-20(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) makes summary judgment appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hill v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC · filed 2006-06-26(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Kitchens v. Brusman · filed 2006-06-27(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

GRIFFIN BROTHERS, INC. v. Town of Alto · filed 2006-06-27(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Norris v. Central of Georgia Railroad · filed 2006-07-12(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the nonmoving party.

Dalton Paving & Construction, Inc. v. South Green Construction of Georgia, Inc. · filed 2007-02-22(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the opposing party.

Satisfaction & Service Housing, Inc. v. SouthTrust Bank, Inc. · filed 2007-02-22(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Britton v. Farmer · filed 2007-02-23(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Chowhan v. Miller · filed 2007-02-27(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

McAfee v. ETS Payphones, Inc. · filed 2007-02-27(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) makes summary judgment appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Collins v. City of Summerville · filed 2007-03-07(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the nonmoving party.

Purvis v. Steve · filed 2007-03-09(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) makes summary judgment appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Touchton v. Bramble · filed 2007-03-13(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Simalton v. AIU Insurance · filed 2007-03-13(c)

Applying that standard, summary judgment is proper ... when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists as to an essential claim element and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Norton v. Cobb County · filed 2007-03-19(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact as to any essential element of a claim and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) makes summary judgment appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Reece v. Turner · filed 2007-03-19(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Aderhold v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC. · filed 2007-03-19(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the opposing party.

D & H Construction Co. v. City of Woodstock · filed 2007-03-19(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed ... in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) makes summary judgment appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Gavahi-Kashani v. Automotive Finance Corp. · filed 2007-06-22(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Falanga v. Kirschner & Venker, P.C. · filed 2007-06-25(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment asa matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Canal Insurance v. Pro Search · filed 2007-06-26(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Dowdell v. Volvo Commercial Finance, LLC · filed 2007-06-27(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Kennedy v. Georgia Department of Human Resources Child Support Enforcement · filed 2007-06-29(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Worksiterx, LLC v. Drtango, Inc. · filed 2007-07-03(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Section 9-11-56 requires the moving party to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under undisputed facts viewed favorably to the nonmoving party.

Decker Car Wash, Inc. v. BP Products North America, Inc. · filed 2007-07-03(c)

[T]he moving party must show that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hawkins v. National City Mortgage Co. · filed 2007-07-05(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact appears and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Ferrari v. American Home Products Corp. · filed 2007-07-05(c)

Summary judgment is proper when no genuine issue of material fact appears and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Baker v. Merrill Lynch Trust Co., FSB · filed 2007-07-05(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) makes summary judgment proper when no issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Marchant v. Travelers Indem. Co. of Ill. · filed 2007-07-06(c)

A grant of a motion for summary judgment is proper when there is no issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hamburger v. PFM Capital Management, Inc. · filed 2007-07-06(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Kay-Lex Co. v. Essex Insurance · filed 2007-07-10(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Moses v. Traton Corp. · filed 2007-07-10(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. UNIV. OF GEORGIA ATHLETIC ASS'N, INC. · filed 2007-11-09(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact appears and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Lollis v. Turner · filed 2007-11-15(c)

Summary judgment is proper when no genuine issue of material fact appears and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Phillips v. Government Employees Insurance · filed 2007-11-20(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Exel Transportation Services, Inc. v. Sigma Vita, Inc. · filed 2007-11-21(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Mooneyham v. PROVIDENT AUTO LEASING CO. · filed 2007-11-26(c)

Summary judgment is proper when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Matson v. Noble Investment Group, LLC · filed 2007-11-29(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of ... law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Pinckney v. Covington Athletic Club & Fitness Center · filed 2007-11-30(c)

Summary judgment is proper when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Section 9-11-56 requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the nonmoving party.

Thompson v. HOWARD BROS., INC. · filed 2008-01-07(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the nonmoving party.

Edwards v. Sewell · filed 2008-01-08(c)

To prevail at summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Long v. Hogan · filed 2008-01-16(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Ussery v. Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Inc. · filed 2008-01-23(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Cleaveland v. Gannon · filed 2008-01-28(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) authorizes summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Benefield v. Pep Boys—Manny, Moe & Jack, Inc. · filed 2008-04-11(c)

Summary judgment is proper if the evidence shows “that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party ... is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Dowdell v. Krystal Co. · filed 2008-04-21(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Thompson · filed 2008-04-25(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Drew v. Istar Financial, Inc. · filed 2008-05-01(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 requires the moving party to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the nonmoving party.

McLaine v. McLeod · filed 2008-05-01(c)

In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must show that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must demonstrate no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under undisputed facts viewed favorably to the nonmoving party.

McCray v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. · filed 2008-05-01(c)

To prevail at summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the nonmoving party.

Gardner v. Marcum · filed 2008-05-20(c)

To prevail at summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) makes summary judgment appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Rosado v. Rosado · filed 2008-05-23(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where the moving party can show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Harris Ventures, Inc. v. Mallory and Evans, Inc. · filed 2008-06-05(c)

Summary judgment is proper where the movant shows no genuine issue of material fact exists and entitlement to summary judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Lee, Black, Hart & Rouse, P.C. v. Travelers Indemnity Co. · filed 2008-06-05(c)

A trial court properly grants summary judgment when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party has shown entitlement to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and evidence viewed favorably to the nonmoving party warrants judgment as a matter of law.

Miller v. BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY · filed 2008-06-09(c)

A trial court properly awards summary judgment when the moving party has demonstrated that there is no genuine issue of ... material fact and that the evidence, viewed most favorably to the nonmoving party, warrants judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 requires the moving party to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under undisputed facts viewed favorably to the nonmoving party.

Johnson v. GAPVT Motors, Inc. · filed 2008-06-18(c)

In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must show that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Coleman v. ARRINGTON AUTO SALES & RENTALS · filed 2008-10-27(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 requires the moving party to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under undisputed facts viewed favorably to the nonmoving party.

Lawson v. ENTECH ENTERPRISES, INC. · filed 2008-10-30(c)

[U]nder OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must show that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Fields v. Lanier · filed 2008-11-04(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Lawyers Title Insurance Corp. v. Stribling · filed 2008-11-05(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Savage v. E. R. Snell Contractor, Inc. · filed 2008-11-05(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Rommelman v. Hoyt · filed 2008-11-10(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Porter v. Urban Residential Development Corp. · filed 2008-11-13(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Ellison v. Burger King Corp. · filed 2008-11-13(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Kim · filed 2008-11-14(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under undisputed facts.

De Castro v. Durrell · filed 2008-11-18(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Mullis v. Bibb County · filed 2008-11-19(c)

A party is entitled to summary judgment if that party demonstrates that no genuine issue of material fact remains and he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Valentino v. Matara · filed 2008-11-21(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).