Ga. Code Ann. § 9-11-56

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed for the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Spooner v. Deere Credit, Inc. · filed 2000-06-29

To prevail on summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Burgess v. Coca-Cola Co. · filed 2000-06-30(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Williamson v. Abellera · filed 2000-07-07(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Odum v. Gibson · filed 2000-07-28(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where the moving party can show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed for the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Solomon v. Norwest Mortgage Corp. · filed 2000-08-28

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Georgia Bank & Trust v. Cincinnati Insurance · filed 2000-08-28(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). Our review is de novo, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

A summary-judgment movant must show that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the nonmovant’s favor, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Hayes v. Collins · filed 2000-08-29(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Barbazza v. International Motor Sports Ass'n · filed 2000-09-06(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). Our review is de novo, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists.

Cherry v. Hughes Supply Co. · filed 2000-09-15(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when there are no genuine issues of material fact. ... In this case, there are no genuine issues of material fact.

A defendant obtains summary judgment by showing that the record lacks evidence sufficient to create a jury issue on at least one essential element of the plaintiff’s case.

All Angles Construction & Demolition, Inc. v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority · filed 2000-09-25(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the nonmovant’s favor, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Stanford v. City of Manchester · filed 2000-09-26

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is appropriate only when the listed record materials show no genuine material factual issue and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Jones v. Hill · filed 2000-09-29(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate only where “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, ... together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the nonmovant’s favor, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Shaffer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance · filed 2000-10-03(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Ford Clinic, Inc. v. Potter · filed 2000-10-06(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where the moving party can show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the nonmovant’s favor, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Oliver v. Sutton · filed 2000-10-19

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is “no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.”

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Dover v. City of Jackson · filed 2000-10-24(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where the moving party can show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Costrini v. Hansen Architects, P.C. · filed 2000-12-01(c)

OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

A summary-judgment movant must show that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the nonmovant’s favor, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Lager's, LLC v. Palace Laundry, Inc. · filed 2000-12-11(c)

To prevail at summary ... judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56 (c), the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the nonmovant’s favor, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Litland v. Smith · filed 2000-12-11(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the nonmovant’s favor, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Touchton v. Amway Corp. · filed 2000-12-11(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the nonmovant’s favor, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Hardin v. Phillips · filed 2001-02-21

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.”

A summary-judgment movant must show that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the opposing party’s favor, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Rolison v. Georgia Central Railway, L.P. · filed 2001-03-02(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Eastside Gardens of Snellville, LLC v. Sims · filed 2001-03-28(c)

judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56 (c), the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Dorsey v. Mancuso · filed 2001-04-17(c)

OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A defendant may meet its burden in moving for summary judgment by showing the court that the documents, affidavits, depositions, and other evidence in the record reveal that there is no evidence sufficient to create a jury issue on at least one essential element of plaintiff’s case.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the nonmovant’s favor, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Seals v. Hygrade Distribution & Delivery Systems, Inc. · filed 2001-05-09(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56 (c), the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is appropriate when the record shows no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Pfeiffer v. Department of Transportation · filed 2001-06-01(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where the evidence of record “show[s] that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the nonmovant’s favor, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Aldridge v. KING'S COLONIAL FORD, INC. · filed 2001-06-08(c)

“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Jacobs v. Thomson Oak Flooring · filed 2001-06-11(c)

OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). To obtain summary judgment, a defendant need not produce any evidence, but must only point to an absence of evidence supporting at least one essential element of the plaintiff’s claim.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the nonmovant’s favor, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Traicoff v. Withers · filed 2000-12-27(c)

there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Fontaine v. Home Depot, Inc. · filed 2001-06-18(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant bears the burden of showing no genuine material factual issue and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on facts viewed favorably to the nonmovant.

Wilkinson v. Household Finance Corp. · filed 2001-06-18(c)

In his appellate brief, Wilkinson correctly argues that the burden is on the movant for summary judgment to demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is appropriate when the record shows no genuine material factual issue and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Five Forks, LLC v. Department of Transportation · filed 2001-06-21(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where the evidence of record “show[s] that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

Summary judgment is proper when no genuine factual issue remains and the opposing party has shown no legal basis for relief.

Letchas v. SIMS ASPHALT CO., INC. · filed 2001-06-22

Because there are no genuine issues of material fact that the City acted lawfully and that Sims has shown no legal basis for any of the relief it seeks, we find that the trial court erred in granting partial summary judgment to Sims and in denying summary judgment to the City.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine material factual issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hudson v. Whited · filed 2001-07-06(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is appropriate when the record shows no genuine material factual issue and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Kristin National, Inc. v. Board of Education · filed 2001-07-09(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where the evidence of record “show[s] that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine material factual issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

East Beach Properties, Ltd. v. Taylor · filed 2001-07-09(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine material factual issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Fulton County Board of Education v. Citizens for Education & Environment, Inc. · filed 2001-07-10(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine material factual issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Smith v. Georgia Kaolin Co. · filed 2001-07-10(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine material factual issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

CGU Life Insurance v. Singer Asset Finance Co. · filed 2001-07-11(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine material factual issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Price v. State · filed 2001-07-31(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and . . . the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. . . ,”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Mathis v. Cannon · filed 2001-11-02(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with the evidence and reasonable inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Burns v. Dees · filed 2001-11-16(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant [or denial] of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Lanier Home Center, Inc. v. Underwood · filed 2001-11-21(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Georgia Textile MacHinery, Inc. v. Federal Express Corp. · filed 2001-11-28(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Brown v. Belinfante · filed 2001-12-11(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ... A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) authorizes summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Trent v. Franco · filed 2001-12-19(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and . . . the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

Subsection (c) makes summary judgment appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Fuller v. Troup County · filed 2002-01-11(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when there are no genuine issues of material fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires the summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

First Citizens Bank v. All-Lift of Georgia, Inc. · filed 2001-09-07(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 requires the summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Gilbert v. Southern Trust Insurance · filed 2001-10-03

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of ... material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper when the movant shows that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Mills v. Parker · filed 2002-01-17(c)

Summary judgment is proper where the moving party is able to show that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the movant is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine material factual issue exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Robinson v. Hunter · filed 2002-02-11(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and . . . the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine material factual issue and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Hall v. Bruno's, Inc. · filed 2002-02-14(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine material factual issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Georgia Lottery Corp. v. First National Bank · filed 2002-02-15(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Stancliff v. Brown & Webb Builders, Inc. · filed 2002-02-18(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine material factual issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Kay v. Davis · filed 2002-02-21(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper when no genuine material factual issue exists and the undisputed facts, viewed most favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

ESI, Inc. of Tennessee v. Stevens · filed 2002-02-22(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and when the undisputed facts, viewed most favorably to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine material factual issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Higgins v. Food Lion, Inc. · filed 2002-02-22(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine material factual issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Doe v. HGI Realty, Inc. · filed 2002-02-26(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

DeKalb County School District v. Allen · filed 2002-02-27(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56 (c), the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmov-ant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Sun v. Mercedes Benz Credit Corp. · filed 2002-03-01(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, [MBCC] must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to [Sun], warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show both that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Palladino v. Piedmont Hospital, Inc. · filed 2002-03-04(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the movant must show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Holbrook v. Stansell · filed 2002-03-06(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Mays v. Ed Voyles Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. · filed 2002-05-07(c)

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Sams v. Video Display Corp. · filed 2002-05-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Piney Grove Baptist Church v. Goss · filed 2002-05-15(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Savage v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance · filed 2002-06-05(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) authorizes summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Feinour v. Ricker Co. · filed 2002-06-06(c)

Summary judgment is proper only when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Simmons v. Regions Bank · filed 2002-06-13(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Prillaman v. Sark · filed 2002-06-13(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Moore v. WVL RESTAURANT · filed 2002-06-13(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). We apply a de novo standard of review to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment and view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Lebbos v. Davis · filed 2002-06-19(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Brown v. McGriff · filed 2002-06-20(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Cohen v. Target Corp. · filed 2002-06-24(c)

To win summary judgment, the moving party must show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Talbot County Bd. of Com'rs v. Woodall · filed 2002-06-24

To obtain summary judgment, the moving party “must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.”

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Soley v. Dodson · filed 2002-07-01(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Crozer v. Reichert · filed 2002-03-11(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Vaughn, Coltrane & Associates v. Van Horn Construction, Inc. · filed 2002-04-01(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate under OCGA § 9-11-56 “when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled ... to judgment as a matter of law.”

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine material factual issue exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Ridley v. Monroe · filed 2002-07-02(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and . . . the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Stevens v. Department of Transportation · filed 2002-07-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Vintson v. Lichtenberg · filed 2002-07-11(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is appropriate when the movant shows no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law.

Harris v. Johnson · filed 2002-07-23(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where the moving party can show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Department of Corrections v. Barkwell · filed 2002-07-25(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Massey v. Seay · filed 2002-08-09(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Dix v. Kroger Co. · filed 2002-08-09(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Odister v. Leach · filed 2002-08-20(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when there are no genuine issues of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Myers v. Harris · filed 2002-08-20(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper when evidence construed for the nonmovant leaves no material factual issue and entitles the movant to judgment as a matter of law.

Lake v. Atlanta Landmarks, Inc. · filed 2002-08-28(c)

Summary judgment is proper when the evidence, construed in the nonmovant’s favor, shows no issue of material fact remains and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper when evidence construed for the nonmovant leaves no material factual issue and entitles the movant to judgment as a matter of law.

Yager v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. · filed 2002-08-29(c)

Summary judgment is proper when the evidence, construed in the nonmovant’s favor, shows no issue of material fact remains and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Belcher v. CSX Transportation, Inc. · filed 2002-09-09(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Phillips v. First Bank of Georgia · filed 2002-09-10(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Section 9-11-56 authorizes summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Magner v. One Securities Corp. · filed 2002-10-29

Summary judgment is appropriate under OCGA § 9-11-56 “when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Mustaqeem-Graydon v. SunTrust Bank · filed 2002-10-30

In order to prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 authorizes summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Sorema North American Reinsurance Co. v. Johnson · filed 2002-11-08

Summary judgment is appropriate under OCGA § 9-11-56 “when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Corbin v. Regions Bank · filed 2002-11-20(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56 (c), Regions must demonstrate the absence of any genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed most favorably toward Corbin, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Smith v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance · filed 2002-11-22

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the ... light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Blockum v. Fieldale Farms Corp. · filed 2002-11-25

“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.”

Section 9-11-56 requires judgment when the record shows no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Mathis v. Cannon · filed 2002-11-25

OCGA § 9-11-56 provides that a judgment shall be rendered if the record shows that there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Devotie v. Turner Arena Operations, Inc. · filed 2002-12-03(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hall v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. · filed 2002-12-04(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Olson v. Ford Motor Co. · filed 2002-12-13

“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Blakey v. Victory Equipment Sales, Inc. · filed 2002-12-20(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Vasquez v. Smith · filed 2003-01-03(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) authorizes summary judgment when evidence construed for the nonmovant leaves no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Gibbs v. Loomis, Fargo & Co. · filed 2003-01-10(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate if the evidence, construed favorably to the nonmoving party, shows that no genuine issue of material fact remains and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Anderson v. Astro Exterminating Services, Inc. · filed 2003-01-29(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Payne v. Middlesex Insurance · filed 2003-02-04(c)

Applying that standard, summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Reece v. Chestatee State Bank · filed 2003-02-06(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Simon v. Gunby · filed 2003-02-13(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56 (c), the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of ... law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Thurman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance · filed 2003-02-14(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Home Builders Ass'n of Savannah, Inc. v. Chatham County · filed 2003-02-24

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Harvey v. Nichols · filed 2003-02-27(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

South v. Bank of America · filed 2003-03-06(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is appropriate when the listed record materials show no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Carter v. McKnight · filed 2003-03-07(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue [of] material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Mohamud v. Wachovia Corp. · filed 2003-03-11(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Jerry Dickerson Presents, Inc. v. Concert/Southern Chastain Promotions · filed 2003-03-14

To obtain summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Schneider v. Susquehanna Radio Corp. · filed 2003-03-14(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Southern Trust Insurance v. Dr. T's Nature Products Co. · filed 2003-06-19

In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the movant must show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 authorizes summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Tripp v. ALL STATE INS. CO. · filed 2003-07-01

Summary judgment is appropriate under OCGA § 9-11-56 “when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the record shows no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Makowski v. Waldrop · filed 2003-07-03(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when the record “show[s] that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Morris v. Johnson · filed 2003-07-08

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the ... light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Brooks v. Gray · filed 2003-07-09(c)

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).”

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Shores v. Modern Transportation Services, Inc. · filed 2003-07-11(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Northen v. Tobin · filed 2003-07-15(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Nguyen v. Talisman Roswell, LLC · filed 2003-07-22(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Means v. City of Atlanta Police Department · filed 2003-08-12(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Abrams v. Massell · filed 2003-08-14(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Walker v. Gwinnett Hospital System, Inc. · filed 2003-09-18(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

City of Pooler v. Edenfield · filed 2003-09-18(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Kace Investments, L.P. v. Hull · filed 2003-09-19(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the opponent, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Vickers v. Merry Land & Investment Co. · filed 2003-09-22(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Davis v. Crum · filed 2003-10-21(c)

To prevail at summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmov-ing party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Ali v. Aarabi · filed 2003-10-22(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Wilson v. City of Sardis · filed 2003-11-14(c)

To prevail at summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is appropriate when the record shows no genuine material factual issue and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Charania v. Regions Bank · filed 2003-11-19(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where the evidence of record “showfs] that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Bowen Tree Surgeons, Inc. v. Canal Indemnity Co. · filed 2003-11-21(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Minor v. Barwick · filed 2003-11-25(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Bradley v. Frank · filed 2003-11-26(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Coldwell Banker Real Estate Corp. v. DeGraft-Hanson · filed 2004-03-03(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate only if there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Duke v. Bachner · filed 2004-03-04(c)

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Denson Heating & Air Conditioning Co. v. Oglesby · filed 2004-03-08(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56 (c), a moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Mock v. Kroger Co. · filed 2004-03-23(c)

Summary judgment is proper when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

English v. Fulton County Building Authority · filed 2004-03-25

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA§ 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) entitles a party to summary judgment upon showing that no genuine issue of material fact remains and that the party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Belcher v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp. · filed 2004-03-25(c)

A party is entitled to summary judgment if that party demonstrates that no genuine issue of material fact remains and it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Flippen Alliance for Community Empowerment, Inc. v. Brannan · filed 2004-04-01(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hagadorn v. Prudential Insurance · filed 2004-04-20(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the opponent, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Tower Projects, LLC v. Marquis Tower, Inc. · filed 2004-04-22(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Pilz v. Monticello Insurance · filed 2004-04-28

To prevail at summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Vo v. Yamaha Golf Car Co. · filed 2004-04-28

To prevail at summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Baker v. Housing Authority · filed 2004-05-13(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c), the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Dodd v. City of Gainesville · filed 2004-05-17(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the opponent, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Endsley v. ROBINS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION · filed 2004-05-20(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.