Ga. Code Ann. § 9-11-56

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Munroe v. Universal Health Services, Inc. · filed 2004-05-24

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Blake v. RGL Associates, Inc. · filed 2004-06-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is appropriate when the record shows no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Schmitt v. Jackson County · filed 2004-06-10(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where the evidence of record “show[s] that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Batayias v. Kerr-McGee Corp. · filed 2004-06-15(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56 (c), the moving party must show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Beard v. Nunes · filed 2004-08-23

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Moore v. MacK · filed 2004-09-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Fitzgerald Water, Light & Bond Commission v. Shaw Industries, Inc. · filed 2004-09-10(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Deen · filed 2004-09-16(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Vito v. Dhillon · filed 2004-09-21(c)

When there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law, summary judgment is proper.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact remains and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Meyer v. Waite · filed 2004-09-22(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Hiers v. Choicepoint Services, Inc. · filed 2004-10-04(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56 (c), the moving party must show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Wilson v. J & L MELTON, INC. · filed 2004-10-07(c)

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the record shows no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Selective Way Insurance v. Litigation Technology, Inc. · filed 2004-10-08(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when the record “show[s] that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and . . . the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Taylor v. Howren · filed 2004-10-12(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Colvard v. Mosley · filed 2004-10-19(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Carswell v. Oconee Regional Medical Center, Inc. · filed 2004-10-21(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). We apply a de novo standard of review to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Scully v. 1ST MAGNOLIA HOMES, INC. · filed 2004-10-25(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c). Adenovo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Georgia Department of Transportation v. Thompson · filed 2004-11-01(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the opponent, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Harrison v. Williams · filed 2004-11-02(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Palma v. Georgia Farm Bureau Insurance · filed 2004-11-03(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the opponent, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Camden Oil Co., LLC v. Jackson · filed 2004-11-22(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Govea v. City of Norcross · filed 2004-11-23(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper when no genuine issue of material fact remains and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Baggett v. Baggett · filed 2004-11-23

Accordingly, the superior court correctly found that there was no genuine issue of material fact for determination and that, as a matter of law, the co-executors assented in February 1988 to the transfer of title to the property to the five individual children. OCGA § 9-11-56.

Summary judgment is proper when no genuine issue of material fact remains for jury resolution and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Holt & Holt, Inc. v. Choate Construction Co. · filed 2004-12-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact remaining for jury resolution and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

White v. Kaminsky · filed 2004-12-14

Summary judgment is appropriate under OCGA § 9-11-56 when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Alston v. Superior Court Clerks' Retirement Fund · filed 2004-12-17(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Jessup v. Rush · filed 2005-01-07

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Spacemakers of America, Inc. v. Suntrust Bank · filed 2005-01-21(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c), the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Cooper v. Olivent · filed 2005-01-27(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is appropriate when the movant shows no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law.

Hobbs v. Lovelady · filed 2005-01-27(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where the moving party can show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Layfield v. Department of Transportation · filed 2005-02-01(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Witherington v. Adkins · filed 2005-02-09(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Barton v. City of Rome · filed 2005-02-09(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Governor's Towne Club, Inc. v. Caffrey Construction Co. · filed 2005-05-13

“To prevail at summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Daiss v. Bennett · filed 2005-05-17(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from an order either granting or denying summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Hill v. Filsoof · filed 2005-05-19

To prevail at summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Lee v. Washington Square Homeowners' Ass'n · filed 2005-05-23(c)

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Baker v. Simon Property Group, Inc. · filed 2005-05-24(c)

Summary judgment should be granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Webb v. Day · filed 2005-06-01(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Poole v. North Georgia Conference of the Methodist Church, Inc. · filed 2005-06-06(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Strickland v. Auto-Owners Insurance · filed 2005-06-15(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).Ade novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the filed record materials show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Jones v. Frickey · filed 2005-06-21(c)

Summary judgment is proper “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Lewis v. Smith · filed 2005-06-21(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Lay Bros., Inc. v. Golden Pantry Food Stores, Inc. · filed 2005-06-22(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Garrett v. Hanes · filed 2005-06-23(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when there are no genuine issues of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Culberson v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC · filed 2005-06-29

“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.”

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Carter v. Parish · filed 2005-06-29

“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Pantusco v. Wiley · filed 2005-06-30(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of ... law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Georgia Forestry Commission v. Canady · filed 2005-07-06

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Brown v. Morton · filed 2005-07-07(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the ... nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Stewart v. Storch · filed 2005-07-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Goode v. City of Atlanta · filed 2005-07-08(c)

When there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law, summary judgment is proper.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

McElmurray v. Augusta-Richmond County · filed 2005-07-11

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Ledford v. Smith · filed 2005-07-12(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Mitchell v. BACKUS CADILLAC-PONTIAC, INC. · filed 2005-07-12(c)

Summary judgment is proper [only] when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists for a jury and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Roquemore v. City of Forsyth · filed 2005-07-14(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists for consideration by a jury, entitling the movant to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

McQueen v. Minolta Business Solutions, Inc. · filed 2005-07-21

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Eldred v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc. · filed 2005-07-28(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Trench Shoring Services of Atlanta, Inc. v. Westchester Fire Insurance · filed 2005-08-01(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Wasdin v. Mager · filed 2005-08-03(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Williams v. Georgia Department of Transportation · filed 2005-08-11(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. Friedenberg · filed 2005-08-25(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Aames Funding Corp. v. Henderson · filed 2005-08-31

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Morris v. Britt · filed 2005-08-31

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the ... light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Ward v. Bergen · filed 2006-01-19(c)

Summary judgment should be granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Townsend v. Lipman · filed 2006-01-23(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Alcovy Shores Water & Sewerage Authority v. Jasper County · filed 2006-01-24(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Foster & Co. General Contractors, Inc. v. House HVAC/Mechanical, Inc. · filed 2006-02-14(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from an order either granting or denying summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Fletcher v. Hatcher · filed 2006-03-07(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Bryant v. DIVYA, INC. · filed 2006-03-07(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. Progressive Bayside Insurance · filed 2006-03-07

“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Kaesemeyer v. Angiogenix, Inc. · filed 2006-03-07(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Johnson County School District v. Greater Savannah Lawn Care · filed 2006-03-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Langley v. Shannon · filed 2006-03-10

Summary judgment is properly granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Bassett v. Jasper Banking Co. · filed 2006-03-13(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Valdosta Hotel Properties, LLC v. White · filed 2006-03-14(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is appropriate only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

BTL COM LTD., CO. v. Vachon · filed 2006-03-16(c)

Under OCGA § 9-11-56 (c), summary judgment is appropriate only when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

McKelvey v. Plaisted · filed 2006-03-16(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Parrish v. Jackson W. Jones, P.C. · filed 2006-03-22(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the opponent, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

McKinnon v. Progressive Bayside Insurance · filed 2006-03-23(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Draper v. Reynolds · filed 2006-03-23(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Auto-Owners Insurance v. Parks · filed 2006-03-24(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Henson v. Tucker · filed 2006-03-24(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of ... law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Adams v. Carlisle · filed 2006-03-30(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA§ 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Walker v. Sears Roebuck & Co. · filed 2006-04-07(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Burkett v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance · filed 2006-04-07(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Perry v. Georgia Power Co. · filed 2006-04-12(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, demand judgment as a matter of law.

Benton v. Benton · filed 2006-04-25

In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must show that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact remains and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Southern General Insurance v. Foy · filed 2006-05-12(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the opponent, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

King v. Atlanta Casualty Insurance · filed 2006-05-25(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) authorizes summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Gulfstream Aerospace Services Corp. v. United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. · filed 2006-07-27(c)

“Summary judgment is appropriate where the moving party shows he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law and there is no genuine issue as to any material fact. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hattaway v. Conner · filed 2006-08-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and undisputed facts viewed for the nonmovant warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Walker Electric Co. v. Byrd · filed 2006-08-18(c)

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the undisputed facts, taken in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law in favor of the moving party. Our review is de novo.”

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Abrohams v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Agency · filed 2006-08-31(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Midway Railroad Construction Co. v. Beck · filed 2006-08-31(c)

To prevail at summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the nonmovant’s favor, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Wells v. Rogers · filed 2006-09-06(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and undisputed facts viewed for the nonmovant warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Campbell, Odom & Griffith, P.C. v. Doctors Co. · filed 2006-09-27(c)

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the undisputed facts, taken in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law in favor of the moving party. Our review is de novo.”

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Holder Construction Group, LLC v. Georgia Tech Facilities, Inc. · filed 2006-10-03

In order to prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Turner v. Wendy's International, Inc. · filed 2006-10-04(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c). Adenovo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Benefit Support, Inc. v. Hall County · filed 2006-10-10(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Howard v. Pope · filed 2006-10-31

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Wester v. United Capital Financial of Atlanta, LLC · filed 2006-11-02(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no material factual issue exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Freeman v. Barnes · filed 2006-11-09

Summary judgment is proper only when no issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Payne v. Warren · filed 2006-11-21(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the opponent, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Walton v. UCC X, Inc. · filed 2006-11-22(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the opponent, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Greer v. Provident Bank, Inc. · filed 2006-11-28(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Ellis v. Hadnott · filed 2006-11-28(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine material factual issue and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law.

Chatham Orthopaedic Surgery Center, LLC v. White · filed 2006-11-29(c)

Summary judgment is proper if the pleadings and evidence show “that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the opponent, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Hill v. Clayton County Board of Commissioners · filed 2006-11-29(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Collins v. Regions Bank · filed 2006-12-05(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hayes v. Lakeside Village Owners Ass'n, Inc. · filed 2006-12-13(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Donchi, Inc. v. ROBDOL, LLC · filed 2007-01-03(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that undisputed facts viewed favorably to the nonmovant warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Morris v. Pugmire Lincoln Mercury, Inc. · filed 2007-01-08

To prevail at summary judgment, ... the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Covington Square Associates, LLC v. Ingles Markets, Inc. · filed 2007-01-12(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Brewer v. Royal Insurance Co. of America · filed 2007-01-26

In order to prevail on summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Ishak v. First Flag Bank · filed 2007-02-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Paul v. Smith, Gambrell & Russell · filed 2007-02-15(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA§ 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

In re Estate of Wallace · filed 2007-03-20(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c). Adenovo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Walter R. Thomas Associates, Inc. v. Media Dynamite, Inc. · filed 2007-03-22(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

A grant of summary judgment establishes only that the claimant failed to produce evidence creating a genuine issue on one essential element, not that the claim necessarily lacked substantial justification or was brought for delay or harassment.

Chong v. REEBAA CONST. CO., INC. · filed 2007-03-23

[Reebaa Construction] fails to recognize that the grant of a motion for summary judgment on [Chong’s counterclaims] establishes only that as to one essential element of [Chong’s] claim [s], [he] failed to adduce evidence that a genuine issue of material fact exists, notwithstanding any issue of material fact regarding any other essential element. See OCGA§ 9-11-56.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Leake v. Murphy · filed 2007-03-26(c)

Summary judgment is proper if the pleadings and evidence show “that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Clay v. Oxendine · filed 2007-03-27(c)

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Watkins v. First South Utility Construction, Inc. · filed 2007-03-27(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c). Adenovo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant [or denial] of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

First Specialty Insurance v. Flowers · filed 2007-03-27(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

J. Kinson Cook of Georgia, Inc. v. Heery/Mitchell · filed 2007-03-27(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Green v. Eastland Homes, Inc. · filed 2007-03-28(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

ChoicePoint Services, Inc. v. Hiers · filed 2007-03-28(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c). Adenovo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Norton v. Holcomb · filed 2007-03-29(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where the moving party can show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

BBL-MCCARTHY, LLC v. Baldwin Paving Co. · filed 2007-04-10(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of ... law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact appears and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Crosby v. Comcast Corp. · filed 2007-04-10(c)

Summary judgment is proper when no genuine issue of material fact appears and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Halligan v. Broun · filed 2007-04-12(c)

“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Bousset v. Walker · filed 2007-04-13(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c). Adenovo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Kirkland v. Tamplin · filed 2007-04-25(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Postnieks v. Chick-Fil-A, Inc. · filed 2007-05-10(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Harris v. INN OF LAKE CITY · filed 2007-05-10(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no material factual issue exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Dashtpeyma v. Wade · filed 2007-05-11

Summary judgment ... is proper only when no issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hardnett v. Silvey · filed 2007-05-17(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that undisputed facts viewed favorably to the nonmovant warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Dockens v. Runkle Consulting, Inc. · filed 2007-05-25

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

MCG Health, Inc. v. Barton · filed 2007-05-25(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Smith v. Liberty Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, Inc. · filed 2007-05-30

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that undisputed facts viewed favorably to the nonmovant warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Thompson v. General Security Insurance · filed 2007-05-31

To prevail at summary judgment . . . , the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Reny v. Sneed · filed 2007-06-06(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Locke's Graphic & Vinyl Signs, Inc. v. Citicorp Vendor Finance, Inc. · filed 2007-06-14

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

New Morn Foods, Inc. v. B & B Egg Co. · filed 2007-06-20(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Atlanta Integrity Mortgage, Inc. v. Ben Hill United Methodist Church, Inc. · filed 2007-07-11(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Auto-Owners Insurance v. Reed · filed 2007-07-16(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Wesley Chapel Foot & Ankle Center, LLC v. Johnson · filed 2007-07-16

the moving party must show that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Amstead v. McFarland · filed 2007-07-17(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Pipkin v. CORA BETT THOMAS REALTY CO., LLC · filed 2007-07-23(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Guideone Mutual Insurance v. Hunter · filed 2007-07-30

In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must show that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.