Ga. Code Ann. § 9-11-56

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Samda Investment Group, LLC v. Western Surety Co. · filed 2007-08-10(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Williams v. National Auto Sales, Inc. · filed 2007-08-16(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Waterfront, LLP v. River Oaks Condominium Ass'n · filed 2007-08-23(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

International Auto Processing, Inc. v. Glynn County · filed 2007-09-06

In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must show that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Benson-Jones v. Sysco Food Services of Atlanta, LLC · filed 2007-09-17

“To prevail at summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Blocker v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. · filed 2007-09-18(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).Ade novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact remains and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Jones v. Equipment King International · filed 2007-09-21(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that undisputed facts viewed favorably to the nonmovant demand judgment as a matter of law.

Atlantic Insurance Brokers, LLC v. Slade Hancock Agency, Inc. · filed 2007-09-28

the moving party must show that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Harris-Jackson v. City of Cochran · filed 2007-10-02(c)

A trial court properly grants summary judgment when there exists no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Blackmon v. Tenet Healthsystem Spalding · filed 2007-10-05(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a ... matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56(c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that undisputed facts viewed favorably to the nonmovant warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Millsaps v. Kaufold · filed 2007-10-09(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA§ 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Harris v. Baker · filed 2007-10-12(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Weaver v. City of Statesboro · filed 2007-10-24(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Gilbert v. Fine · filed 2007-10-24(c)

Summary judgment is proper only when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Turner v. Atlanta Girls' School, Inc. · filed 2007-10-29

[T]o prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56 the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

City of Demorest v. Roberts & Dunahoo Properties, LLC · filed 2007-10-30

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Highwoods Realty Ltd. Partnership v. Community Loans of America, Inc. · filed 2007-11-02(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is appropriate when the record shows no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Wilson v. HOME DEPOT USA, INC. · filed 2007-11-07(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when the record shows that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

DeKalb County v. Buckler · filed 2007-11-09(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Deljoo v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. · filed 2008-01-30(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact remains and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law.

Thomas v. Deason · filed 2008-02-08(c)

In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that no genuine issue of material fact remains and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Bragg v. Oxford Construction Co. · filed 2008-02-15(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56(c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Beasley v. Northside Hospital, Inc. · filed 2008-02-21

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Somers v. M.A.U., Inc. · filed 2008-02-22(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Henson v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. · filed 2008-02-27

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Rodrigues v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. · filed 2008-02-29(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Harvey v. Bank One, N.A. · filed 2008-03-05(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

CALLAWAY GARDENS RESORT, INC. v. Bierman · filed 2008-03-07(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Dudley v. Wachovia Bank, N.A. · filed 2008-03-10

the moving party must show that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Gateway Atlanta Apartments, Inc. v. Harris · filed 2008-03-10(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment may be affirmed only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

C.L.D.F., Inc. v. Aramore, LLC · filed 2008-03-13(c)

We will affirm only if there exists no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Id. See OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Valugym, Inc. v. PTC Properties, Inc. · filed 2008-03-13(c)

A grant of summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Unami v. Roshan · filed 2008-03-17(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that undisputed facts viewed favorably to the nonmovant demand judgment as a matter of law.

McLeod v. Blase · filed 2008-03-18

the moving party must show that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Pazur v. Belcher · filed 2008-03-21(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material'fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that undisputed facts viewed favorably to the nonmovant demand judgment as a matter of law.

Dalton v. 933 Peachtree, L.P. · filed 2008-03-21

In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, ... the moving party must show that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed ... in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hart v. Northside Hospital, Inc. · filed 2008-03-21(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Green v. Raw Deal, Inc. · filed 2008-03-24(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Powell v. Wheeler County · filed 2008-03-25(c)

Summary judgment is proper when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that undisputed facts viewed favorably to the nonmovant warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Kmart Corp. v. McCollum · filed 2008-03-26

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Roylston v. Bank of America, N.A. · filed 2008-03-26(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that undisputed facts warrant judgment as a matter of law.

McGuire Holdings, LLLP v. TSQ Partners, LLC · filed 2008-03-26(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that undisputed facts viewed favorably to the nonmovant demand judgment as a matter of law.

Smith v. Stewart · filed 2008-03-28

In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must show that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Kleber v. City of Atlanta · filed 2008-03-28(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hernandez v. Carnes · filed 2008-04-03(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Turner v. GATEWAY INSURANCE COMPANY · filed 2008-04-03(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Whatley v. Sharma · filed 2008-04-03(c)

Summary judgment is proper only when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Secured Equity Financial, LLC v. Washington Mutual Bank, F. A. · filed 2008-06-23(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) warrants summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Westmoreland v. Williams · filed 2008-06-27(c)

Summary judgment is warranted when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Findley v. Griffin · filed 2008-07-03(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Zurich American Insurance Co. v. Beasley · filed 2008-07-03(c)

A trial court properly grants summary judgment where there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Rooks v. Tenet Health System GB, Inc. · filed 2008-07-07(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Bickerstaff Real Estate Management, LLC v. Hanners · filed 2008-07-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Rheem Manufacturing Co. v. Butts · filed 2008-07-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Beacon Medical Products, LLC v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America · filed 2008-07-09(c)

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).”

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Lee v. McCord · filed 2008-07-11

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Beneke v. Parker · filed 2008-07-17(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

ULQ, LLC v. Meder · filed 2008-07-18(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a denial of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the nonmovant’s favor.

Weatherly v. Weatherly · filed 2008-07-23

“In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must show that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

GREENWOOD HOMES, INC. v. Long · filed 2008-07-24(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Morrill v. Cotton States Mutual Insurance Co. · filed 2008-07-24(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence and inferences viewed for the nonmovant.

Avion Systems, Inc. v. Thompson · filed 2008-07-25(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a denial of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

McCall v. Couture · filed 2008-08-14(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no jury question remains on any material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law.

Partain v. Oconee County · filed 2008-08-15(c)

Upon motion for summary judgment, it is the movant’s burden to show that no jury question remains as to any material fact and that he or she is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Custer v. Coward · filed 2008-08-15(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that undisputed facts viewed favorably to the nonmovant warrant judgment as a matter of law.

AMLI Residential Properties, Inc. v. Georgia Power Co. · filed 2008-08-22

To prevail at summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmov-ing party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact remains and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Kinzy v. Farmers Insurance Exchange · filed 2008-09-10(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

American Teleconferencing Services, Ltd. v. Network Billing Systems, LLC · filed 2008-09-15(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Abreu v. Rainey · filed 2008-09-18(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

JBM Investments, LLC v. Callahan Industries, Inc. · filed 2008-09-18(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Staton v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. · filed 2008-10-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact remains and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Lancer Insurance Co. v. United National Insurance Co. · filed 2008-10-27(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Dover Realty Co., Inc. v. Pecce · filed 2008-12-12(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where the moving party can demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law.

Pruette v. Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital · filed 2008-12-18(c)

Summary judgment is proper if the pleadings and evidence “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires no genuine issue of material fact and undisputed facts warranting judgment as a matter of law.

Sirmans v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF SOUTH GEORGIA · filed 2008-12-22(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence viewed for the nonmovant.

Wilks v. Overall Construction, Inc. · filed 2009-01-13(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Section 9-11-56 requires no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with facts viewed for the nonmovant.

Creeden v. Fuentes · filed 2009-02-13

In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must show that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Iwan Renovations, Inc. v. North Atlanta National Bank · filed 2009-02-16(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Calloway v. City of Fayetteville · filed 2009-02-18(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence viewed for the nonmovant.

Advocate Networks, LLC v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. · filed 2009-02-27(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment ... as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) requires no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with facts viewed for the nonmovant.

Davis v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority · filed 2009-03-02(c)

“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence viewed for the nonmovant.

Morris v. Nexus Real Estate Mortgage & Investment Co. · filed 2009-03-05(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Safe Shield Workwear, LLC v. Shubee, Inc. · filed 2009-03-06(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with facts viewed for the nonmovant.

HANSON STAPLE CO., INC. v. Eckelberry · filed 2009-03-10(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Fountain v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America · filed 2009-03-12(c)

Summary judgment is proper if “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and . . . the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper when the listed record materials show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

American National Property & Casualty Co. v. Amerieast, Inc. · filed 2009-03-12(c)

Summary judgment is proper if “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Trail v. Saunders · filed 2009-03-12(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate if there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that undisputed facts viewed favorably to the nonmovant demand judgment as a matter of law.

Kennedy v. Mathis · filed 2009-03-16

In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must show that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that undisputed facts viewed favorably to the nonmovant warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Hayes v. EMC Mortgage Corp. · filed 2009-03-18

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that undisputed facts viewed favorably to the nonmovant warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Kitchen v. INSURAMERICA CORP. · filed 2009-03-19

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

HAUGABOOK v. Crisler · filed 2009-03-26(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that undisputed facts viewed favorably to the nonmovant warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Coca-Cola Co. v. Parker · filed 2009-03-26

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact remains and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

MUSEUM TOWER CONDO. ASSOC., INC. v. Children's Museum of Atlanta, Inc. · filed 2009-03-26(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Video Warehouse, Inc. v. Southern Trust Insurance Co. · filed 2009-03-30(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Graham v. Hanna · filed 2009-03-30(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper when no genuine issue of material fact remains for jury resolution and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

DuPree v. South Atlantic Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists, Inc. · filed 2009-04-16(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact remaining for jury resolution and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is appropriate when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine material factual issue and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. APAC-Southeast, Inc. · filed 2009-04-17(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings and evidence “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence viewed for the nonmovant.

Smith v. Thigpen · filed 2009-06-26(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence viewed for the nonmovant.

Salahat v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. · filed 2009-06-30(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Section 9-11-56 requires no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed for the nonmovant.

GEORGIACARRY. ORG, INC. v. City of Roswell · filed 2009-07-02

the moving party must show that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence viewed for the nonmovant.

Floyd v. American International South Insurance Co. · filed 2009-07-07(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Everett · filed 2009-07-07(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Leo v. Waffle House, Inc. · filed 2009-07-09(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Section 9-11-56 requires no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with facts viewed for the nonmovant.

Rushin v. Ussery · filed 2009-07-09

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of ... material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence viewed for the nonmovant.

Adams v. Georgia Power Company · filed 2009-07-10(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Chatham County Board of Tax Assessors v. Bock · filed 2009-07-17(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, with evidence viewed for the nonmovant.

GEICO General Insurance Co. v. Wright · filed 2009-07-17(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a denial of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.

Subsection (c) requires no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with facts viewed for the nonmovant.

Bickerstaff Imports, Inc. v. Sentry Select Insurance Co. · filed 2009-07-17(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

DEVENTE v. Flora · filed 2009-09-02(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hampton Island Club, LLC v. B2 Creative, Inc. · filed 2009-09-28(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Performance Food Group, Inc. v. Williams · filed 2009-11-06(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hollis & Spann, Inc. v. Hopkins · filed 2009-11-13(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Atkins v. MRP Park Lake, L.P. · filed 2009-11-20(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Textile Rubber & Chemical Co. v. Thermo-Flex Technologies, Inc. · filed 2009-12-09(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Mucyo v. Publix Super Markets, Inc. · filed 2009-12-11(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Howell v. ZOTTOLI · filed 2010-02-24(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Kaplan v. City of Sandy Springs · filed 2010-03-01(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

WYNDHAM LAKES HOMEOWNERS ASS'N v. Gray · filed 2010-03-23(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) uses the same standard as a directed-verdict motion: the court must view facts and reasonable inferences favorably to the nonmovant and find no issue to be tried.

Beach v. B. F. Saul Property Co. · filed 2010-03-30(c)

Under OCGA §§ 9-11-56 (c) and 9-11-50 (a), summary judgments and directed verdicts are appropriate only when the court, viewing all the facts and reasonable inferences from those facts, in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party, concludes that there are no issues to be tried.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the record shows no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hall v. Hall · filed 2010-04-06(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when the record shows that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Dabbs v. KEY EQUIPMENT FINANCE, INC. · filed 2010-04-07(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Boatright v. Old Dominion Insurance Co. · filed 2010-05-17(c)

Summary judgment is proper where there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) authorizes summary judgment when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Sirdah v. NORTH SPRINGS ASSOCIATES, LLLP · filed 2010-06-08(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings and evidence show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

ChoicePoint Services, Inc. v. Graham · filed 2010-07-15(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Arko v. Cirou · filed 2010-08-05(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Desmear Systems, Inc. v. Vines · filed 2010-08-27(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Dawkins & Smith Homes, LLC v. Lowndes County · filed 2010-09-15(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Clayton v. Southern General Insurance Co. · filed 2010-10-07(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Jones v. Murphy · filed 2010-10-21(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Southern Mutual Church Insurance Co. v. ARS Mechanical, LLC · filed 2010-11-10(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) authorizes summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

LaFarge Building Materials, Inc. v. Pratt · filed 2011-02-09(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and . . . the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Jenkins v. WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION · filed 2011-05-13(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc. v. Depianti · filed 2011-06-23(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Sanderson Farms, Inc. v. Atkins · filed 2011-07-01(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Moses v. Jordan · filed 2011-07-07(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Caldon v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. System · filed 2011-07-13(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact remains and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Amirfazli v. Vatacs Group, Inc. · filed 2011-07-21(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Helton v. JASPER BANKING CO. · filed 2011-08-03(c)

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a ... matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Quarterman v. Cullum · filed 2011-09-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) warrants summary judgment when the material facts shown by the pleadings and record evidence are undisputed and entitle the moving party to judgment as a matter of law.

Higginbotham v. Knight · filed 2011-09-27(c)

Summary judgment is warranted when the material facts, as shown by the pleadings and record evidence, are undisputed and these facts entitle the moving party to judgment as a matter of law. See OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Southeast Culvert, Inc. v. Hardin Bros., LLC · filed 2011-10-04(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

West v. Diduro · filed 2011-10-18(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Elwell v. Keefe · filed 2011-11-03(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the evidence viewed favorably to the nonmoving party leaves no genuine material factual issue and entitles the moving party to judgment as a matter of law.

Villanueva v. First American Title Insurance Co. · filed 2011-12-01(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when the evidence, viewed favorably to the nonmoving party, shows that no genuine issues of material fact remain and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) warrants summary judgment when the pleadings and evidence reveal no genuine issue of material fact and entitle the moving party to judgment as a matter of law.

Zywiciel v. Historic Westside Village Partners, LLC · filed 2011-12-16(c)

Summary judgment is warranted if the pleadings and evidence show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) entitles a party to summary judgment only if no material factual dispute exists and the party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Greenwald v. Odom · filed 2012-02-09(c)

A party is entitled to summary judgment only if he can demonstrate that there is no dispute as to any material fact and that the party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Douglas County Board of Assessors v. Denyse · filed 2012-02-21(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

VRATSINAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. Chitwood · filed 2012-02-27(c)

[Sjummary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Patterson v. Bennett Street Properties, L.P. · filed 2012-03-19(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the nonmovant's favor, entitle it to judgment as a matter of law.

Southern General Insurance v. Wellstar Health Systems, Inc. · filed 2012-03-20(c)

To prevail on summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, when viewed in the nonmovant’s favor, entitle the movant to judgment as a matter of law.