Ga. Code Ann. § 9-11-56

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Phoenix Development and Land Investment, LLC v. Geoscience · filed 2017-03-16(c)

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Georgia Department of Administrative Services v. McCoy · filed 2017-03-16(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Atlantic Geoscience, Inc. v. Phoenix Development & Land Investment, LLC · filed 2017-03-16(c)

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

STRONG Et Al. v. JWM HOLDINGS, LLC; And Vice Versa · filed 2017-04-28(c)

Summary judgment is proper if the pleadings and evidence “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact remains and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hartman v. Clark · filed 2017-05-10(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Massey v. Allstate Insurance Company · filed 2017-05-24(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ... see also OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

FAYETTE COUNTY NURSING HOME, LLC v. PRI X-RAY, LLC Et Al. · filed 2017-06-02(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Sheats v. the Kroger Company · filed 2017-09-08(c)

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Reynolds v. Cb&t · filed 2017-09-22(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings and evidence “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company v. Rockefeller. · filed 2017-09-29(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56(c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact remains and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

WATSON USED CARS, LLC v. KIRKLAND Et Al. · filed 2017-10-04(c)

Summary judgment is proper when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) authorizes summary judgment when the listed record materials show no genuine issue of material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

COX-OTT v. BARNES & THORNBURG, LLP · filed 2024-02-20(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

APPLE PIE RIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. ANDREWS · filed 2024-05-29(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper when no genuine issue of material fact remains and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Tara Wells v. Khan Shell, LLC · filed 2025-11-19(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56(c) requires the moving party to show that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the undisputed facts warrant judgment as a matter of law when viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.

Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc. v. Kell · filed 1997-07-11(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56(c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Hamilton v. Walker · filed 1998-12-04(c)

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when the moving party shows no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law.

Reeder v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. · filed 1998-12-04(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where the moving party can show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Section 9-11-56(c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Empire Fire & Marine Insurance v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. · filed 1999-11-18(c)

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56(c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; a defendant can meet its burden by pointing to a lack of evidence on an essential element of the plaintiff’s claim.

Berry v. Hamilton · filed 2000-11-01(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). To obtain summary judgment, a defendant need not produce any evidence, but must only point to an absence of evidence supporting at least one essential element of the plaintiff’s claim.

Section 9-11-56(c) requires the moving party to show that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the undisputed facts warrant judgment as a matter of law when viewed favorably to the opposing party.

Spencer v. Gary Howard Enterprises, Inc. · filed 2002-07-01(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56(c) permits summary judgment when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Jones v. Macon Soils, Inc. · filed 2004-11-01(c)

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).”

Section 9-11-56(c) requires the moving party to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with the facts viewed in the nonmoving party’s favor.

Daley v. Clark · filed 2006-11-02(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA§ 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine ... issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56(c) requires the moving party to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with undisputed facts viewed in the opposing party’s favor.

Oil-Dri Corp. of Georgia v. Thompson · filed 2009-03-10(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56(c) requires the moving party to show that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the undisputed facts warrant judgment as a matter of law when viewed in the nonmoving party’s favor.

Jarrell v. JDC & Associates, LLC · filed 2009-03-10(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56(c) permits summary judgment when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Pinnacle Properties V, LLC v. Mainline Supply Of · filed 2012-11-30(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings and evidence show no genuine issue as to any material fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 requires the moving party to show that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the nonmoving party’s favor, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Nalley v. the Langdale Company · filed 2012-11-30

In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must show that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 requires the moving party to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with the facts viewed in the nonmoving party’s favor.

Columbus, Georgia v. Cielinski · filed 2012-11-30

In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must show that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is appropriate when the pleadings and evidence show no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Pinnacle Properties V, LLC v. Mainline Supply of Atlanta, LLC · filed 2012-11-30(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings and evidence show no genuine issue as to any material fact, and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 requires the moving party to show that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the nonmoving party’s favor, demand judgment as a matter of law.

City of Columbus v. Cielinski · filed 2012-11-30

In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must show that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56(c) permits summary judgment when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Nuvell National Auto Finance, LLC v. Monroe Guaranty Insurance · filed 2012-11-30(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Section 9-11-56 requires the moving party to show that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmoving party, require judgment as a matter of law.

Johnson v. Bartley · filed 2013-03-29

In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must show that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Crippen v. Outback Steakhouse International, L. P. · filed 2013-03-29

Summary judgment is proper only when no issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper when the record shows no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Cancel v. Sewell · filed 2013-03-29(c)

Summary judgment is proper “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Eells v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance · filed 2013-11-20(c)

Pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-56 (c), summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and when the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56(c) permits summary judgment when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Goodwin v. Allstate Insurance · filed 2014-03-21(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact remains and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; a defendant may show that evidence is lacking on an essential element of the plaintiff’s case.

Moore v. Cottrell, Inc. · filed 2015-11-23(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the evidence, construed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrants judgment as a matter of law. A defendant may obtain summary judgment by showing that there is no evidence sufficient to create a jury issue on at least one essential element of plaintiff’s case.

Section 9-11-56(c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact remains and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Coon v. the Medical Center, Inc. · filed 2015-11-23(c)

Summary judgment is proper only if the pleadings and evidence “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

Section 9-11-56(c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Kelly v. Fann · filed 2017-10-24(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 requires the moving party to show that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.

Alford v. Hernandez · filed 2017-10-24

In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must show that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demand judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Blue Ridge Auto Auction v. Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company, Inc. · filed 2017-10-24(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Section 9-11-56(c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Lynda Weaver Mullinax v. Rising, Inc. · filed 2020-03-13(c)

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). We review a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo and construe the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.”

Section 9-11-56(c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Sorrow v. 380 Properties, LLC · filed 2020-03-13(c)

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”

Section 9-11-56 requires the moving party to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, with the facts viewed in the nonmoving party’s favor.

Dietzen v. Radiology Associates of Atlanta, P.C. · filed 2020-03-13

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56(c) permits summary judgment when the record shows no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Kittrell v. Dream Buiilder Investment, Inc. · filed 2020-03-13(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law[.]” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper when no genuine issue of material fact remains and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

BILLY M. FAULKNER v. CRUMBLEY · filed 2020-11-17(c)

“Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

STADTERMAN v. SOUTHWOOD REALTY CO. · filed 2021-11-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

Section 9-11-56 requires doubts about substantial factual issues to be resolved against the party seeking summary judgment, with reasonable inferences drawn for the opposing party.

Strickland v. Brown · filed 1997-05-22

In a motion for summary judgment, “ £(a)ny doubt as to the existence of substantial issues of fact is resolved against the movant. The party opposing the motion is to be given the benefit of all reasonable doubt and all favorable inferences that may be derived from the evidence produced.’ [Cit.]” City of Atlanta v. North by Northwest Civic Assn., 262 Ga. 531, 537 (4) (422 SE2d 651) (1992). ... Brown was not entitled to summary judgment.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Walker v. Melton · filed 1997-07-08(c)

Summary judgment should be granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Section 9-11-56(c) permits summary judgment only when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Benefield v. Tominich · filed 2011-03-22(c)

Summary judgment is proper “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”

Section 9-11-56(c) permits summary judgment when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Calhoun, Ga Ng, LLC v. Century Bank of Georgia · filed 2013-03-18(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings and evidence “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

Subsection (c) requires a summary judgment movant to show that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

STATHAM v. QUANG · filed 2025-05-13(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Section 9-11-56(c) does not permit summary judgment on a bad faith claim when the insurer’s defense cannot be found reasonable as a matter of law.

Henderson v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company · filed 2014-07-31(c)

As with the part of the Hendersons’ bad faith claim that was submitted to the jury, see Division 2, supra, we discern no basis for concluding that Georgia Farm Bureau’s defense was reasonable as a matter of law. Consequently, the trial court erred in granting in part Georgia Farm Bureau’s motion for summary judgment.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

McNatt v. Colonial Pacific Leasing Corp. · filed 1996-10-08(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the movant must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-movant, warrant summary judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Watson v. MAYOR & ALDERMEN OF SAVANNAH · filed 1996-10-30(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is ho genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Williams v. Department of Corrections · filed 1997-02-11(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Ray v. American Legion Auxiliary · filed 1997-02-11(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, “the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).”

Summary judgment requires no genuine material factual issue and undisputed facts that, viewed most favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance · filed 1997-02-24

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when undisputed material facts show that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Transkey, Inc. v. Adkinson · filed 1997-02-27

Summary judgment is proper only if undisputed material facts show the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment requires no genuine material factual issue and undisputed facts that, viewed most favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Moore v. Bank of Fitzgerald · filed 1997-03-04

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires no genuine material factual issue and undisputed facts that, viewed most favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Moreland v. Traffic Masters, Inc. · filed 1997-03-06(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires no genuine material factual issue and undisputed facts that, viewed most favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Williams v. City of Social Circle · filed 1997-03-07(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment requires no genuine material factual issue and undisputed facts that, viewed most favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Smith v. U-Haul Co. Georgia · filed 1997-03-11

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires no genuine material factual issue and undisputed facts that, viewed most favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Collins v. Lesters, Inc. · filed 1997-03-12(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires the movant to show no genuine material factual issue and that undisputed facts viewed most favorably to the nonmovant warrant judgment as a matter of law.

National American Insurance v. Thornton · filed 1997-03-21(c)

The standard for granting summary judgment is that the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment requires no genuine material factual issue and undisputed facts that, viewed most favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

INTEGON GENERAL INS. CORP. v. Gibson · filed 1997-04-03

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment requires no genuine material factual issue and undisputed facts that, viewed most favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Sapp v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. · filed 1997-04-17

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires no genuine material factual issue and undisputed facts that, viewed most favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Kirves v. Juno Industries · filed 1997-05-06(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of ... law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper under subsection (c) when no genuine material factual issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp. · filed 1997-05-14(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires summary judgment when no genuine material factual issue exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Wieland v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance · filed 1997-05-15(c)

Summary judgment should be granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a ... matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) requires a movant to show no genuine material factual issue and that the undisputed facts, viewed for the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Starrett v. Commercial Bank of Georgia · filed 1997-05-29(c)

“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).”

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to establish no genuine material factual issue and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on undisputed facts viewed for the nonmovant.

Digby's, Inc. v. Emory University · filed 1997-07-09(c)

“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).”

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to establish no genuine material factual issue and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on undisputed facts viewed for the nonmovant.

Freyer v. Silver · filed 1997-07-11(c)

“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) entitles a claimant to summary judgment when no material factual issues remain as to the claim.

Long v. Reeves Southeastern Corp. · filed 2003-01-17(c)

There are no outstanding issues of material fact with regard to Reeves Southeastern’s claim for payment of supplies delivered to Long. Accordingly, Reeves Southeastern is entitled to summary judgment.

Section 56(c) requires no genuine material issue and entitlement as a matter of law, viewing undisputed facts for the nonmovant.

Patton v. CFH Investment · filed 1992-05-13(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

To obtain summary judgment, the movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Price v. Rogers · filed 1992-07-08

“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.”

Summary judgment is proper when the record shows no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Brooks v. Oil-Dri Corp. · filed 1992-07-14(c)

Summary judgment is proper if “the pleadings . . . , together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law . . . .” OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Tokheim Corp. v. First American Bank · filed 1992-10-09

“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.”

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Jackson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. · filed 1992-11-04(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment requires no genuine issue of material fact and undisputed facts that, viewed most favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Wright v. Tidmore · filed 1993-03-09(c)

To prevail at summary judgment, under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine material factual issue and entitlement as a matter of law, after which the nonmovant must identify specific evidence creating a triable issue.

Taylor v. ATLANTA CENTER LIMITED · filed 1993-04-12(c), (e)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56 [(c)], the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Caven v. Warehouse Home Furnishings Distributors, Inc. · filed 1993-07-12(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Conerly v. First National Bank · filed 1993-07-16

“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.”

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Butler v. Huckabee · filed 1993-07-16

“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.”

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the respondent, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Pafford v. Biomet · filed 1993-09-16(c)

On motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed most favorably to the respondent, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Cole v. CRACKER BARREL, INC. · filed 1993-09-29(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Under subsection (c), the movant must show no genuine material factual issue and entitlement to judgment on undisputed facts viewed most favorably to the nonmovant.

City of Thomasville v. Shank · filed 1993-12-02(c)

Under OCGA § 9-11-56 (c), a party moving for summary judgment must show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment must be denied when conflicting evidence leaves a genuine material factual issue and does not warrant judgment as a matter of law for either party.

Nursefinders of Atlanta, Inc. v. Suttles · filed 1994-06-06

“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.” ... Given the conflicts in the evidence, we cannot conclude that there is no genuine issue of material fact or that the evidence warrants judgment as a matter of law for either party.

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Wooten v. Central Georgia Electric Membership Corp. · filed 1994-07-15

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment requires no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on facts viewed favorably to the nonmovant.

Turner v. Sumter Self Storage Co. · filed 1994-09-16(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is required when the evidence shows no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Giddens v. Barrentine · filed 1994-10-03

OCGA § 9-11-56 provides that summary judgment shall be rendered if the evidence shows that “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Cobb County School District v. Mat Factory, Inc. · filed 1994-11-28(c)

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56 (c), the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment requires no genuine material factual issue and undisputed facts that, viewed most favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Smith v. Maytag Corp. · filed 1995-03-16

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment requires no genuine material factual issue and undisputed facts that, viewed most favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Rice v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. · filed 1995-04-27

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment requires no genuine material factual issue and undisputed facts that, viewed most favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Gray v. Vaughn · filed 1995-07-06

To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine material factual issue exists and the undisputed facts, viewed for the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Mull v. Mickey's Lumber & Supply Co. · filed 1995-07-24(c)

“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).”

A summary-judgment movant must show no genuine material factual issue and that the undisputed facts, viewed for the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Fortune v. Principal Financial Group, Inc. · filed 1995-11-17

“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nbnmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Terry · filed 1998-05-05(c)

Under OCGA § 9-11-56 (c), summary judgment should be granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Fowler v. City of Marietta · filed 1998-07-16(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Patriot General Insurance v. Millis · filed 1998-08-13(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Georgia Color Farms, Inc. v. K.K.L., Ltd. Partnership · filed 1998-10-05(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Travel Professionals International, Inc. v. Access Travel Inc. · filed 1998-10-23(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance · filed 1998-12-01(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Tanner's Rome, Inc. v. Ingram · filed 1999-02-05(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Peachtree Casualty Insurance v. Kim · filed 1999-02-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Gouldstone v. Life Investors Insurance Co. of America · filed 1999-03-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Lipsteuer v. CSX Transportation, Inc. · filed 1999-03-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Swiss Bank Corp. v. Thomas, Conner & McDonald, P.A. · filed 1999-03-11(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Indian River Distributors, Inc. v. Savannah Business System, Inc. · filed 1999-03-15(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

McNeal Construction Co. v. Wilson · filed 1999-04-12(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Graves v. Brown · filed 1999-04-12(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

McNamee v. A. J. W. · filed 1999-06-11(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is authorized only when no genuine issue of material fact remains and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Case v. RGA Insurance Services · filed 1999-07-08(c)

The trial court erred in granting Hanover’s motion for summary judgment as summary judgment is authorized only when there is no remaining genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Murray v. Fitzgerald Convenient Centers, Inc. · filed 1999-09-02(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Dester v. Dester · filed 1999-10-19(c)

Under OCGA § 9-11-56 (c), summary judgment should be granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Barrett v. J. H. Harvey Co. · filed 1999-10-21(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Bibb County v. Georgia Power Co. · filed 1999-11-10(c)

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Sewell v. HULL/STOREY DEVELOPMENT, LLC · filed 1999-12-08(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where the moving party can show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Lee v. American Central Insurance · filed 1999-12-20(c)

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Waters v. Steak & Ale of Georgia, Inc. · filed 2000-01-05(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Family Partners Worldwide, Inc. v. Suntrust Bank · filed 2000-03-08(c)

Summary judgment is proper only when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

O'Neal v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance · filed 2000-04-14(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Kramer v. Kroger Co., Inc. · filed 2000-04-26(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

National Business Acquisitions, Inc. v. Mandula · filed 2000-07-11(c)

If there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, summary judgment is proper.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Helmer v. Rumarson Technologies, Inc. · filed 2000-08-18(c)

Additionally, summary judgment is proper only when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Schlotzsky's, Inc. v. Hyde · filed 2000-08-25(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Mooney v. Mooney · filed 2000-09-06(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Wilson Industrial Electric, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance · filed 2000-09-22(c)

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Moore v. ECI MANAGEMENT · filed 2000-11-01(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

McConnell Homes, Inc. v. Feria · filed 2001-01-24(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Gilbert v. Montlick & Associates, P.C. · filed 2001-03-09(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Summary judgment is appropriate when the record shows no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Russum · filed 2001-06-08(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where the evidence of record “show[s] that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Williams v. Truett · filed 2001-08-01(c)

Summary judgment is proper where the moving party is able to show that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the movant is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) makes summary judgment proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Moeller v. Schrenko · filed 2001-08-09(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) allows summary judgment only when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Thompson v. Club Group, Ltd. · filed 2001-08-09(c)

Summary judgment is proper only when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) authorizes summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Harper Investments, Inc. v. Department of Transportation · filed 2001-09-12(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where the evidence of record “show[s] that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the opponent.

Gulf Insurance v. GFA Group, Inc. · filed 2001-09-13(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) makes summary judgment appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

White v. Board of Com'rs of McDuffie County · filed 2001-10-02(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate where the evidence of record “show[s] that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Johns v. Marlow · filed 2001-10-17(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 requires the movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the nonmovant.

SMD, L.L.P. v. City of Roswell · filed 2001-10-24(c)

To prevail at summary judgment, under O.C.G.A. § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the disputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) requires a summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the opposing party.

Dillard-Winecoff, LLC v. IBF Participating Income Fund · filed 2001-07-16(c)

To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Bob Davidson & Associates, Inc. v. Norm Webster & Associates, Inc. · filed 2001-08-02(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Section 9-11-56 requires the summary-judgment movant to show no genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment under facts viewed favorably to the nonmovant.

Little Tallapoosa Development, Inc. v. Baldwin Paving Co. · filed 2001-08-16(c)

“To prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.”

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the undisputed facts, viewed favorably to the nonmovant, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Bau v. Actamed Corp. · filed 2002-03-06(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and when the undisputed facts, viewed most favorably to the nonmoving party, warrant judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

HCP III Woodstock, Inc. v. Healthcare Services Group, Inc. · filed 2002-03-13(c)

Summary judgment is proper only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) makes summary judgment proper when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

DeKalb County v. C. W. Matthews Contracting Co. · filed 2002-03-13(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) authorizes summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Myers v. Funderburk · filed 2002-03-13(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) makes summary judgment proper when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Payne v. Harbin · filed 2002-03-21(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) makes summary judgment appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Green v. Sommers · filed 2002-03-26(c)

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c).

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Cox v. Southern Guaranty Insurance · filed 2002-03-26(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Subsection (c) permits summary judgment when no genuine issue as to any material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Colonial Bank v. Boulder Bankcard Processing, Inc. · filed 2002-03-29(c)

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.