Vermont Bar Association Ethics Opinions
Free plain-English summaries of legal ethics opinions issued by the Vermont Bar Association, with full citations and source links on every page.
No Vermont Bar Association opinions match these filters
Try a different search term or clear the filters.
Could a paralegal sign a court pleading using a vacationing lawyer’s name and the paralegal’s initials?
Opinion 2001-05 said no: the procedural signature rule required the attorney’s own signature, and permitting the nonlawyer to sign raised Rules 5.3 and 5.5(b). It said the paralegal could instead…
Must a Vermont prosecutor withdraw when the defendant sues the prosecutor in a frivolous civil case?
Opinion 01-04 allowed the prosecutor to continue a criminal case begun before the defendant's later civil suit. The committee found no connection between the prosecution and gaining an advantage in…
Could a Vermont lawyer who represented a retailer creditor later represent debtors who owed that retailer?
Opinion 01-03 barred the proposed debtor work on its facts because the lawyer held the retailer’s confidential valuation information and had neither established the retailer as a former client nor…
Could one Vermont lawyer represent both lender and borrower at a real estate closing?
Opinion 01-02 allowed joint representation when the lawyer reasonably believed neither client would be adversely affected or materially limited and both consented after timely consultation. It also…
May a Vermont lawyer meet a proposed ward who seeks alternative counsel without consent from appointed counsel?
Opinion 01-01 permits a lawyer with no other interest in the guardianship to meet a proposed ward seeking alternative representation without first obtaining appointed counsel's consent.
Could Vermont co-counsel for a couple’s estate plan later represent the husband’s estate against the wife?
Opinion 00-12 barred the firm from representing the estate and personal representative against the former client wife without her consent because the estate proceeding was substantially related to…
May a lawyer continue representing an employer after an adverse caller sought representation?
Opinion 00-10 allowed continued employer representation because the lawyer gave no advice and received no information critical to the employer matter. It barred disclosure of the caller’s identity…
Could a Vermont lawyer working for a corporation outside a legal role use J.D. or Esq. on business cards and correspondence?
Opinion 00-09 permits both designations for the licensed lawyer in the stated nonlegal role, with a disclaimer where correspondence might be mistaken for legal advice.
Could a Vermont lawyer who stopped practicing law use J.D. and describe prior legal experience in a human resources consulting business?
Opinion 00-08 permits the J.D. designation and accurate prior-experience description in the stated nonlegal consulting role when clients are told no legal representation exists.
Could a firm defend a bank against the president of a corporation the firm formerly represented?
Opinion 00-07 permitted the bank defense because the president was not the former corporate client and the firm’s earlier suit was unrelated. The firm remained bound by confidentiality duties to the…
May a Vermont landlord's lawyer serve a statutory tenancy-termination notice directly on a represented tenant?
Opinion 00-06 permits the lawyer to deliver the statutory written notice directly as the landlord's agent when direct notice is a prerequisite to eviction, while limiting the contact to the notice.
May a lawyer who left a seller’s firm represent the buyer in a related property dispute?
Opinion 00-05 allowed the buyer’s representation only if the lawyer had not participated in the former firm’s seller representation and had not learned protected information about that matter.
Did a Vermont lawyer's public website require an advertising label, and could disclaimers prevent client duties?
Opinion 2000-04 treated the public site as advertising subject to Rules 7.1 and 7.2, but said ordinary posted pages did not require a Rule 7.3 advertising label. Disclaimers could clarify…
What should court-appointed counsel do after a mental-health client discharges counsel before a merits hearing?
Opinion 2000-03 said appointed counsel must promptly explain the consequences, seek withdrawal without unnecessary disclosure of confidences, and protect the client’s interests while the court…
May a Vermont lawyer pay the usual fee to join a nonprofit referral service?
Opinion 00-01 allowed a lawyer to join and pay the usual charges of the described nonprofit referral service, which supplied matching questionnaires without recommending one lawyer over another.
Could an assistant Vermont attorney general work on class actions against former clients when class counsel purported to waive the conflict?
Opinion 99-09 advised against participation because the lawyer had not shown the matters were unrelated and the former clients themselves had not consented; class counsel could not waive for them.
Could a Vermont attorney who was also a physician identify both professions on law firm letterhead?
Opinion 99-08 allows the dual professional designation if accurate and not false or misleading under Vermont Rules 7.1 and 7.5.
Can a Vermont lawyer with unpaid fees withhold a former client's file?
Opinion 99-07 requires delivery of file materials the client is entitled to receive, including medical records obtained for the matter. A lawyer may assert a fee-and-cost lien only if doing so would…
Can a firm continue a divorce case after one of its lawyers gave preliminary advice to the opposing spouse at a legal clinic?
Opinion 99-04 allowed continued representation only if both spouses consented after disclosure of the protective measures and the clinic lawyer kept the visitor's information from the firm. If…
Could a paralegal conduct a lender’s real estate loan closing without the lawyer present?
Opinion 1999-03 allowed a paralegal to conduct the ministerial parts of the closing with lender-client consent, if a lawyer remained available for legal questions. The paralegal could not give legal…
Could a Vermont defense lawyer advise a client to sign a plea waiver and sign the prosecutor's attorney certificate?
Opinion 99-02 required full advice about the waiver's effects and found it improper to recommend the provision asserting full attorney-client discussions. It found signing any of the three proposed…
May a Vermont firm list nurses, paralegals, and independent contractors on its letterhead?
Opinion 99-01 permits clearly identified nonlawyer employees and part-time lawyer employees on nonmisleading letterhead, but rejects listing independent contractors as if they were associated with…
Could a Vermont lawyer defend a criminal client when another current client was a State's witness?
Opinion 98-13 barred the concurrent representation despite expected favorable testimony and assumed client consent. The committee found that possible cross-examination of a current client created a…
Could a Vermont lawyer represent a new wife against a husband the lawyer represented in a divorce 15 years earlier?
Opinion 98-12 permitted the new wife’s representation on the stated facts: the earlier divorce was unrelated, the lawyer had learned no relevant confidences, and the former marital property was…
Could a Vermont firm share a fee or give a thank-you gift to a lawyer who only referred the client?
Opinion 98-11 rejected both a fee share and a thank-you gift for a lawyer who made the introduction but performed no legal work. The client had not agreed to a fee division, and the former Code…
What did Vermont Opinion 98-09 say about unidentified funds in a dormant IOLTA account?
The linked PDF withdraws Opinion 96-10 and points fiduciary lawyers holding unclaimed property to the Vermont Unclaimed Property Act rather than transfer of the balance to the Vermont Bar Foundation.
Could a Vermont lawyer receive a fee for referring clients to an investment adviser after disclosure and consent?
Opinion 98-08 prohibited the proposed adviser referral fee even with disclosure and client consent, reasoning that the lawyer’s financial interest would compromise the independent judgment clients…
May an insurer-appointed Vermont defense lawyer send detailed bills to an outside auditor or follow insurer billing guidelines?
Opinion 98-07 required the insured client's informed consent after full disclosure before confidential bills went to an outside auditor or the lawyer complied with insurer billing guidelines. The…
Could a lawyer who handled a couple’s real estate matters represent the husband against the wife in divorce?
Opinion 98-06 said no: the divorce involved property the lawyer had acquired or managed for both spouses, and the new representation would injure the wife in matters where she was a former client.
When could a Vermont firm transfer earned fees from trust and notify the client of trust transactions?
Opinion 98-05 generally accepted a month-end ledger for trust receipts and disbursements. It allowed transfer of an earned fee when the invoice was sent, but required immediate redeposit if the…
May a Vermont personal injury lawyer promise at intake to waive advanced litigation costs if the case is lost?
Opinion 98-04 concludes that an advance waiver of litigation costs would impermissibly guarantee financial assistance under former DR 5-103(B), unless the client is indigent or a party to a class action.
May a Vermont lawyer hand cards or advertising circulars to unrepresented criminal defendants at court to seek their cases?
Opinion 98-03 says former DR 2-104 barred the proposed in-person solicitation at court, despite its separate permission for letters or advertising circulars sent by other means.
Could one Vermont lawyer represent a father in divorce and his parents in a child guardianship?
Opinion 98-01 allowed both representations after full disclosure and each client’s consent if the lawyer could adequately represent both. It required withdrawal if a dispute arose between them.
Could a firm litigate a zoning-board matter after one of its lawyers voted on the matter as a board member?
Opinion 97-14 required both the lawyer-board member to leave the board matter and the firm’s litigation lawyer to withdraw. It found the conflict nonwaivable and continuing after the board’s…
May a Vermont lawyer include litigation expenses in a quoted hourly rate?
Opinion 97-13 allows an hourly fee estimated to include expenses if it is reasonable and either covers litigation expenses or leaves the client liable for the difference; separate billing for…
Could a lawyer defend a person by implicating a former criminal client in a related offense?
Opinion 97-12 said the lawyer could not represent the second defendant. The proposed defense would unavoidably use information from the former client's representation and put the clients' interests…
May a suspended Vermont lawyer work as a law clerk or investigator for a licensed lawyer?
Opinion 97-11 permitted supervised work for a licensed lawyer as a clerk, paralegal, or investigator if it did not amount to practicing law or mislead others about the suspension. The suspended…
Could counsel accept a replacement settlement check when the client refused to endorse the original?
Opinion 97-10 said counsel should not accept a substitute check payable to counsel as trustee while the client’s reason for objecting remained unknown. It did not reach the proposed distribution of…
Could a Vermont firm hire an opposing firm’s paralegal and continue the pending litigation?
Opinion 97-09 permitted the hire and continued representation if the new firm effectively screened the paralegal and protected the former firm client’s information. If screening was ineffective,…
How long did Vermont Opinion 97-08 say a lawyer had to retain closed client files?
The committee set no fixed retention period. It called for judgment based on file contents, protection of confidentiality, and preservation of client property and material useful in foreseeable matters.
Could a Vermont lawyer put a prepaid flat fee for future work directly into a business account?
Opinion 97-07 required advance payments for unearned work, including flat fees, to remain segregated in client trust until earned. The lawyer could not withdraw disputed funds before the dispute was…
Could defense counsel tell a motorist to refuse an evidentiary alcohol test under newly enacted H.70?
Opinion 97-06 said counsel could not advise refusal where the law criminalized it and its statutory conditions were met. Counsel could explain the legal consequences of either choice and a…
Did Vermont Opinion 97-05 require encryption for client email, and how did it treat a public lawyer website?
Under the former Code, Opinion 97-05 allowed ordinary unencrypted client email on its stated reasoning, while acknowledging unusually sensitive communications. It treated a public lawyer website…
May a Vermont lawyer use a collection agency to collect a former client's unpaid bill and disclose information about the representation?
Opinion 97-04 permits a lawyer to use a collection agency for a former client's overdue bill, but limits disclosure to information necessary to establish the fee and requires the agency to preserve…
Could a Vermont firm continue litigation after hiring a lawyer from its opposing counsel’s firm?
Opinion 97-03 allowed continued representation because the lateral lawyer had not worked for the opposing former-firm client and held no usable confidential information. It called for keeping the…
Could plaintiff’s counsel speak directly with treating physicians employed by the defendant medical facility?
Opinion 97-02 permitted direct contact with the two treating physicians, including a vice president, about treatment and expert opinions. Counsel could not seek the facility’s privileged internal…
Who may authorize a trade-association law center to disclose legal advice given to a municipal member's officials?
Opinion 97-01 treated the municipal corporation, rather than its calling official or the trade association, as the law center's client. Its governing body could authorize disclosure to other…
May a Vermont lawyer reveal information from a free initial consultation if the person later files a false bankruptcy petition?
Opinion 96-11 held that confidential information obtained in the free consultation remained protected even without a retainer. On the stated facts, the lawyer could not disclose it to the bankruptcy…
What did withdrawn Vermont Opinion 96-10 say about unidentified funds in a dormant IOLTA account?
The withdrawn opinion proposed transfer to the Vermont Bar Foundation when the owner of a small dormant IOLTA balance could not be found; the PDF expressly says Opinion 98-09 withdrew it.
Must a Vermont divorce lawyer withdraw because the opposing spouse says she made a brief inquiry at the firm's reception desk?
Opinion 96-09 allowed the lawyer to continue the existing divorce representation if the contact gave the firm no material confidences or secrets whose use or disclosure would harm the prospective client.
Could a Vermont law firm put its own stock in an employee stock ownership plan including nonlawyers?
Opinion 96-08 rejected the proposed ESOP because nonlawyer participants would gain an ownership interest and voting rights in the firm, and a lawyer trustee would face conflicting duties. It found…
May a Vermont lawyer speak with a former employee of a represented corporate opponent without its lawyer's consent?
Opinion 96-07 permits contact with an unrepresented former employee of an adverse corporation without corporate counsel's consent, even if the employee formerly managed the relevant contract,…
May a Vermont lawyer write city officials about matters outside a client's separate lawsuit against the city?
Opinion 96-06 permits letters to city officials about matters outside the separate litigation where the officials are not represented by city counsel in the subject of those letters.
Could a Vermont personal-injury lawyer sign a provider’s medical lien form promising to protect the provider?
Opinion 96-05 rejected the proposed form because the lawyer’s own promise to protect the provider could conflict with later client instructions. It distinguished a client’s direction to pay a…
Could Vermont Child Support Office contract counsel represent private clients adverse to that office?
Opinion 96-04 allowed that representation only when both the office and private client consented after full disclosure of the possible effect on the lawyer’s independent judgment.
Did payments to Vermont’s Public Defender Special Fund conflict assigned defense counsel?
Opinion 96-02 found no conflict on the stated funding scheme because defender compensation did not depend directly on a defendant’s payment or conviction-related surcharge.
Could counsel who brought an estate’s wrongful death action represent an heir in contested distribution?
Opinion 96-01 said no where another heir contested distribution. Counsel’s work for all heirs in the wrongful death action could yield confidences and create competing interests over the proceeds.
Could former corporate counsel represent an ousted president in efforts to make the corporation sell?
Opinion 95-22 says the lawyer could not take the adverse shareholder-control work without the former corporate client's consent, given knowledge gained in prior takeover and governance representation.
Could a Vermont lawyer pursue a client's claim against the carrier defending the lawyer in an unrelated lawsuit?
Opinion 95-21 allowed continued representation only after full disclosure of the lawyer's insurance and defense relationship with the carrier and the client's consent.
Could counsel disclose a completed guardianship-account theft learned during joint representation?
Opinion 95-19 barred disclosure to the surety, authorities, or other clients on its assumption that the mother’s misconduct was complete. The lawyer had to withdraw from representing all joint…
Browse Vermont Bar Association opinions by topic
Legal ethics opinions from the Vermont Bar Association interpret the rules of professional conduct for working lawyers, in response to inquiries from members and committees. They are advisory, not binding like court discipline decisions, but courts and discipline boards treat formal opinions as substantial guidance on how the rules apply. Every opinion above has a plain-English question and short answer, plus a link to the original source on the bar's site.