When could a Vermont firm transfer earned fees from trust and notify the client of trust transactions?

Short answer Opinion 98-05 generally accepted a month-end ledger for trust receipts and disbursements. It allowed transfer of an earned fee when the invoice was sent, but required immediate redeposit if the client disputed the transfer.
Bar
VTBAR
Issued
1998

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1998. Ask about yours and see what the current Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.

Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A firm asked whether a monthly client ledger satisfied the former Code's prompt-notice and timely-record requirements for trust receipts and disbursements. The committee said a ledger or similar notice at the end of a month with transactions would usually comply, though the meaning of prompt notice depended on circumstances. It noted that large transactions such as real estate closings could require faster disbursement once deposited funds cleared.

The committee also allowed transfer of earned fees when an invoice was sent if the fee was then due and not disputed. If the client later disputed the transfer, the firm had to redeposit the disputed amount immediately. It found no general waiting period before withdrawing earned fees.

On advance notice of trust disbursements, the opinion said none was ordinarily required if the disbursement terms were clear to the client at the outset, unless the engagement agreement required notice. Where the client's approval of documents could matter, the committee said the documents should be shown before disbursement.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1998 under Vermont's former Code of Professional Responsibility. The Vermont Supreme Court's rules history states that the Rules of Professional Conduct applied to lawyer conduct after September 1, 1999. Later rule amendments or opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this opinion as historical context and verify current rules before relying on it.

Common questions

Q: Did the committee generally accept monthly trust-transaction notices?

A: Yes. It said a month-end ledger or similar notice usually met the former Code's requirements when trust transactions occurred during that month.

Q: Could the firm transfer an earned fee when it sent the bill?

A: Yes, if the fee was due and undisputed. A later client dispute required immediate redeposit of the disputed amount.

Q: Was advance notice required for every trust disbursement?

A: No. The opinion said no general advance notice was needed if the disbursement was clear from the outset, unless the parties' agreement required it.

Background and rules framework

The opinion interpreted former DR 9-102(B) and DR 9-102(C)(3) on notice and records, and DR 9-102(A)(2) on withdrawing fees from trust. Its answers addressed the firm arrangements and rules then in force.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Vermont Code of Professional Responsibility DR 9-102(B), DR 9-102(C)(3), DR 9-102(A)(2)

See also

Source

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1998. Ezel checks the current Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace