Legal Ethics Opinions
Free state bar and ABA legal ethics opinions with plain-English summaries, full citations, and source links on every page.
No opinions match these filters
Try a different search term or clear the filters.
May a lawyer admitted only in New Jersey and DC who works as a salaried associate at a New York firm simultaneously run a solo New Jersey practice, and what New York-rules duties attach to the conflicts, advertising, and trust-account aspects?
The opinion concludes the New York Rules do not bar simultaneous employment at two firms, but Rule 1.10 imputes conflicts across both firms (no screening cure available), Rule 7.1 governs any advertis…
Can a New York lawyer pay an online platform that scores users' anonymized workplace-experience entries and connects the lawyer with a user (with the user's consent) without violating the solicitation, advertising, or fee-payment rules?
The opinion concludes the resulting lawyer-user communication is neither a solicitation nor an advertisement (the user initiates it by consenting to disclosure), and the lawyer's payment is a permissi…
What conflicts of interest does a New York per diem (appearance counsel) attorney face when switching between representing plaintiff lenders and defendant debtors in collection matters?
The opinion concludes that a per diem lawyer may not oppose a current client in any matter, or a former client in a substantially related matter, without informed consent confirmed in writing; persona…
May a Texas school's lawyer speak directly with parents at an ARD special-education meeting when the parents are represented by a lawyer but bring only a nonlawyer advocate to the meeting?
The opinion concludes the school's lawyer may not. Rule 4.02(a) prohibits the school's lawyer from communicating, or causing or encouraging another to communicate, with the parents about the subject o…
Can a Texas lawyer hire an unaffiliated 'appearance lawyer' to cover a single hearing or deposition, and what duties does each lawyer take on?
The opinion concludes that a Texas lawyer may hire an appearance lawyer for a discrete task, but the appearance lawyer represents the client (not the hiring lawyer) and owes the full duties of compete…
What must an Illinois lawyer do when they learn that the lawyer who hired them on a matter has been removed from the Master Roll of Attorneys for MCLE noncompliance?
The opinion concludes the lawyer must first notify the hiring lawyer and may not continue working with the hiring lawyer unless reinstatement occurs; if the hiring lawyer is not reinstated, the lawyer…
What must a California lawyer do when charging a flat fee, refunding an advance flat fee after early termination, or renegotiating a flat fee mid-engagement?
The opinion concludes a California lawyer must clearly state which services the flat fee covers and when it is earned, must refund any unearned portion of an advance flat fee on early termination (eve…
What does a New York lawyer have to do when AI tools (whether the lawyer's or the client's) record, transcribe, and summarize attorney-client conversations on Zoom, Teams, or similar platforms?
The opinion concludes the lawyer must obtain client consent before AI records the call, must independently review any AI-generated transcript or summary for accuracy, must safeguard confidentiality an…
When does a New York lawyer's strongly held personal, religious, political, or moral view create a Rule 1.7(a)(2) personal-interest conflict that requires the lawyer to decline or withdraw from a representation?
The opinion concludes such conflicts are rare; the Rules presume lawyers cultivate detachment and can subordinate personal views. A Rule 1.7(a)(2) conflict arises only when the lawyer subjectively con…
If a New York lawyer signs a contract (engagement letter, outside-counsel guideline, or employment policy) that purports to limit the lawyer's Rules-granted discretion, is the lawyer ethically bound by that contract?
The opinion concludes that lawyer and client cannot alter the Rules by agreement; a New York lawyer always retains the discretion the Rules grant, even where exercising it would breach a contract. Ent…
When a California client discharges a contingent-fee lawyer and successor counsel settles the case, what must the predecessor lawyer do to substantiate its quantum-meruit fee lien, and how must trust funds be handled while the lien is in dispute?
The opinion concludes that the predecessor lawyer owes a continuing fiduciary duty to the former client and must promptly quantify the quantum-meruit lien (with reconstructed time records or other rea…
May a Texas lawyer agree to be personally bound by a non-disparagement clause or a marketing-use non-disclosure clause in a client's settlement agreement?
The Committee concludes that under Texas Disciplinary Rule 5.06(b) a lawyer may not be a party to a non-disparagement clause that restricts statements the lawyer might make in the practice of law, and…
May an Illinois lawyer affiliate with a for-profit client referral service that charges clients a fixed fee, splits the fee with the lawyer, offers a money-back guarantee, uses non-attorney actors in ads, and requires lawyer-client communications on its monitored online platform?
The opinion concludes no. The money-back guarantee is a prohibited paid recommendation (Rule 7.2(a)) and misleads about the lawyer's services (Rule 7.1); the lawyer-service fee split violates Rule 5.4…
Can a lawyer not licensed in Illinois represent an Illinois business on transactional and IP matters, and does associating with an Illinois lawyer cure any UPL concern?
The opinion concludes that a non-Illinois lawyer may advise an Illinois business under Rule 5.5(c) if one of its temporary-practice exceptions applies (notably 5.5(c)(1)'s association with an actively…
When a California lawyer or law-firm colleague has a mental impairment affecting their practice, what do that lawyer, their subordinates, and their supervisors have to do?
An impairment does not excuse the impaired lawyer from any duty. It triggers parallel duties for that lawyer's subordinates, supervisors, and other colleagues who know of the conduct, including commun…
Are California lawyers required to have a succession plan, and what duties does an assisting attorney take on?
California has no rule that expressly mandates a succession plan, but the combined duties of competence, diligence, communication, withdrawal, safekeeping client property, and supervision require ever…
What are a California lawyer's ethical duties when working remotely or in a hybrid law-firm setting?
Remote practice does not change a California lawyer's ethical duties. Managerial lawyers must implement reasonable measures, policies, and practices to ensure compliance with the rules in a remote env…
How should a California lawyer represent a client whose decision-making capacity may be impaired, and when may the lawyer take protective action?
The opinion concludes that the lawyer should preserve a normal lawyer-client relationship insofar as possible; that informed, disinterested judgments about capacity will not be treated as unethical in…
May a California lawyer advise and assist a client in operating a cannabis business that is lawful under California law but unlawful under federal law?
Per California Formal Opinion 2020-202, yes. A California lawyer may advise and assist a client in conduct permitted by California cannabis laws even though that conduct may violate federal law, provi…
What are a California lawyer's ethical duties to prevent and respond to a data breach involving confidential client information?
Per California Formal Opinion 2020-203, lawyers must assess the risks of keeping confidential client information on electronic devices and take reasonable steps to secure those systems. After a breach…
May a California lawyer who must withdraw because the client's claim lacks merit try to settle the case before withdrawing?
Per California Formal Opinion 2019-198, yes. The attorney's duty under Rule 1.16(d) to avoid reasonably foreseeable prejudice may be satisfied by negotiating a settlement before withdrawal, provided t…
When can a California lawyer consult outside counsel or law-firm in-house counsel about a current client's matter without creating a conflict and what must the lawyer tell the client?
Per California Formal Opinion 2019-197, the act of seeking legal advice about ethical compliance is not itself a conflict and need not be disclosed; once the lawyer learns of an error that could preju…
What ethical duties does a California lawyer owe when a third-party litigation funder is involved in the case?
Per California Formal Opinion 2020-204, lawyers must preserve independent professional judgment, comply with the duty of confidentiality, obtain the client's informed written consent before sharing co…
What must a California civil-trial lawyer do when a client's witness has testified or will testify falsely?
Under California Formal Opinion 2019-200, an attorney may use evidence that is merely suspected to be false but must refuse to present testimony known to be perjured even on the client's instruction; …
When does a California lawyer become responsible for a profile on a third-party online directory or rating website?
Per California Formal Opinion 2019-199, an attorney becomes responsible for a third-party directory profile when the attorney 'adopts' or otherwise uses it to market the practice, at which point Rules…
What ethical duties do a departing California lawyer and the lawyer's old firm owe to clients during the transition?
Per California Formal Opinion 2020-201, both the departing lawyer and the law firm must put the client's interests first, give timely notice to clients for whom the departing lawyer is principally res…
What duties does a California lawyer owe to a prospective client who shared confidential information during an interview that did not result in representation?
Per California Formal Opinion 2021-205, the interviewing lawyer owes a prospective client the same duty of confidentiality owed to a current or former client. The lawyer (and, by imputation, the law f…
When does a California attorney's blog become regulated advertising under the Rules of Professional Conduct?
Per California Formal Opinion 2016-196, a blog is a 'communication' subject to advertising rules only if it expresses the attorney's availability for professional employment, either by express invitat…
Does a California lawyer's duty of confidentiality protect publicly available information about a current or former client?
Per California Formal Opinion 2016-195, yes. The duty of confidentiality under Business and Professions Code section 6068(e)(1) and former Rule 3-100 covers any information obtained during the represe…
What level of technology competence does a California lawyer handling litigation need to ethically manage electronically stored information (ESI) and e-discovery?
Per California Formal Opinion 2015-193, an attorney's duty of competence under former Rule 3-110 includes a basic understanding of e-discovery; if the matter requires more, the lawyer must acquire the…
When a California lawyer must withdraw because the client is pursuing the case for improper purposes, what may the lawyer tell the court about the reason, and what must the lawyer do if ordered to disclose confidential client communications in camera?
Per California Formal Opinion 2015-192, the lawyer may disclose only as much as is reasonably necessary to demonstrate the need to withdraw; ordinarily 'ethical considerations require withdrawal' or '…
What may a California lawyer say (and not say) to opposing counsel or a settlement officer during settlement negotiations?
Per California Formal Opinion 2015-194, false statements of material fact and implicit misrepresentations during settlement negotiations are prohibited, but statements about a party's negotiating goal…
If a California lawyer represents a debtor in a pro bono simple, no-asset Chapter 7 bankruptcy and concurrently represents one of the debtor's creditors in an unrelated matter, must the lawyer obtain informed written consent from both clients?
Per California Formal Opinion 2014-191, no informed written consent is required under former Rule 3-310(C)(3) because a simple, no-asset Chapter 7 is an in rem proceeding that does not create direct a…
Can a California lawyer concurrently be 'of counsel' to a law firm and run a separate solo practice, and use separate business cards and stationery for each capacity?
The opinion concludes the dual capacity is ethically permitted; the lawyer may use separate business cards and stationery for the two practices so long as the relationship satisfies the 'close, person…
When a California law firm dissolves, what does each attorney (lead partner, associate on the matter, partner unrelated to the matter) owe each client of the firm under the duty to avoid foreseeable prejudice on withdrawal?
Per California Formal Opinion 2014-190, every attorney at the dissolving firm (regardless of partner/associate status or prior contact with the client) owes the client a duty under former Rule 3-700(A…
In a transactional negotiation, does a California lawyer have a duty to alert opposing counsel to (A) an apparent material error opposing counsel made or (B) a material change the lawyer made in revised contract language?
Per California Formal Opinion 2013-189, no duty arises in Scenario A if the lawyer did not induce opposing counsel's error; in Scenario B, once the lawyer realizes that an unintended defect in the red…
Under the former Ohio Code of Professional Responsibility, could an attorney advance litigation expenses for a contingent-fee client, and what happened if the client could not repay?
The opinion concluded that under former DR 5-103(B) an attorney could advance expenses of litigation provided the client remained ultimately liable for them, and that whether to seek reimbursement was…
May a Common Pleas judge teach a class at a state university and accept reimbursement for it?
The opinion concluded that a Common Pleas judge could serve as a visiting lecturer at a state university so long as the activity did not interfere with judicial duties, and could accept reimbursement …
Does a local bar's grievance committee have to tell law-enforcement about criminal conduct it uncovers while investigating an attorney?
The opinion concluded that under EC 1-4 of the former Ohio Code of Professional Responsibility, a Certified Grievance Committee had a duty to notify law-enforcement authorities of criminal conduct dis…
How these opinions are useful
- Understand the rules: Ethics opinions interpret how the rules of professional conduct apply to real fact patterns.
- Persuasive authority: Not binding like court discipline decisions, but state bar formal opinions carry substantial weight.
- Working guidance: The committee shows lawyers what the rule actually requires day to day (conflicts checks, fee letters, intake screens, withdrawal mechanics).
- Practice research: Cite ethics opinions in fee agreements, engagement letters, conflict waivers, and disqualification motions.