May a Vermont lawyer include litigation expenses in a quoted hourly rate?

Short answer Opinion 97-13 allows an hourly fee estimated to include expenses if it is reasonable and either covers litigation expenses or leaves the client liable for the difference; separate billing for litigation expenses was the committee's preferred proposal.
Bar
VTBAR
Issued
1997

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1997. Ask about yours and see what the current Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.

Disclaimer: Advisory only. Not binding precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official ethics opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ethics opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A prospective client asked a lawyer to quote an hourly rate covering all disbursements. The lawyer presented three versions: all costs within the rate, general expenses within the rate with litigation expenses billed separately, or a later surcharge designed to recover recorded disbursements.

The committee applied former DR 2-106's reasonable-fee requirement and DR 5-103(B)'s rule that a client remain ultimately liable for litigation expenses. It preferred separate billing of litigation expenses. An inclusive rate was not inherently forbidden, but it would conflict with DR 5-103(B) if litigation expenses exceeded the fee and the client was not liable for the difference. The committee also identified a concern that an inclusive rate might discourage necessary expenses and affect competent service.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1997 under Vermont's former Code of Professional Responsibility. The Vermont Supreme Court's rules history states that the Rules of Professional Conduct applied to lawyer conduct after September 1, 1999. Later amendments or opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this opinion as historical context and verify current rules before relying on it.

Common questions

Q: Is an all-inclusive hourly rate automatically prohibited?

A: No. The committee said it did not violate the former rules per se if the fee was reasonable and either covered litigation expenses or left the client liable for any difference.

Q: Which of the three billing proposals did the committee prefer?

A: It preferred separately billing litigation expenses while including anticipated general disbursements in the hourly rate.

Background and rules framework

The opinion quoted former DR 2-106 on excessive fees and DR 5-103(B) on advancing litigation expenses. It cited ABA Formal Opinion 93-379 concerning disbursements and described the lawyer's competence duty when setting an inclusive fee.

Citations and references

Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Vermont Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-106 and DR 5-103(B)

Other opinions cited:

  • ABA Formal Opinion 93-379

See also

Source

What do the rules say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1997. Ezel checks the current Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace