Ga. Code Ann. § 5-6-35

Section 5-6-35(a)(6) permits a discretionary appeal from a judgment awarding $10,000 or less, and subsection (d) requires the application to be filed within 30 days of the appealed order.

Carpet South, Inc. v. the Forest at Columbia, Lp D/B/A Forest at Columbia Apartments · filed 2013-11-19(a)(6), (d)

Although an applicant may file a discretionary application to challenge a judgment awarded for $10,000 or less, the application must be filed within 30 days of the order appealed from. OCGA §§ 5-6-35 (a) (6) and (d).

Section 5-6-35 requires a discretionary-appeal application to be filed within 30 days, makes compliance jurisdictional, and does not eliminate the additional interlocutory-appeal requirements of § 5-6-34 (b).

Edwards v. State · filed 2013-12-18(d)

First, this application was not timely filed. An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith. See Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Edwards filed his application 77 days after entry of the order he seeks to appeal.1 Thus, the application is untimely. ... Second, it appears that Edwards’s motion for new trial remains pending in the trial court. Accordingly, Edwards needed to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedure in order to appeal the order at issue. OCGA § 5-6-35, the discretionary appeal statute, does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832 (471 SE2d 213) (1996).

Section 5-6-35(d) requires an application for discretionary appeal to be filed within 30 days after entry of the order or judgment, and the deadline is jurisdictional.

Newby v. State · filed 2014-02-25(d)

Additionally, both an application for a discretionary appeal and a direct appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. See OCGA §§ 5-6-35 (d), 5-6-38 (a). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider an untimely appeal. See Legare v. State, 269 Ga. 468, 469 (499 SE2d 640) (1998); Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989).

Subsection (d) requires an application for discretionary appeal to be filed within 30 days after entry of the order or judgment being appealed, and the filing requirement is jurisdictional.

Dewayne L. Meadows v. State · filed 2014-04-03(d)

An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith.

Section 5-6-35(c) requires an application for discretionary review to include a stamped “filed” copy of the order appealed from, and subsection (d) makes the 30-day filing period jurisdictional.

Petty v. State · filed 2014-08-08(c), (d)

Pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35 (c) and Court of Appeals Rule 31 (e), an application for discretionary review must include a stamped “filed” copy of the order being appealed. Here, Petty has not included any order addressing his motion to withdraw his plea and vacate his sentence. Accordingly, we are unable to determine whether his application was filed within 30 days of the order(s) he challenges, which is a jurisdictional requirement. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d); Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989).

Section 5-6-35(d) requires an application for discretionary appeal to be filed within 30 days after entry of the order or judgment appealed from, and compliance with the statute is jurisdictional.

In the Interest Of: M. G. and C. G., Children (Mother) · filed 2014-10-15(d)

An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith.

Subsection (d) requires a discretionary application to be filed within 30 days of entry of the order to be appealed.

Tesfaye v. State · filed 2015-01-13(d)

To be timely, a discretionary application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d); Hill v. State, 204 Ga. App. 582 (420 SE2d 393) (1992). Because the completed application was filed in this Court 82 days after entry of the order Tesfaye seeks to appeal, it is untimely.

Section 5-6-35(d) requires a discretionary-appeal application to be filed within 30 days after entry of the order or judgment, and the deadline is jurisdictional.

Glover v. State · filed 2015-03-13(d)

An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith.

Section 5-6-35(d) requires an application for discretionary appeal to be filed within 30 days after entry of the order or judgment, and the deadline is jurisdictional.

Brown v. State · filed 2016-06-17(d)

An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal made beyond 30 days.

Subsection (d) requires an application for discretionary appeal to be filed within 30 days after entry of the order or judgment, and the deadline is jurisdictional.

In the Interest Of: Mc., Nc., Jc., Children (Mother) · filed 2016-09-09(d)

An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith.

Subsection (d) requires a discretionary-appeal application to be filed within 30 days after entry of the order or judgment, and the deadline is jurisdictional.

Dunigan Rogers v. State · filed 2017-02-22(d)

An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal made beyond 30 days.

Section 5-6-35(d) requires an application for discretionary appeal to be filed within 30 days after entry of the order or judgment, and compliance is jurisdictional.

Mitchell v. State · filed 2017-03-15(d)

An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith.

Section 5-6-35 requires a discretionary-appeal application to be filed within 30 days, makes compliance jurisdictional, and directs that a timely application ordinarily be granted when the lower court’s order is subject to direct appeal.

Marshall Rice v. State · filed 2017-05-17(d), (j)

An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith. Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). The filing of a motion for reconsideration does not extend the time for filing a discretionary application, and the denial of a motion for reconsideration is not an appealable order. See State v. White, 282 Ga. 859, 860 (1) (655 SE2d 575) (2008); Bell v. Cohran, 244 Ga. App. 510, 510 (536 SE2d 187) (2000); Savage v. Newsome, 173 Ga. App. 271, 271 (326 SE2d 5) (1985). This application, filed 36 days after entry of the trial court’s denial of Rice’s motion to merge sentences, is untimely. ... Ordinarily, we will grant a timely application when the lower court’s order is subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j).

Section 5-6-35(d) requires a discretionary appeal application to be filed within 30 days after entry of the order or judgment, and the filing requirements are jurisdictional.

In the Interest of T. H., a Child (Father) · filed 2017-07-19(d)

An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith. See Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989).

Section 5-6-35 requires a discretionary-appeal application to include the order or judgment being appealed and to be filed within 30 days, and those requirements are jurisdictional.

Pickett v. State · filed 2017-10-23(c), (d)

An application for discretionary appeal must include “a copy of the order or judgment being appealed.” OCGA § 5-6-35 (c). ... An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the order to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith.

Section 5-6-35(d) requires a discretionary appeal application to be filed within 30 days after entry of the order appealed from, and the deadline is jurisdictional.

Hawkins v. Hawkins · filed 2018-03-15(d)

To be timely, a discretionary application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order to be appealed. ... The requirements of OCGA § 5-6- 35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith.

Section 5-6-35 requires a discretionary-appeal application to be filed within 30 days and requires the applicant to include file-stamped copies of the order appealed from and the motion leading to it.

In the Interest of G. A. S., a Child (Father) · filed 2019-02-11(c), (d)

For this Court to have jurisdiction, an application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the order sought to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d); In the Interest of B. R. F., 299 Ga. 294, 298 (788 SE2d 416) (2016); Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989) (“The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional and this court cannot accept an appeal not made in compliance therewith.”) ... As the applicant, the father must provide this Court will file-stamped copies of both the trial court’s order from which the appeal is sought and the motion that led directly to the order. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (c); Court of Appeals Rule 31 (c), (e).

Section 5-6-35(d) requires an application for discretionary appeal to be filed within 30 days after entry of the order or judgment, and the filing deadline is jurisdictional.

Windhom v. State · filed 2018-01-30(d)

First, an application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith.

Section 5-6-35(d) requires an application for discretionary appeal to be filed within 30 days after entry of the order or judgment, and the filing requirements are jurisdictional.

J. D. Solomon, Jr. v. State · filed 2019-04-11(d)

An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith.

Under § 5-6-35 (d) and (j), a discretionary-review application must be filed within 30 days of the order when the order is subject to direct appeal.

Pembleton v. State · filed 2019-07-25(d), (j)

Ordinarily, we will grant an otherwise timely application for discretionary appeal if the lower court’s order is subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). To fall within this general rule, however, the application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d), (j).

A directly appealable order may be reviewed under subsection (j), but the discretionary application must still be filed within 30 days under subsection (d).

Khadene Walker v. Windcrest Park Townhome Association, Inc. · filed 2021-06-02(d), (j)

Ordinarily, if a party applies for discretionary review of a directly appealable order, we grant the application under OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). To fall within this general rule, however, the application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order to be appealed.

Section 5-6-35(d) requires an application for discretionary appeal to be filed within 30 days of the judgment or order sought to be appealed, and the deadline is jurisdictional.

Adams v. Adams · filed 2022-01-24(d)

An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the judgment or trial court order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). “The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional and this court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith.”

Section 5-6-35(d) requires a discretionary appeal application to be filed within 30 days of the judgment or trial court order, and the deadline is jurisdictional.

Reynolds v. State · filed 2022-11-03(d)

An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the judgment or trial court order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). “The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional and this court cannot accept [an application] for appeal not made in compliance therewith.”

Subsection (d) requires an application for discretionary review to be filed within 30 days after entry of the order or judgment, and compliance with the statute time requirements is jurisdictional.

Thrasher v. State · filed 2022-11-08(d)

An application for discretionary review must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). Compliance with the time requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 is jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith. See Gable v. State, 290 Ga. 81, 82 (2) (a) (720 SE2d 170) (2011); Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989).

Section 5-6-35(d) requires a discretionary appeal application to be filed within 30 days of the order being appealed, and compliance with the statute is jurisdictional.

Advantage Point Solutions LLC v. Zylun Staffing D/B/A Codev · filed 2024-03-26(d)

A discretionary application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith.

Section 5-6-35(d) requires an application for discretionary appeal to be filed within 30 days of the order, and compliance with the section is jurisdictional.

Shuman v. Bulloch County Board of Commissioners and R&H Development Company, Inc. · filed 2025-04-15(d)

To be timely, an application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith.

Section 5-6-35 (d) requires an application for discretionary appeal to be filed within 30 days after entry of the order to be appealed, and the requirement is jurisdictional.

Goodman v. State · filed 2025-06-12(d)

An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith.

Section 5-6-35 (d) requires an application for discretionary appeal to be filed within 30 days after entry of the order being appealed, and the statute’s requirements are jurisdictional.

Smith v. Hughes-Smith · filed 2025-07-02(d)

An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith.

Section 5-6-35(d) requires an application for discretionary appeal to be filed within 30 days after entry of the order being appealed.

Fontes v. Quencia Bloom · filed 2025-07-18(d)

An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith.

Subsection (d) requires a discretionary appeal application to be filed within 30 days after entry of the order or judgment being appealed.

Ramsumair v. Ramsumair · filed 2025-12-30(d)

To be timely, a discretionary application must be filed within 30 days after entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35(d); Court of Appeals Rule 31(a).

Subsection (d) requires an application for discretionary appeal to be filed within 30 days after entry of the order or judgment being appealed, and the deadline is jurisdictional.

Maddox v. State · filed 2019-09-23(d)

An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). This filing deadline is jurisdictional, and this Court is unable to accept an untimely application.

Subsection (d) requires an application for discretionary review to be filed within 30 days of entry of the order or judgment to be appealed, and the requirement is jurisdictional.

City of Atlanta v. El Sawi · filed 2019-12-24(d)

An application for discretionary review must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith.

Section 5-6-35 governs discretionary appeals but does not excuse a party appealing an interlocutory order from satisfying the additional requirements of Section 5-6-34(b).

McGill v. Borucki · filed 2016-04-12

OCGA § 5-6-35, which governs the discretionary appeal procedure, does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6- 34 (b).

Section 5-6-35 does not excuse a party appealing an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of Section 5-6-34(b).

Cornelius Haston, Jr. v. Homeward Residential, Inc. · filed 2013-05-23

And OCGA § 5-6-35, the discretionary appeal statute, does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).

Section 5-6-35 does not excuse a party seeking review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements for an interlocutory appeal under § 5-6-34(b).

Ahmed v. Deutsche Bank · filed 2013-07-01

But OCGA § 5-6-35, the discretionary appeal statute, does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).

Section 5-6-35 does not excuse a party seeking review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of § 5-6-34(b).

Deschamps v. Marathon Reo Management, LLC · filed 2014-05-28

OCGA § 5-6-35, the discretionary appeal statute, does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).

Compliance with the discretionary-appeal statute does not excuse a party seeking review of an interlocutory order from satisfying the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).

Harper v. State · filed 2015-06-22

Although Harper filed an application for discretionary appeal, compliance with the discretionary appeal statute, OCGA § 5-6-35, does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).

Section 5-6-35's discretionary-appeal procedure does not excuse a party seeking review of an interlocutory order from also satisfying the requirements of § 5-6-34(b).

Otis N. White, Jr. v. Williams · filed 2015-09-21

Although White filed an application for discretionary appeal, as described in OCGA § 5-6-35, compliance with that procedure does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).

Section 5-6-35's discretionary-appeal procedure does not eliminate the additional requirements for an interlocutory appeal under § 5-6-34(b).

Eidson v. Croutch · filed 2016-06-23(a)(10)

And it is well settled that where an appeal is both discretionary and interlocutory, the discretionary appeal statute does not excuse a party from complying with the additional interlocutory requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).

Section 5-6-35's discretionary-appeal procedure does not permit a party to bypass the interlocutory-appeal requirements of § 5-6-34(b) when seeking review of an interlocutory order.

Weener v. Branch Banking and Trust Company · filed 2017-05-17

Although appeals in garnishment cases are typically by discretionary application, see OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (4), “the discretionary-application statute, OCGA § 5-6-35, does not allow a party to ignore the interlocutory-application subsection, OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), when attempting to obtain appellate review” of an interlocutory order.

Section 5-6-35 does not excuse a party seeking review of an interlocutory order from also complying with the certificate-of-immediate-review requirements of Section 5-6-34(b).

In the Interest of G. L. S., a Minor Child · filed 2017-06-08

Although G. L. S. filed an application for discretionary appeal, compliance with the discretionary appeal statute, OCGA § 5-6-35, does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).

Section 5-6-35 governs discretionary appeals, but using that procedure does not excuse a party seeking review of an interlocutory order from meeting § 5-6-34(b)'s additional requirements.

Dixit v. Dixit · filed 2017-09-18

Although he filed an application for discretionary appeal, compliance with the discretionary appeal statute, OCGA § 5-6-35, does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).

Compliance with the discretionary-appeal statute does not excuse a party seeking review of an interlocutory order from satisfying the additional requirements for an interlocutory appeal.

Damron v. Damron · filed 2018-12-05

Although Sara Damron filed an application for discretionary appeal, compliance with the discretionary appeal statute, OCGA § 5-6- 35, does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).

Compliance with § 5-6-35 for a discretionary appeal does not excuse a party seeking review of an interlocutory order from also complying with § 5-6-34(b).

Cunningham v. Najarian Capital LLC · filed 2018-12-19

Although Cunningham filed an application for discretionary appeal, compliance with the discretionary-appeal statute, OCGA § 5-6-35, does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).

Filing a discretionary-appeal application under § 5-6-35 does not excuse a party seeking review of an interlocutory order from obtaining a certificate of immediate review and complying with § 5-6-34 (b).

Johnson v. State · filed 2020-04-03

Although Johnson filed an application for discretionary appeal, as described in OCGA § 5-6-35, compliance with that procedure does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the interlocutory appeal procedures – including obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court – set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).

Section 5-6-35 provides the procedure for seeking a discretionary appeal, but using it does not eliminate the interlocutory-appeal requirements when the order is interlocutory.

Jones v. Jones · filed 2020-11-17

Although Emanuel Jones filed an application for discretionary appeal, as described in OCGA § 5-6-35, compliance with that procedure does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the interlocutory appeal procedures set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). ... Where, as here, both discretionary and interlocutory appeal procedures apply, an applicant must follow the interlocutory appeal procedures and obtain a timely certificate of immediate review from the trial court before filing an application.

Section 5-6-35's discretionary-appeal procedure does not excuse a party seeking review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of Section 5-6-34 (b).

Martin v. Fowler · filed 2020-12-23

Although Martin filed an application for discretionary appeal, compliance with the discretionary appeal statute, OCGA § 5-6-35, does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).

"Filing a discretionary application under section 5-6-35 does not excuse compliance with the additional interlocutory-appeal requirements of section 5-6-34(b)."

Cervantes v. Gonzalez · filed 2021-03-16

Although Daniel did file a discretionary application pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35, which governs discretionary appeal procedures, that does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), including obtaining a certificate of immediate review.

"Filing a discretionary application does not excuse compliance with the additional interlocutory-appeal requirements of section 5-6-34(b)."

Bryan v. Bryan · filed 2021-06-15

A party appealing an interlocutory order must comply with the requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), irrespective of whether the appeal is brought pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35.

Section 5-6-35 does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of section 5-6-34 (b).

Davey E. Wright v. Joane M. Tape · filed 2021-11-08

Moreover, OCGA § 5-6-35, the discretionary appeal statute, does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).

Section 5-6-35 governs discretionary appeals but does not excuse compliance with the additional requirements for interlocutory appeals under Section 5-6-34 (b).

Crawford v. Smith · filed 2022-02-10

OCGA § 5-6-35, which governs the discretionary appeal procedure, does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).

Section 5-6-35's discretionary-appeal procedure does not excuse a party appealing an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of Section 5-6-34(b).

Dunn v. Dunn · filed 2022-03-09

Moreover, OCGA § 5-6-35, the discretionary appeal statute, does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).

Section 5-6-35's discretionary-appeal procedure does not excuse a party appealing an interlocutory order from also complying with the requirements of § 5-6-34(b), including obtaining a certificate of immediate review.

Thomas Hawk Tribble v. State · filed 2021-12-20(a)(5)

Although Tribble filed an application for discretionary appeal, as described in OCGA § 5-6-35,3 compliance with that procedure does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the interlocutory appeal procedures – including obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court – set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).

Section 5-6-35's discretionary-appeal procedure does not eliminate the additional interlocutory-appeal requirements of § 5-6-34 (b).

Strauss v. State · filed 2025-01-23

Although Strauss filed an application for discretionary appeal, as described in OCGA § 5-6-35, compliance with that procedure does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).

Filing an application for discretionary appeal under § 5-6-35 does not excuse a party appealing an interlocutory order from meeting the additional requirements of § 5-6-34 (b).

Nirvana Minter v. City of Atlanta · filed 2025-01-23

Although Minter filed an application for discretionary appeal, as described in OCGA § 5-6-35, compliance with that procedure does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a party appealing a superior-court ruling that disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision to use the discretionary-appeal procedures.

Dawson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N. A. · filed 2013-06-11(a)(1)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Dawson was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires a discretionary appeal for an order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

Will Stevenson v. Bac Home Loans Servicing · filed 2013-06-13(a)(11)

We lack jurisdiction. Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Stevenson was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mortgage Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

When a superior court order involves a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, the appellant must use the discretionary appeal procedure.

Moore v. Moore · filed 2013-06-18(a)(1)

First, when a superior court order involves a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, an appellant is required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a discretionary appeal when a superior-court order disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision.

Jacquelyne G. Freeman v. Heritage Park Condominium Association · filed 2013-07-02(a)(1)

Because the order that Freeman seeks to appeal disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, she was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a party appealing an order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision to follow the discretionary appeal procedure.

Vibert French v. U.S. Bank National Association · filed 2013-07-18(a)(1)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, the Frenches were required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a party appealing a superior-court judgment disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision to use the discretionary appeal procedure.

Hollace Turner v. US Bank National Association · filed 2013-07-18(a)(1)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Turner was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a discretionary appeal when a superior-court order disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision.

Akinnagbe v. Thg Properties, Lllp. · filed 2013-07-31(a)(1)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Akinnagbe was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874, 875 (581 SE2d 333) (2003). “Even when the superior court decides an issue that was not raised or considered in the magistrate court, any appeal to this court must be pursuant to the discretionary appeal procedure because the case reached the superior court through a de novo appeal from the magistrate court.” Bullock, supra at 876.

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a discretionary appeal for an order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

Fulton v. Flagstar Bank · filed 2013-08-30(a)(1)

We lack jurisdiction. Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Fulton was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). Her failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires an appeal from an order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision to follow the discretionary-appeal procedure.

Bannister v. Johnson · filed 2013-09-26(a)(1)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Bannister was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874, 875 (581 SE2d 333) (2003).

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires an appellant to use the discretionary-appeal procedure when appealing a superior court order arising from a de novo appeal from a magistrate court ruling.

Wyser v. 2012 C Property Holdings, LLC · filed 2013-10-23(a)(1)

When a superior court order involves a de novo appeal from a magistrate court ruling, an appellant is required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a party appealing a superior-court decision in a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision to use discretionary-appeal procedures.

Smith v. Vendor Resources Management · filed 2013-11-22(a)(1)

Because the order at issue concerns a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, the applicants were required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). Their failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires an appellant challenging a superior court order on a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision to use the discretionary-appeal procedure.

Tammy Doe v. Wri Capital Group A/A/F Colfin A1-Ga, LLC · filed 2014-02-05(a)(1)

When a superior court order involves a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, an appellant is required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires a party appealing a superior-court decision disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision to use the discretionary appeal procedure.

Stevenson v. Tcs Realty, LLC · filed 2014-02-27(a)(11)

First, because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Stevenson was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mortgage Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995).

Subsection (a)(1) requires a party appealing an order that disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision to follow the discretionary appeal procedures.

Parsons v. Federal National Mortgage Association · filed 2014-03-19(a)(1)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Parsons was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires an appellant to use the discretionary-appeal procedure when appealing a superior-court order arising from a de novo appeal of a magistrate-court decision.

Stephens v. Citimortgage, Inc. · filed 2014-03-20(a)(1)

First, when a superior court order involves a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, an appellant is required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a discretionary appeal for an appeal from a superior-court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision.

Harris v. Robbie Tucker · filed 2014-04-04(a)(1)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Harris was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures, pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1).

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a discretionary appeal when a party seeks review of a superior-court judgment entered on a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision.

Owens v. U.S. Bank National Association · filed 2014-04-17(a)(1)

Because the order at issue concerns a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Owens was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures.

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a discretionary appeal when a superior-court order disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

McKinnis v. Golden Alliance Management · filed 2014-06-19(a)(1)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, McKinnis and Tsegai were required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Section 5-6-35 (a) (1) requires a discretionary appeal when a superior court decides a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

Lynch v. Terry E. Parkman Dmd Pc · filed 2014-06-25(a)(1)

Because the superior court’s order disposed of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Lynch was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). His failure to follow this procedure deprives us of jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires discretionary-appeal procedures for an appeal to the superior court from a magistrate-court decision that is decided de novo.

Cazeau v. Ih2 Property Georgia, L.P. · filed 2014-06-25(a)(1)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, the Cazeaus were required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires a party seeking review of a state-court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision to use the discretionary-appeal procedures.

Alejos v. Rollizo · filed 2014-07-31(a)(11)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Alejos was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11). This is true even though the state court considered matters which were not considered by the magistrate court. See Southtowne Hyundai-Isuzu-Suzuki v. Hopper, 216 Ga. App. 214 (453 SE2d 756) (1995); see also Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874, 875 (581 SE2d 333) (2003) (addressing OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1), a similar provision concerning superior court decisions on appeals from magistrate courts).

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires an appellant seeking review of a superior court order on a de novo appeal from a magistrate court ruling to use the discretionary appeal procedure.

Middlebrooks v. Floyd · filed 2014-07-31(a)(1)

When a superior court order involves a de novo appeal from a magistrate court ruling, an appellant must follow the discretionary appeal procedure to obtain review before this Court.

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires a discretionary appeal from an order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

Mazyck v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank Assoc. · filed 2014-09-10(a)(11)

Because the order to be appealed disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Mazyck was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mortgage Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a discretionary appeal from a superior-court order resolving a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision.

Siewert v. Nelson · filed 2014-09-10(a)(1)

Because the superior court’s order disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Siewert was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a discretionary appeal when a superior-court order disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

Webley v. Everbank · filed 2014-09-10(a)(1)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Webley was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a party appealing an order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision to use discretionary appeal procedures.

Dunn v. Federal National Mortgage Association · filed 2014-09-10(a)(1)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Dunn was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires a discretionary appeal when the order being appealed disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

Pyne v. Thr Georgia LLC D/B/A Riverstone Single Family Home Division · filed 2014-09-10(a)(11)

Because the order to be appealed disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Pyne was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures.

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a discretionary appeal when a superior-court order reviews a magistrate-court decision de novo.

Lorinda T. Walker v. Federal National Mortgage Association · filed 2014-09-11(a)(1)

Because the order at issue concerns a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Walker was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a discretionary appeal when the superior court rules on a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

Isaola v. Habitat for Humanity of Dalton-Whitfield & Murray, Inc. · filed 2014-09-29(a)(1)

Because the superior court’s order disposed of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Isaola was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires a discretionary appeal to obtain review of a state-court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision.

Michaelell Z. Darling v. Mjd Management Group · filed 2014-10-29(a)(11)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Darling was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review before this Court.

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires a discretionary appeal to obtain review of an order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

Haider v. Hamilton · filed 2014-10-29(a)(11)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Haider was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mortgage Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995).

Subsection (a)(11) requires a party seeking appellate review of a superior-court judgment entered after a de novo appeal from magistrate court in a dispossessory action to follow discretionary-appeal procedures.

Burns v. Federal National Mortgage Association · filed 2014-10-29(a)(11)

Because the case reached the superior court by virtue of a de novo appeal from magistrate court, Burns was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to seek appellate review in this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mortgage Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a party appealing a superior-court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court ruling to use the discretionary-appeal procedures.

Shouse v. Sledge · filed 2014-11-07(a)(1)

First, because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court ruling, Shouse was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal.

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a party appealing an order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision to use the discretionary appeal procedures.

Youngblood v. the Bank of New York Mellon Trust N. A. · filed 2014-11-19(a)(1)

First, because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Youngblood was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal.

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a discretionary appeal from an order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

Denequia Smith v. the American Home Real Estate Pm · filed 2014-12-25(a)(1)

First, because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Smith was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). Her failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal.

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a discretionary appeal when a superior-court order disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision.

Williams v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company · filed 2015-02-05(a)(1)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Williams was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); Dean’s Catering v. Strum & Associates, 231 Ga. App. 202 (498 SE2d 786) (1998); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires a party seeking review of an order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision to use discretionary-appeal procedures.

Torin Pope v. US Bank National Association · filed 2015-02-11(a)(11)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Pope was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mortgage Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a discretionary appeal for an appeal to superior court from a de novo appeal of a magistrate court decision.

Daniels v. Key Property Services · filed 2015-02-18(a)(1)

First, because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Daniels was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal.

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires a party seeking review of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision to use the discretionary-appeal procedures.

Evans v. Ih4 Property Georgia L. P. · filed 2015-02-18(a)(11)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Evans was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mortgage Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). Evans’s failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires a party seeking review of a state-court de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision to use the discretionary-appeal procedure.

Broughton v. Federal National Mortgage Association · filed 2015-03-05(a)(11)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, the Broughtons were required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mortgage Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). Their failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Subsection (a)(11) requires a discretionary appeal to obtain review of a superior-court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision.

Adams Jr. v. Bank of America · filed 2015-03-09(a)(11)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Adams was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mortgage Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires discretionary-appeal procedures for review of an order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision.

Harpo v. Mordena Bolt · filed 2015-08-10(a)(11)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Harpo was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mtg. Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). Because Harpo did not follow the proper procedure for requesting appellate review in this case, we lack jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Section 5-6-35 requires an application for discretionary appeal in damages actions where the judgment is $10,000.00 or less and in appeals from orders disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

Pollock v. Williams-Wade · filed 2015-08-10(a)(6) and (a)(11)

First, OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6) requires the filing of an application for discretionary appeal “in all actions for damages in which the judgment is $10,000.00 or less.” ... Second, because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11) also required Pollock to follow the discretionary appeal procedures.

Subsection (a)(11) requires a party seeking review of a state-court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision to use the discretionary-appeal procedures.

Bell v. Res-Ga Kap, LLC · filed 2015-09-21(a)(11)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Bell was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mortgage Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires a party seeking review of a superior-court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision to follow the discretionary-appeal procedures.

Seckinger v. Bisun Properties, LLC · filed 2016-01-11(a)(11)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Seckinger was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mtg. Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a discretionary appeal to obtain review of a superior-court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision.

The Casher Group, Inc. v. Diaz Investments, Inc. · filed 2016-01-25(a)(1)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, The Casher Group was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). The failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal.

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a discretionary appeal to review a superior court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

Rowe v. Christiana Trust · filed 2016-01-25(a)(1)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Rowe was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a party appealing an order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision to follow discretionary-appeal procedures.

Brown v. Moore · filed 2016-01-26(a)(1)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Brown was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal.

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires a party seeking review of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision to use discretionary-appeal procedures.

Goodgame v. Federal National Mortgage Association · filed 2016-02-24(a)(11)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Goodgame was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mortgage Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires a party seeking review of a state-court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision to use the discretionary appeal procedures.

Yi v. Sang S. Park · filed 2016-03-11(a)(11)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Yi was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mortgage Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires an appellant to use the discretionary-appeal procedure when appealing a superior-court order involving a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

Howell v. Beauly, LLC. · filed 2016-04-04(a)(1)

When a superior court order involves a de novo appeal from a magistrate court’s decision, an appellant is required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Section 5-6-35 (a)(1) requires a discretionary appeal when a superior court order resolves a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

Davis v. Federal National Mortgage Association · filed 2016-05-11(a)(1)

Because the superior court’s order disposed of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Davis was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). Davis’s failure to follow this procedure deprives us of jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Section 5-6-35 (a)(11) requires a party seeking review of an order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision to use the discretionary appeal procedures.

GINGER HALL D/B/A KIDS EXPRESS v. JIMMY HINSON · filed 2016-05-11(a)(11)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Hall was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mortgage Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82, 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). The failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal.

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires a party seeking review of a state-court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision to use the discretionary-appeal procedures.

Ulery v. Veranda Village Apartments · filed 2016-05-19(a)(11)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Ulery was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mortgage Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). Her failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a discretionary appeal when the order disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

Dykes v. Watts · filed 2016-06-16(a)(1)

We lack jurisdiction. Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Dykes was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Subsection (a)(1) requires an appellant in a superior-court de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision to use the discretionary-appeal procedure.

Bendolph v. Westkey Enterprises, LLC · filed 2016-06-16(a)(1)

When a superior court order involves a de novo appeal from a magistrate court’s decision, an appellant is required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires an appeal from a state-court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision to be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review.

Smith v. Jones · filed 2016-08-10(a)(11)

An appeal from a state court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); see Strachan v. Meritor Mtg. Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires an application for discretionary appeal when the superior court reviews a lower-court decision by a de novo proceeding.

Smith v. Hughes · filed 2016-12-07(a)(1)

“[A]ppeals from decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of lower courts by certiorari or de novo proceedings shall be by application for discretionary appeal.” Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874, 875 (581 SE2d 333) (2003) (punctuation omitted); see also OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1). Because Smith did not follow the proper procedure for requesting appellate review in this case, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Subsection (a)(11) requires a party seeking review of an order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision to use discretionary-appeal procedures.

Wayne Andrew Family Harrigan Jr. v. American Homes 4 Rent Properties Eight, LLC Isaoa · filed 2017-01-20(a)(11)

First, because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Harrigan and Pou were required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mortgage Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). Their failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal.

Section 5-6-35 (a)(1) requires a discretionary application to appeal a superior court order resolving a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

Brown v. Davis · filed 2017-03-30(a)(1)

When a superior court order involves a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, an appellant is required to follow the discretionary application procedure in order to appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a discretionary appeal when challenging an order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

Cato v. Agape Property Managment , Inc. · filed 2017-02-22(a)(1)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Cato was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures.

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a party appealing a superior court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision to use the discretionary appeal procedure.

Torri Hornsby Griffin v. Najarian Holdings, LLC · filed 2017-07-04(a)(1)

Because the superior court’s order disposed of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Griffin was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). Griffin’s failure to follow this procedure deprives us of jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Subsection (a)(11) requires an appeal from a state-court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision to be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review.

Rayan v. Bridge Property Management, L.C. as Agent for the Owner of the Falls at Gwinnett Place Apartment Com · filed 2017-07-28(a)(11)

An appeal from a state court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review.

Section 5-6-35 (a)(1) requires a party appealing to superior court from a magistrate court decision in a de novo appeal to use the discretionary appeal procedure.

Gistarb v. Jeff 1 LLC · filed 2017-07-28(a)(1)

Because the superior court’s order disposed of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Gistarb was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires a discretionary appeal application when seeking review of a superior court order in a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

Robinson v. Unifund Ccr Partners · filed 2017-08-01(a)(11)

Here, because the state court’s order involved the de novo appeal of a magistrate court decision, Robinson was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain this Court’s review.

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a discretionary appeal when appealing to the Court of Appeals from a superior-court decision on a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision.

Wright v. Mendoza-Hernandez · filed 2017-08-25(a)(1)

Because the superior court’s order disposed of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Wright was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). Wright’s failure to follow that procedure deprives us of jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a party appealing a superior-court judgment disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision to follow discretionary-appeal procedures.

Harris v. Robbie Tucker · filed 2017-09-15(a)(1)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Harris was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires an appellant to use the discretionary-application procedure when appealing a superior-court order involving a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision.

Cockfield v. Oshinowo · filed 2018-02-07(a)(1)

When a superior court order involves a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, an appellant is required to follow the discretionary application procedure in order to appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Subsection (a)(11) requires an appellant to use the discretionary appeal procedure when appealing a state court ruling involving a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

Saripalli v. Vendor Resource Management · filed 2018-08-13(a)(11)

When a state court ruling involves a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, an appellant is required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mtg. Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995).

Subsection (a)(1) requires use of the discretionary appeal procedure for a superior court order involving a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

Sutton v. Firebird Sfe I, LLC · filed 2018-08-27(a)(1)

When a superior court order involves a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, an appellant is required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires a discretionary appeal to obtain review of a de novo state-court ruling on appeal from a magistrate-court decision.

Brooker v. Shipman Family Investments · filed 2018-09-07(a)(11)

The state court’s decision is not subject to direct appeal. Because the order at issue is a de novo ruling on appeal from a magistrate court decision, Brooker was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mtg. Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a discretionary-appeal application when litigation begins in magistrate court and reaches superior court through a de novo appeal, but does not apply to a transfer from magistrate court.

Jones-Smith v. Crockett · filed 2018-09-26(a)(1)

Under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1), an application for discretionary appeal is required where litigation begins in magistrate court and reaches the superior court by means of a de novo appeal. By its terms, this provision only applies where the superior court exercises de novo review of the magistrate court’s decision. Because this case was transferred from magistrate court, OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1) does not apply.

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires a discretionary appeal application to obtain review of an order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

Evans v. Joann Wright · filed 2018-10-17(a)(11)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Evans was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mtg. Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). Her failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal.

Subsection (a)(11) requires a party seeking review of a state-court judgment entered on a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision to use discretionary appeal procedures.

Lewis v. Atlanta Communities Real Estate Brokerage · filed 2019-01-10(a)(11)

Here, because the state court’s order involved the de novo appeal of a magistrate court decision, Defendant was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain this Court’s review. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mtg. Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82, 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires a party seeking review of an order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision to use the discretionary-appeal procedure.

Alarcon v. Najarian Capital, LLC · filed 2019-01-15(a)(11)

As we previously explained in our November 8, 2018 dismissal order, because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Alarcon was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mtg. Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82, 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). Her failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal.

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires a discretionary appeal from a state-court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

Twyman v. E.R. Snell Contracting, Inc. · filed 2019-01-16(a)(11)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Twyman was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mtg. Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82, 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires a discretionary appeal to obtain review of a state court's de novo ruling on appeal from a magistrate court decision.

Thomas v. Prestige Financial Services, Inc. · filed 2019-02-11(a)(11)

Because the state court’s order is a de novo ruling on appeal from a magistrate court decision, Thomas was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure to obtain review in this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mortgage Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82, 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995).

Subsection (a)(11) requires a party seeking review of an order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision to use discretionary-appeal procedures.

Green v. Barron · filed 2015-07-23(a)(11)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Green was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mtg. Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). Her failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a party appealing to the superior court from a magistrate-court decision in a dispossessory proceeding to use the discretionary-appeal procedure for a further appeal to the Court of Appeals.

Cockfield v. Oshinowo · filed 2017-11-14(a)(1)

Because the superior court’s order disposed of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Cockfield was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). His failure to follow this procedure deprives us of jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires an appeal from a state-court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision to be initiated by an application for discretionary review.

Starling Gillings v. Salex · filed 2018-07-19(a)(11)

An appeal from a state court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); see Strachan v. Meritor Mtg. Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995).

Subsection (a)(11) requires an appeal from a state court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision to be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review.

YANCEY v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION A/K/A FANNIE MAE · filed 2019-02-26(a)(11)

An appeal from a state court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mtg. Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82, 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires an appeal from a state court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision to be initiated by an application for discretionary review, and failure to follow that procedure is grounds for dismissal.

Pittman v. Envision Property Management · filed 2019-05-07(a)(11)

First, an appeal from a state court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review, and the failure to follow our discretionary application procedure is grounds for dismissal.

Section 5-6-35 (a) (1) and (11) requires a party seeking review of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision to follow discretionary appeal procedures.

James v. American Homes 4 Rent Properties Eight, LLC Isaoa · filed 2019-07-16(a)(1) and (11)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, James was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1) and (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mtg. Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). Her failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a discretionary appeal when an order disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

1st Childcare & Preschool, LLC v. Tate · filed 2019-07-29(a)(1)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, the parties were required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995).

Section 5-6-35 (a) (11) requires a party appealing a de novo state-court decision from a magistrate-court case to use discretionary-appeal procedures.

Romans v. Jackie Long · filed 2019-10-25(a)(11)

First, the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision. Thus, Romans was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mtg. Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82, 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995).

Section 5-6-35 requires an application for discretionary review to initiate an appeal from a state court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

Guthrie v. Trio Leasing, LLC · filed 2019-11-12(a)(11), (b)

An appeal from a state court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11), (b); Strachan v. Meritor Mtg. Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). Pretermitting whether an application for discretionary review also was required here under § 5-6-35 (a) (3) (under which an appeal from an order involving a dispossessory warrant in which the only issue to be resolved is rent due and the amount is less than $2,500), Guthrie’s failure to file an application deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Strachan, 216 Ga. App. at 82.

Section 5-6-35 requires a discretionary appeal when the superior court reviews a magistrate-court decision through a de novo proceeding, even when the appealed judgment grants partial summary judgment.

Sae Shin v. Fogarty · filed 2021-02-04(a)(1), (b)

Thus, as the underlying subject matter in this appeal was a de novo appeal from the magistrate court, this appeal was subject to the procedures in OCGA § 5-6-35. ... Additionally, OCGA § 5-6-35 applies even though the judgment [the Tenants seek] to appeal was the grant of partial summary judgment.

A superior-court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision must be reviewed through the discretionary-appeal procedure.

Medows v. Medows · filed 2021-02-16(a)(1)

Because the superior court’s order disposed of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Medows was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure to obtain review of the superior court’s order.

A superior-court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision must be reviewed through the discretionary-appeal procedure.

McKethan v. Gsls Ga, LLC · filed 2021-03-23(a)(1)

Because the superior court’s order disposed of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, McKethan was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure to obtain review of the superior court’s order.

An appeal from a state-court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision must be initiated by discretionary application under section 5-6-35(a)(11) and (b).

STROUD v. CROSSINGS AT EAGLES LANDING, LLC D/B/A CROSSINGS AT EAGLES LANDING, LLC · filed 2021-04-30(a)(11), (b)

An appeal from a state court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary appeal.

An appeal from a superior-court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision must be initiated by discretionary application.

KACEVIC v. NAJARIAN CAPITAL, LLC · filed 2021-06-02(a)(11), (b)

An appeal from a superior court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary appeal.

Section 5-6-35(a)(1) requires a discretionary appeal when a superior court order disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision.

JONES v. BAHAY PROPERTY, LLC · filed 2021-11-08(a)(1)

Because the superior court’s order disposed of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Jones was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure.

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires a party seeking review of an order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision to use the discretionary-appeal procedure.

Poole v. Ring · filed 2022-01-10(a)(11)

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, Poole was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures to obtain review before this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mortgage Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82, 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995).

Section 5-6-35 requires an application for discretionary appeal to initiate an appeal from a superior-court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision.

Rodgers v. Ace Homes, LLC · filed 2022-01-26(a)(11), (b)

An appeal from a superior court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary appeal. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11), (b); Strachan v. Meritor Mtg. Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82, 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995).

Section 5-6-35(a)(11) requires an appeal from a superior-court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate-court decision to be initiated by an application for discretionary appeal.

WILLIAMS v. ACE HOMES, LLC · filed 2022-02-01(a)(11), (b)

An appeal from a superior court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary appeal.