Statute Annotations › South Carolina › S.C. Code Ann. § 12-36-910

S.C. Code Ann. § 12-36-910

South Carolina sales and use tax: the cases that interpreted this section

Jurisdiction
South Carolina
Case notes
6
Cited in passing
6
Citing cases indexed
7
Case dates
1997–2024
Screened through
2024-06-26
Courts' treatment: live
No reviewed case has held this section invalid, preempted, superseded or repealed.
This reflects what the reviewed cases said, not legislative action: a later amendment or repeal by the legislature would not appear here unless a reviewed case discussed it.

12 citing cases reviewed: 6 interpreted the section (annotated below), 6 cited it only in passing. Cases filed after 2024-06-26 may not have been reviewed yet.

Have a situation under S.C. Code Ann. § 12-36-910?

These notes show how courts have ruled. Ask about your specific facts and see which of these rulings apply, with citations you can check.

Sales tax on gross proceeds of retail sales

Section 12-36-910(A) imposes a sales tax on all persons engaged in the business of selling tangible personal property at retail.

Rent-A-Center E., Inc. v. S.C. Dep't of Revenue · filed 2019-01-16(A)

Looking to the plain and ordinary meaning of the language in section 12-36-910(A), we believe the statute imposes a tax on all persons engaged in the business of selling tangible personal property at retail.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Section 12-36-910(A) imposes a five-percent sales tax on the gross proceeds of every person engaged in selling tangible personal property at retail, including membership fees that directly result from those sales.

Books-A-Million v. SCDOR · filed 2020-04-01(A)

After reviewing the record, we find the decision of the ALC was supported by substantial evidence. South Carolina case law provides that gross proceeds of sales includes all value that comes from or is a direct result of the sale of tangible personal property. The Membership Fee is a direct result of the sale of tangible personal property because BAM would not be able to sell Club Memberships but for BAM's sale of tangible personal property. Thus, the ALC did not err in finding the amounts collected by BAM for Club Memberships are subject to sales tax.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Section 12-36-910(A) imposes sales tax on gross proceeds from retail sales of tangible personal property, including related membership fees whose value derives from taxable sales.

Books-A-Million, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Revenue · filed 2022-09-14(A)

In South Carolina, individuals who are engaged in the sale of tangible personal property must pay five percent of the gross proceeds of their sales in taxes. S.C. Code Ann. § 12-36-910(A) (2014). ... The Millionaire's Club memberships possess value based solely on the discounts they afford on taxable sales. Therefore, Books-A-Million's sales of Millionaire's Club memberships are subject to sales tax in South Carolina.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Section 12-36-910(A) imposes sales tax on the gross proceeds of retail sales of tangible personal property by businesses selling such property in South Carolina.

Lowe's Home Centers, LLC v. SCDOR · filed 2024-06-12(A)

South Carolina imposes a sales tax on "the gross proceeds of sales" by those "engaged or continuing within this State in the business of selling tangible personal property[1] at retail." S.C. Code Ann. § 12-36-910(A) (2014). ... For an installation sales contract, a customer purchases the necessary materials—tangible personal property—from Lowe's as a separate item delineated in the contract; evidence supports the ALC's finding that such a purchase involves a retail sale. For this reason, and because the sale of materials to the contracting customer is the last sale in the chain of transactions, the ALC did not err in upholding SCDOR's determination that the sale of the materials to be installed is a retail sale transaction subject to South Carolina's sales tax.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Section 12-36-910(A) imposes a five-percent sales tax on gross proceeds from retail sales of tangible personal property, including property withdrawn from inventory when no separate charge is made.

Greystone Catering Company, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Revenue & Taxation · filed 1997-04-21(A)

This section provides: (A) A sales tax, equal to five percent of the gross proceeds of sales, is imposed upon every person engaged or continuing within this State in the business of selling tangible personal property at retail. ... Here, Greystone does not bill separately for the food. Therefore, the last transaction occurred when the food and drink items were withdrawn from inventory. ... However, the statutes in this case clearly require a five per cent sales tax on all retail tangible personal property and a seven per cent accommodations tax on all room charges. Additional guest charges, including room service and amenities, are exempt from the accommodations tax, but not the sales tax. ... A finding that withdrawals from inventory are not taxable under these circumstances would be contrary to the legislature’s intent.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Section 12-36-910 makes sales tax depend on the sale of the item, not on whether the buyer later fulfills the installment contract.

South Carolina Department of Revenue v. Anonymous Co. A · filed 2009-06-01

We note that whether or not sales tax is owed depends on the sale of an item rather than the fulfillment of the installment contract. See S.C.Code Ann. § 12-36-910 (2008).
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
6 more cases cited this section only in passing

These cases mention the section without interpreting it (a string cite, a footnote, background). Listed so you can see the full citation record, not just the annotated rulings.

Jack's Custom Cycles v. SCDOR, section 12-36-910(A) is cited only in a footnote to identify the State's sales-tax rate. The court did not interpret or decide anything about that statute; its holding concerned the separate partial-exemption statute, § 12-36-2110(A). opinion →
Jack's Custom Cycles v. SCDOR, the court cited § 12-36-910(A) only in a footnote to identify the statewide sales tax rate; it did not interpret or apply that statute. The decision instead concerned the partial exemption in § 12-36-2110(A). opinion →
Orthofix v. SCDOR, the court mentioned § 12-36-910(A) only in describing the general sales-tax background. Its holding concerned the constitutionality and severability of the DME exemption in § 12-36-2120(74), not the meaning or application of § 12-36-910(A). opinion →
Ed Robinson Laundry & Dry Cleaning, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Revenue, the statute is cited only to identify the Sales and Use Tax Act challenged by Robinson. The court's equal-protection analysis discusses the Act generally and an exemption in § 12-36-2120, but does not construe or otherwise decide what § 12-36-910 means, requires, or covers. opinion →
Home Medical Systems, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Revenue, the court cited § 12-36-910(A) only to state the general five-percent retail sales tax rate. Its actual analysis and holding concerned the separate sales-tax exemption in § 12-36-2120(28)(a), not the meaning or application of § 12-36-910. opinion →
Lexington County Health Services District v. South Carolina Department of Revenue, the court cited § 12-36-910(A) only to support its broader rejection of an absurdity argument concerning the separate health-services-district exemption in § 44-7-2120. It did not decide the meaning, scope, or application of § 12-36-910 itself. opinion →

Which of these rulings fit your facts?

Describe your situation under S.C. Code Ann. § 12-36-910. Ezel checks it against the cases on this page and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace