28 U.S.C. § 157

Classification as a core proceeding under § 157(b) does not eliminate a litigant’s right to a jury trial.

Data Compass Corp. v. Datafast, Inc. (In Re Data Compass Corp.) · filed 1988-10-25(b)

In so holding, this Court is in agreement with those who are persuaded that the classification of a matter as a core proceeding does not eliminate a litigant’s constitutional right to a jury trial.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings concerning the dischargeability of a debt as core proceedings in which the bankruptcy court may enter a final determination.

Suerth v. Mapson (In Re Mapson) · filed 1988-10-26(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) as a matter relating to the dischargeability of a debt, and thus this court will enter a final determination on the pending motions reviewable only by appeal to the district court.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats an objection to a claimed exemption as a core proceeding in which the bankruptcy court may enter final judgment.

In Re Williams · filed 1988-10-28(b)(2)(B)

The proceeding before the Court is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B). The Court has jurisdiction to enter a final judgment in the case.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a motion to avoid a judgment lien impairing a debtor’s exemption as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Jamison v. St. Elizabeth Medical Center (In Re Jamison) · filed 1988-10-28(b)(2)(A)

This matter is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157 treats an objection to allowance of a claim as a core proceeding that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

In Re Smith · filed 1988-10-31(b)(2)(B)

This contested matter is a core proceeding which the Court may hear and determine in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) and (2)(B).

Section 157(b) permits a bankruptcy court to enter a final judgment on a claim for violation of the automatic stay because the claim arises under the Bankruptcy Code.

Periera v. Chapman · filed 1988-11-01(b)

Under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b), the bankruptcy court may hear and determine “all core proceedings arising under title 11.” ... The substantive right at issue in this case, the automatic stay provision of 11 U.S.C. § 362(a), was created by the Bankruptcy Code and would not exist outside of that statutory scheme. Thus, the bankruptcy court may issue a final judgment in the plaintiff’s section 362(h) action.

A motion for payment of administrative expenses is a core matter under § 157(b)(2)(A).

In Re William A. Smith Const. Co., Inc. · filed 1988-11-02(b)(2)(A)

This matter before the Court is a motion of Richard Schreiber (Schreiber) for payment of administrative expenses. ... This is a core matter under provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), with jurisdiction further conferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and General Order No. 84 of this District.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine dischargeability of a debt as a core proceeding that the bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

In Re Lord · filed 1988-11-03(b)(2)(I)

This is a "core proceeding" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) and (K), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2) treats a proceeding as core when its disputed issue turns on interpreting and applying a specific provision of Title 11.

T.G. Motors, Inc. of Houston v. C.M. Turtur Investments, Inc. (In Re C.M. Turtur Investments, Inc.) · filed 1988-11-07(b)(2)

Since the disputed issue turns on the interpretation and application of a specific provision of Title 11, the proceeding is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2)(E) classifies certain proceedings concerning estate property as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Pongetti v. Deposit Guaranty National Bank (In Re Strickland) · filed 1988-11-08(b)(2)(E)

This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and determine a motion to convert a Chapter 11 case to Chapter 12 as a core proceeding.

In re Ridgely · filed 1988-11-08(b)(2)(A)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats motions to change venue as core matters concerning the administration of the estate.

In Re Greenhaven Associates, Ltd. · filed 1988-11-09(b)(2)(A)

These motions to change venue constitute core matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(G) treats a motion for relief from the automatic stay as a core proceeding within the bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction.

In Re Trawler Eagle, Inc. · filed 1988-11-10(b)(2)(G)

8.This is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G), over which this Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1).

Section 157(b)(2) does not treat a state eminent domain proceeding begun before bankruptcy as a core proceeding merely because its compensation award will affect the bankruptcy estate.

Rico v. Acquisition of 24.4142 Cuerdas of Land & the Buildings (In Re Interamericas Turnkey Development Co.) · filed 1988-11-21(b)(2)

We cannot find that the definition of a core proceeding reaches far enough to encompass a State eminent domain proceeding instigated against the Hotel prior to the Hotel’s filing for bankruptcy.

Section 157(b)(2) treats a dispute over a debtor’s claimed exemption in withheld wages as a core proceeding.

Haynes v. First United Bank of Mississippi (In re Haynes) · filed 1988-11-25(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B), (E), and (0).

Section 157(b)(2) treats a motion in a debt dischargeability proceeding as a core proceeding.

Raitano v. Nunez (In Re Nunez) · filed 1988-11-28(b)(2)(I)

The motion constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (I), (0).

Section 157(b)(2)(N) treats a proceeding to approve a debtor’s sale of personal property as core when its resolution turns on interpreting and applying Title 11.

In Re San Jacinto Glass Industries, Inc. · filed 1988-12-07(b)(2)(N)

Since the resolution of the issues before me turns on the interpretation and application of a specific provision of Title 11, the proceeding is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(N).

Section 157(b)(2) treats an objection to claimed exemptions as a core bankruptcy matter.

In Re Brothers · filed 1988-12-08(b)(2)(A), (B) and (K)

This is a core matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B) and (K).

Section 157(b)(2) permits a bankruptcy court to determine a proceeding involving the allocation of estate property as a core proceeding.

TM Carlton House Partners v. Career Planners, Inc. (In Re TM Carlton House Partners, Ltd.) · filed 1988-12-09(b)(2)

Moreover, we are concerned with allocation of property of the estate, which we believe arguably implicates §§ 157(b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(B), (b)(2)(E), and (b)(2)(0). We shall therefore proceed to determine this proceeding, applying the legal principles which we have formulated heretofore to the Findings of Fact appearing earlier in this Opinion.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a motion to convert a Chapter 11 case as a core proceeding.

In Re Silverstein · filed 1988-12-12(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(A), (K) and (M) classifies a dispute over a creditor’s asserted interest in a debtor’s rents as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Northwestern National Life Insurance v. Metro Square (In Re Metro Square) · filed 1988-12-13(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (K) and (M).

Section 157(b)(2)(J) treats this discharge dispute as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Oswald v. Gonsor (In Re Gonsor) · filed 1988-12-14(b)(2)(J)

This matter constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J).

Section 157(b)(2)(K) treats a dispute over the priority of liens as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Westamerica Bank, N.A. v. Department of Corrections (In Re Commercial Reprographics, Inc.) · filed 1988-12-28(b)(2)(K)

The dispute between Konica and WestAmerica Bank is also a core proceeding to determine the priority of liens. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(K).

Section 157(b)(2)(K) treats a motion to avoid a lien under 11 U.S.C. § 522(f) as a core proceeding.

Matter of Reid · filed 1988-12-30(b)(2)(K)

The matter at hand concerns a motion to avoid lien under 11 U.S.C. § 522(f) and as such is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(K).

Section 157(b)(2) treats a proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a debt as a core proceeding.

Berry v. McLemore (In Re McLemore) · filed 1988-12-30(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)®.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) and (H) treat exemption objections and fraudulent transfer proceedings as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Eide v. Rodemeyer (In re Rodemeyer) · filed 1989-01-04(b)(2)(B), (H)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B), (H).

Section 157 treats an action to collect post-petition accounts receivable as a core proceeding concerning administration of the estate.

Associated Grocers of Colorado, Inc. v. Tempora Corp. (In Re Associated Grocers of Colorado, Inc.) · filed 1989-01-06(b)(2)(A)

Therefore, this Court finds that the Plaintiffs First Claim for Relief of $21,-469.91 in post-petition accounts receivable is a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(M) treats orders approving a debtor’s use or lease of property as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may determine.

Adams v. Philadelphia Housing Authority (In Re Adams) · filed 1989-01-09(b)(2)(M)

We believe that 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(M), rendering “orders approving the use or lease of property” by the debtor a core proceeding is also pertinent. We therefore conclude that, irrespective of the parties’ failure to properly present the issue, these proceedings are indeed “core proceedings” which we can and will determine.

Section 157 treats a proceeding over a covenant not to compete after rejection of a franchise agreement as a core proceeding.

Silk Plants, Etc. Franchise Systems, Inc. v. Register (In Re Register) · filed 1989-01-11

This is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(c).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats determinations of debt dischargeability as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Hoskins v. Yanks (In Re Yanks) · filed 1989-01-12(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding in which the Court is authorized to hear and determine all matters relating to this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157 treats proceedings to enforce the automatic stay or recover damages for its violation as core proceedings.

Schewe v. Fairview Estates (In Re Schewe) · filed 1989-01-12(b)(1) and (b)(2)

A proceeding to enforce the stay or to recover damages from the violation thereof is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(1) and (2).

Section 157 treats a proceeding to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as a core proceeding.

First National Bank of Toms River, N.J. v. Wellen (In re Wellen) · filed 1989-01-12

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 157.

Section 157(b)(2) treats a proceeding concerning estate administration and affecting the debtor-creditor relationship as a core proceeding.

In Re Adams · filed 1989-01-20(b)(2)

Such a case falls squarely within 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (0) since it concerns the administration of the debtor’s estate and affects the debtor-creditor relationship.

Section 157(b)(2) treats a dispute over a postpetition contract to sell virtually all of a debtor’s assets for a planned reorganization as a core proceeding.

Bass v. Millican (In Re Telamarketing Communications) · filed 1989-01-23(b)(2)(A), (O)

Here, as in Standard Metals, the contract in question was not only post-petition, it concerned all, or virtually all, of the assets of the Debtor — a contract other than in the ordinary course of business of the Debtor, as that expression is used in 11 U.S.C. § 363(b)(1). ... ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the within matter is a “core” proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(A) and (0).

Section 157(b)(2) classifies an adversary proceeding alleging preferential and postpetition transfers as a core proceeding.

Herzog v. SunarHauserman (In Re Network 90º, Inc.) · filed 1989-01-23(b)(2)

This Adversary Complaint alleges preferential and postpetition transfers. It therefore constitutes a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E), § 157(b)(2)(F) and § 157(b)(2)(0).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as core proceedings.

Bowyers True Value Hardware, Inc. v. Beverly (In re Beverly) · filed 1989-01-23(b)(2)(I)

This action is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 157(b)(2)(I) and seeks an exception to discharge pursuant to the provisions of 11 U.S.C. Sec. 523(a)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(G) covers a request for relief from the automatic stay as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Goldome Realty Credit Corp. v. McCrary (In re McCrary) · filed 1989-01-24(b)(2)(G)

That this is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G); and ... IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any order directed to the Debtor’s employer which required the withholding of monies to be paid to the Chapter 13 Trustee, be and hereby is set aside; and that any such employer is relieved of any further responsibility to withhold and pay over such sums.

Section 157 permits a bankruptcy judge to hear and determine a trustee’s objection to a claim as a core proceeding.

In Re All-American Auxiliary Ass'n · filed 1989-01-25(b)(2)(B)

This matter is a core proceeding which the Court may hear and determine in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) and (2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2)(K) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and determine a lien-priority dispute as a core proceeding.

In Re Gateway Center Building Investors, Ltd. · filed 1989-01-25(b)(2)(K)

This is a “core proceeding” which the Court may hear and determine pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(K).

Section 157(b)(2)(G) classifies motions for relief from the automatic stay as core proceedings.

In re Rodemeyer · filed 1989-01-25(b)(2)(G)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G).

Section 157(b) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and determine an objection to a claim as a core proceeding.

In Re Shaner · filed 1989-01-26(b)(2)(B)

This is a core proceeding which the Court is empowered to hear and determine in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) and (2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats an objection to a claim of exemption as a core proceeding in which a bankruptcy judge may enter a final order.

In re Garland · filed 1989-01-26(b)(2)(B)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) in which this bankruptcy judge may enter a final order.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats determination of a debtor’s tax liability on an IRS claim as a core proceeding.

In Re Horton · filed 1989-01-31(b)(2)(B)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats determination of a debtor’s tax liability as a core proceeding.

In Re Hunt · filed 1989-02-01(b)(2)(B)

The determination of a debtor’s tax liability constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) (Supp. IV 1986), and 11 U.S.C. § 505(a)(1) (1982).

Section 157 treats a proceeding seeking a declaration about the effect of the automatic stay on a foreclosure redemption period as a core proceeding.

United States v. Thom, Inc. (In Re Thom, Inc.) · filed 1989-02-01

This is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157.

Section 157(b)(2)(G) classifies a proceeding for relief from the automatic stay as a core proceeding.

Helbock v. Strause (In Re Strause) · filed 1989-02-08(b)(2)(G)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of a debt as core proceedings.

Industrial Financial Corp. v. Falk (In Re Falk) · filed 1989-02-08(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2) covers core bankruptcy proceedings, including actions involving preferences, fraudulent transfers, and the validity of liens.

Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Metro Communications, Inc. (In Re Metro Communications, Inc.) · filed 1989-02-10(b)(2)

This action constitutes a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (F), (H), (K), and (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats matters concerning administration of the bankruptcy estate as core proceedings.

McLean Industries, Inc. v. Medical Laboratory Automation, Inc. (In Re McLean Industries, Inc.) · filed 1989-02-14(b)(2)(A)

These assertions by MLA concerning the alleged failure to comply with Sections 363(b)(1) and 365(a) confirm that this ancillary proceeding is a core proceeding since the issues raised are "matters concerning the administration of the estate” as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b) treats a motion to modify a confirmed Chapter 12 plan as a core proceeding.

In Re Pearson · filed 1989-02-16(b)

This matter constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. Section 157(b).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies a complaint to determine dischargeability under 11 U.S.C. § 523 as a core proceeding.

Rude v. Whitehorn (In Re Whitehorn) · filed 1989-02-16(b)(2)(I)

Under the first prong of Judge Buchmeyer’s test, the Court holds the complaint filed under 11 U.S.C. § 523 is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats objections to claimed exemptions as core bankruptcy proceedings.

In Re Krantz · filed 1989-02-21(b)(2)(B)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2)(G) classifies a motion for relief from the automatic stay as a core proceeding.

In re Bult · filed 1989-02-21(b)(2)(G)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G).

Section 157(b)(2)(E) treats a trustee’s complaint for turnover as a core proceeding.

White v. Babo (In Re Babo) · filed 1989-02-28(b)(2)(E)

The trustee’s complaint for turnover is explicitly a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E).

Section 157(b) treats this adversary proceeding over dischargeability as a core proceeding.

Commercial Credit Plan v. Carter (In Re Carter) · filed 1989-02-28(b)

This matter is a “core” proceeding as envisioned by 28 U.S.C. § 157(b).

Section 157(b) treats a proceeding to determine dischargeability as a core matter.

Kidder v. Freeman (In Re Freeman) · filed 1989-02-28(b)

This is a “core” matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats the resolution of a Chapter 7 trustee’s fee application as a core proceeding.

In Re Orthopaedic Technology, Inc. · filed 1989-03-01(b)(2)(A)

The comprehensive review of the issues raised by this trustee’s fee application creates a matter of first impression in this district, the resolution of which is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a debtor’s motion to assume a lease as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

In Re B.K.B. Enterprises, Inc. · filed 1989-03-07(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies determinations of debt dischargeability as core bankruptcy matters.

Scott v. Hall (In Re Hall) · filed 1989-03-07(b)(2)(I)

This matter concerns the determination of the dischargeability of a debt owed by Defendant to Plaintiff and is, therefore, a core matter under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) makes an objection to a claim a core proceeding that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

In Re Taylor · filed 1989-03-08(b)(2)(B)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) which this Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2) treats a dispute over a debtor’s claimed exemptions as a core proceeding in which a bankruptcy judge may issue a final order.

In Re Leimbach · filed 1989-03-13(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) and (0) in which this bankruptcy judge may issue a final order.

Section 157(b) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and determine a motion to reopen a bankruptcy case as a core proceeding.

In Re Smart · filed 1989-03-14(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding which the Court may hear and determine. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) and (b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats an application to retain counsel for Chapter 11 debtors as a core proceeding.

In Re SIS Corp. · filed 1989-03-15(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding under provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), with jurisdiction further conferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and General Order No. 84 of this District.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies proceedings to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as core proceedings.

Gunter v. Morton (In Re Morton) · filed 1989-03-15(b)(2)(I)

The plaintiff filed a complaint seeking a determination that a $75,000.00 judgment debt in favor of the plaintiff is not dis-chargeable in bankruptcy under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). This is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats proceedings over the release of proceeds attributable to a debtor’s homestead exemption as core matters.

In Re Seyfert · filed 1989-03-17(b)(2)(B)

The Court further finds that these proceedings are core matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a motion to dismiss a Chapter 11 case as a core proceeding.

In Re Pine Village Economic Development · filed 1989-03-17(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157 treats an adversary proceeding involving post-filing conduct directly related to administering the debtor’s estate as a core proceeding.

Altenberg v. Frankford Trust Co. (In Re Railroad Dynamics, Inc.) · filed 1989-03-17(b)(2)(A)

We also believe that the adversary proceeding is core in nature, because it involves post-filing conduct of Frankford which relates directly to the administration of the Debtor’s estate.

Section 157(b)(3) allows a bankruptcy court to determine whether a proceeding will be treated as core.

Germain v. Hobart Corp. (In re New London Store Fixture Co.) · filed 1989-03-21(b)(3)

The Hospital, the trustee and Hobart appeared by counsel at a pretrial conference held on December 12, 1988, at which time, in light of the parties' agreement that the bankruptcy court would determine all issues, the court ruled, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(3), that the proceeding would be treated as a core proceeding.

An action for damages arising from an alleged automatic stay violation falls within the bankruptcy court’s core proceedings under § 157(b)(2)(A) or (G).

B. Cohen & Sons Caterers, Inc. v. New Plan Realty Trust (In Re B. Cohen & Sons Caterers, Inc.) · filed 1989-03-24(b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(G)

The instant proceeding is, essentially, an action to recover damages in light of a creditor’s alleged violation of the automatic stay imposed by the Debtor’s bankruptcy filing, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(h). Although not among the types of proceedings specifically enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2), such a proceeding would appear to clearly fall within the residual scope of 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(A) or (b)(2)(G). ... Neither party appears to dispute our power to hear and determine the matter. We shall therefore proceed to do so.

Section 157(b)(2) treats a motion to reopen a bankruptcy case as a core proceeding.

In Re Perez · filed 1989-03-24(b)(2)(A), (O)

This contested motion constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (0).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a motion to change the venue of a bankruptcy case as a core proceeding concerning administration of the estate.

In Re Oklahoma City Associates · filed 1989-03-24(b)(2)(A)

Since a motion for a change of venue of a bankruptcy case is a “matter concerning the administration of the estate" within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b), it is a “core" proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

A complaint to determine the dischargeability of a student loan is a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2)(I).

Coleman v. Higher Education Assistance Foundation (In Re Coleman) · filed 1989-03-27(b)(2)(I)

This matter concerns the Plaintiffs dis-chargeability complaint under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8)(B) and Bankruptcy Rule 7001(6) and as such is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157 treats proceedings to avoid post-petition transfers under Section 549 as core proceedings.

Brown v. Harris (In Re Auxano, Inc.) · filed 1989-03-28(b)(2)(E)

To ITT’s jurisdictional objection, the Court can and need only say that Section 549 proceedings are core proceedings.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings.

Perino v. Cohen (In Re Cohen) · filed 1989-03-31(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a proceeding concerning the administration of a bankruptcy estate as a core proceeding.

S.B.C. Investments, Ltd. v. Brooks · filed 1989-04-04(b)(2)(A)

The debtors’ post-petition “Management Agreement” with Payne submitted for the approval of the bankruptcy court is clearly a core proceeding because it involves matters concerning the administration of the estates under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) (1988).

Section 157(b)(2) treats an adversary proceeding to recover a preferential transfer as a core proceeding.

Moister v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. (In Re Busenlehner) · filed 1989-04-05(b)(2)

Plaintiff-Trustee filed the above-styled adversary complaint to recover an alleged preferential transfer pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 547. It is before the Court on Plaintiff-Trustee’s Motion for Summary Judgment. This matter constitutes a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2)(F) treats a preference action as a core proceeding that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Mann v. Missouri General Insurance Agency, Inc. (In Re St. Louis Globe Democrat, Inc.) · filed 1989-04-06(b)(2)(F)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(F), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2) covers a proceeding to remove a Chapter 7 trustee as a core proceeding.

In Re Vega · filed 1989-04-07(b)(2)

1. This is a core proceeding under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(0).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine whether a debt was discharged as core proceedings.

Gathwright v. United States (In Re Gathwright) · filed 1989-04-10(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157 treats confirmation of a reorganization plan as a core proceeding in which a bankruptcy court may hear and determine the matter and issue a final order.

In Re Lakeside Global II, Ltd. · filed 1989-04-12(b)(2)(L)

According to § 157(b)(2)(L), core proceedings include confirmations of reorganization plans. Congress has specifically legislated that the confirmation matter pending before the court is a core proceeding in which this court may exercise its full authority to hear and determine the matter and issue a final order.

Section 157(b)(2)(G) treats a motion for relief from the automatic stay as a core proceeding.

Sentry Bank & Trust Co. v. Goulding Place Developers, Inc. (In Re Goulding Place Developers, Inc.) · filed 1989-04-13(b)(2)(G)

Before the court is the motion of Sentry Bank and Trust Company (“Sentry”) for relief from the automatic stay. This matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 157(b)(2)(G).

Section 157(b)(2)(F) treats an action to avoid transfers as voidable preferences as a core proceeding.

Narowetz Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Economy Mechanical Industries, Inc. (In Re Narowetz Mechanical Contractors, Inc · filed 1989-04-14(b)(2)(F)

The action to avoid the transfers to Economy as voidable preferences was a “core proceeding” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(F) and reviewable by this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(a).

Section 157 treats a state-law lender liability action that could arise outside bankruptcy as a non-core proceeding.

Hoffman v. First National Bank of Akron (In Re Hoffman) · filed 1989-04-14(b)(2)

Applying the Wood test, Debtor’s lender liability action is a non-core proceeding. The action does not “invoke a substantive right provided by title 11,” nor “by its nature, could [it] arise only in the context of a bankruptcy case.”

An objection to a creditor’s claim is a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2)(B).

In Re Hall · filed 1989-04-14(b)(2)(B)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats determinations of the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings.

Perrine v. Bettman (In re Bettman) · filed 1989-04-14(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding because it involves a determination as to the dischargeability of a particular debt. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a proceeding to dismiss a chapter 13 case for debt-limit ineligibility as a core proceeding.

In Re Teague · filed 1989-04-16(b)(2)(A)

The proceeding is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and the following is the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 7052.

Section 157(b)(2)(H) treats a proceeding to avoid a fraudulent conveyance as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Lindsay v. Beneficial Reinsurance Co. (In Re Lindsay) · filed 1989-04-18(b)(2)(H)

The principal theory on which the plaintiffs proceed is that the foreclosure sale should be avoided as a fraudulent conveyance under 11 U.S.C. § 548(a). As such, this is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(H).

Section 157(b)(2)(O) does not clearly make a state-law contract dispute a core proceeding merely because it relates somewhat to liquidation of estate assets.

Richmond Tank Car Co. v. CTC Investment (In Re Richmond Tank Car Co.) · filed 1989-04-19(b)(2)(O)

The proceeding before the court at this time is not clearly a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157. ... Although this matter is somewhat related to the liquidation of the assets of the estate as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(0), it is one over which a state court has concurrent jurisdiction.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats the allowance of claims against a bankruptcy estate as a core proceeding.

Patrick v. Hughes (In re Hughes) · filed 1989-04-20(b)(2)(B)

This matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

A proceeding to determine dischargeability is a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2)(I).

McKnight v. Morgan (In re Morgan) · filed 1989-04-20(b)(2)(I)

Moreover, the Court finds that the matter before it is a “core proceeding” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) as exemplified in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(1) covers this proceeding as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

In re Tim Wargo & Sons, Inc. · filed 1989-04-20(b)(1)

Moreover, the Court finds that this is a “core proceeding” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) as exemplified in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G).

Section 157 treats a proceeding to determine whether a debtor's debt is dischargeable as a core proceeding.

Baker v. United States Ex Rel. United States Department of Labor · filed 1989-04-21

The issue in this case is whether a certain debt of the debtor is non-dischargeable under the bankruptcy code. This is clearly a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157.

Section 157(b)(1) and (2)(A) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and determine a contested Chapter 12 matter that it classifies as a core proceeding.

In Re Snider · filed 1989-04-24(b)(1), (b)(2)(A)

The matter at bar is a core proceeding which the Court may hear and determine in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) and (2)(A).

Under § 157(b)(2)(O), an action to collect freight undercharges for a bankruptcy estate is a core proceeding.

Miller v. Have-A-Portion, Inc. (In Re Total Transportation, Inc.) · filed 1989-04-25(b)(2)(O)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(0).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a debt as a core proceeding that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Fornachon v. Fornachon (In Re Fornachon) · filed 1989-04-26(b)(2)(I)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2) classifies proceedings involving preferential transfers, fraudulent conveyances, and turnover of property as core proceedings.

Orsa Associates, Inc. v. MBA Financial, Inc. (In Re Orsa Associates) · filed 1989-04-26(b)(2)

The parties agree that the instant proceedings are both “core” in nature. We also agree. The main proceeding, Adversary No. 89-0005S, attacks the transfers of the Debtors’ realty to the Defendant on the grounds that they are preferential transfers, implicating 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(F), or fraudulent conveyances, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(H). A turnover of the properties is sought, giving rise to a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E).

Section 157(b)(2) treats a proceeding over a creditor’s secured claim and Chapter 13 plan payments as a core proceeding.

In re Hill · filed 1989-04-26(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B), (C), (K) and (0).

Section 157(b)(2) covers a trustee’s proceeding concerning estate tax liability and unauthorized tax filings as a core proceeding.

Samore v. Olson (In Re Olson) · filed 1989-04-27(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) was applied to classify an objection to discharge as a core proceeding.

Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. Bernard (In Re Bernard) · filed 1989-05-01(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and determine a Chapter 12 eligibility dispute as a core proceeding.

In Re Vernon · filed 1989-05-03(b)(2)

This is a “core proceeding” which the Court may hear and determine pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (0).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats a dispute over a trustee’s counsel’s fees as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

In Re Rakosi · filed 1989-05-03(b)(2)(B)

The Court further finds that this controversy is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B), and that this Court has jurisdiction to hear this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and General Order 312-D of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.

Section 157(b)(2) treats claims involving post-petition concealment, conspiracy, and misrepresentations affecting estate administration as core proceedings.

Clark v. Levine (In Re Levine) · filed 1989-05-05(b)(2)

The Trustee’s allegations, particularly those which embody, in whole or in part, post-petition conduct and post-petition misconduct by the Defendants in the nature of concealment, civil conspiracy, and misrepresentations, fall squarely within the ambit of subsections (2)(A), (H), and (0) of Section 157(b).

Section 157 treats challenges to exemption claims and determinations of judicial liens as core matters that a bankruptcy court may decide.

Garafano v. Trustees of the Amalgamated Insurance Fund (In Re Garafano) · filed 1989-05-05(b)(2)(B), (b)(2)(K)

Since these consolidated matters involve a challenge to a claim of exemption and a Complaint for the determination of a judicial lien, they are core matters which may be determined by this Court. 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(B) and 157(b)(2)(K).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as a core proceeding that a bankruptcy judge may hear and determine.

Stull v. Holt (In Re Holt) · filed 1989-05-09(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) which this bankruptcy judge may hear and determine.

Section 157(b) treats proceedings to recover fraudulent conveyances and preferences as core proceedings.

Duvoisin v. Kennerly, Montgomery, Howard & Finley (In re Southern Industrial Banking Corp.) · filed 1989-05-11(b)

In this adversary proceeding, the plaintiff seeks to recover a fraudulent conveyance in the amount of $10,414,000 pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 548 and 550. The plaintiff also seeks to recover a preference in the amount of $8,049,489.20 pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 547(b) and 550. This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b).

Section 157(b)(2) treats an action for damages arising from an alleged automatic-stay violation as a core proceeding that the bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Sansone v. Walsworth (In Re Sansone) · filed 1989-05-15(b)(2)

This matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (0), which the court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2) treats an objection to a proof of claim as a core proceeding.

Matter of Ovetsky · filed 1989-05-17(b)(2)

The Court finds this matter to be a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats an involuntary Chapter 11 partnership proceeding as a core proceeding.

In Re Lehal Realty Associates · filed 1989-05-17(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157 treats a debtor’s ordinary accounts receivable proceeding as core.

Builders Alliance, Inc. v. C. & J. Clark Retail, Inc. (In re Builders Alliance, Inc.) · filed 1989-05-23(b)(2)

This proceeding is properly classifiable as a “garden-variety accounts receivable proceeding” brought by a debtor. We have consistently held that such proceedings are core in nature.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a debtor’s motion to dismiss a Chapter 11 proceeding and objections to it as a core proceeding.

Matter of Markhon Industries, Inc. · filed 1989-05-25(b)(2)(A)

This matter concerns the debtor’s motion to dismiss the chapter 11 proceeding and the objections thereto, and as such is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157 allows a bankruptcy court to decide a core proceeding involving the priority of liens.

Mendelson v. Hargrove (In Re Mirkin) · filed 1989-05-25(b)(2)(E)

The Defendants, in an Answer amended pursuant to a motion granted on the date of trial, admitted an averment in the Complaint that this matter was a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E), involving “determinations of the validity, extent, or priority of liens.” This characterization appears correct, allowing us to determine the matter.

Section 157(b)(2)(F) classifies preference proceedings as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Matter of Installation Services, Inc. · filed 1989-05-26(b)(2)(F)

This is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(F).

A dispute over competing claims to a fund can be a core proceeding under § 157.

Overland National Bank of Grand Island v. Olson (In Re Olson) · filed 1989-05-30

The parties agreed and this Court finds that this matter is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (L) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and determine a core proceeding concerning an examiner’s document-production procedures.

In Re Apex Oil Co. · filed 1989-05-31(b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(L)

This is a “core proceeding” which the Court may hear and determine pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (b)(2)(L).

Section 157 treats an adversary proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a marital debt as a core proceeding.

Hill v. Hale (In Re Hill) · filed 1989-06-05

No objections were made by the parties to the jurisdiction of this Court and the Court finds this is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a motion to reopen a bankruptcy case as a core proceeding in which the bankruptcy court may enter a final judgment.

In Re Crull · filed 1989-06-07(b)(2)(A)

This matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), and the Court has jurisdiction to enter a final judgment.

Section 157(b)(2) treats proceedings involving a proof of claim and plan confirmation as core proceedings.

In re Gillette Associates, Ltd. · filed 1989-06-07(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 157(b)(2)(A), (B), (K), and (L).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (G) treats a contested matter involving conversion and relief from the automatic stay as a core proceeding.

In Re Caldwell · filed 1989-06-09(b)(2)(A), (G)

This is a core matter within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (G).

Section 157 treats an adversary proceeding to determine a debt’s dischargeability as a core proceeding.

McHenry v. McHenry (In Re McHenry) · filed 1989-06-09

No objections were made by the parties to the jurisdiction of this Court and the Court finds this is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157.

Section 157(b)(2) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and determine a core proceeding concerning whether a state court receiver must turn over estate property.

In Re Poplar Springs Apartments of Atlanta, Ltd. · filed 1989-06-13(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (E), (M) & (0) which this Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats objections to claims as core proceedings in which the bankruptcy court may enter final judgment.

In Re Russell · filed 1989-06-14(b)(2)(B)

This proceeding is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B), and the Court has jurisdiction to enter a final judgment.

Section 157(b) permits a bankruptcy judge to hear and determine a core proceeding involving the allowance or disallowance of claims against the estate.

Rosen v. W.S.M. Enterprises, Inc. (In Re W.S.M. Enterprises, Inc.) · filed 1989-06-15(b)

The bankruptcy court has subject matter jurisdiction over the instant complaint which is a core proceeding involving the allowance or disallowance of claims against the estate, arising in the instant bankruptcy ease, which this Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2) classifies a trustee’s proceeding to determine interests in property and compel turnover as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Obuchowski v. Davis (In Re Davis) · filed 1989-06-15(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (K), and (0).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) covers a debtor’s adversary proceeding contesting a priority tax assessment and seeking turnover of a refund offset against that assessment as a core proceeding.

Herman v. United States (In re Herman) · filed 1989-06-15(b)(2)(B)

This adversary is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157 treats an adversary proceeding over the equitable subordination and priority of claims as a core proceeding.

Acme Engineering Co. v. Bayside Enterprises, Inc. (In re Medomak Canning) · filed 1989-06-15

This action is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157.

Section 157(b)(2) covers a trustee’s motion to retain counsel as a core proceeding.

In Re Chicago South Shore & South Bend Railroad · filed 1989-06-16(b)(2)

This matter is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2) treats an objection to claimed bankruptcy exemptions as a core proceeding.

In Re Laxson · filed 1989-06-19(b)(2)(B)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B) & (0).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) allows a bankruptcy court to hear and determine a motion to dismiss a Chapter 11 case as a core proceeding.

In Re Hartford Run Apartments of Buford, Ltd. · filed 1989-06-21(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) which this Court may hear and determine.

Section 157 classifies a debtor’s counterclaim to a proof of claim as a core proceeding that the bankruptcy court may determine.

Repco Products Corp. v. Reliance Electric Co. (In Re Repco Products Corp.) · filed 1989-06-22(b)(2)(C)

Although the Complaint takes the form of a counterclaim to a proof of claim, and hence is classifiable as a core proceeding which we can determine under 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(1) and (b)(2)(C), the parties have not designated it as such.

Section 157 treats preference proceedings as core proceedings that bankruptcy judges may hear and determine and in which they may enter appropriate orders and judgments.

Parmelee v. Bank of Greensburg (In Re L & T Steel Fabricators, Inc.) · filed 1989-06-23(b)(2)(F)

This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(F). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1), the Bankruptcy Judge for this district may hear and determine all core proceedings and may enter appropriate orders and judgments.

Section 157(b)(2)(C) treats an estate’s counterclaim against a person who filed a proof of claim as a core proceeding.

Bonner v. Hiser (In Re St. Mary Hospital) · filed 1989-06-26(b)(2)(C)

Given the nature of the main claim and in light of the existence of a proof of claim filed by the Plaintiffs, the Debtor’s Counterclaim, on which we do enter judgment, is clearly core under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(C), which embraces counterclaims by the estate against persons filing proofs of claims.

Section 157(b)(2)(H) supplies a basis for classifying a proceeding as core, allowing the bankruptcy court to enter a final order.

In Re Bolden · filed 1989-06-27(b)(2)(H)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(H). This Memorandum Opinion and accompanying Order constitute the Final Order of the Court.

Section 157(b)(2)(E) and (O) treats turnover and estate administration proceedings as core proceedings.

Society Bank, N.A. v. Sinder (In Re Sinder) · filed 1989-06-28(b)(2)

This proceeding, which arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) in a case referred to this court by the Standing Order of Reference entered in this district on July 30, 1984, is determined to be a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E) — orders to turn over property of the estate, ... and (0) — other proceedings affecting the liquidation of the assets of the estate or the adjustment of the debtor-creditor relationship.

Section 157 treats a dischargeability determination as a core proceeding that a bankruptcy judge may hear and determine after referral.

Jackson v. Jackson (In Re Jackson) · filed 1989-06-30(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I); pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1), the Bankruptcy Judge for this district may hear and determine all core proceedings arising in a case under Title 11 referred under 28 U.S.C. § 157(a), and the Bankruptcy Judge may enter appropriate orders and judgments.

Section 157(b)(2) treats a proceeding to consider confirmation of a reorganization plan as a core proceeding.

In Re Waterways Barge Partnership · filed 1989-07-05(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (L), and (0).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats a proceeding to resolve a claim against the bankruptcy estate as a core proceeding.

In Re Riverside Nursing Home · filed 1989-07-11(b)(2)(B)

This is a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b) covers a bankruptcy court's determination of whether a debtor's agreement is a lease or a conditional sale as a core proceeding.

Delsam, Inc. v. Glenn (In Re Glenn) · filed 1989-07-13(b)(1)

Moreover, the Court finds that it is a “core proceeding” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) as exemplified in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(K) and (M).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (O) classifies a determination of which proposed claims belong to the bankruptcy estate as a core proceeding.

In Re E.F. Hutton Southwest Properties II, Ltd. · filed 1989-07-17(b)(2)(A) and (O)

This determination constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (O) (Supp. IV 1986), and 11 U.S.C. § 541 (1982).

Section 157 treats a complaint to determine dischargeability as a core proceeding that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Ohio Savings Bank v. Larson (In Re Larson) · filed 1989-07-18(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding which the Court may hear and determine in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) and (2)(I).

Section 157(b) treats an action to recover alleged property of the bankruptcy estate as a core proceeding.

Eastern Systems, Inc. v. West 45th Street Industrial Condominiums, Inc. (In Re Eastern Systems, Inc.) · filed 1989-07-19(b)

Since the gravamen of the action is to recover alleged properties of the estate, the proceeding is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b).

Section 157(b) governs whether a bankruptcy proceeding is core.

Osage Crude Oil Purchasing, Inc. v. Osage Oil & Transportation, Inc. (In Re Osage Crude Oil Purchasing, Inc.) · filed 1989-07-21(b)

This is a “core” proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b).

A motion for damages for a willful violation of the automatic stay is a core proceeding that the bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

In Re Peterkin · filed 1989-07-24(b)(2)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2), which this court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(L) makes plan confirmation a core proceeding that a bankruptcy judge may hear and determine.

In Re Jackson · filed 1989-07-24(b)(2)(L)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(L) which this bankruptcy judge may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(G) and (L) treats the motions concerning unpaid secured claims in this opinion as core proceedings.

In Re Lynch · filed 1989-07-18(b)(2)(G) and (L)

The following constitutes findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7052 and the motions underlying this opinion are core proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G) and (L).

Section 157(b)(2) covers a debtor’s contract dispute affecting estate administration and counterclaims against the estate as core proceedings.

LCS Homes, Inc. v. Driggs Building Systems, Inc. (In Re LCS Homes, Inc.) · filed 1989-07-25(b)(2)

The debtor’s complaint for declaratory relief and for contract damages clearly addresses matters affecting the administration of the estate, in that it seeks a declaration that the estate is not liable to DBSI, John Driggs or Robert Fletcher for breach of contract and, in addition, seeks a judgment in its favor for damages for breach of an occupancy agreement. The defendants’ counterclaims are unresolved claims against the estate. All of these items fall within the ambit of section 157 of the Code.

Section 157(b)(2) classifies bankruptcy matters involving exemptions, liens, and estate property as core proceedings.

In Re Cass · filed 1989-07-28(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B), (K), (M), (0), 11 U.S.C. §§ 522(b), (f)(2), (l), 554(b).

Section 157(b)(2)(G) classifies a proceeding for relief from the automatic stay as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

In Re Boyd · filed 1989-08-02(b)(2)(G)

This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (G) and (O).

Section 157(b) treats an objection to confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

In re Educare Centers of Arkansas, Inc. · filed 1989-08-02(b)(2)(L)

Moreover, the Court finds that it is a “core proceeding” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) as exemplified in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) and (L).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a complaint to determine the dischargeability of a debt as a core proceeding.

Pruitt v. United States Government Ex Rel. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Pruitt) · filed 1989-08-03(b)(2)(I)

This Complaint to Determine the Dis-chargeability of a Debt is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2) classifies proceedings involving claim allowance, estate counterclaims, and adjustment of the debtor-creditor relationship as core proceedings.

Donahue v. United States (In Re Donahue) · filed 1989-08-04(b)(2)

This proceeding arises in a case referred to this court by the Standing Order Of Reference entered in this district and is determined to be a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) — allowance or disallowance of claims (C) — counterclaims by the estate and (O) — other proceedings affecting the adjustment of the ... debtor-creditor relationship.