28 U.S.C. § 157

Section 157(b)(2)(F) and (H) classifies proceedings concerning preferences and fraudulent conveyances as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Pongetti v. Merchants & Farmers Bank (In re Wellington Construction Corp.) · filed 1987-03-13(b)(2)(F) and (H)

This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(F) and (H).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a debt as a core proceeding.

Beneficial New York Inc. v. Bossard (In Re Bossard) · filed 1987-03-30(b)(2)(I)

This matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), and the Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and 28 U.S.C. § 157(a).

Section 157(b)(3) treats a debtor’s prepetition accounts receivable claim for contract damages as a noncore proceeding.

Earl Industries, Inc. v. Bond General Contracting, Inc. (In Re Earle Industries, Inc.) · filed 1987-03-30(b)(3)

Given my understanding of the holding in Marathon, I believe that accounts receivable claims are noncore claims, thus limiting my ability to grant the debtor the relief it seeks. ... Based on the foregoing, I conclude, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(3), that this adversary proceeding is a noncore matter.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) classifies the allowance or disallowance of claims against the estate as core proceedings.

In Re Distrigas Corp. · filed 1987-04-02(b)(2)(B)

The “allowance or disallowance of claims against the estate ...” are core proceedings. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a dispute over control of a debtor’s subsidiaries after an attempted foreclosure on their stock as a core proceeding.

Domestic Fuel Corp. v. Rainaldi (In Re Domestic Fuel Corp.) · filed 1987-04-03(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a motion to dismiss a bankruptcy case over a receiver’s authority to file it as a core proceeding.

In Re Monterey Equities-Hillside · filed 1987-04-06(b)(2)(A)

The matter before the Court is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a matter concerning bankruptcy case administration as a core proceeding in which the bankruptcy judge may enter a binding order.

In Re Paolino · filed 1987-04-07(b)(2)(A)

This matter is a core proceeding, see 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), and I will therefore enter a binding order.

Section 157(b)(2) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and determine core proceedings, including claims concerning preferences and liens.

Kirkhart v. Boardwalk Development Co. (In Re Boardwalk Development Co.) · filed 1987-04-14(b)(2)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(C), (F), (K), and (0), which this court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) classifies the allowance or disallowance of claims against a bankruptcy estate as a core proceeding.

Matter of Overly-Hautz Co. · filed 1987-04-14(b)(2)(B)

The case at bar involves the validity of a proof of claim which is important to the administration of the estate. The allowance or disallowance of a claim against the estate is defined as a core proceeding by 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2) does not classify an action to foreclose a real estate mortgage as a core proceeding.

Prairie State Bank v. Allison · filed 1987-04-16(b)(2)

An action to foreclose a real estate mortgage does not fall within any of the listed core proceedings in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a motion for mandatory abstention as a core proceeding because it concerns administration of the estate.

Consulting Actuarial Partners, Ltd. Partnership v. Descap Planning, Inc. (In Re Consulting Actuarial Partners, Ltd. Part · filed 1987-04-22(b)(2)(A)

The bankruptcy court has authority to comply with the mandatory abstention obligation expressed in 28 U.S.C. § 1334(c) (2) because abstention involves a matter concerning the administration of the estate and is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats proceedings concerning exemptions from estate property as core proceedings.

In Re McVade · filed 1987-04-27(b)(2)(B)

We have jurisdiction to hear this proceeding under 28 U.S.C. 1334(b) ... and determine it to be a core matter under 28 U.S.C. 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157 treats a proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a debt as a core proceeding.

Chase Manhattan Bank (USA) NA v. Doggett (In Re Doggett) · filed 1987-04-30(b)(2)(I)

This case arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(a) and having been referred to this court is determined to be a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(a)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) allows a bankruptcy court to hear and determine a proceeding to subordinate a creditor’s claim as a core proceeding.

CLC of America, Inc. v. Lake Shore Equipment Distributors, Inc. (In Re Wisconsin Barge Line, Inc.) · filed 1987-04-30(b)(2)(B)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B), which the Court may hear and determine.

A debtor’s contract dispute that could just as easily have been brought in state court is a non-core bankruptcy proceeding.

Diaz Contracting, Inc. v. Nanco Contracting Corp. · filed 1987-04-30(c)(1)

In view of the fact, however, that the controversy at issue here is plainly a "non-core” bankruptcy proceeding, one that could have as easily been instituted in a state court as well as a district court, see In Re: Colorado Energy Supply, 728 F.2d 1283, 1286 (10th Cir.1984), we need not address this question.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a proceeding to surcharge a court-appointed debtor-in-possession officer’s compensation as a core matter concerning estate administration.

Unsecured Creditors Committee of Debtor v. Noyes (In Re STN Enterprises, Inc.) · filed 1987-05-07(b)(2)(A)

The Committee’s second cause of action, surcharge under 11 U.S.C. §§ 327(a) and 328(b), against Court appointed Defendant Wilkinson, DIP’s president and director, is a “core” proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) as it concerns the administration of the estate.

Section 157(b)(2) treats proceedings involving turnover, preferences, relief from the automatic stay, and fraudulent conveyances as core proceedings.

Main v. Brim (In Re Main) · filed 1987-04-07(b)(2)(E), (F), (G) and (H)

The Court finds that these consolidated adversary proceedings are core proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E), (F), (G) and (H).

Section 157(b)(2) treats an estate’s counterclaims against a creditor who filed a claim, including connected preference and setoff claims, as core proceedings when they are sufficiently tied to the bankruptcy case.

Official Creditors' Committee of Honeycomb, Inc. v. Fidelity Bank, N.A. (In Re Honeycomb, Inc.) · filed 1987-04-10(b)(2)(C), (F)

Application of the facts in the present case to the enumerated standards compel this court to hold that the Committee’s counterclaims are “core” within the meaning of § 157(b)(2)(C) and § 157(b)(2)(F).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (G) classify this motion for relief from the automatic stay as a core proceeding.

Harris v. Matthews (In Re Matthews) · filed 1987-05-11(b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(G)

That this is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), and (b)(2)(G); and ... That the interests of this Movant will be adequately protected by a combination of the Debtors’ compliance with the terms of their confirmed Chapter 13 Plan, and by the Debtors’ performance of the additional conditions set out below.

A debtor’s contract dispute that could have been brought in state court is a non-core bankruptcy proceeding under § 157.

In Re Diaz Contracting, Inc. · filed 1987-05-12

In view of the fact, however, that the controversy at issue here is plainly a "non-core" bankruptcy proceeding, one that could have as easily been instituted in a state court as well as a district court, see In Re: Colorado Energy Supply, 728 F.2d 1283, 1286 (10th Cir.1984), we need not address this question.

Section 157(b)(1) limits the listed core proceedings to matters arising under title 11 or arising in a title 11 case.

Intellitek Computer Corp. v. Kollmorgen Corp. (In Re Nanodata Computer Corp.) · filed 1987-05-13(b)(1)

Although Nanodata would have this Court read such subsection in a declaratory sense so that any proceeding that arguably falls within one of the listed categories would come within the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court, Judge McGuire correctly found that such listed categories must be read in light of the definition of core proceedings in subsection 157(b)(1).

A proceeding is not core under § 157(b)(1) unless it arises under title 11 or arises in a title 11 case.

Central Maine Restaurant Supply v. Omni Hotels Management Corp. · filed 1987-05-18(b)(1)

Because the present proceeding does not “arise under” title 11 and does not “arise in” a case under title 11, it is not a core proceeding and cannot be referred as such to the Bankruptcy Court.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats proceedings to collect and safeguard estate assets as core proceedings concerning administration of the estate.

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Debtor v. Provident National Bank (In Re United Church of the Ministers of · filed 1987-05-19(b)(2)(A)

The C.P. Court actions removed to our Court contemplate disposition of the fundamental bankruptcy-court duty of collecting and safeguarding the assets of the Debtors’ estates. Such proceedings, we believe, satisfy any definition of core proceedings, as we believe these actions directly address “matters concerning the administration of estate,” per 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (O) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and determine a proceeding to enforce the automatic stay as a core proceeding.

Crispell v. Landmark Bank (In Re Crispell) · filed 1987-05-19(b)(2)(A), (O)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (O), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a proceeding on an involuntary Chapter 7 petition as a core proceeding.

In Re Braten · filed 1987-05-22(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

An action for breach of a court-approved agreement to sell estate property is a core proceeding when it arises from the order approving the sale.

J.B. Van Sciver Co. v. William Cooper Associates, Inc. (In Re J.B. Van Sciver Co.) · filed 1987-05-22(b)(2)(N)

First, the litigation arises from a court order which authorized the debtor to sell the subject property. An order approving the sale of property to a non-creditor is a core matter under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(N). This proceeding may be characterized as an outgrowth of the court’s order and, as such, would also be a core matter.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a debtor’s request for a labor dispute injunction concerning administration of the estate as a core proceeding.

Elsinore Shore Associates v. Local 54, Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees International Union · filed 1987-05-26(b)(2)(A)

This request for a Boys Markets injunction was a “matter[ ] concerning the administration of the estate,” and therefore was a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats a proceeding to determine the validity of a proof of claim as a core proceeding.

Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia & Vicinity v. Malone Realty Co. (In Re Malone) · filed 1987-05-28(b)(2)(B)

The proceeding to determine the validity of that proof of claim is a core matter, see 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B), resolution of which is integral to the bankruptcy process.

A trustee’s claim to collect freight undercharges is not a core proceeding when the claim would exist apart from the bankruptcy case.

Christison v. Caterpillar Inc. (In Re Tobler Transfer, Inc.) · filed 1987-05-29(b)(2)

But for the Debtor’s bankruptcy, would TOBLER’s cause of action against CATERPILLAR exist? Clearly the answer is yes. The matter is not a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2) treats the Chapter 11 matters before this court as core proceedings.

Northwest Place, Ltd. v. Cooper (In Re Northwest Place, Ltd.) · filed 1987-05-29(b)(2)

The Court finds these matters to constitute core proceedings within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2)(G) treats a motion to modify the automatic stay as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

In Re Texaco Inc. · filed 1987-05-29(b)(2)(G)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G).

Section 157(b) treats confirmation of a chapter 13 plan as a core proceeding.

In Re Brown · filed 1987-06-03(b)

Because this matter concerns confirmation of a chapter 13 plan, the matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b) about which the Court may make findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7052.

Section 157(b)(2) includes proceedings about the effect of plan confirmation among core proceedings, even though it does not list them expressly.

Foster Development Corp. v. Morning Treat Coffee Co. (In Re Morning Treat Coffee Co.) · filed 1987-06-05(b)(2)

However, confirmation of a plan is a core matter under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(L); I conclude that the effect of plan confirmation is a core proceeding included in the penumbra of bankruptcy court jurisdiction defined inclusively by 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2) to surround the explicit jurisdiction of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(L).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a proceeding to appoint a Chapter 11 trustee as a core proceeding.

In Re McCorhill Publishing, Inc. · filed 1987-06-11(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(1) permits a bankruptcy judge to enter judgment in a core proceeding, including an action under 11 U.S.C. § 362(h).

Wagner v. Ivory (In Re Wagner) · filed 1987-06-12(b)(1)

An action under 11 U.S.C. § 362(h) is a core proceeding. ... Therefore, I will enter a judgment in this case. See 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings.

Schwalbe v. Gans (In Re Gans) · filed 1987-06-15(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(O) covers a reclamation action as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. (In Re Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp.) · filed 1987-06-16(b)(2)(O)

This is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(0).

Section 157(b)(2)(G) treats a motion for relief from the automatic stay as a core proceeding.

In Re WL Bradley Co., Inc. · filed 1987-06-17(b)(2)(G)

The motion for relief from stay is a core proceeding.

Section 157(c)(1) limits a bankruptcy judge in a non-core proceeding to submitting proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law to the district court.

Global International Airways Corp. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc. (In Re Global International Airways Corp.) · filed 1987-06-19(c)(1)

I concur with the bankruptcy court’s conclusion that this case involves a non-core proceeding. As provided in 28 U.S.C. § 157(c)(1), a bankruptcy judge in non-core proceedings is limited to submitting proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law to the district court.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats an objection to a debtor’s claimed exemption as a core proceeding in which the bankruptcy court may enter a final judgment.

In Re Rodriguez · filed 1987-06-19(b)(2)(B)

The proceeding before the Court is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B), and this Court has jurisdiction to enter a final judgment.

Section 157(b)(2) identifies core proceedings in which a bankruptcy court may enter final orders.

Classe v. Classe (In re Classe) · filed 1987-06-23(b)(2)

This matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(b)(A), (C), and (I). These findings and conclusions and orders are the final orders of the Bankruptcy Court in this Adversary Proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2) classifies proceedings concerning estate administration, the automatic stay, asset sales, and estate property as core proceedings.

Harris v. Ramel (In re Allen) · filed 1987-06-29(b)(2)

That this is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (G), (N) and (0); and ... That by separate order, judgment is being entered in favor of the Plaintiffs and against the Defendants in that the Trustee’s transfer of title to this real property was free and clear of any claim of the Debtor or H.M. Ramel or Harvey F. Euge.

Section 157(b)(3) requires the bankruptcy court to determine whether a proceeding is core.

CPI Oil & Refining, Inc. v. Dennis (In Re Dennis) · filed 1987-07-06(b)(3)

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(3), the Court determines that this is a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (B) treat matters concerning estate administration and the allowance or disallowance of claims as core proceedings.

In Re Chicago Lutheran Hospital Ass'n · filed 1987-07-08(b)(2)(A), (B)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), since it involves matters concerning the administration of the estate and 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B), concerning the allowance or disallowance of claims against the estate.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) covers a debtor’s request to reject a collective bargaining agreement as a core proceeding.

In Re Amherst Sparkle Market, Inc. · filed 1987-07-08(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A). Herein, the Debtor seeks rejection of a contract entered into with the Union on June 1, 1985, which is due to expire on June 1, 1988.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a motion to convert a Chapter 11 case to Chapter 12 as a core proceeding.

In Re Cobb · filed 1987-07-08(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157 treats a proceeding to determine dischargeability of a debt as a core proceeding that a bankruptcy judge may hear and determine.

Castilla v. Gonzalez Seijo (In Re Gonzalez Seijo) · filed 1987-07-09(b)(2)(I)

The action is a core proceeding over which this Court has jurisdiction to hear, determine and enter the appropriate order.

Section 157 permits a bankruptcy court to hear and determine a dispute over competing creditors’ claims to a fund as a core proceeding.

In Re John Galt Energy, Inc. · filed 1987-07-10(b)(2)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(F), (K) and/or (O), which this Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2) treats a proceeding concerning the dischargeability of debts as a core proceeding.

Beaman v. Levy (In Re Levy) · filed 1987-07-13(b)(2)

This is a case arising under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(a) and having been referred to this court, the within action is determined to be a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (I).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats an application for interim attorney compensation from estate assets as a core proceeding.

In Re A. Tarricone, Inc. · filed 1987-07-13(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) covers a motion to join an involuntary bankruptcy petition as a core proceeding.

In Re Braten · filed 1987-07-14(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (I) covers an adversary proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a debt as a core proceeding.

Trell v. Dunlevy (In re Dunlevy) · filed 1987-07-14(b)(2)(A) and (I)

This is a case that arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(a) and having been referred to this court, the within action is determined to be a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (I), in which the plaintiffs filed a complaint (Doc. 1) to determine the dischargeability of a debt under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2), (4) or (6).

Section 157(b) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and determine a preference proceeding as a core proceeding.

Air One, Inc. v. Wing on Bank, Ltd. (In Re Air One, Inc.) · filed 1987-08-04(b)(2)(B), (F)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) and (F), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (O) allows a bankruptcy court to hear and determine a motion to compel debtors to assume or reject insurance contracts as a core proceeding.

In Re Wisconsin Barge Line, Inc. · filed 1987-08-04(b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(O)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (O), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2) does not treat a trustee’s damages claims against the debtor’s attorneys as core proceedings when the claims seek none of the listed core relief.

Levy v. Butler, Payne & Griffin (In Re Landbank Corp.) · filed 1987-08-04(b)(2)

In the present case, the Trustee is seeking to recover money damages incurred by Landbank due to the defendants’ alleged negligent representation of Land-bank in certain real estate loan closings and foreclosure proceedings, and for their alleged preparation of false statements for loan closings handled on behalf of Land-bank. None of the allegations in the Trustee’s Amended Complaint demand relief under the list of “core” proceedings set forth in Section 157(b)(2). There are no allegations that these defendants have any property belonging to Landbank, or that they have filed any claims against the estate.

Section 157(b)(2)(A), (L), and (O) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and determine proceedings concerning revocation of a Chapter 11 plan’s confirmation as core proceedings.

Wing on Bank, Ltd. v. Interstate Airlines, Inc. (In Re Air One, Inc.) · filed 1987-08-04(b)(2)(A), (L), and (O)

These are “core proceedings” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (L), and (O), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) and (J) treats dischargeability determinations and objections to discharge as core bankruptcy matters.

Forstall v. McCall (In Re McCall) · filed 1987-08-06(b)(2)(I) and (J)

This is a core matter. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) and (J).

Section 157(b)(2) treats a debtor’s dispute over its own tax liability and the allocation of payments on an IRS claim as a core proceeding.

In Re Vermont Fiberglass, Inc. · filed 1987-08-10(b)(2)

We also hold ... that this proceeding is a “core matter,” over which this Court may enter a final order, ... as defined in part by 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2) to include: matters concerning the administration of the estate; the allowance of claims against the estate; the validity, extent, or priority of liens; and, other proceedings affecting the liquidation of the assets of the estate or the adjustment of the debtor-creditor relationship.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a bankruptcy debtor’s challenge to state driver’s license revocation as a core proceeding.

Norton v. Tennessee Department of Safety (In Re Norton) · filed 1987-08-10(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2) classifies proceedings concerning turnover and liens as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Zaisan, Inc. v. Braden Cornerstone Partnership, Ltd. (In Re Zaisan, Inc.) · filed 1987-08-10(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (E), (K) and (0).

Section 157(b)(2)(L) treats a proceeding to confirm a Chapter 11 plan as a core proceeding.

In Re Sandy Ridge Development Corp. · filed 1987-08-11(b)(2)(L)

This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(L); pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1), the Bankruptcy Judge for this district may hear and determine all core proceedings arising in a case under Title 11 referred under 28 U.S.C. § 157(a), and the Bankruptcy Judge may enter appropriate orders and judgments.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats applications for interim professional fees and expense reimbursement as core proceedings.

In Re George Worthington Co. · filed 1987-08-14(b)(2)(A)

The several matters before the Court comprise various applications for allowance of interim fees and expense reimbursements pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 331. ... These applications constitute core proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157 treats temporary valuation of a creditor’s claim for plan voting as a core proceeding concerning estate administration and claims allowance.

In Re TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. · filed 1987-08-14(b)(2)

This court has jurisdiction of this matter as a core proceeding. Core proceedings include those that are “matters concerning the administration of the estate” and “allowance or disallowance of claims against the estate.” 28 U.S.C. section 157. Matters concerning valuation of claims, even for voting purposes only, have been provided for by Congress in the Code, at section 502(c).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats the allowance of a creditor’s attorney fee claim as a core proceeding.

In Re Mills · filed 1987-08-14(b)(2)(B)

This is a core proceeding as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2) covers adversary proceedings arising in a Title 11 case concerning a debtor’s property sale agreement as core proceedings.

Kenney v. Columbus Plaza, Inc. (In re Columbus Plaza, Inc.) · filed 1987-08-20(b)(2)

Both the Complaint and the Counterclaim are proceedings which arose in a case under Title 11 and, therefore, are core proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157 (b)(2)(A), (B), (N) and (O).

Section 157 treats a proceeding as core if it invokes a substantive right under title 11 or could arise only in a bankruptcy case.

Wood v. Wood · filed 1987-08-26(b)(1)

We hold, therefore, that a proceeding is core under section 157 if it invokes a substantive right provided by title 11 or if it is a proceeding that, by its nature, could arise only in the context of a bankruptcy case.

Section 157 treats a proceeding to prosecute a violation of the discharge injunction as a core proceeding.

In Re Barbour · filed 1987-08-28(b)

If a proceeding to prosecute a violation of the automatic stay is a core proceeding, as held in Budget Service Company v. Better Homes of Virginia, Inc., 804 F.2d at 292, then so too should a proceeding to prosecute a violation of the discharge injunction.

Section 157(b)(2) does not treat claims that could have arisen at law without title 11 as core proceedings.

Third National Bank in Nashville v. River Oaks Homes, Inc. (In Re River Oaks Homes, Inc.) · filed 1987-09-01(b)(2)

Insofar as the claims asserted by the plaintiff against SouthTrust, SMS, and GECC are concerned, the Court concludes that this proceeding is not a core proceeding as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2), in that the relief sought against those defendants is not such that those claims could not have arisen at law in the absence of title 11.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (K) covers a proceeding to recover estate funds and determine lien priorities as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Matter of DeLancey · filed 1987-09-03(b)(2)(A) and (K)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (K).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (K) cover this dispute over estate property and lien priorities as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Barr v. Juniata Valley Bank (In re DeLancey) · filed 1987-09-03(b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(K)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (K).

Section 157(b)(2)(G) treats a motion for relief from the automatic stay as a core proceeding that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

In Re Planned Systems, Inc. · filed 1987-09-14(b)(2)(G)

This is a core proceeding which the Court may hear and determine. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G).

Section 157 treats this claim objection and lien dispute as a core proceeding in which the bankruptcy court may enter judgment.

In Re Neatex, Inc. · filed 1987-09-14(b)(2)(B), (b)(2)(K)

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(3), the court finds that this is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) and (K). Accordingly, the court shall enter its judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1).

Section 157(b)(2)(K) treats a proceeding to determine the extent of a creditor’s rights in rents as a core proceeding.

Jones v. United States (In Re Jones) · filed 1987-09-16(b)(2)(K)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 157(b)(2)(K).

Section 157 treats matters concerning the administration of bankruptcy estates as core proceedings.

In Re Michigan General Corp. · filed 1987-09-16(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding which involves matters concerning the administration of the estates.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats proceedings to assume or reject executory contracts or unexpired leases as core proceedings concerning administration of the estate.

In Re Texaco Inc. · filed 1987-09-17(b)(2)(A)

There is no question that proceedings to assume or reject executory contracts or unexpired leases are matters concerning the administration of the estate within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and are core proceedings.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats a proceeding to allow an administrative expense claim as a core proceeding that the bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

In Re National Service Lines, Inc. · filed 1987-09-22(b)(2)(B)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2) treats objections to claims, estate counterclaims against claimants, and turnover of estate property as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may determine on referral.

Gingold v. United States Ex Rel. Department of Health & Human Services (In Re Shelby County Healthcare Services) · filed 1987-09-08(b)(2)(B), (C), (E)

In accordance with 28 U.S.C. Section 157(a) and (b)(2)(B), (C) and (E), these matters can and have been referred by the district court to this bankruptcy court. ... By definition “core” proceedings include, but are not limited to, allowance or disal-lowance of claims, counterclaims by the estate against persons filing claims against the estate, turnover of property of the estate and other proceedings affecting the liquidation of the assets of the estate or the adjustment of the debtor-creditor relationship. Accordingly, the court concludes that these are core proceedings determinable by this court pursuant to the district court’s reference.

A Chapter 13 dispute over assuming a residential lease is a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2)(A), (L), and (M).

Madisonview Towers v. Yardley (In Re Yardley) · filed 1987-09-16(b)(2)(A), (L), (M)

This is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(A), (L), (M) (Supp. II 1984).

Section 157(b)(2)(F) and (H) treats proceedings to avoid preferences and fraudulent transfers as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Staats v. Amerine (In re Bethel Resources, Inc.) · filed 1987-09-17(b)(2)(F) and (H)

This matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(F) and (H).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a motion to dismiss a bankruptcy case as a core proceeding.

In Re Galloway Farms, Inc. · filed 1987-09-23(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(O) treats a dispute over whether a debtor’s interest in a land sales contract is property of the estate as a core proceeding.

Jones v. Vee Jay, Inc. (In Re Vee Jay, Inc.) · filed 1987-09-24(b)(2)(O)

The matter presented is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(0).

Section 157 does not treat an adversary proceeding as core when its outcome cannot affect the bankruptcy estate.

Meadowlands Communications, Inc. v. Banker's Trust Co., New York · filed 1987-09-25(b)

Based upon the guidelines set forth above, I find that the adversary proceeding at issue is not a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157. ... In sum, plaintiff’s complaint against defendant banks does not constitute a core proceeding because it is not related to the bankruptcy.

Section 157 treats a motion for relief from the automatic stay as a core proceeding.

In Re Evans · filed 1987-09-30

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157, this matter is a core proceeding, and jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1334.

Section 157 treats proceedings to recover preferential transfers as core bankruptcy proceedings.

In Re H & S Transportation Co. · filed 1987-09-30

These are core proceedings. 28 U.S.C. § 157.

Section 157(b)(2) treats a proceeding as core when resolving it is necessary to administer the estate and affects the adjustment of the debtor-creditor relationship.

InterFirst Bank Fannin v. Bernell (In Re Mesa Intercontinental, Inc.) · filed 1987-10-06(b)(2)(O)

In addition, and for the same reason, this dispute is an “other proceeding affecting the liquidation of the assets of the estate or the adjustment of the debtor-creditor or the equity security holder relationship”. 28 U.S.C. section 157(b)(2)(0). This proceeding may be considered a core proceeding under the controlling Wood standard.

Section 157(b)(2)(K) treats a proceeding over creditors’ security interests in a debtor’s receivables as a core proceeding.

Provident Hospital & Training Ass'n v. GMAC Mortgage Co. (In Re Provident Hospital & Training Ass'n) · filed 1987-10-07(b)(2)(K)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(K).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a determination of whether a particular debt is dischargeable as a core proceeding.

Baker v. United States ex rel. United States Department of Labor (In re Baker) · filed 1987-10-07(b)(2)(I)

The true nature of this proceeding is the determination of whether a particular debt is dischargeable. As such, it is a “core proceeding” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) and is not interposed as a review of the Secretary of Labor’s decision.

Section 157 governs the classification of bankruptcy adversary proceedings as core proceedings.

Tri-City Service District v. Pacific Marine Dredging & Construction (In Re Pacific Marine Dredging & Construction) · filed 1987-10-09

The parties have stipulated and this court finds that this adversary proceeding is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) and (F) permits bankruptcy courts to hear and determine core proceedings involving claim allowance and preferential transfers.

Air One, Inc. v. Flight Support International, Inc. (In Re Air One, Inc.) · filed 1987-10-09(b)(2)(B), (F)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) and (F), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats the determination of a landlord’s claim against a debtor as a core proceeding.

In Re Cohoes Industrial Terminal, Inc. · filed 1987-10-09(b)(2)(B)

This is a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (B) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and determine an objection to claims as a core proceeding.

In Re Spruill · filed 1987-10-09(b)(2)(A) and (B)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (B), which this court may hear and determine.

A debtor’s prepetition common-law claim is noncore when it is before the bankruptcy court only because the plaintiff is a debtor and raises no substantive bankruptcy issue.

Consolidated Lewis Investment Corp.-Ltd. Partnership v. Hibernia National Bank (In Re Consolidated Lewis Investment Corp · filed 1987-10-15(b)

The cause of action arose pre-petition and is before the bankruptcy court only because one of the parties is a debtor in bankruptcy. ... I conclude, therefore, that this proceeding is a noncore proceeding.

Section 157 treats collection of prepetition accounts receivable as a related, noncore proceeding.

Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. Felsway Corp. (In Re Oneida Motor Freight, Inc.) · filed 1987-10-19(b)(3)

This Court finds that prepetition account receivable collections are merely “related to” a Title 11 bankruptcy case and that the 1984 Amendments passed by Congress were not intended to give this Court a jurisdiction over said matters.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats an objection to a creditor’s claim as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

In Re Long · filed 1987-10-21(b)(2)(B)

This matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

A proceeding on an involuntary bankruptcy petition is a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2)(A).

In Re Veliotis · filed 1987-10-23(b)(2)(A)

That this is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A); and ... That this matter proceed upon the Amended Involuntary Petition filed on October 15, 1987; and that the Petitioning Creditor is to forthwith provide a copy of this order to the Alleged Debtor or his legal representative.

Section 157(b)(2) classifies proceedings to determine dischargeability of debts as core proceedings.

Davenport v. Schulcz (In Re Schulcz) · filed 1987-10-28(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) provides the basis for classifying a bankruptcy proceeding as core.

Domestic Fuel Corp. v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A. (In Re Domestic Fuel Corp.) · filed 1987-10-28(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) allows a bankruptcy court to hear and determine a trustee’s motion to compromise an estate claim as a core proceeding.

In Re Carson · filed 1987-11-02(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding which the Court may hear and determine. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats an objection to a claimed exemption as a core proceeding.

In Re Baker · filed 1987-11-03(b)(2)(B)

This matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157 treats a proceeding concerning the allowance of claims against the bankruptcy estate or modification of the automatic stay as a core proceeding.

McLean Thomas, Inc. v. FLR Co. (In re FLR Co.) · filed 1987-11-03(b)(2)(B), (b)(2)(G)

As such, McLean’s request for relief concerns the “allowance or disallowance of claims against [FLR’s] estate;” can be properly designated as a “[motion] to terminate, annul, or modify the automatic stay;” and accordingly involves a core proceeding.

Section 157 treats proceedings concerning relief from the automatic stay and the validity of liens as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

In Re Valle Feed of Farmington, Inc. · filed 1987-10-14(b)(2)(G), (K)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G) and (K), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157 treats alleged automatic-stay violations and requests for turnover of estate property as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and decide.

LTV Steel Co. v. David Graham Co. (In Re Chateaugay Corp.) · filed 1987-10-15(b)(1), (b)(2)(A), (E) and (O)

By their very nature these matters are integral to the administration of the Debtors’ estate and are explicitly recognized as core matters. 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(1), (b)(2)(A), (E) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(E) covers this dispute over a creditor’s lien on money held by a Chapter 7 trustee as a core proceeding.

In Re Figearo · filed 1987-11-20(b)(2)(E)

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(3), the court finds that this is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E). Accordingly, the court shall enter a final order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (M) treats a debtor’s motion to assume an alleged executory contract as a core proceeding in which the bankruptcy court may enter a final order.

In Re McClain Airlines, Inc. · filed 1987-11-20(b)(2)(A), (M)

The matter is clearly a core proceeding entitling this Court to enter a final order. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (M).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of a debt as core matters.

AVCO Financial Services v. Lesher (In Re Lesher) · filed 1987-11-24(b)(2)(I)

This Court has jurisdiction over the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157. Moreover, the Court finds that it is a “core matter” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) as exemplified in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(H) treats a matter inextricably linked to claims for recovery of fraudulent conveyances as a core proceeding in which the bankruptcy court may enter a final order.

Kaiser Steel Corp. v. Frates (In Re Kaiser Steel Corp.) · filed 1987-11-24(b)(2)(H)

This matter is inextricably linked to the Kaiser claims being asserted for the recovery of fraudulent conveyances. The Court therefore finds that this is a “core” matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(H) and a final order shall enter accordingly.

Section 157(b)(2) classifies proceedings concerning stay relief and lien validity or priority as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Sunburst Bank v. Findley (In Re Findley) · filed 1987-11-25(b)(2)

Both of these proceedings are core proceedings as defined under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A)(G)(K) and (M).

Section 157(b)(2)(L) treats plan confirmation as a core proceeding that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

In Re Professional Technical Services, Inc. · filed 1987-12-04(b)(2)(L)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(L), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(F) treats an adversary proceeding to avoid a preferential transfer as a core proceeding.

Anderson v. Ocean Garden Products, Inc. (In Re Metro Produce, Inc.) · filed 1987-12-07(b)(2)(F)

The court finds this matter constitutes a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. Section 157(b)(2)(F).

A debtor’s motion for contempt concerning collection efforts after a Chapter 13 discharge is a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2)(A).

Rentas v. New York State Higher Education Services, Corp. (In Re Rentas) · filed 1987-12-08(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of a debt as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

United States v. O'Connell (In Re O'Connell) · filed 1987-12-08(b)(2)(I)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2) classifies proceedings involving claim allowance, turnover of estate property, and recovery of preferences as core proceedings.

Gilbert v. Suburban Athletic Club (In Re Dayton Circuit Courts 2) · filed 1987-12-08(b)(2)

This proceeding, which arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) in a case referred to this court by the Order Of Reference entered in this district on July 30, 1984, is determined to be a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) — allowance or disal-lowance of claims against the estate ..., (E) — orders to turn over property of the estate, (F) — proceedings to determine, avoid or recover preferences and (0) — other proceedings affecting the liquidation of the assets of the estate or the adjustment of the debtor-creditor ... relationship_ The matter is before the court upon the ... Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (Doc. 35).

A contested motion to value a creditor’s claim is a core bankruptcy proceeding under § 157(b)(2)(B) and (O).

In Re Richardson · filed 1987-12-10(b)(2)(B) and (O)

This contested matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a trustee’s application to remove a state court matter to bankruptcy court as a core proceeding.

In Re World Financial Services Center, Inc. · filed 1987-12-16(b)(2)(A)

At issue is the application of the trustee, Harold Taxel (“trustee”), for removal of this matter from the California Superior Court to the bankruptcy court. ... This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(3) classifies a debtor’s contract-based claim styled as turnover as noncore when it is only related to the bankruptcy case.

Republic Reader's Service, Inc. v. Magazine Service Bureau, Inc. (In Re Republic Reader's Service, Inc.) · filed 1987-12-18(b)(3)

Therefore, plaintiff's assertion that this proceeding evokes core status is unfounded, and I hold that pursuant to section 157(b)(3), this adversary proceeding is a “proceeding that is otherwise related to a case under Title 11”, that is, a noncore proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats a proceeding concerning a claimed bankruptcy exemption as a core proceeding.

In Re Bagnato · filed 1987-12-21(b)(2)(B)

This is a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and determine a motion to transfer venue as a core proceeding.

In Re Nantucket Apartments Associates · filed 1987-11-09(b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(O)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (0), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2) treats proceedings to recover preferences and proceedings affecting estate liquidation or debtor-creditor adjustments as core proceedings.

Warren v. Huntington National Bank (In Re Ullman) · filed 1987-12-08(b)(2)(F), (b)(2)(O)

This proceeding, which arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) in a case referred to this court by the Order Of Reference entered in this district on July 30, 1984, is determined to be a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(F) — proceedings to determine, avoid, or recover preferences and (O) — other proceedings effecting the liquidation of the assets of the estate or the adjustment of the debtor/creditor ... relationship....

Section 157 treats a motion to modify the automatic stay as a core proceeding that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

In Re DiCello · filed 1987-12-28(b)(2)(A) and (G)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (G), which this court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(1) does not treat a prepetition state-law dispute solely between nondebtors as a core proceeding when it neither arises under title 11 nor arises in a bankruptcy case.

World Travel Vacation Brokers, Inc. v. Bowery Savings Bank (In Re Chargit Inc.) · filed 1987-12-29(b)(1)

Applying these standards, this third-party litigation among certain creditor parties and a bank, does not support any finding of “core” status sufficient to accord this Court jurisdiction to hear and determine this matter. The instant complaint relates solely to activities which took place prior to the commencement of the debtor’s chapter 11 case; and it raises only state law claims between non-debtor third-parties which do not arise under title 11 or arise in the debtor’s title 11 case. Accordingly the instant complaint does not qualify as a core proceeding arising under title 11, or arising in a case under title 11.

Section 157 treats a dispute over the priority of competing liens on a debtor’s property as a core proceeding that a bankruptcy court may decide.

Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. Tacoma Boatbuilding Co. (In Re Tacoma Boatbuilding Co.) · filed 1987-12-31(b)(2)(K)

This adversary proceeding requires a determination as to the priority of competing liens on the debtor’s property. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1), (b)(2)(K) and (0), such a controversy is explicitly recognized as a core proceeding within the reach of a bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction. Thus, this Court has the power to hear and rule on the issues raised in the Complaint.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and determine claim allowance or disallowance as a core proceeding.

In Re Medical Equities, Inc. · filed 1987-12-31(b)(2)(B)

This is a core proceeding which the court may hear and determine pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B), allowance or disallowance of claims.

Section 157 treats enforcement of a bankruptcy court’s discharge order as a core proceeding.

Miller v. Mayer (In Re Miller) · filed 1988-01-04(b)(2)(J)

Congress having considered that the granting or denial of a discharge is a pure “core” matter could not possibly have intended, as intimated by Sequoia, that the enforcement of the provisions of the discharge is a “non-core” matter and therefore cannot be handled by a bankruptcy judge and must be “certified” to the district court for disposition.

Section 157 permits a bankruptcy judge to finally adjudicate a core proceeding involving administration of the estate.

In re Inca Materials, Inc. · filed 1988-01-06

The instant controversy is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157 involving the administration of the estate. Accordingly, this order is a final adjudication of the merits of the issues raised herein.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (O) treats a proceeding over unauthorized transfers of estate assets during a Chapter 11 case as core.

Eisenberg v. Bank of New York (In Re Sattlers, Inc.) · filed 1988-01-12(b)(2)(A) and (O)

Because all of the alleged transfers of estate assets occurred during the pendency of the Chapter 11 case, and without the imprimatur of this court, this adversary proceeding is clearly core under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2) treats estate administration, plan confirmation, and proceedings affecting the adjustment of debtor creditor relationships as core proceedings.

Matter of Caulfield · filed 1988-01-12(b)(2)

This proceeding, which arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) in a case referred to this court by the Standing Order of Reference entered in this district on July 30, 1984, is determined to be a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) — matters concerning the administration of the estate, (L) — confirmation of plans, and (O) — other proceedings affecting the adjustment of the debtor/creditor relationship.

A motion to modify the automatic stay is a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2)(G).

In Re Texaco, Inc. · filed 1988-01-13(b)(2)(G)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G).

Section 157(b)(2)(E) treats a proceeding over competing liens in a bankruptcy case as a core proceeding.

United States v. Williams (In Re Williams) · filed 1988-01-13(b)(2)(E)

This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E).

Section 157(b)(2) treats this dispute over use and misuse of cash collateral as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

In Re Placid Oil Co. · filed 1988-01-15(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B), (K), (M), (0).

Section 157(b)(2)(J) treats objections to discharge as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Baer v. Greene (In Re Greene) · filed 1988-01-20(b)(2)(J)

This is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J).

Section 157(b)(2)(F) makes actions to avoid preferences core proceedings; core status does not depend on the merits.

Becker v. County of Sacramento (In Re Hackney) · filed 1988-01-21(b)(2)(F)

28 U.S.C. Section 157(b)(2)(F) provides that actions to avoid preferences are core proceedings. Neither jurisdiction nor the determination of core status depends upon the merits of the proceeding in question, as contended by the County.

Section 157(b) permits a bankruptcy judge to enter a final judgment in a core proceeding involving an alleged violation of the automatic stay.

In Re Meyerland Co. · filed 1988-01-21(b)

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b), this proceeding is a core proceeding in which I may enter a final order for judgment.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats proceedings to determine claims against a debtor in bankruptcy as core proceedings.

In re Clausen Co. v. Clausen Co. · filed 1988-01-22(b)(2)(B)

This adversary proceeding to determine Dynatron/Bondo’s claims against Clausen is a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) covers this contested bankruptcy proceeding concerning a consent order, class certification, and relief from the automatic stay as a core proceeding.

Lazaro v. Texaco Inc. (In Re Texaco Inc.) · filed 1988-01-25(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (E) permit a bankruptcy court to hear requests for declaratory and injunctive relief concerning an automatic-stay violation as core proceedings.

INSLAW, Inc. v. United States (In Re INSLAW, Inc.) · filed 1988-01-25(b)(2)(A) and (E)

This Court may also exercise jurisdiction over INSLAW’s requests for declaratory and injunctive relief as core proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (E).

A motion to transfer a Chapter 11 case is a core proceeding under § 157(b).

In re WPRV-TV, Inc. · filed 1988-01-26(b)

This matter is a “core” proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b).

Section 157(b)(2)(N) treats a proceeding to approve the sale of estate property as a core proceeding that the bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Yakubesin v. Yakubesin (In Re Yakubesin) · filed 1988-01-27(b)(2)(N)

This is a core proceeding which the Court may hear and determine. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(N).

Section 157(b)(2) treats contested matters concerning adequate protection and claimed security in proceeds as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may finally decide.

In Re Turner · filed 1988-01-29(b)(2)

These contested matters present core proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 157(b)(2)(A), (G), (K), (M) and (O); therefore, the Court will make final findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7052, subject to appeal to the United States District Court.

A counterclaim for specific performance of a lease purchase option can be treated as a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2)(C).

Hudson Holding Associates v. Rifino (In Re Hudson Holding Associates) · filed 1988-02-02(b)(2)(C)

This is a core proceeding within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(C).

Section 157(b)(2)(G) treats a motion for relief from the automatic stay as a core proceeding.

In Re Vita · filed 1988-02-02(b)(2)(G)

This is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a motion to transfer venue of a bankruptcy case as a core matter.

In Re Toxic Control Technologies, Inc. · filed 1988-02-09(b)(2)(A)

Thus, this motion is within our jurisdiction under 28 U.S. C. § 1334(b) and is a core matter under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

A complaint objecting to a debtor’s discharge is a core matter under § 157(b)(1).

Vairo v. Ward (In Re Ward) · filed 1988-02-12(b)(1)

Moreover, the Court finds that the matter before it is a “core matter” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) as exemplified in 28 U.S. C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(F) treats an action to recover a preferential transfer as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Staats v. Branham Sign Co. (In Re Circleville Distributing Co.) · filed 1988-02-16(b)(2)(F)

This is a core proceeding arising under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(F).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of a debt as core proceedings.

Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland Insurance v. Frantz (In Re Frantz) · filed 1988-02-16(b)(2)(I)

A proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a debt is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats matters concerning administration of a bankruptcy estate as core proceedings.

Schindle v. Sharak (In re Salzman) · filed 1988-02-17(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (G) covers core proceedings concerning estate administration and relief from the automatic stay.

Rudaw/Empirical Software Products Ltd. v. Elgar Electronics Corp. (In Re Rudaw/Empirical Software Products Ltd.) · filed 1988-02-19(b)(2)(A), (G)

This is a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (G).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) covers a motion for sanctions for violating the automatic stay as a core proceeding.

In Re Grace · filed 1988-02-25(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (N) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and determine a core proceeding involving approval of a compromise and property sale.

In Re Planned Systems, Inc. · filed 1988-02-25(b)(2)(A) and (N)

This is a core proceeding which the Court may hear and determine. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (N).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats an objection to a proof of claim as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

In Re Bennett · filed 1988-02-26(b)(2)(B)

This is a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2)(C) treats a debtor’s counterclaim against a party that filed a proof of claim as a core proceeding.

Dechert Price & Rhoads v. Direct Satellite Communications, Inc. (In re Direct Satellite Communications, Inc.) · filed 1988-02-29(b)(2)(C)

It is, therefore, a “core proceeding” such as is described by 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(C).