28 U.S.C. § 157

A trustee’s motion to assume an unexpired lease is a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2).

In Re Tulp · filed 1989-08-08(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (O) do not make a debtor’s state-law breach-of-contract claim against a noncreditor third party a core proceeding merely because a recovery would benefit creditors.

Marine Iron & Shipbuilding Co. v. City of Duluth (In Re Marine Iron & Shipbuilding Co.) · filed 1989-08-08(b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(O)

It necessarily follows that Congress did not intend an action such as Debtor’s claim against Defendant to fall within the catch-all provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2) treats proceedings seeking turnover of estate property, determining lien interests in that property, or asserting secured claims against the estate as core proceedings.

First National Bank of Chicago v. Valley Liquors, Inc. (In Re Valley Liquors, Inc.) · filed 1989-08-10(b)(2)

The Court has core jurisdiction over this adversary proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334(b) and 157(b)(2). The suit con-cededly involves sale proceeds of Debtor’s property. Under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E) the proceeding is core because it seeks turn over of estate property. Under § 157(b)(2)(K) this case requires determination of the validity, extent and priority of liens or other interests asserted or which could be asserted by Plaintiff and Defendants in and to said estate property. Furthermore, under § 157(b)(2)(B) Plaintiff’s suit amounts to a secured claim against the estate.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) and (O) classify this proceeding to determine a debtor’s tax liability as a core proceeding.

Mitchell v. United States (In Re Mitchell) · filed 1989-08-10(b)(2)(B), (O)

This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157 and 11 U.S.C. § 505. This matter is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B), (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a motion to dismiss a Chapter 11 case as a core proceeding.

In re Hospitality Associates of Tappan Zee, Ltd. Partnership · filed 1989-08-10(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(F) treats a trustee’s action to avoid a preferential transfer as a core proceeding.

Eide v. United States Ex Rel. Farmers Home Administration (In Re Quade) · filed 1989-08-11(b)(2)(F)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(F).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a proceeding to determine trustee and counsel compensation as a core proceeding.

In re Cohoes Industrial Terminal, Inc. · filed 1989-08-11(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) and (E) treat disputes over exemptions and turnover of estate property as core proceedings.

Baron v. Kodak Retirement Income Plan (In re Johnson) · filed 1989-08-11(b)(2)(B), (E)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(B), (E).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats an action to determine the dischargeability of a debt as a core proceeding.

Serelson v. United States ex rel. Internal Revenue Service (In re Clements) · filed 1989-08-14(b)(2)(I)

This action to Determine the Dischargeability of a Debt is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157 (b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2) does not classify an action to collect an account receivable as a core proceeding; under § 157(c)(1), the bankruptcy court may submit proposed findings and conclusions to the district court.

Luper v. Capital Conveyor (In Re Lee Way Holding Co.) · filed 1989-08-15(b)(2)

That discussion shall not be repeated here; suffice it to say that an action to collect an account receivable is not a core proceeding, but is certainly a “related matter” over which this Court has subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, pursuant to § 157(c)(1), this Court may hear the proceeding and submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law to the District Court.

An adversary proceeding concerning a debtor’s statutory repurchase rights can qualify as a core proceeding under § 157(b).

Jarrett Ranches, Inc. v. Farm Credit Banks of Omaha (In Re Jarrett Ranches, Inc.) · filed 1989-08-16(b)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b).

Section 157(b)(2)'s list of core proceedings is not exhaustive; a proceeding seeking specific applications of Bankruptcy Code provisions can be core.

Cardinal Industries, Inc. v. Buckeye Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (In Re Cardinal Industries, Inc.) · filed 1989-08-18(b)(2)

Such subsections are not an exclusive list of matters which are properly characterized as core proceedings, however. The Court perceives few issues which would have greater relevance to its core jurisdiction than those raised by this complaint concerning specific applications of particular sections of the Bankruptcy Code.

Section 157(b)(2) covers a proceeding seeking damages for a willful violation of the automatic stay as a core proceeding.

In Re Price · filed 1989-08-23(b)(2)

This matter constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), and (0).

Section 157(b)(2)(E) treats a dispute over release of segregated estate funds to competing claimants as a core proceeding.

In Re Alliance Properties, Inc. · filed 1989-08-23(b)(2)(E)

The Court finds that this controversy is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E), and that this Court has jurisdiction to hear this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and General Order 312-D of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.

Section 157(b) treats disputes over segregated rents and a creditor’s deficiency claim as core proceedings subject to bankruptcy court jurisdiction.

National Real Estate Ltd. Partnership-II v. Consolidated Capital Properties (In Re National Real Estate Ltd. Partnership · filed 1989-08-23(b)

The first two issues clearly are core proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b) and subject to bankruptcy court jurisdiction.

Section 157(b)(2)(K) treats an action to determine a lien’s validity, extent, or priority as a core proceeding.

Muir v. Long Island Realty Funding Corp. (In Re Muir) · filed 1989-08-23(b)(2)(K)

An action to determine the validity extent or priority of a lien is explicitly listed as a core proceeding in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(K), and as a result the plaintiffs action is a core proceeding.

Section 157(b) classifies the motions before the bankruptcy court as core proceedings.

In Re McKissie · filed 1989-07-27(b)(2)(A), (G), (O)

The motions constitute core proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(A), (G), (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(G) classifies a motion for relief from the automatic stay as a core proceeding.

In Re Revco D.S., Inc. · filed 1989-08-24(b)(2)(G)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (L) classify a motion to dismiss a bankruptcy case and an objection to plan confirmation as core proceedings.

Matter of Belt · filed 1989-08-28(b)(2)(A) and (L)

The matters before the court concern the Creditor’s motion to dismiss and objection to confirmation and as such are core proceedings within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (L).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats objections to claimed exemptions as core bankruptcy proceedings.

In Re McKeag · filed 1989-08-30(b)(2)(B)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) and (K) treats a trustee’s challenge to a claimed lien as a core proceeding in which the bankruptcy court may enter final judgment.

Ramsay v. Westbrook Construction Co. (In re Horton Vaults, Inc.) · filed 1989-08-31(b)(2)(B) and (K)

The proceeding before the Court is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) and (K), and this Court has jurisdiction to enter a final judgment in the case.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) authorizes bankruptcy courts to hear and determine dischargeability disputes as core proceedings.

NCNB National Bank of Florida v. Sofro (In Re Rental Journal, Inc.) · filed 1989-09-01(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding in which the court is authorized to hear and determine all matters relating to this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2) treats a motion concerning assumption or rejection of a debtor’s lease as a core proceeding.

Secretary of the Army, Department of the Army v. Terrace Apartments, Ltd. (In Re Terrace Apartments, Ltd.) · filed 1989-09-07(b)(2)

The Court finds this matter to be a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2) treats proceedings that would bring property into the debtor’s estate as core proceedings.

St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Pepsico, Inc., Pepsico, Inc., Third-Party v. Banner Industries, Inc., Thir · filed 1989-09-08(b)(2)

It follows that proceedings having the effect of bringing property into the estate of the debtor are core proceedings as defined by section 157(b).

Section 157(b)(2)(H) treats an action to set aside fraudulent transfers as a core proceeding that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Roemelmeyer v. Phillips (In Re Phillips) · filed 1989-09-14(b)(2)(H)

This is a core proceeding in which the Court is authorized to hear and determine all matters relating to this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(H).

Section 157(b)(2)(F) classifies preference proceedings as core proceedings.

Gilchrist MacHinery Co. v. Ross (In Re Gilchrist MacHinery Co.) · filed 1989-09-15(b)(2)(F)

This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(F).

Section 157(b)(2) treats a trustee’s claims inherited from the debtor as non-core when they do not involve the listed bankruptcy matters, such as estate administration, claims allowance, or avoidance.

Hays and Company, as Trustee for Monge Oil Corporation v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. · filed 1989-09-15(b)(2)

The non-§ 544(b) claims made by Hays involve non-core proceedings because they do not involve: the administration of the estate; the allowance of claims against the estate; the voi-dance of preferences or fraudulent transfers; determinations as to dischargeability of debts; priorities of liens; or confirmation of a plan, etc.

Section 157(b)(2)(F) treats a proceeding to recover a preferential transfer as a core proceeding.

Dura-Built Homes, Inc. v. Dobbins Forest Products, Inc. · filed 1989-09-18(b)(2)(F)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(F).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) covers the trustee’s motions for substantive consolidation and approval of the related stipulation as a core proceeding.

In Re I.R.C.C., Inc. · filed 1989-09-19(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(1) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and decide a core proceeding seeking damages for postpetition conduct affecting estate property.

Clarkson v. DeCaceres (In Re Clarkson) · filed 1989-09-21(b)(1)

In any event, however, we believe that this matter is a core proceeding because it seeks damages for alleged conduct affecting property of the Debtors’ estate which occurred principally post-petition, ... and because it relates to subject matter (disposition of the Debtors’ personalty) which was clearly property of the Debtors’ estate and concerning which this court had entered an Order on December 8, 1988, contempt of which is alleged herein.

A bankruptcy court’s assessment of the reasonableness of attorney fees under § 506(b) is a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2).

In Re Korangy · filed 1989-09-22(b)(2)

Section 506(b) requires the bankruptcy court to assess the reasonableness of fees under an attorney fee agreement. Section 506(b) is not alone in mandating the bankruptcy court to make such an assessment; 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2) makes the assessment a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as a core proceeding that the bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. v. Rechichi (In Re Rechichi) · filed 1989-09-25(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding in which the Court is authorized to hear and determine all matters relating to this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2) treats this proceeding concerning exemptions, lien avoidance, and property sales as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

In re Wiford · filed 1989-09-26(b)(2)

This a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B), (K), (N), (O), 11 U.S.C. §§ 522(b), (f)(2), (l), 363(b)(1), (f).

Section 157(b) allows a bankruptcy court to hear and determine a dischargeability proceeding as a core proceeding.

Angel v. Angel (In Re Angel) · filed 1989-09-13(b)(1), (b)(2)(I)

This action is a core proceeding which the Court may hear and determine. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) and (2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2) treats matters concerning estate administration, estate counterclaims against claimants, and proceedings affecting the debtor-creditor relationship as core proceedings.

Ledford v. Tiedge (In Re Sams) · filed 1989-08-30(b)(2)(A), (C), (O)

This proceeding, which arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) in a case referred to this court by the Standing Order Of Reference entered in this district on July 30, 1984, is determined to be a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) — matters concerning the administration of the estate (C) — counterclaims by the estate against persons filing claims against the estate and (0) — proceedings affecting the adjustment of the debtor-creditor relationship.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) identifies core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

In Re Gregory · filed 1989-09-28(b)(2)(A)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2) does not limit core proceedings to the matters it expressly lists; a proceeding concerning the application of Bankruptcy Code provisions may also be core.

Cardinal Industries, Inc. v. Buckeye Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n · filed 1989-09-28(b)(2)

In determining the procedure for the entry of the final order in this matter, the Court notes that there is no subsection of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2) which expressly reflects these matters. Such subsections are not an exclusive list of matters which are properly characterized as core proceedings, however. The Court perceives few issues which would have greater relevance to its core jurisdiction than those raised by this complaint concerning specific applications of particular sections of the Bankruptcy Code. And to the extent the Debtors request this Court to use its equity powers under 11 U.S.C. § 105(a), this Court may be the only forum where the appropriateness of such relief could be determined. Therefore, the Court further finds that this is a core proceeding which this Bankruptcy Judge may hear and determine.

An application for a bankruptcy professional’s compensation and expenses is a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2).

In Re Chas. A. Stevens & Co. · filed 1989-09-29(b)(2)(A), (O)

This matter constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (0).

A debtor’s tax refund claim for a money judgment is not a core proceeding merely because the claimant is in Chapter 11; absent consent, the bankruptcy court handles it under § 157(c)(1).

Murray Industries, Inc. v. United States, Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (In re Murray Industries, Inc · filed 1989-09-29(b)(2)(O)

The only connection of the claim asserted is that the taxpayer who seeks a refund is a Chapter 11 debtor. This alone, in this Court’s judgment, is not sufficient to render this proceeding to be a “core” proceeding. For this reason, it can only be handled by this Court within the limitations set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 157(c)(1) unless there is a consent by the Government to the entry of a dispos-itive final judgment subject only to review under 28 U.S.C. § 158.

Section 157(b)(1) permits a bankruptcy court to decide as core motions arising within a core adversary proceeding over interests in property.

National Westminster Bancorp N.J. v. ICS Cybernetics, Inc. (In Re ICS Cybernetics, Inc.) · filed 1989-10-06(b)(1)

The instant motions are core proceedings, 28 U.S.C.A. § 157(b)(1), arising as they do in conjunction with a core adversary proceeding which has three parts, two of which bear the attributes of an inter-pleader brought on to determine the validity, priority and extent of the interest of four entities, including the Debtor, in certain income generating personal property.

Section 157 treats claims of, and objections to, the exempt status of estate property as core proceedings.

In Re Alagna · filed 1989-10-06(b)(2)(B) and (E)

A claim of, and any objection to, exempt status of property of a debtor’s estate is a “core proceeding” as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) and (E).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) and (O) classify an objection to a creditor's bankruptcy claim as a core proceeding.

In Re Blanton · filed 1989-10-06(b)(2)(B) and (O)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) and (O).

Section 157 treats a tax dispute over income from a plan-created creditor distribution account as a core proceeding when the tax would reduce creditor distributions from the estate.

Unsecured Creditors' Committee of Goldblatt Bros. v. United States (In Re Goldblatt Bros.) · filed 1989-10-10(b)(2)(A)

To the extent that any state or federal tax would be due on CDA income, the pro rata cash distribution due to creditors holding Class 3 Allowed Claims under the Plan would be directly reduced. It is therefore clear that issues as to taxability of income earned on funds held in the CDA is within this Court’s core jurisdiction to administer the estate and implement the confirmation process.

Section 157(b)(2) classifies proceedings involving claims and turnover of estate property as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Jones v. United States ex rel. Commodity Credit Corp. (In re Jones) · filed 1989-10-13(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B), (E), and (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats the determination of a removal application as a core proceeding.

Jandous Electric Construction Corp. v. City of New York (In Re Jandous Electric Construction Corp.) · filed 1989-10-16(b)(2)(A)

The determination of the debtor’s removal application is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157 classifies actions to avoid preferential transfers as core proceedings.

Redmond v. Mendenhall · filed 1989-10-16(b)(2)(F)

An action to avoid a preferential transfer is a “core proceeding” as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157.

Section 157(b) treats a motion to dismiss a Chapter 11 case with prejudice as a core proceeding.

In Re Tim Wargo & Sons, Inc. · filed 1989-10-16(b)(1)

Moreover, the Court finds that this is a “core proceeding” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) as exemplified in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G).

Section 157(b) makes a proceeding for turnover of estate property and relief for an alleged automatic stay violation a core proceeding that a bankruptcy judge may hear and determine.

Orient River Investments v. Equibank (In Re Orient River Investments, Inc.) · filed 1989-10-16(b)

As this is a proceeding seeking the turnover of the contents of a distinct sum which is property of the estate and relief for an alleged violation of the automatic stay, it is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(E), (b)(2)(G), (b)(2)(E), and (b)(2)(0), which we must hear and determine pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats proceedings on objections to claims as core bankruptcy proceedings.

In Re Diamond Mortg. Corp. of Illinois · filed 1989-10-16(b)(2)(B)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) covers a bankruptcy court order setting notice and scheduling procedures for potential foreclosure injunction requests in a Chapter 11 case.

Cardinal Industries, Inc. v. Buckeye Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (In Re Cardinal Industries, Inc.) · filed 1989-10-18(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) which this Bankruptcy Judge may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2) treats a proceeding to modify a secured claim in a Chapter 13 plan as a core proceeding.

Williams v. First National Bank, Rosedale, Mississippi (In Re Williams) · filed 1989-10-20(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (K), (L), and (0).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies determinations of the dischargeability of particular debts as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Sax (In Re Sax) · filed 1989-10-20(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) as a determination of the dis-chargeability of a particular debt.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of a debt as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Hudson Belk Co. v. Williams (In Re Williams) · filed 1989-10-20(b)(2)(I)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), which this court may hearing and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(L) treats an objection to confirmation of a chapter 13 plan as a core proceeding.

In Re Schaitz · filed 1989-10-23(b)(2)(L)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(L).

Section 157(b)(1) authorizes a bankruptcy court to enter final orders in core proceedings, including proceedings concerning estate administration and lien priority.

In Re Sunrise R v. Inc. · filed 1989-10-24(b)(1)

Furthermore, as proceedings concerning the administration of the estate (28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A)), determinations of the validity, extent, or priority of liens (28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E)), and other matters affecting the liquidation of the assets of the estate (28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(O)) are considered “core proceedings”, this court has the authority to enter final orders in respect thereto. (28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1)).

Section 157(b)(2) treats proceedings that determine claims against the estate, estate counterclaims, and lien rights as core proceedings.

Hughes-Bechtol, Inc. v. Air Enterprises, Inc. (In Re Hughes-Bechtol, Inc.) · filed 1989-10-25(b)(2)

Reviewed from a narrow and procedural prospective only, the State Court action could be determined to be a non-core proceeding, Commercial Heat Treating at 888; however, viewed from a substantive and realistic perspective, the State Court action is determined to be a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a motion to transfer venue as a core matter concerning administration of the estate that a bankruptcy judge may hear and determine.

In Re Ridgely Communications, Inc. · filed 1989-10-26(b)(2)(A)

A motion for a transfer of venue is a core matter concerning the administration of the estate which a bankruptcy judge may hear and determine.

Section 157(b) treats an adversary proceeding to avoid transfers as a core proceeding.

Scherling v. Ehrenkranz (In Re Eljay Jrs., Inc.) · filed 1989-10-27(b)

Accordingly, this adversary proceeding is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b) (1984).

Section 157(b) treats an adversary proceeding involving claims under 11 U.S.C. § 727 as a core proceeding.

Humphries v. Schnurr (In Re Schnurr) · filed 1989-10-31(b)

This Court has jurisdiction of this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 1334, as well as the standing Order of Reference existing in this District. Additionally, this adversary proceeding is a core proceeding since it involves claims made under 11 U.S.C. § 727.

Section 157(b)(2)(G) treats a motion for relief from the automatic stay as a core proceeding.

Society Bank v. Botteri (In Re Botteri) · filed 1989-11-01(b)(2)(G)

This proceeding is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G).

A claim seeking to preserve insurance coverage after a post-petition breach of contract is a core proceeding concerning administration of the estate.

Valley Forge Plaza Associates v. Fireman's Fund Insurance · filed 1989-11-08(b)(2)(A)

I am persuaded that a cause of action based on a post-petition breach of contract should not be deemed a “traditional” contract action which the Supreme Court has reserved exclusively for Article III courts and that preservation of an insurance contract is a matter concerning the administration of the estate within the meaning of § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(J) treats an objection to a debtor’s discharge as a core bankruptcy matter.

Duval v. Portner (In Re Portner) · filed 1989-11-11(b)(2)(J)

This is a core matter under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J).

Section 157 treats confirmation of a reorganization plan as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

In Re Dowden · filed 1989-11-14(b)(2)(L)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 157(L) inasmuch as it deals with confirmation of plans.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies proceedings to determine the dischargeability of debts as core proceedings.

Chapins v. Peloso (In Re Peloso) · filed 1989-11-14(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) does not make a dispute between nondebtors a core proceeding merely because one party’s rights trace to a bankruptcy court approved agreement.

Grant Paper Co. v. Communicraft, Inc. (In Re City Wide Press, Inc.) · filed 1989-11-17(b)(2)(A)

The invocation of § 157(b)(2)(A) in this context presupposes a much broader reading of that statutory subsection than appears constitutionally warranted.

Section 157(b)(2)(G) treats the bankruptcy court’s review of this state court judgment following limited relief from the automatic stay as a core proceeding.

Levine v. Levine (In Re Levine) · filed 1989-11-21(b)(2)(G)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G).

A motion to dismiss a Chapter 11 case is a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2)(A).

In Re Park Place Associates · filed 1989-11-21(b)(2)(A)

2. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(G) treats a motion for relief from the automatic stay as a core proceeding that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

In Re Lakeshore Apartments of Ft. Oglethorpe, II, Ltd. · filed 1989-11-27(b)(2)(G)

This is a core proceeding which the Court may hear and determine under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G).

Section 157 treats an objection to a debtor’s discharge as a core proceeding.

G & J Investments v. Zell (In Re Zell) · filed 1989-11-29(b)(2)(J)

This is a core proceeding arising under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1), and (b)(2)(J).

Section 157 allows a bankruptcy court to hear and determine a complaint about the dischargeability of a debt as a core proceeding.

Buckeye Candy Co. v. Ritzer (In Re Ritzer) · filed 1989-10-04(b)(1), (b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding which the Court may hear and determine in accordance with 28 U.S.C. Sec. 157(b)(1) and (2)(I).

Section 157 treats a debtor’s counterclaim arising from the same transaction as a creditor’s claim as a core proceeding.

Dalpe v. Paige (In Re Paige) · filed 1989-10-19(b)(2)(C), (b)(3)

The counterclaim arises out of the same sale transaction as the plaintiffs’ claim. Accordingly, it is determined that this proceeding is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(C), (b)(3).

Section 157(b)(2)(A), (K), and (O) covers a motion concerning a lease security deposit and setoff as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Schwartz v. C.M.C., Inc. (In Re Communicall Central, Inc.) · filed 1989-10-27(b)(2)(A), (K), (O)

The motion constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (K) and (O).

Section 157(b) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and determine motions for relief from the automatic stay and dismissal as core proceedings.

In Re Stulley · filed 1989-11-29(b)(1), (b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(G)

This is a core proceeding which the Court may hear and determine pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1), (2)(A) and (G).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine dischargeability as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Tatavitto v. Ferruzza (In Re Ferruzza) · filed 1989-11-30(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats dischargeability actions as core proceedings that a bankruptcy judge may hear and determine.

FCC National Bank v. Orecchio (In Re Orecchio) · filed 1989-11-30(b)(2)(I)

This dischargeability action is a core proceeding which this bankruptcy judge may hear and determine. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(O) covers a trustee’s action under 11 U.S.C. § 723 to recover from general partners as a core proceeding.

Wilkey v. Inter-Trade, Inc. (In Re Owensboro Distilling Co.) · filed 1989-12-01(b)(2)(O)

Though 11 U.S.C. § 723 falls squarely within the core proceeding confines of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(0), it still does scarcely more than create a conduit for the trustee to serve as the plaintiff in a contract action.

Section 157(b)(2)(J) treats an objection to a debtor’s discharge as a core proceeding that a bankruptcy judge may hear and determine.

Grange Mutual Insurance v. Benningfield (In Re Benningfield) · filed 1989-12-04(b)(2)(J)

This action objecting to the granting of a discharge in bankruptcy is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J) which this bankruptcy judge may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats an objection to a claim as a core proceeding within the bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction.

Matter of D'Lites of America, Inc. · filed 1989-12-06(b)(2)(B)

It is a core proceeding over which the Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) (1989).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats a proceeding to allow an administrative expense claim as a core proceeding.

In Re Grimm & Rothwell, Inc. · filed 1989-12-06(b)(2)(B)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine whether debts are dischargeable as core proceedings.

Stahl v. Lang (In Re Lang) · filed 1989-12-06(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats an adversary proceeding to rescind a debtor’s property sale and recover the buyer’s deposit as a core proceeding.

Carr v. Hudson Holding Associates (In re Hudson Holding Associates) · filed 1989-12-06(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2) treats objections to claims and related counterclaims against the claimant as core proceedings.

Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of West Virginia, Inc. · filed 1989-12-12(b)(2)

Blue Cross has filed proofs of claim against the estate. The debtor objects to the administrative priority status claimed by Blue Cross and has filed counterclaims. Bankruptcy Rule 3007 permits the debtor to join a demand for relief with objections to claims. This procedure commences an adversary proceeding. Clearly, this matter is a core proceeding and we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (B) treats a motion to strike a response to a claim objection and seek sanctions as a core proceeding.

In Re Chas. A. Stevens & Co. · filed 1989-12-14(b)(2)(A) and (B)

The motion constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (B).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of debts as core proceedings.

Chisholm v. Colton (In Re Colton) · filed 1989-12-14(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding under provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (I) and (O), with jurisdiction conferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and General Order No. 84 of ... this District.

Section 157(b)(2) covers a trustee’s adversary proceeding over alleged postpetition transfers as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Pongetti v. Security Bank (In Re Marlar) · filed 1989-12-14(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (E), and (0).

A Rule 9011 sanctions proceeding arising from an objection to discharge is a core proceeding under § 157.

Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Sutherlin · filed 1989-12-14(b)

FSLIC’s argument does not provide any sound reason, nor does this court find one of its own, for the court to decline to follow the settled authority which holds that an award of sanctions under bankruptcy Rule 9011 is a core proceeding. Accordingly, this court holds that the correct standard of review in this matter is an abuse of discretion standard.

Section 157 treats objections to secured proofs of claim and counterclaims to proofs of claim as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may fully determine.

Melbourne v. Mid-Penn Consumer Discount Co. (In re Melbourne) · filed 1989-12-19(b)(2)(B), (b)(2)(C)

As it is in the form of an objection to Mid-Penn’s secured proof of claim, this proceeding is uncontestably core in nature pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B). The fact that the Debtor raises significant claims against Mid-Penn and ultimately is awarded a significant monetary recovery against Mid-Penn does not change this result, because counterclaims to proofs of claim are also within the scope of core proceedings.

Section 157 authorizes a bankruptcy judge to hear and determine a dischargeability proceeding as a core proceeding.

Century Surety Insurance v. Rainer (In Re Rainer) · filed 1989-12-06(b)(1), (b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding which the Court has authority to hear and determine in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) and (2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(A), (N), and (O) covers this dispute over a deposit for a proposed bankruptcy asset sale as a core proceeding.

In re Mercury Lamps, Inc. · filed 1989-12-22(b)(2)(A), (N), (O)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (N), (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(F) treats a proceeding to avoid a preferential transfer as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Arnason v. Satin American Corp. (In Re J.I.C. Installations, Inc.) · filed 1989-12-27(b)(2)(F)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(F).

Section 157(b)(2)(J) treats objections to discharge as core proceedings in which a bankruptcy judge may enter final judgment.

Creative Recreational Systems, Inc. v. Rice (In Re Rice) · filed 1989-12-29(b)(2)(J)

This is a “core proceeding” as to which a bankruptcy judge has the power to enter final judgment. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J).

Section 157(b) treats fraudulent conveyance proceedings as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Brignac v. Roppolo Petroleum (In re Roppolo) · filed 1990-01-04(b)

Congressional intent that these matters be handled in the bankruptcy courts appears in 28 U.S.C. Sec. 157(b)(2)(H) where fraudulent conveyance proceedings are specifically set forth as core. Under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 157(b)(1), core proceedings can be heard and determined in the bankruptcy court.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a motion to dismiss a bankruptcy case as a core proceeding in which the bankruptcy judge may enter orders and judgments.

In Re St. Augustine Trust · filed 1990-01-10(b)(2)(A)

The Court further concludes that this is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) so that the undersigned United States Bankruptcy Judge has judicial power and jurisdiction to enter appropriate orders and judgments.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a claim for damages for violating the automatic stay as a core proceeding.

Taxel v. Electronic Sports Research (In Re Cinematronics, Inc.) · filed 1990-01-10(b)(2)(A)

The first claim for relief is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) and (H) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and determine exemption objections and fraudulent transfer proceedings as core proceedings.

Rimmel v. Goldman (In Re Goldman) · filed 1990-01-11(b)(2)(B), (b)(2)(H)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) & (H), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(G) makes a motion for relief from the automatic stay a core proceeding that a bankruptcy judge may hear and determine.

In Re Cardinal Congregate I · filed 1990-01-12(b)(2)(G)

This is a core proceeding which the Court may hear and determine under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a proceeding to approve the selection of a bankruptcy trustee as a core proceeding.

In Re Cardinal Industries, Inc. · filed 1990-01-12(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (O) permits a bankruptcy court to treat a professional’s fee application as a core proceeding.

In Re Chas. A. Stevens & Co. · filed 1990-01-18(b)(2)(A), (O)

This matter constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (O).

Section 157(b)(2)'s list of core proceedings is nonexclusive and supports treating a trustee's action to recover a partnership deficiency from general partners as core.

McGraw v. Betz (In Re Bell & Beckwith) · filed 1990-01-19(b)(2)

The list of core proceedings set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 157 is not exclusive. However, § 157(b)(2)(A), (E) and (0) support this action’s core status.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats compensation of professionals as a core proceeding because it affects administration of the debtor’s estate.

In Re Wizard Enterprises, Inc. · filed 1990-01-22(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding inasmuch as compensation of professionals affects the administration of the debtor’s estate under 28 U.S.C. Section 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(H) treats a fraudulent conveyance action as a core proceeding that the bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Staats v. Palermini (In Re Palermini) · filed 1990-01-22(b)(2)(H)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(H) which this Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats proceedings concerning the allowance or disallowance of claims as core proceedings.

In Re Pettibone Corp. · filed 1990-01-23(b)(2)(B)

This is a core proceeding within 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) (allowance and disallowance of claims).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of a debt as core proceedings.

Lopez v. Martinez (In Re Martinez) · filed 1990-01-26(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) and this opinion constitutes the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Section 157(b)(2)(K) treats a proceeding over the validity of a claimed lien as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Drewes v. United States (In Re Bukowski) · filed 1990-01-29(b)(2)(K)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(K).

Section 157(b)(2) covers a bankruptcy proceeding concerning settlement of a mechanic’s lien as a core proceeding.

Parr Elevator, Inc. v. Schultz Manufacturing & Fabricating Co. · filed 1990-01-31(b)(2)

To begin, this court finds that the proceedings before the bankruptcy court were a “core” proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats this adversary proceeding over competing claims to a tax refund as a core proceeding.

United States v. Revco D.S., Inc. (In re Revco D.S., Inc.) · filed 1990-01-31(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157 treats this proceeding as core and permits the bankruptcy court to enter final judgment.

Bank of Yellville v. Scott (In Re Scott) · filed 1990-01-17(b)(2)(E), (b)(2)(O)

The proceeding before the Court is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E) and (O), and the Court has jurisdiction to enter a final judgment.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (G) treats motions to convert a bankruptcy case and for relief from the automatic stay as core proceedings.

In Re Reinbold · filed 1990-02-05(b)(2)(A), (G)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (G).

A contract-rescission adversary proceeding may be a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2)(A).

Kolinsky v. Gagliano (In Re Kolinsky) · filed 1990-02-06(b)(2)(A)

This is a core ... proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157 treats a proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a debt as a core proceeding that a bankruptcy judge may hear and determine.

Beverly Enterprises v. Eversole (In Re Eversole) · filed 1990-02-06(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding which the Court may hear and determine in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) and (b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a debt as a core proceeding.

Senkel v. Fahland (In Re Fahland) · filed 1990-02-08(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 157(b)(2)(I), in that it requests a determination of the discharge-ability of a debt.

Section 157(b)(2)(J) treats this dischargeability dispute as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Boatmen's Bank v. Johnson (In Re Johnson) · filed 1990-02-08(b)(2)(J)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J).

An objection to claims for administrative expense priority is a core proceeding under § 157.

In Re Consolidated Oil & Gas, Inc. · filed 1990-02-09

2. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157.

Section 157(b)(2)(L) treats plan confirmation as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

In Re Rusty Jones, Inc. · filed 1990-02-09(b)(2)(L)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(L).

Section 157(b)(2) treats a trustee’s action to determine a security interest in rents and obtain turnover as a core proceeding.

Drummond v. Farm Credit Bank of Spokane (In Re Ranch) · filed 1990-02-13(b)(2)

The action by the Trustee under 11 U.S.C. § 544 seeks a determination of the validity of the defendant’s security interest in such rents and is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E) (orders to turn over property of the estate), (K) (determination of the validity, extent or priority of liens) and (0) (proceedings affecting the liquidation of assets of the estate).

Section 157(b)(2)(J) treats an objection to discharge as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Bank of India v. Sapru (In Re Sapru) · filed 1990-02-15(b)(2)(J)

This is a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J).

Section 157(b)(2) treats an objection to the classification of attorneys’ fee claims in a bankruptcy case as a core proceeding.

In Re Del Grosso · filed 1990-02-15(b)(2)(A), (O)

This objection constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (0).

Section 157 treats a proceeding to recover specific escrowed funds and collect a postpetition account receivable as core, allowing the bankruptcy court to decide it.

222 Liberty Associates v. Prescott Forbes Real Estate Corp. (In Re 222 Liberty Associates) · filed 1990-02-16(b)(2)

The parties agree that this matter is a core proceeding over which this court not only has jurisdiction, but is empowered to decide, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(1), (b)(2)(E), (b)(2)(0). We also agree.

Section 157(b)(2)(G) treats a motion to lift or modify the automatic stay as a core proceeding.

In re Beauti-Full Size Boutique, Inc. · filed 1990-02-16(b)(2)(G)

This is a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G).

Section 157(b)(2) treats a debtor-in-possession’s post-petition contract dispute as a core proceeding.

Lipshie v. AM Cable TV Industries, Inc. (In Re Geauga Trenching Corp.) · filed 1990-02-21(b)(2)

The Trustee’s action centers around this post-petition contract. This, without more, is a core proceeding because it arises in a Title 11 case.

Section 157(b)(2) treats proceedings concerning the determination and disposition of estate assets as core proceedings.

Lambert v. Cantin (In Re Cantin) · filed 1990-02-22(b)(2)

This Court has core jurisdiction over this matter as it involves the very essential determination and disposition of assets of the estate, 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B), (E), (H), (N), (O).

Section 157 gives a bankruptcy court jurisdiction to determine whether an arguable claim arising under Title 11 is a core or non-core proceeding and how to proceed.

Matilla v. Radco Merchandising Services, Inc. (In Re Radco Merchandising Services, Inc.) · filed 1990-02-23

What is clear is that the Matillas present an arguable claim in Count 2 against Marine Midland, arising under Title 11; under the principles examined earlier in this opinion, this gives the bankruptcy court at least enough jurisdiction to determine if this is a core or a non-core proceeding under Title 11, and how to advance from there.

Section 157 treats motions to terminate, annul, or modify the automatic stay as core proceedings.

In Re Bona · filed 1990-02-23(b)(2)(G)

Motions to terminate, annul or modify the automatic stay are core proceedings under Sec. 157(b)(2)(G).

Section 157(b)(2) treats contested matters concerning claims and plan confirmation as core bankruptcy proceedings.

In Re Glow · filed 1990-02-27(b)(2)

No objection was made by counsel to the jurisdiction of this Court as to this matter, the Court finds jurisdiction to be present, and that this contested matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B), (K) and (L).

Section 157 permits a bankruptcy court to hear and determine proceedings it classifies as core under subsection (b)(2).

In Re Cheek · filed 1990-03-01(b)(2)(B) and (I)

This is a “core proceeding” which the Court may hear and determine pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) and (I).

Section 157 treats an adversary proceeding challenging an IRS tax claim as a core proceeding.

Farrington v. United States, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service · filed 1990-03-01

Jurisdiction to hear this matter is granted by 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and this is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (B) treats motions for leave to file late proofs of claim as core proceedings.

In Re Sanitary & Improvement District No. 7 · filed 1990-03-06(b)(2)(A) and (B)

These matters are core proceedings as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (B).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (O) treats the collection of a post-petition debt as a core proceeding.

LTV Steel Co. v. Connors (In Re Chateaugay Corp.) · filed 1990-03-06(b)(2)(A) and (O)

The collection of a post-petition debt is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(E) treats a trustee’s action to recover insurance proceeds for the bankruptcy estate as a core proceeding.

Gilbert v. New England Mutual Life Insurance (In re Worl) · filed 1990-03-08(b)(2)(E)

This matter is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E).

Section 157(b)(2) treats a debtor’s post-petition legal malpractice claim against its bankruptcy counsel as a core proceeding when the alleged conduct directly affects estate administration and debtor-creditor relations.

Woodard v. Sanders (In Re SPI Communications & Marketing, Inc.) · filed 1990-03-09(b)(2)

Thus, although the adjudication of a legal malpractice claim involves state law, the allegations of the Complaints allege a direct causal link between Sanders’ legal representation of the former Debtors’ cases and the subsequent fundamental change affecting debtor-creditor relations as a result of the conversion of their cases from Chapter 11 reorganization to Chapter 7 liquidation. The Court’s jurisdiction, therefore, stems not only from Code § 157(b)(2)(A), but also from subsection (0) as it concerns the adjustment of the debtor-creditor relationship.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings.

American General Finance, Inc. v. Heath (In Re Heath) · filed 1990-03-12(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b) gives bankruptcy courts authority over core proceedings that affect the bankruptcy estate, including proceedings concerning claims, offsets, and setoffs.

Town of Colchester v. Hinesburg Sand & Gravel, Inc. (In Re APC Construction, Inc.) · filed 1990-03-13(b)

The net, or the sum of the claims, offsets and setoffs, as the case may be, affects the totality of the estate that may be distributed to claimants. Congress has given us core jurisdiction over such matters. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b).

Section 157 permits a bankruptcy court to finally adjudicate as a core proceeding an action to enjoin proceedings that conflict with a debtor’s reorganization and affect administration of the estate.

Deltacorp, Inc. v. Office of Thrift Supervision (In Re Deltacorp, Inc.) · filed 1990-03-13

Those matters within the jurisdiction of the district court which may be referred to the bankruptcy court are provided for in 28 U.S.C. § 157. An action brought to enjoin proceedings in another forum that conflicts with a debt- or’s reorganization and that will affect the administration of a debtor’s estate is, by its nature, a core proceeding which may be finally adjudicated by the bankruptcy court.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (O) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and decide as core proceedings claims under § 525 and the Supremacy Clause concerning interference with a reorganization.

Will Rogers Jockey & Polo Club, Inc. v. Oklahoma Horse Racing Commission (In Re Will Rogers Jockey & Polo Club, Inc.) · filed 1990-03-13(b)(2)(A) and (O)

The Court holds that it has core jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (O) to hear and decide Will Rogers’ claims under 11 U.S.C. § 525 and the Supremacy Clause.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) makes determinations about the dischargeability of particular debts core proceedings in which a bankruptcy court may enter final orders and judgments.

Coronet Insurance v. Blumberg (In Re Blumberg) · filed 1990-03-15(b)(2)(I)

“Determinations as to the dischargeability of particular debts” are core proceedings within 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I). This court is therefore empowered to enter final orders and judgments in this proceeding.

Section 157(b)(1) allows a bankruptcy court to hear and determine a core proceeding that depends on a substantive Bankruptcy Code right and affects liquidation of estate assets.

Camp v. National Union Fire Insurance (In Re Government Securities Corp.) · filed 1990-03-16(b)(1)

Application of Section 541(c)(1)(B) could not be contemplated outside of bankruptcy, and the controversy involving payment on the bond affects the liquidation of debtor’s assets. Accordingly, this matter comes within the ambit of “core” proceedings, giving the bankruptcy court subject matter jurisdiction to hear and determine the instant ease.

A collection action involving property no longer in the bankruptcy estate is not a core proceeding when it does not affect the estate.

First National Bank of Maryland v. United States Wall Corp. (In Re Incor, Inc.) · filed 1990-03-16(b)(2)

Under these circumstances, this Court agrees with the conclusion of the bankruptcy court that this action to collect the accounts receivable cannot be considered a core matter.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine dischargeability as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Advance-United Expressways Inc. v. Wines (In Re Wines) · filed 1990-03-20(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding in which the Court is authorized to hear and determine all matters relating to this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Motions to dismiss a bankruptcy case are core proceedings because they affect administration of the estate.

In Re N.R. Guaranteed Retirement, Inc. · filed 1990-03-22(b)(2)(A)

Motions to dismiss, since they plainly effect the administration of the estate, are also core proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(G) permits a bankruptcy judge to hear and determine a motion for relief from the automatic stay as a core proceeding.

In Re North Indianapolis Venture · filed 1990-03-22(b)(2)(G)

This is a core proceeding which this bankruptcy judge may hear and determine under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G).

Section 157 treats a proceeding as core if it invokes a right provided by title 11 or could arise only in bankruptcy.

James A. LATHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees · filed 1990-03-23(b)(1)

In Matter of Wood, 825 F.2d 90 (5th Cir.1987), we concluded that “a proceeding is core under section 157 if it invokes a substantive right provided by title 11 or if it is a proceeding that, by its nature, could arise only in the context of a bankruptcy proceeding.” Id. at 97. Whatever the difficulties of determining core status in other contexts, our case is not close. Latham’s personal claims would not invoke substantive rights provided by title 11, nor do they arise only in the context of bankruptcy proceedings.

Section 157(b)(2) treats a proceeding based on Bankruptcy Code § 726(b) as a core proceeding.

Bishop v. United States (In Re Leonard) · filed 1990-03-28(b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(O)

The plaintiffs cause of action arises under Code § 726(b). I find that this proceeding is a core proceeding, see 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (O); ... and that this court has jurisdiction.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (B) makes the determination of a creditor’s motion to dismiss a Chapter 13 case a core proceeding.

In Re Jerome · filed 1990-03-29(b)(2)(A) and (B)

1. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 157(a) to make a determination with respect to the creditor’s-motion to dismiss this Chapter 13 case. Such determination is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (B).

Section 157 treats matters concerning estate administration and determinations of dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings.

Friedly v. Niswonger (In Re Niswonger) · filed 1990-03-29(b)(2)(A)

These related adversary proceedings, which arise under 28 U.S.C. Section 1334(b) in a case referred to this court by the Standing Order of Reference entered in this district on July 30, 1984, are determined to be core proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 157(b)(2)(A) — matters concerning the administration of the estate and (1) — determinations as to the dis-chargeability of particular debts.

Section 157(b)(2) classifies proceedings involving estate administration, estate counterclaims against claimants, and adjustments of the debtor-creditor relationship as core proceedings.

Spaulding v. Citizens Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Dayton (In Re Spaulding) · filed 1990-03-29(b)(2)

This proceeding, which arises under 28 U.S.C. Section 1334(b) in a case referred to this court by the Standing Order of Reference entered in this district, is determined to be a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 157(b)(2)(A) — matters concerning the administration of the estate, (C) counterclaims by the estate against persons filing claims against the estate and (0) other proceedings affecting the adjustment of the debtor-creditor relationship.

Section 157(b)(2) treats proceedings concerning the allowance of claims against the estate and the dischargeability of debts as core proceedings.

Florence v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Florence) · filed 1990-03-29(b)(2)(B), (b)(2)(I)

This proceeding, which arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) in a case referred to this court by the Standing Order of Reference entered in this district on July 30, 1984, is determined to be a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) — allowance or disallowance of claims against the estate and (I) determinations as to the discharge-ability of particular debts.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats proceedings on professional fee applications as core proceedings.

In Re Grimes · filed 1990-03-29(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157 treats turnover orders and sale orders as core bankruptcy proceedings.

In re Karl GERWER · filed 1990-03-13(b)(2)(E), (b)(2)(N)

It argues that the turnover and sale were not core proceedings. But 28 U.S.C. Sec. 157(b)(2)(E) defines a turnover order as a core proceeding and 28 U.S.C. Sec. 157(b)(2)(N) defines a sale order as a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2) treats turnover orders and sale orders as core proceedings.

Austein v. Schwartz (In re Gerwer) · filed 1990-03-13(b)(2)(E), (b)(2)(N)

But 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E) defines a turnover order as a core proceeding and 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(N) defines a sale order as a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (O) treats a motion to substantively consolidate bankruptcy cases as a core proceeding.

In re Bounds · filed 1990-03-30(b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(O)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (O).