28 U.S.C. § 1391

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Stoke v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Terry v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred.

Jones v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the surgery at issue took place.

Walley v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiff underwent the surgery underlying the claim.

BEST v. C R BARD INC · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

Plaintiffs request this Court to transfer the out-of-state plaintiffs to the jurisdictions in which they had surgery for the implantation of their Bard inferior vena cava filter. See Br. in Supp. of Mot. (“Br.”) 7. The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred.

Britt v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Hebron v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Wedge v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiffs received the implants at issue.

Templeton v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Stuebs v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

McCaskill v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where a plaintiff’s medical device was implanted.

Reeves v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including the surgery at issue.

Burge v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) allows venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Ingram v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiff underwent the surgery at issue.

McKay v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiffs’ medical devices were implanted.

Shevlin v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Finn v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including the district where the relevant surgery took place.

McClamy v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Karper v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Eckenrod v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Hartman-Massey v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiffs underwent the implantation surgeries at issue.

Simpson v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Gordon v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Lawrence v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Rael v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiff’s implantation surgery took place.

Rowe v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiffs underwent the implantation surgeries at issue.

McBride v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the medical procedure at issue took place.

Hines v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiff underwent the surgery at issue.

Olson v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiffs underwent the surgeries underlying their claims.

Umholtz v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred.

Ramirez v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Foster v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

ALDERMAN v. C. R. BARD, INC. · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including the districts where the plaintiffs underwent the surgeries at issue.

Barnes v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Sullivan v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Geniesse v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Thompson v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiff’s implantation surgery took place.

Wayt v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including the district where the plaintiff underwent the surgery at issue.

Robinson v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including the district where the plaintiff’s medical device was implanted.

Foreman v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to a claim occurred.

Tafoya v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to a claim occurred.

Bedrosian v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Dias v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Vail v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Christian v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Roman v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Ghalebi v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including the district where the plaintiff underwent the surgery at issue.

Sutherland v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Fernandez v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Samuel v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Pruitt v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Turner v. C R Bard Inc. · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

A district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred is a proper venue for that claim.

Wilder v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Pilip v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Saenz v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including the implant surgery at issue here.

Holevinski v. C.R. Bard, Inc. · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiff underwent the surgery at issue.

Guptil v. C.R. Bard, Inc. · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Higgs v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Gatliff v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiff received the medical implant at issue.

Gueno v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

Plaintiffs request this Court to transfer the out-of-state plaintiffs to the jurisdictions in which they had surgery for the implantation of their Bard inferior vena cava filter. See Br. in Supp. of Mot. (“Br.”) 7. The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Accreditation Commission for Health Care, Inc. v. NextLOGiK, Inc. · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

Because Plaintiff has satisfied its burden of establishing venue under § 1391(b)(2), the Court need not address Plaintiff's arguments concerning § 1391(b)(1).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiffs’ filters were implanted.

Dominy v. C R Bard Incorporated · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Payne v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Klumpp v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Ramsey v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

McCormick v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Brdek v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Ronquillo v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Shannon v. C.R. Bard, Inc. · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Carmichiel v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the surgery at issue took place.

Shelton v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Edmonds v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Cotton v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Levin v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

McCloskey v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiffs underwent the implant surgeries at issue.

McDonald v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Arredondo v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Tahan v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Napier v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred.

Becerra v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Howell v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Harvey v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiff underwent the surgery at issue.

Washington v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Guidry v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Richardson v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where a plaintiff underwent the surgery at issue.

Donnell v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to a claim occurred.

Vasquez v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Fazio v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Hoyopatubbi v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiffs underwent the implantation surgeries at issue.

DuVal v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Marner v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Duffy v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Novia v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiffs’ implantation surgeries took place.

Gibson v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred.

Carpenter v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including the district where the plaintiff underwent the surgery at issue.

Hughes v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

Plaintiffs request this Court to transfer the out-of-state plaintiffs to the jurisdictions in which they had surgery for the implantation of their Bard inferior vena cava filter. See Br. in Supp. of Mot. (“Br.”) 7. The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Harrison v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to a claim occurred.

Durden v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the surgery at issue took place.

Hanson v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Hertzberg v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Collins v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Leonhart v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Bruce v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Palmiter v. C.R. Bard, Inc. · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred.

Allen v. C.R. Bard, Inc. · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Holmes v. C.R. Bard, Inc. · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including the district where the plaintiff’s implantation surgery took place.

Mata v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Bowes v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred.

Morris v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where a plaintiff underwent the implant surgery at issue.

Aguilera v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where significant events material to a claim occurred, even if other material events occurred elsewhere.

Powers-Barnhard v. Butler · filed 2020-08-21(b)(2)

The events in Syracuse could support Plaintiff’s claim even without the later sexual abuse elsewhere. Thus, the Court finds Plaintiff has met her burden and established that venue under § 1391(b)(2) is proper in this District.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to a claim occurred; venue is improper when the plaintiff shows no connection between the claim and the chosen district.

SCHAFER v. DIRECT ENERGY SERVICES, LLC · filed 2020-08-21(b)(2)

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2), a civil action may be brought in a “a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated.” ... Plaintiffs articulate no connection between the Western District and Underwood’s claim, and the Court therefore agrees that venue in this district is improper.

Section 1391(b)(2) requires a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim to have occurred in the district; the plaintiff’s office there alone does not establish venue.

LS Parry Inc. v. Tepeyac, LLC · filed 2020-08-25(b)(2)

Even construing the pleadings liberally, the Court does not find sufficient factual allegations of “substantial” actions that occurred in New York.1 Accordingly, the Court concludes that Plaintiff has failed to make a prima facie showing of proper venue, and dismissal is warranted under Rule 12(b)(3).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the disputed implant surgery took place.

Powell v. C. R. Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-26(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred, including receipt of the alleged fraudulent communications.

Hodgson v. Roper · filed 2020-08-26(b)(2)

Accordingly, venue is proper in the Eastern District of California because it is “a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim[s] occurred,” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Chromy v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-26(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiffs underwent implantation surgery.

Maldonado v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-26(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) makes venue proper in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred.

KELLY v. PEERSTAR LLC · filed 2020-08-26(b)(2)

Venue is proper because a substantial part of the events giving rise to the parties’ claims occurred in the Western District of Pennsylvania.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the implantation surgery at issue took place.

Cabrera v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-26(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Head v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-26(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.”

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including the district where a plaintiff received the medical implant at issue.

Wawrzyniak v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-27(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b}(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiff underwent the surgery at issue.

KING v. CR BARD INC · filed 2020-08-27(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b}(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Stamer v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-27(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b}(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Be Green Packaging LLC v. Chen · filed 2020-08-27(b)(2)

Thus, the Court concludes that for purposes of the venue statute, a substantial part of the events giving rise to Be Green’s claims occurred in South Carolina.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiff underwent the medical procedure at issue.

McCaslin v. C.R. Bard, Inc. · filed 2020-08-27(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b}(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Byers v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-27(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b}(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to a claim occurred.

Davitt v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-27(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b}(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Shoop v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-27(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.”

Section 1391(b)(2) permits a civil action to be brought in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

(PC) Hill v. Black · filed 2020-08-21(b)(2)

The federal venue statute provides that a civil action “may be brought in (1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in this action, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to such action.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). In this case, the claim arose in Monterey County, which is in the Northern District of California.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Henry v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-26(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where the implant surgery giving rise to a claim occurred.

Beeler v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-27(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b}(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue for a TCPA claim where the plaintiff received the allegedly prohibited communication.

Pierucci v. Homes.com Incorporated · filed 2020-09-10(b)(2)

For purposes of TCPA claims, a “substantial part” of the events occur where the plaintiff received the purportedly prohibited communication.

Section 1391(b)(2) does not make venue proper in a district merely because the plaintiff resides there or would face hardship litigating elsewhere.

Allman v. Barr · filed 2020-09-11(b)(2)

Neither Mr. Allman’s status as an incarcerated and indigent resident of Colorado nor his strong preference to litigate in Colorado rather than Oregon make venue proper in the District of Colorado under § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) requires a substantial connection between the events giving rise to a claim and the district where the action is brought.

Post Acute Medical LLC v. LeBlanc · filed 2020-09-14(b)(2)

The events giving rise to PAM’s claims — focused upon the conduct of a ... Texas company (and its Texas-based owner) in a Texas litigation and in providing services to PAM’s hospitals around the country — fail to show a “substantial” connection to the Middle District of Pennsylvania.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

DBSI Incorporated v. Oates · filed 2020-09-14(b)(2)

However, as the Court has already established, a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred in Arizona. Defendant entered into an employment agreement with an Arizona corporation and used that relationship to allegedly misappropriate confidential information stored in Arizona. The District of Arizona is a proper venue for this case.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to a claim occurred.

VAN DUZER LANG v. PATIENTS OUT OF TIME · filed 2020-09-15(b)(2)

As stated above, because a substantial part of the events giving rise to Plaintiffs’ non- contract claims occurred within the Western District of Virginia, and not New Jersey, the Court finds that venue is improper as to those claims.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred.

Gorney v. Veterans Administration · filed 2020-09-15(b)(2)

Venue in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, Tucson Division, is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2) and LRCiv 77.1(c), as a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred in Pima County, Arizona.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

SIMMONS REALTY CO., INC. v. BEDFORD UST HOLDING COMPANY, LLC · filed 2020-09-15(b)(2)

Venue is proper because a substantial part of the events giving rise to Plaintiff's claims occurred in the Western District of Pennsylvania.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, even if relevant events also occurred in another district.

RUDOLF v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. · filed 2020-09-16(b)(2)

Rudolf asserts venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2), which requires that a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to Rudolf’s claims occurred in this District. ... As a result, his employment discrimination claims arise out of events that took place in both Pittsburgh and New York, and venue is proper in this District.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

(PS) Howard v. Daly · filed 2020-09-18(b)(2)

Thus, a substantial part of the claims occurred, to the extent they occurred anywhere, in San Francisco. Therefore, plaintiffs claim should have been filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where the defendant intentionally targeted sales of the allegedly infringing product, even if local sales alone were not substantial.

Sundance Botanicals, LLC v. The Power of Elderberries, LLC · filed 2020-09-21(b)(2)

In other words, The Power of Elderberries did target sales into the Northern District of Indiana, thus venue is also proper.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Oppenheimer v. Robison · filed 2020-09-22(b)(2)

Venue is proper in this Court because Plaintiff alleges a substantial part of the events or omissions that form the basis of his claims occurred within the Court’s jurisdiction; Craig Daniel Robison and Katherine Anne Robison (collectively, “the Robisons”) were served in Baldwin County, Alabama; and venue is not contested.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Manfre-Lane v. South Texas Dental Associates L.P. · filed 2020-09-22(b)(2)

In light of those allegations, the Court finds that “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred” in the Northern District of Texas.

Section 1391(b) does not provide venue in the Eastern District of California for a claim against an official at a San Diego County prison.

(PC) Bradford v. Gee · filed 2020-09-18(b)

Second, venue is not proper as to the property/access to the courts claim against defendant Frijas, who is allegedly employed at the R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility, in San Diego County. San Diego County lies within the venue of the Southern District of California, and not in this court.

In a legal malpractice suit, the events or omissions relevant to venue are the defendant attorney’s allegedly deficient services, rather than the events underlying the claim the attorney mishandled.

MORIARTY v. ZEFF LAW FIRM LLC · filed 2020-09-30(b)(2)

The determinative “events or omissions” relevant to proper venue in a legal malpractice suit under § 1391(b)(2) are those of the defendant-attorney in providing the allegedly deficient legal services, not those of the underlying claim.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits a civil action to be brought in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Frey v. Minter · filed 2020-10-01(b)(2)

A civil action may be brought in “a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2). Here, events giving rise to Mr. Frey’s claim occurred in the Middle District of Georgia, which was therefore a permissible transferee venue.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the defendant’s alleged wrongful activity occurred.

Dinkins v. State of MO · filed 2020-10-01(b)(2)

In deciding whether a substantial part of the events giving rise to a plaintiff's claims occurred in the forum district, the court must focus on the defendants alleged wrongful activity. ... As such, the proper venue for this claim is with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred or a substantial part of the property at issue is situated.

EMERSON RADIO CORPORATION v. YU · filed 2020-10-01(b)(2)

Venue is proper given that “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated” in this district.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred.

Cox v. Morley · filed 2020-10-06(b)(2)

The events underlying the severed claims occurred in counties falling within the Northern District of New York. See 28 U.S.C. § 112(a). Plaintiff is currently incarcerated in Great Meadow Correctional Facility, and he seeks immediate injunctive relief. Venue for the severed claims is therefore proper in the Northern District of New York. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where goods were manufactured, order communications occurred, and payment was due.

Integrated Process Engineers & Constructors, Inc. v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc. · filed 2020-10-07(b)(2)

Under § 1391(b)(2), venue is proper in any district where a “substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” ... Those facts all support a conclusion that a “substantial part” of relevant events occurred here.