28 U.S.C. § 1391

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the underlying events occurred.

Dodson International Parts, Inc. v. Williams International Co. LLC · filed 2020-06-15(b)(2)

This Court is a proper venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2) owing to underlying events that took place in this District.

A district where a defective product was manufactured and a related dealership agreement was signed may be a proper venue for claims arising from the product, even when venue is also proper elsewhere.

Meyer v. Korges Enterprises Incorporated · filed 2020-06-16(b)(2)

When considering whether the suit falls within § 1391(b)(2), the Court must look at the nature of the action to determine whether a substantial part of the event or omissions giving rise to the claim were located in this district. ... The actions that occurred in the Northern District of Indiana are “significant to the genesis of the dispute[]” and this “Court cannot say that the Northern District of Indiana has an insubstantial connection to the case,” therefore Desert Autoplex’s motion to dismiss for improper venue under Rule 12(b)(3) is denied.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, even if venue is also proper elsewhere.

Meyer v. Newmar Corporation · filed 2020-06-16(b)(2)

When considering whether the suit falls within § 1391(b)(2), the Court must look at the nature of the action to determine whether a substantial part of the event or omissions giving rise to the claim were located in this district. ... The actions that occurred in the Northern District of Indiana are “significant to the genesis of the dispute[]” and this “Court cannot say that the Northern District of Indiana has an insubstantial connection to the case,” therefore Desert Autoplex’s motion to dismiss for improper venue under Rule 12(b)(3) is denied.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a judicial district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Speyrer v. Williams · filed 2020-06-23(b)(2)

Therefore, venue is proper in the Monroe Division of the Western District.

Section 1391(b) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Rice v. Golden · filed 2020-06-23(b)

In this case, with respect to Rice’s claims at SCI Phoenix, “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim” took place at this facility which is located in Montgomery County and within the venue of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Rice v. Young · filed 2020-06-23(b)(2)

In this case, with respect to Rice’s claim of sexual assault at SCI Phoenix, “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim” took place at this facility which is located in Montgomery County and within the venue of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

(PC) Thompson v. Razavi · filed 2020-06-25(b)(2)

This latter claim against the CHCF doctor is not a “substantial part” of plaintiff's complaint. CTF is in Monterey County, which lies in the Northern District of California. Therefore, plaintiff's complaint should have been filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including the formation and performance of a contract.

Barr and Morgan v. Eljamal · filed 2020-07-02(b)(2)

Because the nature of the specific acts in the forum (the formation and execution of the contract) have a close nexus to the claims—indeed, they are the very basis for the claims—it follows necessarily that a substantial part of the acts occurred in Connecticut.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Jiggetts v. State of Maryland · filed 2020-07-07(b)(2)

Accordingly, venue lies in the District of Maryland, 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2), and this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Norman v. John/Jane Doe · filed 2020-07-08(b)(2)

Because Plaintiff does not allege that any of the events or omissions giving rise to his claims arose in this district, venue is not proper in this Court under § 1391(b). ... Accordingly, the Court concludes that venue lies in the Southern District of Texas, 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2), and this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Conte v. Commonwealth of Virginia · filed 2020-07-09(b)(2)

Because the events and omissions giving rise to Plaintiffs’ claims, as reflected in their Complaint, occurred almost entirely in the Western District of Virginia, venue does not lie in the Eastern District of Virginia under § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391 permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the action occurred.

CORNETTE v. GRAVER · filed 2020-07-20(b)(2)

Venue is proper because a substantial part of the events giving rise to this action occurred in the Western District of Pennsylvania.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including substantial performance of the contract at issue.

Lundstrom, Jr. v. Homolka, P.A. · filed 2020-07-21(b)(2)

As to the question of venue, 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2) provides that venue lies in “a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2). As discussed above, a substantial portion of the performance of the contract at issue in this case occurred at plaintiffs farm in Sisseton, South Dakota, which lies within the boundaries of the Northern Division of the District of South Dakota. ... Thus, venue in this Court is proper.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred.

CORSENTINO v. MEYER'S RV CENTERS LLC · filed 2020-07-22(b)(2)

Moreover, as the place where Thor Motor authorized Camping World to sell its RVs and registered, executed, and performed its limited warranty, “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim[s] occurred” in New Jersey.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred.

Goolden v. Wardak · filed 2020-07-23(b)(2)

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1391, venue is proper in any judicial district in which a “substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391. ... Goolden has adequately alleged that a substantial part of the events giving rise to the intentional infliction of emotional distress and defamation claims occurred in this District.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a judicial district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Ruloph v. LAMMICO · filed 2020-07-24(b)(2)

Because a substantial part of the events alleged occurred in Sebastian County and Washington County, which are both within the Western District of Arkansas, venue is proper in this district.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, even if related events occurred elsewhere.

Acosta v. KDE Equine, LLC · filed 2020-07-28(b)(2)

The DOL has thus made a prima facie showing that venue is proper in this court, because a significant amount of the work giving rise to the alleged violations was performed in this district.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred.

Patchcoski v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · filed 2020-07-28(b)(2)

Venue is proper because a substantial part of the events giving rise to Plaintiffs ‘claims occurred in this district.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

BARTON v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC · filed 2020-07-28(b)(2)

Venue is improper in the Western District pursuant to § 1391(b)(2) because a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim did not occur within this district.

Section 1391(b)(2) requires a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim to occur in the district; later, tangentially related events do not establish venue.

Jerger v. D&M Leasing Dallas · filed 2020-07-28(b)(2)

Accordingly, the text’s requirement that only “events or omissions giving rise to the claim” are to be considered prohibits the Court from consideration of post-hoc tangentially related events.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Marso v. SafeSpeed, LLC · filed 2020-08-04(b)(2)

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2), venue is proper in “a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” ... In other words, a substantial part of the events which give rise to his claims occurred in Kansas. Accordingly, venue is proper in Kansas.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims occurred.

Heads v. Paradigm Investment Group, LLC · filed 2020-08-07(b)(2)

Venue is proper in this Court because Plaintiff alleges a substantial part of the events or omissions that form the basis of her claims occurred in Baldwin County, which is within this Court’s jurisdiction, and venue is not contested. Doc. 1 ¶¶ 16-72; see also 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, even if substantial events also occurred elsewhere.

First Class Transports, Inc. v. Charles R. Myers Insurance Agency · filed 2020-08-10(b)(2)

Movant has failed to demonstrate that “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim” did not occur in this district.

Section 1391(a)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred.

Bunn v. Dash · filed 2020-08-10(a)(2)

Venue is obviously proper in the Central District of California under subsection (2) of the venue statute because all of the events giving rise to each of Bunn’s claims took place in or near Los Angeles, California.

Section 1391(b)(2) requires a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims to occur in the chosen district.

Innovate1 v. First Bridge Merchant Solutions, LLC · filed 2020-08-13(b)(2)

Because Defendants’ alleged interactions with Plaintiffs regarding the solicitation and execution of the Account Agreement did not occur in Connecticut, these interactions cannot serve as a basis for venue in Connecticut.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Black-Tureaud v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-13(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Brown v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-13(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including the surgery at issue here.

Hill v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-13(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the implantation surgery took place.

Juegens v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-13(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Kuzma v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-13(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Miller v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-13(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the surgery at issue took place.

Garza v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-13(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Seeba v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-13(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Butler v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-13(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits a civil action in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Barnett v. Jacks Family Restaurants LP · filed 2020-08-14(b)(2)

“A civil action may be brought in . . . a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated . . . .” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2). ... Here, Plaintiff has alleged that the sexual harassment he endured occurred at Defendant’s Montgomery and LaFayette locations, which are indisputably in Alabama and specifically in the Middle District itself. Therefore, Plaintiff could have brought this action in the Middle District had he so desired.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

MASSETTI v. CREE, INC. · filed 2020-08-14(b)(2)

Venue is proper because a substantial part of the events giving rise to Plaintiff’s claims occurred in the Western District of Pennsylvania.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits a court to consider where the alleged effects occurred and where the plaintiff acted when deciding whether a substantial part of the events or omissions occurred in a district.

Umphress v. Hall · filed 2020-08-14(b)(2)

That is, the Court may also consider the location of the effects of the alleged conduct, which can include a consideration of a plaintiff’s activities.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiff underwent the implant surgery at issue.

Johnson v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.”

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Kearney v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

McPeak v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Sand v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Whitaker v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Hunter v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Moore v. C R Bard Incorporated · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Duncan v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.”

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including the district where the plaintiff underwent the implantation surgery at issue.

Lopez v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Venue may lie in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including the plaintiff’s implantation surgery.

Cordovez v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiff received the medical implant at issue.

Szymaszek v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Lewis v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.”

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including the district where the plaintiff underwent the surgery at issue.

Ateman v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

ROSE v. C R BARD INC · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.”

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Martin v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Creekmur v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the device at issue was implanted.

Coleman v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the implant surgeries at issue took place.

Slade v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Laplante v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Gross v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including the district where the surgery at issue took place.

Ferguson v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiff underwent the surgery at issue.

Hasselle v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.”

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Canders v. Negron · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

Venue is therefore proper in the Eastern District of New Yorkunder 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiffs underwent the implantation surgeries at issue.

Urevith v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Cruz v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to a claim occurred.

Carn v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Haney v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.”

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred; the plaintiffs’ implantation surgeries made the proposed districts proper venues.

Colbert v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.”

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Long v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Dancy v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the device was implanted.

Stoner v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where a medical device was implanted.

Jackson v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Delgado v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.”

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Dominguez v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Kozma v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Green v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiff’s implantation surgery took place.

Marquez v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

McQuitty v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiff underwent the surgery at issue.

Slocum v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.”

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Childress v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including the districts where the plaintiffs’ surgeries took place.

Hopkins v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Maxwell v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Copperthtie v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

A district where a plaintiff underwent the implant surgery underlying the claim can be a proper venue under § 1391(b)(2).

Mickens v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiff underwent the implant surgery at issue.

Munzing v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Newcomb v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Karsten v. McDougall & Sons · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

Venue is proper in that district, as a “substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred” there.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

T-Mobile USA Inc v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

First, “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred” in the Western District of Michigan, making it a proper venue.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Floyd v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the surgery at issue took place.

Aaron v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including a district where the plaintiff’s implantation surgery took place.

Douglas v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Toft v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiffs underwent the surgery at issue.

Preissler v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Vargas v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiff underwent the surgery at issue.

Warner v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Goodman v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including the plaintiffs’ implant surgeries.

William v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.”

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Ronga v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiffs underwent the surgeries at issue.

PHILLIPS v. CR BARD INC · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.”

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

SCOTT v. C R BARD INC · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiff underwent the implantation surgery at issue.

Rivers v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

Plaintiffs request this Court to transfer the out-of-state plaintiffs to the jurisdictions in which they had surgery for the implantation of their Bard inferior vena cava filter. See Br. in Supp. of Mot. (“Br.”) 7. The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Clark v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.”

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Eddlemon v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred.

Pittman v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiffs received their implants.

Gray v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the medical device implantation surgeries at issue took place.

Lee v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to a claim occurred.

Pulliam v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Fry v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiff’s implant surgery took place.

Magee v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the surgery at issue took place.

Watts v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including the implantation surgery at issue in a product liability claim.

CARR v. C. R. BARD, INC. · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the surgery at issue took place.

Fielder v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Tuttle v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiff received the implant at issue.

Merrell v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Legree v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Melton v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the medical procedure at issue took place.

Schouten v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Thomas v. C.R. Bard, Inc. · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the surgery at issue took place.

Chapman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to a claim occurred.

Lowe v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Hoffman v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiff underwent the surgery at issue.

Keeling v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including the district where the plaintiff received the implant at issue.

Macias v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the surgery at issue took place.

McCoy v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including the district where the plaintiff underwent the surgery at issue.

Giordano v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Henderson v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to a claim occurred.

Montgomery v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Grindstaff v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Fee v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Holness v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Tunstall v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiff underwent the surgery at issue.

Nachman v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the medical procedure underlying the claim took place.

Schnellmann v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Hendrix v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Rodriguez v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Mergenthaler v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiff underwent implantation surgery.

Washburn v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to a claim occurred.

Walker v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the medical procedure at issue took place.

Eason v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

McCray v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Sirmons v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Tisdale v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Smalls v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Stewart v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiffs received the implants at issue.

Rowland v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

Plaintiffs request this Court to transfer the out-of-state plaintiffs to the jurisdictions in which they had surgery for the implantation of their Bard inferior vena cava filter. See Mot. 7. The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where a plaintiff underwent the surgery at issue.

Linnar v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.”

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Giordano v. C R Bard Incorporated · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in the district where the plaintiffs received the implants at issue because a substantial part of the events giving rise to their claims occurred there.

Gardner v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Orr v. C. R. Bard, Inc. · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Burks v. CR Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to a claim occurred.

Fenwick v. C.R. Bard, Inc. · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiffs’ medical devices were implanted.

Norris v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to a claim occurred.

Smith v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-18(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).