28 U.S.C. § 1391

Section 1391 permits venue in the district where the events giving rise to the claims allegedly occurred.

Barrett v. Ambient Pressure Diving, Ltd. · filed 2006-03-31(a)(2)

Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because the events giving rise to plaintiffs claims allegedly occurred in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, which is in this judicial district.

Section 1391(b) permits venue in a district where the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Norfolk Dredging Co. v. Phelps · filed 2006-06-13(b)

As stated in the complaint, the events or omissions giving rise to this claim occurred in Hampton Roads, making the Norfolk Division of the Eastern District of Virginia a proper venue for this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).

Section 1391(a) permits venue in a diversity action in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Moore v. Motor Coach Industries, Inc. · filed 2007-05-18(a)

In this case, venue is proper in both the Northern District of Illinois and the Southern District of New York. ... Moreover, the accident alleged in the complaint occurred in Manhattan. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(a).

Section 1391(a)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Mahoney v. Eli Lilly & Co. · filed 2008-04-22(a)(2)

Because complete diversity exists, 28 U.S.C. § 1332; because Massachusetts's long-arm statute extends to torts allegedly committed in Massachusetts, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 223A, § 3; and because a substantial part of the events occurred in Massachusetts, 28 U.S.C. § 1391(a)(2), the court recognizes that this case could have been brought in the District of Massachusetts.

Section 1391 permits a civil action in a judicial district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Godinez v. Gomez · filed 2008-04-30(b)(2)

The district court did not err when it dismissed his second and third causes of action with leave to file them in the appropriate venues, and cautioned Godinez to bring his claims in the judicial districts in which the events occurred. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) (requiring district court to dismiss or transfer case filed in wrong district to any district or division in which it could have been brought); 28 U.S.C. § 1391 (civil action should be brought in judicial district in which a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a judicial district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Brown v. Kimoto · filed 2008-08-19(b)(2)

The district court did not err when it dismissed the complaint with leave to file the causes of action in the appropriate venues and cautioned Brown to bring his claims in the judicial districts in which the events occurred. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) (requiring district court to dismiss or transfer ease filed in wrong district to any district or division in which it could have been brought); 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2) (civil action should be brought in judicial district in which a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred).

Section 1391(b) permits venue in a district where the acts or omissions giving rise to the claims occurred.

Rushdan v. Perbula · filed 2008-09-25(b)

Further, venue was proper in the Eastern District of California because the alleged acts and omissions giving rise to the claims occurred in that district.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Little v. Sniezek · filed 2009-04-29(b)(2)

(2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, ... 28 U.S.C. § 1391. As previously noted, Little is challenging a District of Columbia Superior Court conviction, The trial court is located within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. All records of conviction, transcripts of proceedings, witnesses, counsel, and conviction records are likewise located within the District of Columbia. Thus, for the convenience of the parties and in the interest of justice the action will be transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Section 1391(b) supports venue in the district where the events giving rise to the complaint occurred.

In re Kissi · filed 2009-11-30(b)

Inasmuch as venue appears to be proper in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Kissi cannot show a clear and indisputable right to the writ.

Section 1391(b) permits venue in a district where a substantial portion of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Stratus Technologies Bermuda Ltd. v. Enstratus Networks, LLC · filed 2011-07-07(b)

Venue is also proper in this district. A substantial portion of the events giving rise to the trademark claim occurred here, specifically, the marketing of enStratus services under the allegedly infringing en-Stratus brand name. 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).

Section 1391(b) permits venue in a judicial district where the events giving rise to the claims occurred.

Suber v. Guinta · filed 2013-02-28(b)

Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) because the events giving rise to plaintiffs’ claims allegedly occurred in the City of Coatesville, Chester County, Pennsylvania, which is located within this judicial district.

Section 1391(e) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Johnson v. Orsino · filed 2013-04-24(e)

Venue is proper because “a substantial part of the events ... giving rise to the claim occurred” within this district. 28 U.S.C. § 1391(e).

Section 1391(b) permits venue in a district where the events at issue occurred.

World Outreach Conference Center v. City of Chicago · filed 2013-06-10(b)

Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) as the events at issue occurred within the Northern District of Illinois.

Section 1391(b) permits venue in a judicial district where the events giving rise to the claims occurred.

Sube v. City of Allentown · filed 2013-09-27(b)

Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) because the events giving rise to plaintiffs claims allegedly occurred in Le-high County, Pennsylvania, which is located within this judicial district.

Section 1391(b) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Blacher v. Diaz · filed 2013-10-04(b)

Venue was not proper in the Eastern District of California because the events giving rise to those claims occurred in the Central District of California.

Section 1391 permits venue in a district where the underlying events occurred.

Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's v. AXA Equitable Life Insurance · filed 2013-11-07

Venue is proper because the underlying facts occurred in the Southern District of Florida. 28 U.S.C. § 1391.

Section 1391(b) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Hill v. Samuels · filed 2013-11-20(b)

Under the circumstances of this case, venue is proper in a judicial district where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). Since none of the alleged events occurred in the District of Columbia, the remainder of this case will be transferred in the interest of justice to a judicial district “where the court may exercise personal jurisdiction [over the individuals directly responsible for the alleged misconduct], where venue is proper, and where the events giving rise to plaintiff's claims occurred.” Ballard, 601 F. Supp. 2d at 123; see Zakiya v. United States, 267 F. Supp. 2d 47, 59 (D.D.C. 2003) (transferring case involving challenge to national BOP policy to the district where “actual implementation” of the policy occurred).

A civil action may be brought in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Vehr v. United States · filed 2014-07-02(b)(2)

Proper venue in the alternative forum of a district court is defined by statute, which provides that a civil action may be brought in "a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events . . . giving rise to the claim occurred." 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2) (2012). The events of which plaintiff complains occurred in Washington, D.C. Compl. 1. The district court to which this matter could be transferred is the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Section 1391(b) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Clendenny v. Architect of the Capitol · filed 2017-02-15(b)

Venue is proper in this district as the AOC is a government agency located in the District of Columbia and a "substantial part of the events ... giving rise to the claim occurred” in the District of Columbia.

Section 1391 permits venue in the district where the actions giving rise to the suit occurred.

Barker v. Conroy · filed 2017-10-11

Political question immunity is inapplicable and venue is proper within the District of Columbia because the actions took place at the House of Representatives located in the District. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391.

Section 1391(e) permits venue in a district where the events giving rise to the claims occurred in an action against federal officials.

Maralex Res., Inc. v. Jewell · filed 2017-10-19(e)

Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(e) because the events giving rise to the claims took place in this district.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where the alleged unlawful acts occurred.

Menoken v. Lipnic · filed 2018-03-06(b)(2)

Venue is proper in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia because “[a]ll alleged unlawful acts were committed in the District of Columbia.” Am. Compl. ¶ 3; see also 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a judicial district where the events giving rise to the claims occurred.

Leibowitz v. DuPage County, Illinois · filed 2018-03-07(b)(2)

Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2), as the events giving rise to plaintiff’s claims occurred in this judicial district.

Section 1391 permits venue in a district where the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Hunt v. Guam Police Department · filed 2018-03-31

Venue is proper in this judicial district, the District of Guam, because Defendant is the Guam Police Department, an agency within the Government of Guam, and the events giving rise to Plaintiff’s cause of action occurred in Guam.

Section 1391(b) permits venue in a district where the events giving rise to the claims occurred.

Richardson v. City of Chi. · filed 2018-05-29(b)

Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), as the events giving rise to the claims asserted in Richardson's governing First Amended Complaint [340] occurred in this judicial district and the City is a municipal corporation located here.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a civil action occurred.

Taalak v. Pavalis · filed 2019-05-20(b)(2)

Taalak’s claims relate to what she alleges to be mistreatment at the South Dakota Women’s Prison in Pierre, South Dakota, by those who work at the prison. Venue in the Central Division of the District of South Dakota is appropriate.

Section 1391 permits venue in the district where the alleged violations occurred.

LaSpina v. SEIU Pennsylvania State Council · filed 2019-08-29

Venue is appropriate in this court since the alleged constitutional violations occurred in this district. See 28 U.S.C. §1391.

Section 1391 permits venue in a judicial district where the events giving rise to the complaint occurred.

Lopez-Betancourt v. Loyola University of Chicago Stritch School of Medicine · filed 2019-09-03(b)(2)

Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because the events alleged in Plaintiff’s complaint occurred within the Northern District of Illinois.

Section 1391(b) permits a civil action to be brought in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Orlando v. N.Y.S.D.O.C.C.S. · filed 2019-09-24(b)

A civil action may be brought in, among other districts, a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred. 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). ... Here, plaintiff could have brought this action in the Northern District of New York because this district includes Clinton County, which is where the events at issue here took place.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Silver v. Rausch Sturm Israel Enerson & Hornik LLP · filed 2020-01-09(b)(2)

Here, under Section 1391(b)(2), venue is proper and more convenient in San Antonio, where the acts or omissions that Silver alleges give rise to his claims (including under the FDCPA) occurred.

Section 1391(b) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Doe v. Rooney · filed 2020-02-05(b)

Petitioner alleges that the operative events occurred in New Jersey, where he seeks to recover unemployment benefits from the State of New Jersey.2 Venue is therefore proper in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).

Section 1391(b) permits a civil action to be filed in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

(HC) Kibunguchy v. Tylenol Corporation · filed 2020-03-20(b)

In this case, it appears that petitioner’s claims arose in Atascadero, California, which is in San Luis Obispo County. San Luis Obispo County is in the Central District of California. Therefore, petitioner’s claims should have been filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Section 1391(b) permits venue in a district where events giving rise to the claims occurred.

Asberry v. Foss · filed 2020-04-20(b)

Venue is proper because certain events giving rise to the claims are alleged to have occurred at SVSP, which is located in this judicial district.

Section 1391(b) permits venue in a district where events giving rise to the claims occurred.

McCurty v. Soirdia · filed 2020-04-29(b)

Venue is proper because certain events giving rise to the claims are alleged to have occurred at CTF, which is located in this judicial district.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

ISAAC v. ELLIS · filed 2020-05-20(b)(2)

Plaintiff complains about events occurring in Lowndes County, Georgia, which is within the Middle District of Georgia. 28 U.S.C. § 90(b)(6). Thus, venue is proper in that District. 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where the events giving rise to the claims occurred.

WINTERS v. AKZO NOBEL SURFACE CHEMISTRY, LLC · filed 2020-05-26(b)(2)

As such, the interests of justice and judicial economy compel us to transfer all claims against Bill Timpano to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, where jurisdiction and venue are proper. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b) permits venue in a judicial district where events giving rise to the claims occurred.

Peoples v. Machuca · filed 2020-06-26(b)

Venue is proper because certain events giving rise to the claims are alleged to have occurred at SVSP, which is located in this judicial district.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits a civil action to be brought in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

(PC) Dawson v. Newsom · filed 2020-07-01(b)(2)

Therefore, plaintiff’s claim should have been brought in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Eastern Division.

Section 1391(b) permits venue in a judicial district where the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Hopkins v. Ahern · filed 2020-07-22(b)

Venue is proper because the events giving rise to the claim are alleged to have occurred in SRJ, which is located in this judicial district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).

Section 1391(b) permits venue in the district where the events giving rise to a claim occurred.

Tuduj v. Ek · filed 2020-08-25(b)

To the extent that Plaintiff alleges new claims arising at Menard Correctional Center, proper venue lies in the Southern District of Illinois as the place where the events allegedly occurred and the district where most of the defendants presumably reside. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1391(b). These claims will be dismissed without prejudice.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Matter v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Arrowood v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred.

Pieterick v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Plott v. C. R. Bard, Inc. · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiff’s medical device was implanted.

Hazley v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Leaphart v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Cheeks v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Hooper v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Parker v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Shealey v. C. R. Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Listul v. C. R. Bard Inc. · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Venue is proper in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including the plaintiffs’ surgeries in this case.

Hill v. C. R. Bard Inc. · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Jones v. C. R. Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiff’s medical device was implanted.

Smith v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Hunter v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to a claim occurred.

Carlock v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Mosier v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Pelayo v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Miller v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Misner v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiffs’ medical devices were implanted.

Staker v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred.

Napolitano v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiffs’ medical devices were implanted.

Sepelak v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Urbanec v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Gonzalez v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including the surgery at issue.

Bilyeu v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including the districts where the plaintiffs underwent the surgeries at issue.

Gump v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where a plaintiff’s device was implanted.

Wilson v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Wyman v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Gomez v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Green v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Ismond v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Osborn v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Stafford v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Favero v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Salmon v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Newton v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where a plaintiff underwent the surgery at issue.

Espinosa v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Jackson v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiff’s medical device was implanted.

Holtzman v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Reynolds v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) allows venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Mack v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Boulton v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Spangler v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including the surgery at issue in these claims.

McDade v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

McAdams v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Venue is proper in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Wooten v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Williams v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiff underwent the surgery at issue.

Bennett v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Penn v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Devries v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Young v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Paprocki v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiff’s device was implanted.

Perkins v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Crosby v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to a claim occurred.

Coleman v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Dean v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

KEIM v. C R BARD INC · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where a plaintiff’s medical device was implanted.

Clemons v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Moore v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Venue is proper in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Ransom v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiffs’ implant surgeries took place.

Watkins v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the medical device at issue was implanted.

Wehrle v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Rose v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Bailey v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiffs underwent the surgeries at issue.

Thompson v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

A district where a plaintiff’s medical device was implanted can be a proper venue under § 1391(b)(2).

Hale v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Grimes v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Concha v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Noel v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the medical procedure at issue took place.

Langley v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiff underwent the surgery at issue.

Pilger v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Dorsey v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b) makes venue improper in a district where the defendants do not reside and none of the events underlying the claim occurred.

Meeks v. Michigan Department of Corrections · filed 2020-08-31(b)

Venue for the remainder of plaintiff’s lawsuit is not proper in the Eastern District of Michigan, because plaintiff failed to allege that any of the acts, events, or omissions which form the basis of his access to the courts claim took place in this district.

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where a plaintiff underwent the surgery at issue.

Goshorn v. C. R. Bard, Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including the district where the plaintiff’s implantation surgery took place.

Wiedner v. C.R. Bard, Inc. · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiffs underwent the device implantation surgeries at issue.

Payne v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Murray v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Wilkinson-Arter v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Mustion v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Gaddis v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiff underwent the surgery at issue.

Lee v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Bishop v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiff had the surgery at issue.

POFF v. C. R. BARD, INC. · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Roberson v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Harris v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Armijo v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiff underwent the implantation at issue.

Frailich v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Degrado v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Duncan v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Rawlings v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(1) and (2) permits venue based on defendants’ residence or where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Giron v. Trump · filed 2020-08-31(b)(1), (2)

Because Plaintiff does not allege that all of the defendants reside in New York or that a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to his claim arose in this district, venue is not proper in this Court under § 1391(b)(1), (2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Moton v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

McCarthy v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Hines v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including the district where the plaintiff’s implantation surgery took place.

Chaffee v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including the districts where the plaintiffs’ implant surgeries took place.

Summers v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred.

Adkins v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.”

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Tobias v. C R Bard Inc. · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Lawrence v. C R Bard Inc. · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Frederick v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, including where the plaintiffs underwent implantation surgery.

Morris v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Knowles v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred.

Thomas v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Clark v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Long v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

Curry v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue where a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim occurred, including where the plaintiff underwent the surgery at issue.

Oxenreider v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Ganoe v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).

Section 1391(b)(2) permits venue in a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Zuzek v. C R Bard Inc · filed 2020-08-31(b)(2)

The identified cases might have been brought in those jurisdictions because that is where “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).