Alabama Judicial Inquiry Commission Ethics Opinions

Free plain-English summaries of legal ethics opinions issued by the Alabama Judicial Inquiry Commission, with full citations and source links on every page.

967 opinions · Updated October 27, 2026
967 opinions

No Alabama Judicial Inquiry Commission opinions match these filters

Try a different search term or clear the filters.

Did a judge's serious accusations against opposing attorneys require recusal from their firms' cases?

Yes on these unusual facts. The Commission required recusal from pending cases involving either firm and from new cases where a firm member was initial counsel while related disciplinary proceedings…

April 30, 1999

Did a judge have to recuse from an insurer's cases because the judge's spouse sued the same insurer elsewhere?

Not merely because the cases shared an insurer and general subject. The Commission identified recusal grounds if the spouse worked on the same matter during their joint practice, had an affected…

April 30, 1999

Was a judge disqualified from city or county cases solely because the judge's son or his firm served as counsel for the city or county party but did not handle that case?

No, if the son did not participate in the particular case. The Commission listed additional grounds involving bias, affected interests, material-witness status, or case-related advice that could…

April 30, 1999

Did a $2,000 campaign contribution automatically require recusal, and did the JIC decide the statute's enforceability?

The Commission did not decide whether Ala. Code § 12-24-2 was enforceable or required reporting. Apart from any applicable statute, it found no automatic recusal from a contribution alone, while…

April 30, 1999

Could a district judge hear cases filed by the local Department of Human Resources when the judge's spouse directed that office?

No. Canon 3C(1)(d)(i) disqualified the judge because the spouse directed a party office. The opinion allowed remittal of that ground under Canon 3D, absent additional nonremittable impartiality grounds.

March 26, 1999

Could a circuit judge serve on a local bank board that approved substantial loans and paid directors?

Yes on the stated facts, subject to limits on prestige, finances, fiduciary service, and compensation. The Commission said bank-party cases require disqualification, subject to Canon 3D remittal,…

March 26, 1999

When should a judge recuse after lunch with a party during a pending case?

The Commission said a judge should recuse if the lunch was private, close to case proceedings, and another party or counsel expressed reasonable concern. The Commission distinguished private party…

March 26, 1999

Did a spouse's job as a public-school teacher itself bar a judge from hearing a case against school board members?

No. The Commission said ordinary employment alone did not require recusal, but bias, disputed-fact knowledge, an affected salary or job interest, material-witness status, or other direct involvement could.

March 11, 1999

Did an unsolicited ex parte allegation by a party's relative require the judge to recuse?

No on the stated facts. The judge had disclosed the incident, felt no bias, and saw no evidence that the party arranged it; the Commission said no further remedial action was required unless the…

February 19, 1999

Was a judge automatically disqualified when a lawyer appearing in court subleased space in the judge's building?

No on the stated sublease facts. The Commission required recusal if the judge knew a financial interest could be substantially affected by the case or other facts reasonably called impartiality into…

February 19, 1999

Could a sitting district judge use the title 'Judge' while campaigning for a circuit judgeship?

Yes, if the materials did not mislead voters into believing the candidate already held the office sought. The Commission approved an informative flyer but rejected a bumper sticker that could imply…

February 19, 1999

Did a district attorney's television endorsement disqualify the elected judge from local criminal cases?

No on the facts presented. The Commission said the endorsement alone did not require recusal, though additional circumstances could reasonably call the judge's impartiality into question.

January 13, 1999

Did opposing campaign activity and a defeated election opponent's appearance as counsel require recusal?

No on these facts. The Commission said support or opposition by parties and lawyers alone did not disqualify the judge after the election, absent personal bias or prejudice toward a party.

December 18, 1998

Could a part-time municipal judge serve on the municipality's employee grievance committee?

Yes on the stated facts. The Commission said the unpaid, nonlegal role would not interfere with court duties or impartiality, and the part-time judge was exempt from Canon 5G.

December 18, 1998

Could a judge resume a case after the party whose lawyer also represented the judge left the lawsuit?

Yes if the case was properly reassigned and no unusual circumstance continued to call impartiality into question. The Commission said the original ground for recusal ended when that party left the case.

November 13, 1998

Did an alleged acquaintance with a custody litigant's family disqualify the judge?

No on the facts provided. The judge knew only a casual acquaintance who might be related to the plaintiff and had once been listed as a witness; the Commission found no close relationship reasonably…

November 13, 1998

Could a judge join a host committee for benefit banquets supporting three ministry organizations?

No for the described committee. The Commission considered the duties together and identified concerns about impartiality, possible legal advice, and using judicial prestige to solicit funds or other…

November 13, 1998

Did paying respects at a murder victim's funeral disqualify the judge from the capital trial?

No on these facts. The judge had not known the officer, only briefly offered condolences, and had formed no view on guilt; the Commission nevertheless said the judge should disclose the attendance…

November 13, 1998

Did a litigant's separate lawsuit against the judge disqualify the judge from the litigant's pending cases?

No on the stated facts, during or after the collateral suit. The Commission required recusal only if the suit caused the judge to develop actual personal bias or prejudice toward the litigant.

November 13, 1998

Did judges' active opposition to a salary class action require recusal from unrelated cases involving the plaintiffs' lawyer?

Yes. The Commission treated the judges' filed opposition, affidavit, and strategy communications as personal involvement that reasonably questioned impartiality in unrelated matters involving…

October 19, 1998

Could a judge join the board of an environmental charity involved in recurring permit litigation?

No for this organization. The Commission found it would regularly engage in adversary court proceedings and was concerned that the judge's public board role could lend judicial prestige to its activities.

September 4, 1998

Could a judge hire a prominent local lawyer's mother-in-law as bailiff?

No where the hire would cause more than occasional recusal and moving the bailiff to another judge was impractical. The Commission tied the prohibition to recurring appearances by the lawyer's firm.

July 31, 1998

Could a part-time municipal judge defend a city police lieutenant in a federal civil-rights case?

No. The Commission said representing a city police supervisor would adversely reflect on the municipal judge's impartiality even though that officer and subordinates rarely appeared in the judge's court.

July 31, 1998

Could a retiring judge give a factual affidavit or interview about an unrecorded chambers conference in a former case?

Yes. The Commission found no Canon bar to a requested factual account or counsel interview before subpoenaed testimony, while distinguishing character testimony and noting that an inactive retired…

July 31, 1998

Must a judge recuse when counsel in another case represents the judge or an opposing party in a quo warranto action?

Yes. The Commission held that the judge’s personal role as relator required recusal from cases involving counsel for either side of that action, despite its public character.

July 31, 1998

Do a litigant’s reported threats against a judge require recusal in that litigant’s later case?

No, unless the reported threats actually caused the judge to develop personal bias or prejudice against the litigant.

June 26, 1998

Must a judge recuse from harassment charges against a police officer after deciding related resisting-arrest cases?

No, unless the judge formed personal bias or prejudice concerning a party. The Commission declined to decide who should appoint a special prosecutor.

June 26, 1998

Must a judge recuse because local lawyers, court staff, law enforcement personnel, or another judge are parties?

No, those roles alone did not disqualify the judge in this case. The Commission found no special relationship or other circumstance requiring recusal.

June 26, 1998

Do past employment by parties and earlier campaign contributions require a judge to recuse?

No on the facts presented. The Commission identified narrower exceptions for legal-adviser work on the dispute or a spouse’s participation in it, neither of which was stated.

June 26, 1998

May a judge accept a fee for legal work performed before taking office when payment becomes available nine years later?

Yes, where a fee agreement predated the judgeship. The Commission said its earlier opinions controlled even though payment arrived years after taking office.

June 26, 1998

May a judicial candidate retain a contribution from a later litigant or accept one from a current party?

Yes, under the described facts. The Commission required the cited statutory campaign filings but no additional disclosure of these contributions.

May 15, 1998

Must a judge who owns property recuse from a county storm-water fee challenge that could affect the judge’s assessments?

No on the stated facts. The Commission found no disqualifying financial interest and concluded the judge’s other interest could not be substantially affected.

May 15, 1998

May a judge seeking reelection describe types of cases a challenger has never handled?

Yes, if the statements are true, not misleading to a reasonable person, and preserve the dignity of judicial office.

May 15, 1998

Must a trial judge recuse from a postconviction petition after witnessing an incident and testifying about it in related civil litigation?

Not automatically. The Commission required recusal if the judge developed personal bias or was, or was likely to be, a material witness under its two-part test.

May 15, 1998

When must a judge recuse if an announced election opponent is a lawyer or party in the case?

The judge must recuse from cases filed after the opponent became counsel following the candidacy announcement and from any case with that opponent as a party; earlier pending cases require…

May 15, 1998

May a judge set a status call after informally hearing of a possible conflict in a case?

Yes. The Commission permitted a status call to determine whether the reported conflict actually existed.

May 15, 1998

Does a judge remain disqualified after the party whose lawyer created the conflict is dismissed from the case?

Usually no under these facts. The Commission allowed the judge to hear the case after dismissal unless unusual additional circumstances left a continuing impartiality concern.

May 15, 1998

May a judge serve on a committee recommending changes to Alabama domestic-violence law?

Yes. The Commission permitted service under Canon 4 if it did not interfere with judicial duties or cast doubt on impartiality.

March 13, 1998

Must a judge recuse from an insurance-policy case because the judge has a similar lawsuit against a different insurer?

No on the stated facts. Similar subject matter alone did not create a reasonable impartiality question, though personal bias or a substantially affected interest would require recusal.

March 13, 1998

May a judge write a requested letter to a judicial panel recommending an attorney for a circuit judgeship?

Yes. The Commission found a requested recommendation consistent with Canons 2C and 4 because a judge can contribute insight to judicial selection.

January 23, 1998

Did the alleged relationship between the judge and people associated with a party require recusal?

No on the facts supplied. The judge denied the claimed closeness and conduct, and the Commission found no relationship creating reasonable doubt about impartiality.

January 23, 1998

Is a party’s perception that a judge favors the opposing side enough to require recusal?

No. The shared opinion applies Canon 3C’s objective reasonable-person standard to the facts; a litigant’s perception alone was insufficient.

January 23, 1998

Does a litigant’s complaint to the Judicial Inquiry Commission by itself require the judge to recuse?

No. The shared opinion says a complaint alone does not disqualify the judge, though actual influence or special circumstances creating a reasonable impartiality concern could.

January 23, 1998

Did a prior related case, a complaint against the judge, perceived bias, and alleged social ties require recusal?

No on the facts provided. The Commission found no actual bias, special circumstances, or objectively reasonable impartiality concern from those allegations.

January 23, 1998

Must a judge recuse from a false-arrest suit because a defendant is a magistrate employed by the circuit clerk?

No, staff status alone was insufficient. The opinion required recusal for additional circumstances such as the judge’s appointment role, personal bias, or knowledge of disputed facts.

January 23, 1998

Must a judge return used computer equipment received lawfully from another state agency through the surplus-property program?

No. The Commission distinguished unsolicited state surplus property from the private-sector donations addressed in Opinion 97-682.

January 23, 1998

May a judge test new courtroom technology on an AOC committee funded by donated equipment?

Yes to committee service and testing. The Commission said the judge should not personally solicit or procure donated hardware, software, or training.

December 5, 1997

May circuit and district judges serve on a county work release board when the statute makes their positions ex officio?

Yes. The Commission permitted the statutory board roles, while saying the judges should keep individual participant supervision separate from judging.

December 5, 1997

May a recused Supreme Court justice vote to appoint a special justice in the same case?

Yes. The Commission characterized the appointment vote as a purely ministerial act and found no Canon bar despite the justice’s recusal from the merits.

November 10, 1997

When is a justice disqualified from deciding Commission membership while a complaint against that justice is pending?

The opinion permitted justices to decide the Court’s appointment authority generally, but required recusal after confirmed Commission notice of a pending complaint or a prior stated view on the merits.

October 3, 1997

May a judge sit on a nonprofit youth facility board while referring juveniles to that facility?

Yes on the additional facts described. The Commission permitted unpaid board service where the facility supplied needed rehabilitation and was not funded per referral; it overruled three earlier…

October 3, 1997

Must a judge recuse from a criminal case because the defendant’s aunt married the judge’s spouse’s first cousin?

No. The Commission found the defendant outside the fourth degree of relationship to the judge or spouse; this opinion superseded 97-666.

October 3, 1997

Do the judicial Canons cover part-time Court of the Judiciary members, and may they contribute to or solicit for other candidates?

Yes, Canon 7 covers those part-time judges. The Commission said it discouraged but did not prohibit contributions or solicitation for others, while barring personal solicitation for their own…

October 3, 1997

May a judge canvass church members for pledges in a stewardship campaign featuring the judge’s photograph and statement?

The Commission said Canon 5B discouraged judicial participation in charitable or religious fundraising, including the described canvassing role.

October 3, 1997

Must a judge recuse because an attorney in the case says they intend to run against the judge in the next election?

No. A stated intention to run did not alone create a reasonable impartiality question, though later facts or actual bias could require recusal.

October 3, 1997

May a judge serve as a bank director and receive normal board compensation?

Yes for an advisory role without day-to-day operations, with ordinary compensation. The opinion also addressed recusal in bank cases and the Canon 3D remittal procedure.

October 3, 1997

May a judge recommend lawyers for contract indigent-defense appointments before the judge’s court?

Yes. The Commission treated the recommendation as part of securing quality representation, subject to Canon 3B(4)’s merit, nepotism, and favoritism limits.

October 3, 1997

May an active retired judge serving part time consult for the county on jail programs?

Yes. The Commission permitted paid county consulting but said the judge must avoid assigned cases involving personal or ex parte knowledge gained in that role.

October 3, 1997

May a university name a chair for a living judge, and may the judge raise funds for it?

The chair could bear the judge’s name, but the Commission prohibited the judge from fundraising to endow it under the stated facts.

October 3, 1997

Must local judges recuse from a divorce case because one party is the circuit clerk’s child?

No. The family tie did not require disqualification, though the Commission said voluntary recusal would not violate the judges’ duty to sit.

October 3, 1997

Browse Alabama Judicial Inquiry Commission opinions by topic

Legal ethics opinions from the Alabama Judicial Inquiry Commission interpret the rules of professional conduct for working lawyers, in response to inquiries from members and committees. They are advisory, not binding like court discipline decisions, but courts and discipline boards treat formal opinions as substantial guidance on how the rules apply. Every opinion above has a plain-English question and short answer, plus a link to the original source on the bar's site.

Ethics opinions from other bars

Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct of the District of Columbia Courts (15) Alabama State Bar (139) Alaska Bar Association (146) American Bar Association (150) Arkansas Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee (120) Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee (203) Colorado Bar Association (113) Colorado Judicial Ethics Advisory Board (82) Connecticut Bar Association (73) Disciplinary Board of the Hawaii Supreme Court (19) District of Columbia Bar (182) Illinois Judicial Ethics Committee (185) Illinois State Bar Association (389) Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission (13) Kentucky Bar Association (380) Los Angeles County Bar Association (100) Louisiana State Bar Association (22) Maine Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics (57) Maine Board of Overseers of the Bar (217) Maryland Judicial Ethics Committee (256) Massachusetts Bar Association (127) Minnesota Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board (26) Mississippi Judicial Election Oversight Committee (9) Nebraska Judicial Ethics Committee (122) Nebraska Supreme Court Lawyers' Advisory Committee (279) New Hampshire Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics (24) New Hampshire Bar Association (35) New Jersey Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics (558) New Mexico Advisory Committee on the Code of Judicial Conduct (193) New York City Bar (180) New York State Bar Association (932) North Carolina State Bar (578) Office of Legal Ethics Counsel & Advisory Committee of the Supreme Court of Missouri (930) Ohio Board of Professional Conduct (453) Oklahoma Bar Association (328) Orange County Bar Association (17) Oregon State Bar (196) Pennsylvania Bar Association (21) Rhode Island Supreme Court Ethics Advisory Panel (700) South Carolina Bar (505) South Dakota Special Committee on Judicial Election Campaign Intervention (20) State Bar Association of North Dakota (195) State Bar of Arizona (304) State Bar of California (189) State Bar of Georgia (65) State Bar of Michigan (245) State Bar of Montana (78) State Bar of Nevada (61) State Bar of New Mexico (90) State Bar of Wisconsin (263) Texas Professional Ethics Committee (707) The Florida Bar (543) The Mississippi Bar (162) Utah Courts Ethics Advisory Committee (19) Utah State Bar Ethics Advisory Opinion Committee (102) Vermont Bar Association (315) Vermont Judicial Ethics Committee (23) Virginia State Bar (299) Washington State Bar Association (1104) West Virginia Judicial Investigation Commission (773) West Virginia State Bar (Lawyer Disciplinary Board) (104) Wyoming Supreme Court Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee (18)