28 U.S.C. § 157

A motion to enforce a release integral to a reorganization plan is a core proceeding that the bankruptcy court may determine.

C.F. Trust, Inc. v. Tyler · filed 2004-12-16(b)(1)

This narrower question is plainly a core matter as the Release is integral to the Plan.

Section 157(b)(2) does not make a state-law insurance coverage dispute a core proceeding merely because its outcome affects the bankruptcy estate.

Great American Insurance v. Mobile Tool International, Inc. (In Re Mobile Tool International) · filed 2005-01-04(b)(2)

As noted above, we have concluded that we have jurisdiction given the relation of the dispute to the bankruptcy case. Thus, we do not have core jurisdiction, but “related to” jurisdiction.

Section 157's core proceeding category does not cover a dispute over a nondebtor's insurance coverage when its effect on the bankruptcy estate is only indirect.

MT. McKINLEY INSURANCE COMPANY v. CORNING INCORPORATED · filed 2005-02-16(b)(1)

A non-debtor's right to coverage under an insurance policy has a much more attenuated relationship to core bankruptcy functions than does the debtor's interest in the policy. ... Therefore, United States Lines does not support Corning's contention that the affiliate-insurer claims are core.

Section 157(b)(1) does not treat insurance coverage claims between non-debtors as core proceedings when their resolution has no direct impact on the bankruptcy case.

Mt. McKinley Insurance v. Corning Inc. · filed 2005-02-16(b)(1)

As in United States Lines, the pre-petition execution of the insurance contracts suggests that this lawsuit is not core to PCC’s reorganization. Moreover, unlike United States Lines, the debtor is not involved in this lawsuit, and plaintiffs here seek to adjudicate the rights of non-debtors only. Thus, the adjudication of the claims in this lawsuit will have no direct impact on PCC’s bankruptcy proceedings.

A proceeding seeking relief for conduct actionable under the Bankruptcy Code is a core proceeding arising under title 11.

Mayo v. Union Bank (In re Mayo) · filed 2005-02-24(b)(1)

Because the Plaintiff seeks redress of allegedly discriminatory conduct that is actionable by the language of the Bankruptcy Code itself, the Court finds this adversary proceeding to be a core proceeding “arising under” title 11.

Section 157 treats actions against a bankruptcy trustee for conduct during the bankruptcy case as core proceedings.

Industrial Clearinghouse, Inc. v. Mims (In Re Coastal Plains, Inc.) · filed 2005-03-11(b)(2)(A)

Surely, if a malpractice claim against an examiner’s accountant is a core proceeding, then an action against the Trustee is similarly a core proceeding under § 157. Therefore, the Court finds that actions against a trustee involving his conduct during the course of the bankruptcy case are core proceedings, and the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over them.

Section 157(b) does not require a court to classify a matter as core or noncore before determining whether it has bankruptcy jurisdiction under § 1334.

Michaels v. World Color Press, Inc. (In Re LGI, Inc.) · filed 2005-03-15(b)

It is not necessary for the bankruptcy court to decide whether a matter is core or noncore under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b) in order to determine that it has jurisdiction over that matter under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(a) or (b).

Section 157(b)(2) treats a tax liability dispute as a core proceeding when it affects administration of the bankruptcy estate and allowance of claims against it.

Pursue Energy Corp. v. Mississippi State Tax Commission · filed 2005-03-31(b)(2)

This case qualifies as a core proceeding under the three criteria of 157(b)(2) cited by the Bankruptcy Court. First, the dispute over Pursue’s tax liability directly affects the administration of the bankruptcy estate.

Section 157(b)(2) treats a dispute among creditors over payment of employee wage and WARN Act claims in a bankruptcy case as a core proceeding.

Preston Trucking Co. v. Liquidity Solutions, Inc. (In Re Preston Trucking Co.) · filed 2005-04-08(b)(2)

The instant contest between contending creditors over the right to payment of employee wage and WARN Act ... claims in a bankruptcy case is a “core proceeding,” over which this Court has subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (M) and (O).

Section 157 treats a motion to abstain as a core proceeding, allowing the bankruptcy court to enter a final order.

Alexander v. Cintas Corp. (In Re Terry Manufacturing Co.) · filed 2005-04-15

A motion to abstain is a core proceeding, within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157. For this reason, this Court may enter a final order rather than submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law to the District Court.

Section 157(b)(2) treats a debtor’s objection and counterclaim arising from a creditor’s filed claim as a core proceeding.

Doctors Health, Inc. v. Nylcare Health Plans of Mid-Atlantic, Inc. (In Re Doctors Health, Inc.) · filed 2005-04-15(b)(2)

NYLCare subjected itself to the core jurisdiction of this Court, by reason of having filed a claim against the debtor in the instant bankruptcy case.

Section 157(b)(2) treats determinations of damages for automatic-stay violations as core proceedings in which a bankruptcy court may enter final orders.

In Re Pawlowicz · filed 2005-12-05(b)(2)

A determination as to both propriety and amount of damages under this section is a “core proceeding” over which this Court has been conferred with the jurisdictional authority to enter final orders.

Section 157(b)(2) treats the determination of bid procedures for a sale of bankruptcy estate property as a core proceeding.

In Re Antaeus Technical Services, Inc. · filed 2005-12-06(b)(2)

The determination of appropriate bid procedures for a sale of property of the bankruptcy estate is a “core” bankruptcy proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (0).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats an objection to a creditor’s claim as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

In Re Engebregtsen · filed 2006-02-17(b)(2)(B)

The court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and this is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(3) assigns the initial core or non-core determination to the bankruptcy judge; a withdrawal motion based on that classification is premature before the judge makes it.

Carroll v. Prosser · filed 2008-07-18(b)(3)

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(3), however, the determination whether a proceeding is core or non-core is made by the bankruptcy judge in the first instance. ... As such, to the extent the motion is predicated on an argument that the proceeding is core or non-core, the motion is also premature.

Section 157(b)(3) requires a bankruptcy judge to determine whether a proceeding is core, but failure to make that determination does not deprive the court of jurisdiction.

Mullarkey v. Tamboer · filed 2008-07-31(b)(3)

We agree with the view adopted by the Fourth Circuit and hold that the Bankruptcy Court was not deprived of jurisdiction over Mullarkey’s Complaint for failure to make the determination under § 157(b)(3).

Section 157(c)(2) permits a bankruptcy court to make a final determination in a non-core proceeding when all parties consent; submitting a stipulation for court approval can establish that consent.

Bartock v. Bae Systems Survivability: Systems, LLC Ex Rel. Q'Gara-Hess & Eisenhardt Armoring Co. (In Re Bartock) · filed 2008-12-09(c)(2)

This is an exceedingly clear signification of consent by the Parties for this Court to make a decision in the case by approving the Stipulation even if it would otherwise be a non-core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(3) requires a bankruptcy judge to determine whether a proceeding is core or otherwise related to a bankruptcy case.

Reynard v. Karass (In re Saito Bros. Inc.) · filed 2016-10-27(b)(3)

Under' those motions, and under the Court’s independent power and obligation as reflected by 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(3), and pursuant to Civil Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(h)(3), the TPC will be dismissed.

Proceedings seeking relief for violations of the automatic stay arise under title 11 and are core proceedings under § 157.

Wernes v. Kroesen · filed 2020-05-01(b)(1)

Proceedings involving violations of the automatic stay “arise under title 11” and are core pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157. ... The court therefore concludes that Ms. Kroesen’s complaint asserts relief “arising under” the Code such that the matter is indeed a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2) governs whether a proceeding is core, which bears on the bankruptcy court’s power to enter a final order.

The Maxus Liquidating Trust v. YPF S.A. · filed 2020-06-23(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2), and this Court has the judicial power to enter a final order.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a decision whether to reopen a bankruptcy case for its administration as a core proceeding.

TTC Illinois Incorporated and TTC Holdings Incorporated · filed 2020-06-24(b)(2)(A)

The decision on whether to reopen this case under the circumstances presented relates to the administration of the case and is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. §157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b) classifies proceedings involving administration of a bankruptcy case as core proceedings.

Halperin v. Richards · filed 2020-06-25(b)

This adversary proceeding is a core matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b), as it involves administration of the bankruptcy case.

Section 157(b) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and finally determine core proceedings.

Andrew Joseph Blanchard and Christine Laurent Blanchard · filed 2020-07-16(b)

The matter presently before the Court constitutes a core proceeding that this Court may hear and determine on a final basis under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats attorney-fee disgorgement disputes concerning administration of the bankruptcy estate as core proceedings.

Morris v. King · filed 2020-10-26(b)(2)(A)

Whether an attorney must disgorge fees for failure to comply with §§ 329 and 330 and Rule 2016 is a matter concerning administration of the bankruptcy estate, and is also a core proceeding.

Section 157(b) treats a request to reject an executory contract under § 365 as a core proceeding because it can arise only in a bankruptcy case.

Chesapeake Energy Corporation and CHK NGV Leasing Company, LLC · filed 2020-10-28(b)

The matter is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b) as a request to reject an executory contract under § 365 can only arise in a bankruptcy case.

Section 157 does not treat prepetition state law claims as core proceedings when the creditor has not filed a claim in bankruptcy court and the claims do not directly affect a bankruptcy function.

Tailored Fund CAP LLC v. RWDY, Inc. · filed 2020-10-29(b)

In other words, defendants have failed to identify a legitimate bankruptcy function that any of Tailored Fund's claims would directly affect. Accordingly, none of plaintiff's claims are core.

A fee application following dismissal of an involuntary bankruptcy petition is a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2).

HL Builders, LLC · filed 2020-10-30(b)(2)

Because this Order supplements the Court’s February 18, 2020 judgment to the extent it determines reasonable attorney’s fees, the matter is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

A breach of fiduciary duty claim arising from a trustee’s administration of the bankruptcy estate is a core proceeding.

Wyman · filed 2020-11-30(b)(2)

In In re DeLorean, the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel held that the state law malicious prosecution action was a “core proceeding” because it “ar[ose] from the efforts of officers of the estate to administer the estate and collect its assets and therefore impact[ed] the handling and administration of the estate.” DeLorean, 155 B.R. at 525. The Ninth Circuit’s reasoning applies to the instant case because here, the breach of fiduciary duty claim arose from Trustee Samuel Sweet’s (“Sweet”) potential liability for allegedly mishandling matters directly related to the administration of the estate.

A claim against a debtor is a core bankruptcy proceeding subject to resolution by the bankruptcy court when the claimant files a proof of claim in the bankruptcy case.

Ucarer v. ALA Turk, Inc. · filed 2020-11-30(b)

Because Plaintiff has filed a proof of claim in the E.D.N.Y. bankruptcy proceeding, his claim against Ala Turk qualifies as a “core” proceeding subject to resolution by the Bankruptcy Court.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a bankruptcy debtor’s motion for approval to borrow funds as a core proceeding.

U.S. Federal Credit Union v. Gateway Radiology Consultants, P.A. · filed 2020-12-22(b)(2)(A)

We do have jurisdiction to review the approval order because Gateway’s § 364 motion for approval to borrow money under the PPP was a core matter under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats claims for money against a debtor’s estate as core proceedings.

Creditor, Pilgrim Skating Arena, Inc. v. Laubenstein · filed 2021-03-08(b)(2)(B)

Two of Pilgrim’s three existing arbitration claims are claims for money against the estate of the debtors, constituting core proceedings.

Section 157(b)(2)(G) treats proceedings to determine an automatic stay as core bankruptcy matters.

Gilliam v. Porter McGuire Kiakona & Chow, LLP · filed 2021-04-28(b)(2)(G)

First, proceedings to determine an automatic stay are core bankruptcy matters.

Section 157(b)(2) provides a nonexclusive list of core bankruptcy proceedings.

Molner v. Reed Smith LLP · filed 2021-04-30(b)(2)

Section 157(b)(2) of title 28 sets forth a non- exclusive list of core proceedings that “provides courts with ready examples of such matters.”

Section 157(b)(1) does not classify a creditor’s state-law fraudulent-transfer claim as core when it neither arises under nor arises in title 11.

Kim v. Yoon · filed 2021-05-12(b)(1)

The matter, therefore, does not arise in or under title 11, and there is no core jurisdiction.

Section 157(b)(2) treats enforcement of orders confirming a plan or approving a property sale as a core proceeding.

TE Holdcorp, LLC · filed 2021-05-14(b)(2)

The Court properly determined the Enforcement Motion was a core proceeding. Under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2), orders with respect to “confirmations of plans” and “approving the sale of property” are core proceedings. The Enforcement Motion sought enforcement of the Sale Order and the Confirmation Order and thus was a core proceeding.

Section 157 permits state law claims to qualify as core proceedings when resolving them is integral to deciding claims against the bankruptcy estate.

ULX Partners, LLC v. Tavenner · filed 2021-05-28(b)(3)

The statute dictates that a proceeding does not become a non-core proceeding “solely on the basis that its resolution may be affected by State law.” 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(3). ... Here, the Court finds that the state law claims in the Trustee’s complaint constitute core claims.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) covers core proceedings asserting Bankruptcy Code claims and seeking relief that requires the bankruptcy court to interpret and enforce its own orders.

Lee v. Choudhri · filed 2021-06-16(b)(2)(A)

This Court determines that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), this Adversary Proceeding contains core matters because the complaint primarily asserts claims and seeks relief under the United States Bankruptcy Code, including ju- risdiction to interpret and enforce its own orders.

Section 157 treats claims arising from a state foreclosure action as noncore when they concern issues the bankruptcy court cannot decide.

Caires v. J.P. Morgan Chase · filed 2021-06-24(b)(2)

The claims that have been brought in this Adversary Proceeding all relate to the State Court Foreclosure Action, which is not a “core” proceeding because it concerns issues that cannot be decided by the Bankruptcy Court.

Section 157’s core proceeding category does not include a state court foreclosure action concerning issues the bankruptcy court cannot decide.

Richard Caires · filed 2021-06-24(b)(2)

The claims that have been brought in this Adversary Proceeding all relate to the State Court Foreclosure Action, which is not a “core” proceeding because it concerns issues that cannot be decided by the Bankruptcy Court.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats review of an attorney’s transactions with a debtor and related sanctions as core proceedings concerning administration of the bankruptcy case.

Tariea Tanya Kincaid · filed 2021-12-09(b)(2)(A)

The review of attorneys’ transactions with debtors and the determination of appropriate sanctions in connection therewith relate ... to the administration of the bankruptcy case and are core proceedings.

Section 157(b) treats a motion involving claim allowance and plan interpretation as a core matter that the bankruptcy court may consider.

NorthEast Gas Generation, LLC · filed 2022-03-18(b)

As framed by NEG, however, this matter is “core” because it involves the allowance of claims and the interpretation of the Plan. (D.I. 423 ¶ 7.) 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b) & 1334. Therefore, it argues that Resorts is not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction by the Court. The Court agrees and concludes that it has jurisdiction to consider NEG’s Motion.

Listing a proceeding in § 157(b) does not alone make it core; the court must examine the substance of the proceeding.

In re: Tonopah Solar Energy, LLC · filed 2022-03-30(b)

But a proceeding is not core simply because it is listed in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats an attorney fee dispute affecting escrow funds and the administration of the bankruptcy estate as a core proceeding.

1934 Bedford LLC v. Loeb & Loeb Esq. · filed 2022-03-31(b)(2)(A)

and the Bankruptcy Court’s adjudication concerned the “administration of the estate,” (Appellee’s Br. 21 (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A))), this constitutes a core proceeding.

Section 157(a) permits referral of bankruptcy matters to bankruptcy courts, and section 157(b) permits bankruptcy courts to finally decide core proceedings such as claim objections.

Minkina v. Rodgers, Powers & Schwartz, LLP · filed 2022-05-10(a), (b)(1), and (b)(2)(B)

It therefore falls squarely in the bankruptcy jurisdiction conferred on the district courts by § 1334(b) and, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(a), referred by the district court for this district to the bankruptcy court for this district by a standing order of reference. Moreover, objections to claims are core proceedings within the meaning of § 157(b)(1) and (2). See 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) (core proceedings include allowance or disallowance of claims against the estate). Accordingly, the Court may hear and finally determine them. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1).

Section 157(b)(2)(J) treats objections to a debtor’s discharge as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Neary v. Lindeman · filed 2022-04-19(b)(2)(J)

The proceeding constitutes a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (O) treat proceedings resolving proofs of claim as core proceedings within the bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction.

Rodriguez v. Smith · filed 2022-04-22(b)(2)(A), (O)

Further, the Court determines that that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), and (O), the Court held jurisdiction to enter these orders because they resolved core proceedings – namely proofs of claim.

Section 157(b)(2)(G) treats proceedings to terminate, annul, or modify the automatic stay as core proceedings.

Jaffan International, LLC · filed 2022-04-29(b)(2)(G)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) and (K) classifies certain bankruptcy matters as core proceedings for bankruptcy court adjudication.

Aluminum Shapes, L.L.C. - Adversary Proceeding · filed 2022-05-02(b)(2)(B), (K)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B), and (K).

Section 157’s core-proceeding classification does not cover claims whose connection to the bankruptcy is merely factual and that would not be resolved in the claims-allowance process.

TRU Creditor Litigation Trust v. Brandon · filed 2022-05-11(b)(2)

Because all of the claims asserted by the Trust constitute non-core claims, the Court will sustain the Trust’s objections to the Bankruptcy Court’s conclusion that all of the Trust’s claims constitute core claims.

Section 157(b)(2)(L) treats confirmation of a bankruptcy plan as a core proceeding.

Pacific Links US Holdings, Inc. · filed 2022-05-13(b)(2)(L)

Confirmation of the Plan is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(L), and this Court has exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether the Plan complies with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and should be confirmed and has exclusive jurisdiction over all of the Debtors’ assets.

Reconsideration of an order converting a Chapter 11 case to Chapter 7 is a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2)(A) and (O).

Fatih Ozcelebi · filed 2022-05-16(b)(2)(A), (O)

This proceeding is a core matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), and (O), as it primarily concerns reconsideration of this Court’s prior Order converting Debtor’s bankruptcy case from one under chapter 11 to one under chapter 7.

Section 157(b)(2)(H) treats proceedings to recover fraudulent transfers as core matters.

Schmidt v. Twosons Corporation · filed 2022-05-19(b)(2)(H)

This adversary proceeding seeks to recover fraudulent transfers and is therefore a core matter under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(H).

Section 157 treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of debts as core proceedings.

Wilson v. Silva · filed 2022-05-20(b)(2)(I)

This adversary proceeding is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(1) and (b)(2)(I) (determination of the dischargeability of debts).

Section 157(b)(2)(H) treats a fraudulent-transfer avoidance proceeding as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Hankins v. CKK Properties, LLC · filed 2022-05-23(b)(2)(H)

It is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(H).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats determinations about the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings.

White v. U.S. Department Of Education · filed 2022-05-24(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) (determinations as to the dischargeability of particular debts).

Section 157(b) treats proceedings arising under title 11 or arising in a title 11 case as core proceedings.

George Washington Bridge Bus Station and Infrastru v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey · filed 2022-05-25(b)

As this statutory framework makes plain, the statutory term “core proceedings” encompasses both those “arising under title 11” and those “arising in” cases under title 11.

Section 157 treats objections to claims as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and finally determine.

Peter M Tufts · filed 2022-05-31(b)(2)(B)

Moreover, objections to claims are core proceedings within the meaning of § 157(b)(1) and (2). See 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) (core proceedings include allowance or disallowance of claims against the estate). Accordingly, the Court may hear and finally determine them.

Section 157(b) treats a claim for violation of the discharge injunction as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Disen v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC · filed 2022-05-31(b)

Thus, a claim for violation of the discharge injunction is a core proceeding “arising under” the Bankruptcy Code.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats matters concerning administration of the bankruptcy estate as core proceedings.

Helena Chemical Company v. Hood · filed 2022-06-01(b)(2)(A)

This is a “core proceeding” under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A)(1) (matters concerning administration of the estate).

Section 157(b)(2) treats claim allowance and dischargeability determinations as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Pastorek, M.D. v. Mijares · filed 2022-06-01(b)(2)(B), (b)(2)(I)

The claims in this adversary proceeding are core matters under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) and (I), as they involve allowance or disallowance of claims against the estate and determinations as to the dischargeability of particular debts.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (J) treats this proceeding as core, allowing the bankruptcy court to enter a final judgment.

Hortensia Sanchez Ibarra · filed 2022-06-01(b)(2)(A), (J)

This matter is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (J), allowing this Court to enter final judgments.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats determinations of the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings.

Michelena v. Michelena · filed 2022-06-02(b)(2)(I)

Furthermore, a determination as to the dischargeability of a particular debt is a core matter under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine the scope of a debtor’s discharge as a core proceeding.

Placid Oil Company v. Avalon Plantation, Inc. · filed 2022-06-03(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2) treats proceedings concerning a Chapter 13 trustee’s conduct and administration of the estate as core proceedings.

Paul F. Mammay · filed 2022-07-07(b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(O)

In the context of the Motions, the matters complained of by the Debtor/Movant concern the Chapter 13 Trustee’s conduct and administration of the estate. Therefore, the Motions are core proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(A) and (O).

Section 157’s list of core proceedings is nonexhaustive; claims under 11 U.S.C. § 526 can be core proceedings even though they are not listed.

US Trustee v. Buch · filed 2022-07-11(b)(2)

Defendants are incorrect. This is a core proceeding. The fact that claims under § 526 are not listed in 28 U.S.C. § 157 is of little importance.

Section 157 treats claims invoking substantive rights created by bankruptcy law that arise only in a bankruptcy case as core proceedings, even if they are not listed in subsection (b)(2).

US Trustee v. Deighan Law LLC · filed 2022-07-12(b)(2)

Defendants are incorrect. This is a core proceeding. The fact that claims under § 526 are not listed in 28 U.S.C. § 157 is of little importance. ... Under Barnett’s definition, the Trustee’s claims against Defendants are core proceedings. First, these claims invoke substantial rights created by federal bankruptcy law—not rights created outside federal bankruptcy law. Second, these claims do not exist outside of the bankruptcy context.

Section 157(b)(2) covers adversary proceedings to recover transfers of customer property as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Securities Investor Protection Corporation v. Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, LLC. et a · filed 2022-07-18(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (F), (H) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2) classifies confirmation of a reorganization plan as a core proceeding.

Glaukom, LLC · filed 2022-07-19(b)(2)

Confirmation of the Plan is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2), and this Court has exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether the Plan complies with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and should be confirmed.

Section 157(b)(2) treats a trustee’s preference avoidance proceeding as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Rescia Ch. 7 Trustee v. Plycon Van Lines, Inc. · filed 2022-07-21(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(B) and (b)(2)(F).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (O) classify a proceeding concerning estate administration and affecting the liquidation of estate assets as a core proceeding.

Schuster v. Warner · filed 2022-07-21(b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(O)

It falls within “matters concerning the administration of the estate” and “other proceedings affecting the liquidation of the assets of the estate” and is thus a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2) treats a dischargeability proceeding as core, allowing a bankruptcy judge to enter a final judgment.

Khalil v. El Rafaei · filed 2022-07-22(b)(2)

With respect to the Section 523 AP, this is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(A), (1), and (O), in which final orders or judgments may be entered by a bankruptcy judge.

Section 157(b)(2) treats confirmation of a reorganization plan as a core proceeding.

Boy Scouts of America · filed 2022-07-29(b)(2)

Confirmation is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2) treats a lien avoidance proceeding concerning estate administration and liquidation of estate assets as a core proceeding.

Acuna v. Illinois Department of Revenue · filed 2022-07-29(b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(O)

It falls within “matters concerning the administration of the estate” and “other proceedings affecting the liquidation of the assets of the estate” and is thus a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies determinations of a particular debt’s dischargeability as core proceedings.

Illinois Department of Employment Security v. Taylor · filed 2022-08-01(b)(2)(I)

The determination of the dischargeability of a particular debt is a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and finally determine a motion to appoint a Chapter 11 trustee as a core proceeding.

Westbank Holdings, LLC · filed 2022-08-01(b)(2)

The matter presently before the Court constitutes a core proceeding that this Court may hear and determine on a final basis under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2) treats a proposed compromise and a motion to void actions taken in violation of the automatic stay as core proceedings.

Thornhill Brothers Fitness, LLC · filed 2022-07-08(b)(2)(A), (G), (O)

These matters constitute “core” proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (G), and (O).

Section 157(b)(2) treats proceedings involving estate administration, dischargeability of debts, and restructuring of debtor-creditor relations as core proceedings.

Fred Lara Naranjo and Joimaree Jones Naranjo · filed 2022-07-29(b)(2)(A), (I), (O)

The resolution of the Trustee’s motions are core proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (I), and (O) because they implicate estate administration, the dischargeability of debts, and the restructuring of debtor-creditor relations.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) and (J) classifies determinations of dischargeability and objections to discharge as core proceedings in which a bankruptcy court may enter a final order.

SE Property Holdings, LLC v. Stewart · filed 2022-08-03(b)(2)(I), (J)

This matter seeking a determination of an objection to discharge and dischargeability of a debt are core proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) and (J) over which this Court has authority to enter a final order.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies claims to determine the nondischargeability of debt under § 523(a)(2)(A) and § 523(a)(3)(B) as core proceedings.

Michigan Department of Health and Human Services v. Sylvester · filed 2022-08-04(b)(2)(I)

HHS’ non-dischargeability of debt claims under 11 U.S.C. §§ 523(a)(2)(A) and 523(a)(3)(B) are core proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2) treats a claim to avoid and recover a postpetition transfer as a core proceeding that a bankruptcy court can decide by final judgment.

Gordos Restaurant Corp. - Adversary Proceeding · filed 2022-08-04(b)(2)

The Trustee’s claim to avoid and recover the postpetition transfer of Gordos’ trade name and associated goodwill under 11 U.S.C. §§ 549 and 550 arises uniquely under the Bankruptcy Code and is a core proceeding that the Court can decide by a final judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2) and the United States Constitution.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats determinations about the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings.

Thomas G Smith · filed 2022-08-05(b)(2)(I)

It falls within “determinations as to the dischargeability of particular debts” and is thus a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2) classifies this adversary proceeding to recover transferred customer property as a core proceeding.

Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of B v. Union Securities Investment Trust Co., Ltd. · filed 2022-08-10(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (F), (H) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2) classifies certain bankruptcy proceedings as core proceedings.

Securities Investor Protection Corporation v. Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, LLC. et a · filed 2022-08-10(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (F), (H) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (E) treats a proceeding to determine whether property belongs to the bankruptcy estate as a core proceeding.

Ries v. Archer · filed 2022-08-15(b)(2)(A), (E)

This action ultimately concerns whether the Moore and Randall County Farms should be declared to be property of the bankruptcy estate and administered by the Trustee for the benefit of the estate’s creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1). It therefore arises both under the Bankruptcy Code and in this chapter 7 case. See 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b). The Court concludes this is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (E).

Section 157(b)(1) permits bankruptcy judges to determine referred core proceedings, but state-law claims that can exist outside bankruptcy are not core proceedings merely because they follow a bankruptcy sale.

In re: DEVORE STOP, a General Partnership · filed 2022-08-16(b)(1)

And 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) provides that “[b]ankruptcy judges may hear and determine all cases under title 11 and all core proceedings arising under title 11, or arising in a case under title 11” that are referred to it by the district court. ... The bankruptcy court did not err in concluding that the claims were not core claims arising in the bankruptcy case.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a motion to dismiss a bankruptcy case as a core proceeding concerning administration of the case.

Autopro Transportation Inc. · filed 2022-08-18(b)(2)(A)

Resolving a motion to dismiss a bankruptcy case is part of the administration of the case and is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. §157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a motion to dismiss a bankruptcy case as a core proceeding concerning administration of the case.

Le La Nails, LLC · filed 2022-08-18(b)(2)(A)

Resolving a motion to dismiss a bankruptcy case is part of the administration of the case and is a core proceeding.

Section 157(b) treats claims involving rights created by bankruptcy law as core proceedings; claims that do not involve those rights are not core on that basis.

Ever-Seal, Inc. v. DuraSeal, Inc. · filed 2022-08-23(b)

Thus, Plaintiff’s claims do not involve rights created by bankruptcy law and are not “core” bankruptcy proceedings.

Section 157(b)(2) treats disputes arising from a bankruptcy sale, the satisfaction of claims in bankruptcy, and an adequate protection lien as core proceedings.

Good Gateway, LLC v. NRCT, LLC · filed 2022-08-23(b)(2)

The Court, therefore, has jurisdiction over this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) and it is a core matter under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B), (M), (N), & (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings.

Baer v. Myers · filed 2022-08-24(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(I) because the complaint seeks a determination as to the dischargeability of particular debts.

Section 157(b)(2)(A), (F), (H), and (O) covers a trustee’s adversary proceeding to recover subsequent transfers of customer property as a core proceeding.

Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of B v. The Public Institution For Social Security · filed 2022-08-17(b)(2)(A), (F), (H), and (O)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (F), (H) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2) classifies this type of transfer recovery proceeding as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of B v. Union Securities Investment Trust Co., Ltd. · filed 2022-08-18(b)(2)(A), (F), (H), (O)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (F), (H) and (O).

Section 157 treats a post-confirmation Chapter 13 plan modification as a core proceeding that a bankruptcy judge may hear and determine.

Duane Douglas Croniser · filed 2022-08-23(b)(1), (b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(L)

A post-confirmation plan modification pursuant to § 1329 is a core proceeding pursuant to both 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (L) (deeming confirmation of plans a core proceeding), and the court has the authority to hear and determine this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1).

A proceeding to interpret a bankruptcy court’s plan and confirmation order to decide whether a fee was discharged can qualify as a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2).

Mesabi Metallics Co LLC v. B Riley FBR Inc · filed 2022-08-25(b)(2)

A non-exhaustive list of the categories of core proceedings is set out in § 157(b)(2), and includes “determinations as to the dischargeability of particular debts,” “objections to discharges,” and “confirmations of plans.” 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), (J), (L). This matter falls within those categories of core proceedings, as Mesabi asked the Bankruptcy Court to interpret the discharge injunction order in its own plan and confirmation order to determine whether B. Riley’s fee was discharged in the bankruptcy.

Section 157(b)(2) permits an adversary proceeding involving administrative expense claims to be classified as a core proceeding.

Highland Capital Management, L.P. - Adversary Proceeding · filed 2022-08-30(b)(2)

Bankruptcy subject matter jurisdiction exists in this Adversary Proceeding, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b), and this is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B), (C), and (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of particular debts as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Leon v. Bianco · filed 2022-08-30(b)(2)(I)

The proceeding is core in nature pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(G) treats a motion for relief from the automatic stay as a core proceeding.

Matthew M. Motil · filed 2022-09-01(b)(2)(G)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G).

Section 157(b)(2) treats an equitable-subordination claim concerning a proof of claim as a core proceeding.

Blackjewel, L.L.C. v. United Bank · filed 2022-09-02(b)(2)

Count IV of the Complaint is a statutorily core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B), (K), and (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats review of debtors’ transactions with attorneys and related sanctions as core proceedings concerning bankruptcy case administration.

Autopro Transportation Inc. · filed 2022-09-08(b)(2)(A)

The review of attorneys’ transactions with debtors and the determination of appropriate sanctions in connection therewith relate to the administration of bankruptcy cases and are core proceedings.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats review of attorneys’ transactions with debtors and related sanctions as core proceedings concerning the administration of bankruptcy cases.

Le La Nails, LLC · filed 2022-09-08(b)(2)(A)

The review of attorneys’ transactions with debtors and the determination of appropriate sanctions in connection therewith relate to the administration of bankruptcy cases and are core proceedings. 28 U.S.C. §157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies proceedings to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as core bankruptcy proceedings.

White v. Davidson · filed 2022-09-12(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (I).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) allows a bankruptcy court to hear and finally determine core proceedings concerning claims against the estate.

Seven Three Distilling Company, LLC and Reorganized Debtor, Seven Three Distilling Company · filed 2022-09-19(b)(2)(B)

The matters presently before the Court constitute core proceedings that this Court may hear and determine on a final basis under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2) identifies categories of core bankruptcy proceedings.

Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of B v. Korea Exchange Bank, Individually And As Trustee F · filed 2022-09-21(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (F), (H) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2) classifies this adversary proceeding to recover transferred customer property as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Securities Investor Protection Corporation v. Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, LLC. et a · filed 2022-09-21(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (F), (H) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2) classifies specified bankruptcy matters as core proceedings.

Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of B v. Bank Hapoalim B.M. · filed 2022-09-22(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (F), (H) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2) treats this trustee’s transfer-recovery adversary proceeding as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of B v. The Sumitomo Trust and Banking Co., Ltd. · filed 2022-09-22(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (F), (H) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2) covers this adversary proceeding as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Securities Investor Protection Corporation v. Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, LLC. et a · filed 2022-09-22(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (F), (H) and (O).

Section 157(b)(1) treats claims concerning the administration of estate property and the conduct of court-appointed professionals as core proceedings.

Prosser v. Carroll · filed 2022-08-26(b)(1)

This is a core proceeding.35 ... In this case, the Complaint raises issues regarding the administration of property of the estate and asserts claims against the professionals appointed by the Court to administer that estate.

Section 157 treats claims concerning administration of a bankruptcy estate as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Eiler v. DCF-LLC · filed 2022-09-23(b)(2)(A)

Because the first through fourth claims concern the administration of the estate, they are core proceedings, and I may hear and determine them and enter appropriate judgments.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as a core proceeding.

Perlenfein, Inc., dba B&R Auto Wrecking v. Smith · filed 2022-09-26(b)(2)(I)

This proceeding is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats this adversary proceeding as a core proceeding.

Schneorson v. Barry S. Franklyn Esq. · filed 2022-09-29(b)(2)(A)

This adversary proceeding is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(O) treats proceedings to determine a bankruptcy estate’s interests in marital property as core proceedings.

Schneorson v. Schneorson · filed 2022-09-29(b)(2)(O)

The claims asserted in this adversary proceeding to determine the estate’s interests in marital property are core proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(O).

Section 157 treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of debts as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and decide.

The First Citizens National Bank of Upper Sandusky v. Mann · filed 2022-09-30(b)(2)(I)

Proceedings to determine the dischargeability of debts are core proceedings that the court may hear and decide.

Section 157(b)(2) treats a dispute over a creditor’s claim and lien as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Malone v. IOU Central, Inc · filed 2022-09-30(b)(2)

As I previously ruled, this proceeding is a core proceeding under several subsections of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)—(A), (B), (K), and (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (B) treats claims against a Chapter 11 debtor involving administrative expenses as core matters on which the bankruptcy court may enter final orders.

Highland Capital Management, L.P. - Adversary Proceeding · filed 2022-09-30(b)(2)(A) and (B)

The Action presents “arising in” or “arising under” core matters, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (B)—as it involves claims that were asserted against a Chapter 11 Debtor (before the effective date of its plan) and the application of sections 503 and 507 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats an objection to a claim as a core proceeding.

Intelsat S.A. and Intelsat US LLC · filed 2022-09-30(b)(2)(B)

The Objection constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine whether a student loan debt is dischargeable as a core proceeding.

Haugen v. State of North Dakota dba Bank of North Dakota by · filed 2022-10-03(b)(2)(I)

This adversary action is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (O) permits a bankruptcy court to enter a final order in a core proceeding concerning attorney conduct.

Christine Marie Naughton · filed 2022-10-05(b)(2)(A) and (O)

As this matter is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (O), the Court may enter a final order.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats an objection to a claim as a core proceeding.

Intelsat S.A. and Intelsat US LLC · filed 2022-10-05(b)(2)(B)

The Objection constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157 permits a bankruptcy court to enter final orders or judgments on the core issue of whether claims belong to the bankruptcy estate.

ALAN NISSELSON, as Trustee of the Estate of Port M v. MARJERRY REALTY CORP. · filed 2022-10-06(b)(1)

The issue of whether the claims asserted by the Fund Group are property of the estate is a “core” issue as to which the Court may enter final orders or judgment.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (O) permits the bankruptcy court to enter a final order in a core proceeding concerning attorney conduct in a bankruptcy case.

Christine Marie Naughton · filed 2022-10-06(b)(2)(A) and (O)

As this matter is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (O), the Court may enter a final order.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (O) permits a bankruptcy court to enter a final order in a core proceeding involving review of attorney conduct.

Steven Rosenschein · filed 2022-10-06(b)(2)(A) and (O)

As this matter is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (O), the Court may enter a final order.

Section 157(b)(2) classifies this adversary proceeding as a core proceeding.

Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of B v. Barfield Nominees Limited · filed 2022-09-28(b)(2)(A), (F), (H) and (O)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (F), (H) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2) covers an adversary proceeding to recover subsequent transfers of customer property as a core proceeding.

Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of B v. Quilvest Finance LTD. · filed 2022-09-27(b)(2)(A), (F), (H), (O)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (F), (H) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats claims against the debtor involving a creditor’s proof of claim as core proceedings on which the bankruptcy court may enter final orders or judgment.

Cattell v. Deeks · filed 2022-10-11(b)(2)(B)

Victoria’s claims against Cattell are core claims as to which this court may enter final orders or judgment.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (E) makes this estate administration and turnover matter a core proceeding in which the bankruptcy court may enter a final order.

Christopher Allen Lents and Kimberly Dawn Lents · filed 2022-10-11(b)(2)(A) and (E)

This matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (E) and this Court may enter a final order.

Section 157(b)(2)(P) treats recognition of foreign proceedings and other Chapter 15 matters as core proceedings.

Comfort Jet Aviation, Ltd · filed 2022-10-14(b)(2)(P)

This is a core proceeding pertaining to the recognition of foreign proceedings and other matters under Chapter 15 of title 11 as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(P).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies determinations of dischargeability as core proceedings in which a bankruptcy court has statutory authority to enter a final order.

Payne v. Payne · filed 2022-10-20(b)(2)(I)

This is a statutory core proceeding, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §157(b)(2)(I); thus, the Court has statutory authority to enter a final order.

Section 157(b)(2) encompasses an adversary proceeding to recover subsequent transfers of customer property as a core proceeding.

Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of B v. Abu Dhabi Investment Authority · filed 2022-10-28(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (F), (H) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2) classifies a proceeding to recover transferred customer property as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Securities Investor Protection Corporation v. Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, LLC. et a · filed 2022-10-31(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (F), (H) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(B), (L) and (O) permits the bankruptcy court to finally decide this core proceeding concerning a secured lien amount and Chapter 13 plan.

Alan Elias · filed 2022-11-02(b)(2)(B), (L) and (O)

The Court declares this contested matter to be a core proceeding according to 28 U.S.C. § 157 (b)(2)(B), (L) and (O), over which this Court has constitutional authority to enter a final judgment.

Section 157(b)(2) treats determination of the validity of an involuntary bankruptcy petition as a core proceeding.

Project Restore LLC · filed 2022-10-07(b)(2)

Starting with the first question of core or non-core, the determination of the validity of an involuntary petition is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) classifies matters concerning administration of the estate as core proceedings.

Lee v. Choudhri · filed 2022-11-14(b)(2)(A)

This Court determines that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), this Adversary Proceeding contains core matters because the Complaint primarily asserts claims and seeks relief that rely on the Court’s interpretation and enforcement of its May 22, 2018 Order.

Section 157 permits bankruptcy judges to hear and determine core proceedings referred by district courts.

Affiliated Physicians and Employers Master Trust d v. Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service · filed 2022-11-15(a), (b)(2)(A), and (b)(2)(O)

The Court has jurisdiction over this contested matter under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334(a) and 157(a) and the Standing Order of the United States District Court dated July 10, 1984, as amended September 18, 2012, referring all Bankruptcy cases to the Bankruptcy Court. As explained in detail below, this matter is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats proceedings concerning administration of the bankruptcy estate as core proceedings.

Karol Felisha Longmire · filed 2022-11-22(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2) identifies specified bankruptcy matters, including claims allowance, as core proceedings.

Tri Harbor Holdings Corporation v. Sigmapharm Laboratories, LLC · filed 2022-11-22(b)(2)(A), (B), and (O)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B) [claims allowance] and (O).

Section 157(b) gives bankruptcy courts authority to hear and decide core proceedings arising under or arising in bankruptcy cases.

Palmetto State Armory, LLC v. IKON WEAPONS, LLC · filed 2022-11-30(b)(1), (b)(2)

This is a statutorily core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) and (2).

Section 157(b)(2) identifies categories of core bankruptcy proceedings.

Securities Investor Protection Corporation v. Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, LLC. et a · filed 2022-12-02(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (F), (H) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as core proceedings.

GulfCo of Alabama, LLC d/b/a Tower Loan of Dothan v. Mock · filed 2022-12-05(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b) permits bankruptcy courts to decide core proceedings concerning the administration of the estate, including disputes over rent proceeds.

TAGGART · filed 2022-12-06(b)

The Bankruptcy Court did not err in rendering a decision on this issue because AJX’s Motion to Turnover Rent implicated core proceedings that related to the administration of the bankruptcy estate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b) and 1334.

Section 157(b)(2) treats a trustee’s fraudulent transfer claim as a core proceeding.

Evangelista v. Silver · filed 2022-12-09(b)(2)

The Trustee’s fraudulent transfer claim is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2) and the Court has jurisdiction over this claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 157.

Section 157(b)(2) identifies core bankruptcy proceedings that a bankruptcy judge may hear and decide.

ComedyMX LLC · filed 2022-12-16(b)(2)

The parties’ motions for removal under § 1185(a), the trustee’s motion to dismiss under § 1112(b), and Beyond’s motion for relief under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 1009(a) are core proceedings under § 157(b)(2) which may be heard and decided in this Court.

Section 157(b) identifies core proceedings as including allowance or disallowance of claims and estimation of claims or interests for plan confirmation.

MatlinPatterson Global Opportunities Partners II L · filed 2022-12-16(b)(2)(B)

“core proceedings arising under title 11” are statutorily defined as including the “allowance or disallowance of claims against the estate” and “estimation of claims or interests for the purposes of confirming a plan.” 28 U.S.C. § 157(b).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats an objection to a claim as a core proceeding that a bankruptcy court may finally decide.

Stone Wolf Capital Management Company · filed 2022-12-20(b)(2)(B)

The Court declares this contested matter to be a core proceeding according to 28 U.S.C. § 157 (b)(2)(B), over which this Court has constitutional authority to enter a final judgment.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) classifies claim objections as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Pekin Brook Farm LLC · filed 2022-12-20(b)(2)(B)

The Court declares this contested matter to be a core proceeding according to 28 U.S.C. § 157 (b)(2)(B), over which this Court has constitutional authority to enter a final judgment.

Section 157(b)(2)(A), (F), and (O) classifies preference claims and recovery claims as core proceedings.

Curtis v. Law Office of Rogelio Solis PLLC · filed 2022-11-09(b)(2)(A), (F), and (O)

This Court determines that since the Complaint alleges a preference claim under § 547 and for recovery of the funds under § 550 of the Bankruptcy Code, the adjudication of preference claims and for recovery are statutorily “core” under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (F), and (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats a claim objection as a core proceeding in which the bankruptcy court may enter final judgment when it also has constitutional authority.

In re Caesars Entm't Operating Co. · filed 2018-07-30(b)(2)(B)

Because a claim objection is a matter "arising in" a case under Title 11, see In re Montalbano , 486 B.R. 436, 438 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2013) ; In re Tripplett , 115 B.R. 955, 958 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1990), the objection here is a core proceeding - both statutorily, see 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B), and constitutionally, see Schmid v. Bank of Am., N.A. , 498 B.R. 221, 223-24 (W.D. Wis. 2013). The court may therefore enter a final judgment.

Section 157(b)(2) permits a bankruptcy court to enter final orders in core proceedings involving interference with estate property and records.

In re Correra · filed 2018-08-21(b)(2)

These are core proceedings, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), possibly (e),... and (O). Thus, the bankruptcy court has statutory authority to enter final orders.

Section 157(b)(2) does not treat pre-petition contract claims against a party that filed no bankruptcy claim as core proceedings.

Halperin v. Moreno (In re Green Field Energy Servs., Inc.) · filed 2018-09-12(b)(2)

MGH Holdings has not filed a claim in Green Field's bankruptcy case. Therefore, the Court finds that the Trustee's claims against MGH Holdings for pre-petition breaches of two pre-petition contracts are not "core" claims under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157 treats a motion to extend the automatic stay as a core proceeding in which the bankruptcy court may enter a final judgment.

In re Goodrich · filed 2018-09-24(b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(G)

The Court declares the Debtor's Motion, seeking an extension of the automatic stay, constitutes a core proceeding for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (G), over which this Court has constitutional authority to enter a final judgment.