28 U.S.C. § 157

A proceeding to determine a debtor’s tax liability under section 505(a) is a core bankruptcy proceeding.

In re Altegrity, Inc. · filed 2016-01-14(b)(2)

Because, however, matters brought under section 505(a) are “core” proceedings,... a bankruptcy court should ... exercise its discretionary authority to abstain sparingly.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats the allowance or disallowance of claims against a bankruptcy estate as a core proceeding.

In re Devey · filed 2018-08-17(b)(2)(B)

Confirmation of a chapter 13 plan and the allowance or disallowance of claims against the bankruptcy estate are, as a matter of law, core matters that arise under the Bankruptcy Code.

Section 157 treats claims that arise in a bankruptcy case as core proceedings.

Tera Res. Co., Ltd. v. Lee (In re Cuzco Dev. U.S.A., LLC) · filed 2018-08-27(b)(2)

As I explain above, Tera's direct and derivative claims against Cuzco USA and Mr. Lee "arise in" Cuzco USA's bankruptcy case. Therefore, those claims are core proceedings.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) covers a motion to dismiss a bankruptcy case for cause as a core proceeding.

In re Malek · filed 2018-09-12(b)(2)(A)

A motion to dismiss a bankruptcy case for cause arises under title 11 and is a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(H) treats proceedings to determine, avoid, or recover fraudulent conveyances under the Bankruptcy Code as core matters.

In re McCurnin · filed 2018-09-24(b)(2)(H)

Counts II, III(a), and IV of the Complaint are proceedings to "determine, avoid or recover fraudulent conveyances" pursuant to provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and are therefore core matters.

Section 157(b)(2) treats disputes over enforcement of a bankruptcy financing order and related lien rights as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may finally decide.

Somerset Trust Co. v. Mostoller (In re Somerset Reg'l Water Res., LLC) · filed 2018-09-24(b)(2)

Second, this matter is a core proceeding over which the Court has both subject-matter jurisdiction and the requisite statutory authority to enter a final judgment. Indeed, enforcement of the Final DIP Order concerns the administration of this estate inasmuch as the funds to be paid to STC effectively reduces its post-petition claim. It also deals with the enforcement of the Final DIP Order and therefore is a controversy that concerns both an order "in respect to obtaining credit" and the Debtor's use of cash collateral. Furthermore, this controversy is a request for a determination of the validity, extent or priority of liens of STC against the applicable tax refund, and obviously the controversy affects the adjustment of the debtor-creditor relationship. All of these types of matters fall within the core jurisdiction of this Court.

Section 157 treats a determination of whether franchise agreement rights are property of the debtor's estate as a core matter.

Dine Brands Global, Inc. v. RMH Franchise Holdings, Inc. (In re RMH Franchise Holdings, Inc.) · filed 2018-09-25(b)

The immediate issue before the Court today is whether the rights under the Franchise Agreements are property of the Debtors' estates. This is a core matter.

Section 157 treats a claim for sanctions for violating the discharge injunction as a core proceeding because it arises under the Bankruptcy Code.

Daniels v. Howe Law Firm, P.C. (In re Daniels) · filed 2018-09-28(b)(2)(A)

Plaintiff's claim for sanctions for violations of the discharge injunction arises under the Bankruptcy Code and, therefore, is a core proceeding, over which this Court has subject matter jurisdiction.

Section 157(b)(1) does not treat a state-law contract claim as a core proceeding when the claim can arise outside bankruptcy.

AY McDonald Industries Inc. v. McDonald · filed 2018-10-03(b)(1)

AY’s claim for injunctive and declaratory relief is not a core proceeding. It does not “arise under” title 11 as it does not “involve a cause of action created or determined by a statutory provision of title 11.”

Section 157(b)(1) treats a claim as a core proceeding when it arises under title 11 or arises in a bankruptcy case and involves rights established by federal bankruptcy law; a contract claim that can arise outside bankruptcy is not core.

AY McDonald Indus., Inc. v. McDonald (In re McDonald) · filed 2018-10-03(b)(1)

A core proceeding is one that arises under title 11 or arises in a case under title 11 and involves rights established by federal bankruptcy law. ... AY's claim for injunctive and declaratory relief is not a core proceeding. ... Nor does it "arise in" title 11, as AY's claim against Debtor can arise outside the context of a bankruptcy proceeding.

Section 157(b)(1) does not treat a dispute over the interest rate actually charged on a loan as a core proceeding when the dispute could exist outside bankruptcy.

Morgan, Sr. v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, a Delaware limite · filed 2018-10-04(b)(1)

That is not a core proceeding as it is a matter that would exist outside of the bankruptcy context.

Section 157(b)(2)(L) treats plan confirmation, including sufficiently related releases of claims against nondebtors, as a core proceeding.

Lynch v. Lapidem Ltd. (In re Kirwan Offices S.À.R.L.) · filed 2018-10-10(b)(2)(L)

A bankruptcy court acts pursuant to its core jurisdiction when it considers the involuntary release of claims against a third-party, non-debtor in connection with the confirmation of a proposed plan of reorganization, which is a statutorily-defined core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(K) does not cover a third party’s charging lien against a debtor’s creditor after the estate has been administered and the proceeds distributed.

Keefe v. Asi Holding Co. · filed 2018-12-10(b)(2)(K)

Thus, section 157(b)(2)(K) cannot apply to charging liens sought by a third party against a creditor of the debtor, after the estate has been administered and the proceeds have been distributed, because such liens can have no conceivable effect on the debtor's estate.

Section 157(b)(2)(G) treats a motion for relief from the automatic stay as core, but a separate request to determine mortgage payment obligations is non-core.

In re Thorpe · filed 2019-01-17(b)(2)(G)

The Objection is not a "core" motion for relief from the automatic stay. In effect, the Objection is merely a request for declaratory relief regarding the respective rights of the Debtor and JPMorgan in connection with a secured debt that was not provided for by the plan. The matter may be categorized fairly as non-core, just like the claims in Boltz-Rubinstein.

Section 157(b)(2) treats a claim for violation of the discharge injunction as a core proceeding.

Trevino v. Select Porfolio Servicing, Inc. (In re Trevino) · filed 2019-03-07(b)(2)

Not only is the discharge injunction a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2), but the discharge injunction falls squarely within the realms of bankruptcy.

Section 157 does not treat ERISA claims that exist outside bankruptcy as core proceedings.

Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Lakeville Transportation, Inc. · filed 2019-03-25(b)(2)

Clearly, the ERISA claims alleged here exist outside of bankruptcy, and, therefore, this is not a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(1) covers a post-petition contract dispute as a core proceeding arising in a Title 11 case when resolving it depends on interpreting bankruptcy court orders.

Ass'n v. Franklin Advisers, Inc. · filed 2019-03-26(b)(1)

Although Plaintiffs portray this case as a simple contractual dispute, a proceeding over breach of contract claims can still "arise in" Title 11 and constitute a core bankruptcy proceeding. Such is the case, where, as here, the dispute concerns a post-petition contract the resolution of which depends upon the interpretation of bankruptcy court orders.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats dismissal of a bankruptcy case as a core proceeding concerning administration of the estate.

In re Class Five, LLC · filed 2019-04-15(b)(2)(A)

The dismissal of a bankruptcy case is a matter concerning the administration of the estate, and is thus a core proceeding under the Bankruptcy Code.

Section 157(b) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and determine actions concerning the amount and validity of tax claims against the bankruptcy estate as core proceedings.

In re Allied Consol. Indus., Inc. · filed 2019-04-22(b)

Actions to determine the amount and validity of tax claims against the bankruptcy estate are core proceedings that this court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b) does not treat a state foreclosure dispute as a core proceeding when its issues do not depend on bankruptcy law for their existence.

LSF8 Master Participation Trust v. Marusak · filed 2019-04-29(b)

Based upon this court’s review of the Amended Petition and Answer in the Carter County District Court case Marusak has attached to his Notice of Removal, the only issues in the removed case involve state foreclosure law, and do not depend on bankruptcy law for their existence; thus, it is not a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) classifies objections to claims as core proceedings.

In re Woodruff · filed 2019-04-30(b)(2)(B)

Similarly, an objection to a claim may only arise in a case under the Bankruptcy Code, arises under section 502 of the Bankruptcy Code and is specified as a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2) treats interpretation and enforcement of a bankruptcy court order entered in a core proceeding as a core proceeding.

Henry v. Casey · filed 2019-05-17(b)(2)

The interpretation and enforcement of a bankruptcy court order entered in a core proceeding is itself a core proceeding.

Section 157 treats proceedings to determine violations of the automatic stay or discharge injunction as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Ragone, Jr. v. Pizza Pan Elyria, LLC · filed 2019-05-21(b)(1), (b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(O)

Actions to determine whether violations of the automatic stay and/or the discharge injunction have occurred are core proceedings that this Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(H) treats fraudulent transfer lawsuits as core proceedings, a factor the court considers when deciding whether to withdraw a bankruptcy reference.

Jalbert v. Wessel G m b H · filed 2019-07-25(b)(2)(H)

Specifically, (1) the Trustee’s fraudulent transfer lawsuit is a core proceeding as stipulated in the joint pre-trial order and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(H), (2) withdrawal would not foster a more economical use of the parties’ resources because a bench trial was conducted, a judgment was rendered in the bankruptcy court and this matter is now on appeal before this Court; (3) withdrawing the reference would not expedite the bankruptcy process and (4) the timing of Wessel’s motion raises issues of forum shopping.

A claim that a bankruptcy trustee breached duties under 11 U.S.C. § 704 while administering the estate is a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2)(A).

Wyman · filed 2019-08-22(b)(2)(A)

The Court finds that Claim II clearly falls under the core proceedings category because it is premised on Sweet’s potential liability for violating 11 U.S.C. § 704. § 157(b)(2)(A) straightforwardly indicates that core proceedings include “matters concerning the administration of the estate.”

Section 157(b)(2) treats proceedings to determine, avoid, or recover fraudulent conveyances as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Schmidt v. Sosa · filed 2019-08-22(b)(2)

This court determines that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2), this Adversary Proceeding contains core matters, as it primarily involves proceedings to determine, avoid, or recover a fraudulent conveyance.

An unjust enrichment claim is a non-core proceeding outside Section 157(b)(2).

Emerald Capital Advisors Corp., in Its Capacity as v. Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft · filed 2019-08-26(b)(2)

The claim of unjust enrichment is a non-core claim and does not fall within Section 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats disputes over bankruptcy counsel’s fees as core proceedings because those fees implicate administration of the estate.

Sharon Davis · filed 2019-08-29(b)(2)(A)

These matters constitute core proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) because payment of professional fees implicates the administration of the estate.

Section 157 treats motions for relief from the automatic stay and requests to abandon estate property as core proceedings.

Thomas G. Gialamas · filed 2019-09-03(b)(2)

A motion to terminate, annul, or modify the automatic stay is a core proceeding, as is a request to abandon property of the estate. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (E), (G), (M) and (O).

Section 157 treats a proceeding to determine whether a creditor violated the discharge injunction as a core proceeding.

Pursell Holdings, LLC · filed 2019-08-30(b)(2)

Whether a creditor has violated the discharge injunction is undoubtedly a core proceeding, although, as noted previously, bankruptcy and state courts have concurrent jurisdiction to determine if the injunction was violated.

Section 157(b)(2) does not classify breach of fiduciary duty or aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty claims as core proceedings.

Our Alchemy, LLC - Adversary Proceeding · filed 2019-09-16(b)(2)

The breach of fiduciary and aiding and abetting the breach of fiduciary duty claims are non-core proceedings that do not fall under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2) treats recharacterization and avoidance claims as core bankruptcy matters.

Our Alchemy, LLC - Adversary Proceeding · filed 2019-09-16(b)(2)

The recharacterization and avoidance claims are core matters under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2}(B), (F) and (H).

Section 157 treats a proceeding seeking damages for an automatic stay violation as core when it requires applying Bankruptcy Code section 362.

Edwards v. B&E TRANSPORT, LLC · filed 2019-09-25(b)(3)

As the question involves an application of Bankruptcy Code section 362, the Court determines the proceeding to be core. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1); see 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(3).

A proceeding concerning an attorney’s conduct in a bankruptcy case can qualify as a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2)(A).

Matthew C Abel · filed 2019-09-27(b)(2)(A)

The Court declares the complaint and responsive pleading create a core proceeding for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), over which this Court has constitutional authority to enter a final judgment.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) identifies core proceedings in which a bankruptcy court may enter final judgment when it has constitutional authority.

HARRINGTON v. SYNERGY LAW, LLC · filed 2019-09-27(b)(2)(A)

The Court declares the complaint and responsive pleading create a core proceeding for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), over which this Court has constitutional authority to enter a final judgment.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) and (K) treats disputes over claims against the estate and liens on the debtor’s property as core proceedings.

McIntyre Land Company, Inc. v. Truist Bank · filed 2019-10-08(b)(2)(B), (K)

Under that statute, this litigation raised core issues. ... The litigation was about the “allowance or disallowance” of BB&T’s claim against Building’s estate and the “validity” and “extent” of BB&T’s lien on the undeveloped property that Building owned.

Section 157(b) does not treat state-law claims against a debtor’s private bankruptcy counsel as core proceedings merely because the claims concern the bankruptcy case.

Wisdom v. Gugino · filed 2019-10-09(b)

Wisdom’s action neither arises under, nor arises in, title 11, and thus is not core to the proceedings.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a motion concerning bankruptcy estate assets as a core proceeding involving administration of the estate.

Sindesmos Hellinikes-Kinotitos of Chicago · filed 2019-10-25(b)(2)(A)

It follows that a motion concerning such assets is a matter concerning the administration of the estate and is therefore a statutorily core proceeding, 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), and a motion to sell such assets is expressly core.

State-law foreclosure claims that the bankruptcy court cannot decide are not core proceedings under § 157.

G.L.A.D. Enterprises, LLC · filed 2019-10-28(b)(2)

The claims that have been brought in this Adversary Proceeding all relate to the Foreclosure Actions, which are not “core” proceedings because they concern issues that cannot be decided by the bankruptcy court.

Section 157 treats a bankruptcy court’s enforcement of its own order as a core proceeding.

Lee v. BDFI, LLC · filed 2019-11-14(b)(2)(A), (O)

The pending dispute requesting that this Court cancel a lis pendens is a non-core proceeding, however the request that this Court enforce its own Order is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (D) treats proceedings concerning estate administration and enforcement of an order for obtaining credit as core proceedings.

MRPC Christiana, LLC v. Crown Bank · filed 2019-12-05(b)(2)(A), (D)

This matter constitutes a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(A) and (D) as it concerns the administration of the estate and enforcement of an order in respect to obtaining credit.

Section 157 treats a motion to renew a judgment from a core dischargeability proceeding as a core proceeding when the motion seeks to continue enforcement of that judgment.

Densley v. Dyches · filed 2019-12-13(b)(2)(I)

Densley’s complaint sought to except a debt from Dyches’s discharge, making this a core proceeding within the definition of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), and she successfully obtained a judgment of nondischargeability. Densley’s current motion to renew that judgment is still within the Court’s core jurisdiction because it asks the Court to continue enforcement of that judgment, and “the enforcement of orders resulting from core proceedings are themselves considered core proceedings.”3 As a result, the Court may enter a final order.

Section 157 treats a proceeding to determine whether a contract may be rejected under the Bankruptcy Code as a core proceeding.

Alta Mesa Holdings, LP v. Kingfisher Midstream, LLC · filed 2019-12-20(b)(2)(A)

This adversary proceeding is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) because rejection is a substantive right created by the Bankruptcy Code.

Section 157(b)(3) does not make a proceeding noncore merely because resolving it requires applying state law.

Ibbotson v. Riel · filed 2020-01-23(b)(3)

The fact that Bankruptcy Code section 544(a)(3) requires an analysis of Washington state law does not alter the “core” nature of the dispute.

Section 157(b)(2) provides a nonexclusive list of core proceedings; related claims arising from the same transaction as a core claim may also be core.

Toys "R" Us, Inc. - Adversary Proceeding · filed 2020-01-28(b)(2)

Inasmuch as the list of core proceedings is not limited to those enumerated in § 157(b)(2), and all of the counts contained in the Complaint arise out of the same transaction as the core proceeding under Count One, there is a commonality of issues that renders Counts Two, Three and Four “core.”

Section 157(b)(2)(O) does not make a state law claim core merely because a recovery could add assets to the bankruptcy estate.

Montoya, Trustee v. Curtis · filed 2020-01-29(b)(2)(O)

The Court rejects the Curtis Defendants’ assertion that this adversary proceeding is a core proceeding because the outcome may affect the liquidation of estate assets, arguably fitting within the literal definition of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(O). Merely because the bankruptcy estate has the potential to recover funds as a result of this adversary proceeding does not render the proceeding “core.”

Section 157(b)(2) classifies a claim alleging misconduct in the plan confirmation process as a core matter.

Holdner v. Kreitzberg · filed 2020-02-05(b)(2)

As discussed below, Mr. Holdner’s first claim for relief appears to allege misconduct as part of the confirmation process. ... The first claim is a core matter under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (L), (N), and/or (O).

Claims concerning a trustee’s and an estate professional’s conduct in carrying out estate duties are core matters.

Marshall v. John Does 1-5 · filed 2020-02-05(b)(2)(A), (L)

The fourth claim for relief involves the conduct of a trustee and an estate professional in the discharge of their duties for the estate. Accordingly, this court has “arising in” and “arising under” jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b). This claim is a core matter under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (L).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats claims requiring interpretation of a bankruptcy court-approved transaction agreement as core proceedings concerning administration of the estate.

Dotson v. FCA US LLC · filed 2020-02-19(b)(2)(A)

Of particular importance here is that “matters concerning the administration of the estate,” are core proceedings. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A). ... Therefore, Dotson’s claims are a core proceed- ing.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) and (C) treats proceedings concerning the allowance or disallowance of claims and determination of estate counterclaims as core proceedings.

C2R Global Manufacturing, Inc. · filed 2020-02-20(b)(2)(B), (C)

Because this patent dispute concerns the allowance or disallowance of claims and the determination of counterclaims of the estate, this is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) and (C).

Section 157 treats an automatic-stay violation claim as a core proceeding because it invokes a substantive Bankruptcy Code right and can arise only in bankruptcy.

Roggio v. Roggio · filed 2020-02-28(b)

Since Count I alleges a violation of the automatic stay, it is a core proceeding in that it invokes a substantive right provided by the Bankruptcy Code. Further, it is the type of claim that could only arise in a bankruptcy proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (O) classify a proceeding about the scope of a bankruptcy discharge injunction as a core proceeding.

Fawwaz F. Beyha · filed 2020-03-04(b)(2)(A), (O)

As the instant proceeding concerns the scope of the discharge injunction arising from §§ 524 and 1141 of the Code, it is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(A), (O).

Section 157 treats a motion for sanctions under Bankruptcy Rule 9011 as a core proceeding.

Lee E. Chapman · filed 2020-03-11(b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(O)

A motion for sanctions under Bankruptcy Rule 9011 is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(A) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies proceedings to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Michael v. Denson · filed 2020-03-30(b)(2)(I)

This adversary proceeding is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats the allowance or disallowance of claims against the estate as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Central Louisiana Home Healthcare, LLC · filed 2020-03-30(b)(2)(B)

All claims presented to this court are “core” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) (allowance or disallowance of claims against the estate).

Section 157(b)(2) treats avoidance claims and claims for damages arising from automatic-stay violations as core proceedings.

Gordon v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. · filed 2020-03-31(b)(2)

Plaintiff’s avoidance claims and the claim for damages arising from the alleged violation of the automatic stay are clearly core proceedings, while Plaintiff’s RICO claim is, arguably, a non-core proceeding, over which this Court has subject matter jurisdiction because the claim is related to Debtor’s bankruptcy case.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats determinations of the dischargeability of a debt as core proceedings.

Pliura v. Brady · filed 2020-03-31(b)(2)(I)

The determination of the dischargeability of a particular debt is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. §157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies determinations of debt dischargeability as core proceedings.

Aeschliman v. Vraney · filed 2020-03-31(b)(2)(I)

The determination of the dischargeability of a particular debt is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), and actions to determine the scope of a debtor’s discharge is a fundamental part of the bankruptcy process.

Section 157(b)(2)(H) treats fraudulent transfer proceedings as core proceedings in which a bankruptcy court may enter a final order.

Miller v. The United States of America · filed 2020-03-31(b)(2)(H)

This matter is a core proceeding within the definition of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(H), and the Court may enter a final order.

Claims for violations of the automatic stay are core proceedings under § 157.

Steed v. GSRAN-Z, LLC · filed 2020-04-01

The Court finds it has jurisdiction over the claims for violations of the automatic stay pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334, that such claims are core ... proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157, and that it is appropriate to retain jurisdiction in this adversary proceeding to resolve those claims.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats determination of whether a creditor violated the automatic stay as a core matter.

Steed v. GSRAN-Z LLC · filed 2020-04-01(b)(2)(A)

Determination of whether a creditor has violated the automatic stay is a core matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157 treats claim objections and dischargeability actions as core proceedings.

Steed v. Educational Credit Management Corporation · filed 2020-04-01(b)(2)(B), (b)(2)(I)

This adversary proceeding certainly asserted core claims at the time it was filed—claim objections and dischargeability actions are undoubtedly core.

Section 157 treats proceedings involving turnover of estate property as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and decide.

Mark W. Klinger · filed 2020-04-01(b)(2)(E)

Proceedings involving the turnover of property of the bankruptcy estate are core proceedings that this court may hear and decide under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) and (b)(2)(E).

Section 157(b)(2) treats confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan as a core proceeding.

Charles O Canfield and Laurel L Canfield · filed 2020-04-02(b)(2)

Confirmation of the Plan is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2), and this Court has exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether the Plan complies with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and should be confirmed.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) makes matters concerning estate administration core proceedings in which the bankruptcy court may enter a final order.

Charles K. Breland, Jr. · filed 2020-04-03(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §157(b)(2)(A), and the Court has authority to enter a final order.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a motion to approve a bankruptcy compromise as a core proceeding on which the bankruptcy court may enter a final order.

Osprey Utah, LLC. · filed 2020-04-03(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §157(b)(2)(A), and the Court has authority to enter a final order.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats the allowance of claims as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Bay Circle Properties, LLC · filed 2020-04-03(b)(2)(B)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §157(b) (2) (B) as it involves the allowance of claims.

Section 157 treats an action to determine the dischargeability of a particular debt as a core proceeding.

Darlene Robinson, ACNPc and Glite Healthcare Allia v. Thompson · filed 2020-04-03(b)(2)

An action to determine the dischargeability of a particular debt is a core proceeding, and the parties have consented to entry of a final judgment by this Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(H).

Section 157(b)(2)(O) treats proceedings affecting the adjustment of the debtor-creditor relationship as core proceedings.

City of Detroit, Michigan · filed 2020-04-06(b)(2)(O)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(O), because it is a proceeding “affecting . . . the adjustment of the debtor-creditor . . . relationship.”

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats a claim objection as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Robby Joe Ring and Amy Elizabeth Ring · filed 2020-04-09(b)(2)(B)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2)(E) classifies orders to turn over property of the estate as core proceedings.

Gould v. BOKF, N.A. d/b/a Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. · filed 2020-04-10(b)(2)(E)

This is a “core proceeding” under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E)(orders to turn over property of the estate).

Section 157 treats proceedings to determine dischargeability of debts as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and decide.

Ott v. Somogye · filed 2020-03-30(b)(1) and (b)(2)(I)

Proceedings to determine dischargeability of debts are core proceedings that this court may hear and decide.

Section 157 permits a bankruptcy court to hear and determine proceedings concerning violations of the automatic stay or discharge injunction as core proceedings.

Ragone, Jr. v. Pizza Pan Elyria, LLC · filed 2020-03-31(b)(1), (b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(O)

Actions to determine whether violations of the automatic stay and/or the discharge injunction have occurred are core proceedings that this Court may hear and determine. 28 U.S.C. §157(b)(1) and (b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(O).

Section 157 treats proceedings to determine whether a debt is dischargeable or to object to a discharge as core proceedings in which the bankruptcy court may enter a final order.

Allen Beal - Adversary Proceeding · filed 2020-03-31(b)(2)(I), (J)

SBSU’s complaint seeks to except a debt from Beal’s discharge and to deny that discharge entirely, making this a core proceeding within the definition of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) and (J), and the Court may enter a final order.

Section 157(b)(2) treats an adversary proceeding seeking approval of a bankruptcy property sale as a core proceeding.

Barnes v. Barnes · filed 2020-04-13(b)(2)(A), (N), and (O)

This Adversary Proceeding constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(A), (N), and (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats dischargeability determinations as core proceedings in which a bankruptcy court may enter final orders and judgments.

Trejo v. Mae · filed 2020-04-15(b)(2)(I)

This adversary proceeding involves a core matter over which the Court has both statutory and constitutional authority to enter final orders and judgments pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (I).

Section 157(b)(2) treats a proceeding to enforce a discharge injunction as core, allowing the bankruptcy court to enter a final order.

Troy R. Morgan and Breklyn A Morgan · filed 2020-04-16(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2), and this Court may enter a final order.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (O) identifies core bankruptcy proceedings in which the bankruptcy court may enter a final order.

FBI Wind Down, Inc. · filed 2020-04-17(b)(2)(A) and (O)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (O). ... The Court has the judicial authority to enter a final order.

Section 157 treats actions to deny a debtor’s discharge as core proceedings in which the bankruptcy court may enter a final judgment.

McDermott v. McDonald · filed 2020-04-17(b)(2)(J)

Actions to deny a debtor’s discharge are core proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1), (b)(2)(A) and (J) and the Court has authority to enter a final judgment.

Section 157(b)(2)(H) treats a trustee’s fraudulent transfer and recovery claims under Bankruptcy Code §§ 548 and 550 as core proceedings.

Aurzada v. Jenkins · filed 2020-04-17(b)(2)(H)

The Trustee’s claims under sections 548 and 550 of the Bankruptcy Code constitute core matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(H), inasmuch ... they arise under the Bankruptcy Code.

Section 157 treats motions for relief from the automatic stay or redress for its violation as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Dionna D Rice · filed 2020-04-21(b)(2)

“[A]ny motion seeking relief from, or redress regarding, the automatic stay, by definition arises under the Bankruptcy Code and is therefore a core proceeding within this court's statutory and constitutional authority.”

Section 157(b)(2) classifies the determination and dischargeability of a debtor’s tax liability as a core proceeding.

Ivison v. Internal Revenue Service, United States of America · filed 2020-04-23(b)(2)

The determination and dischargeability of Plaintiffs’ tax liability constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B), (I), and (O).

A dispute over a debtor’s privileged documents can be a core bankruptcy proceeding under § 157(b)(2)(A).

VeroBlue Farms USA, Inc. v. Jackson Walker LLP · filed 2020-04-24(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157 treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of debt as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and decide.

Hlady v. American Education Services · filed 2020-04-24(b)(2)(I)

A proceeding to determine the dischargeability of debt is a core proceeding that the Court may hear and decide.

Section 157(b)(2)(O) treats a proceeding as core when its outcome may affect estate liquidation or the debtor-creditor relationship, unless it is a personal injury tort or wrongful death claim.

Dells Land and Cattle Company II, LLC v. Krus · filed 2020-04-24(b)(2)(O)

With that in mind, the Court finds this adversary action to be a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157 because its outcome may affect “the liquidation of the assets of the estate or the adjustment of the debtor-creditor or the equity security holder relationship,” and is not a personal injury tort or wrongful death claim.

Section 157(b) treats a proceeding to determine dischargeability as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

CreditBox.com, L.L.C. v. Perez · filed 2020-04-28(b)

1. This contested matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b\24(1) 2. This court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 8§ 157(a) and 1334 (b).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a § 523 nondischargeability action as a core proceeding; an affirmative defense to that action is also core.

Karras v. Stirlen · filed 2020-04-30(b)(2)(I)

An action brought pursuant to § 523 is a statutorily- designated core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) and “stems from the bankruptcy itself.” Stern, 564 U.S. at 499. It follows that an affirmative defense to such an action is likewise a core proceeding over which the Court has constitutional authority.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) identifies dischargeability matters as core proceedings.

Kroesen v. Wernes · filed 2020-05-01(b)(2)(I)

As to Ms. Wernes’ dischargeability complaint, Ms. Wernes alleged that matter was core and Ms. Kroesen admitted the allegation and dischargeability matters are specifically enumerated in the statute’s list of core proceedings. The court concludes that the matter is undoubtedly core and no party disputed otherwise.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) covers a debtor’s challenge to exclusion from PPP funds as a core proceeding when the exclusion affects administration of the bankruptcy case.

Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of Santa v. United States of America Small Business Administra · filed 2020-05-01(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A). Defendant’s decision to exclude Plaintiff from the PPP is core: it goes to the heart of case administration, as the funds were intended by Congress to replace Plaintiff’s lost revenue caused by the government lockdowns.

Section 157(b)(2)(E) treats this turnover adversary proceeding as a core bankruptcy matter.

Kent v. Skoda Minotti & Co., Certified Public Accountants · filed 2020-05-05(b)(2)(E)

This adversary proceeding is a core matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §157(b)(2)(E).

Section 157(b)(2) treats a dispute over the application of Bankruptcy Code section 365 as a core proceeding that the bankruptcy court may finally decide when the dispute stems from the bankruptcy itself.

47 Hops LLC · filed 2020-05-13(b)(2)

The parties’ dispute regarding the application of Bankruptcy Code section 365 is statutorily “core”9 and “the action at issue stems from the bankruptcy itself.”10 Accordingly, the court may properly exercise the judicial power necessary to finally decide this dispute.

Section 157(b)(2)(M) treats a dispute over the use of cash collateral under § 363 as a core proceeding.

Claar Cellars LLC · filed 2020-05-14(b)(2)(M)

The parties’ dispute regarding the application of Bankruptcy Code section 363 is statutorily “core” and “the action at issue stems from the bankruptcy itself.”

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as a core bankruptcy matter in which the bankruptcy court may enter final judgment.

Rubash v. United States Department Of Education · filed 2020-05-19(b)(2)(I)

This is a core matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §157(b)(2)(I), and the Court will enter final judgment.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Slack v. Woods · filed 2020-05-21(b)(2)(I)

Issues of nondischargeability of debt are core proceedings under the terms of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) and (B) identify dischargeability and claim allowance matters as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Hauk v. Valdivia · filed 2020-05-22(b)(2)

With respect to every claim pled in Plaintiff’s Complaint (Docket # 1), and every claim pled in Defendant’s “Counter-Complaint” (Docket # 4), this is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(I) and/or 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a proceeding concerning the administration of a bankruptcy case as a core proceeding.

Stephen Harry Dernick and David Dwight Dernick · filed 2020-05-22(b)(2)(A)

The matter before the Court is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) because the acts leading to the issuance of the Show Cause Order concern the administration of the Debtors’ bankruptcy cases.

Section 157 treats nondischargeability litigation as a core proceeding in which a bankruptcy court may enter final orders and judgments.

Wurmlinger v. Greenfield · filed 2020-05-26(b)(2)(I)

This nondischargeability litigation is a core proceeding over which the Court exercises jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. §§ 157, 1334, and in which it enters final orders and judgments subject to appeal, 28 U.S.C. § 158.

A claim under Bankruptcy Code § 525 is a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2)(A), (D), and (O).

Springfield Hospital, Inc. v. Carranza, in her capacity as Administrator for the · filed 2020-05-04(b)(2)(A), (D), and (O)

This decision addresses a cause of action under § 525 of the Bankruptcy Code and thus is a core proceeding arising under Title 11 of the United States Code as described in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (D), and (O).

Section 157(b)(2) treats a cause of action under Bankruptcy Code § 525 as a core proceeding arising under title 11.

Springfield Medical Care Systems, Inc. v. Carranza · filed 2020-05-08(b)(2)(A), (D), and (O)

This decision addresses a cause of action under § 525 of the Bankruptcy Code and thus is a core proceeding arising under Title 11 of the United States Code as described in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (D), and (O).

Section 157(b)(2) treats the determination and dischargeability of tax liabilities as a core proceeding.

Ivison v. Internal Revenue Service, United States of America · filed 2020-05-29(b)(2)(A), (B), and (O)

The determination and dischargeability of Plaintiffs’ tax liabilities constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B), and (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats proceedings concerning revival of a bankruptcy confirmation order’s judgment as core proceedings.

RR Valve, Inc., a Nevada corporation and Gerard Stephan Lazzara · filed 2020-06-02(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), and the Court holds constitutional authority to enter appropriate orders and judgments.

Section 157(b) treats this proceeding as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Welded Construction, L.P. v. The Williams Companies, Inc. · filed 2020-06-08(b)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 157(b).

Section 157(b)(2) treats a proceeding to determine whether a creditor violated a discharge injunction as a core bankruptcy matter.

Bauer v. Credit Central LLC · filed 2020-06-08(b)(2)

A determination regarding a violation of a discharge injunction is a core bankruptcy matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

State-law claims that do not arise under or in a Title 11 case are non-core proceedings under Section 157(b)(2).

Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. v. Girod Loanco, LLC · filed 2020-06-09(b)(2)

Next, the claims pending here are non-core because they do not arise under or in a case under Title 11.

Section 157(b)(2) treats the trustee’s bankruptcy-law claims as core proceedings.

Lentz v. Donald Norris Associates, PLLC d/b/a Stonepoint Le · filed 2020-06-09(b)(2)

The amended complaint (“Complaint”) includes five counts that are core under, variously, 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (E), (A), and (O); and one count that is non-core.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats matters concerning the administration of a bankruptcy estate as core proceedings.

Bianca Cruz · filed 2020-06-12(b)(2)(A)

This is a core matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) as it “concern[s] the administration of the estate.”

Section 157(b)(2)(I) makes determining whether a debt is dischargeable a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Cowan v. Ladosenszky · filed 2020-06-16(b)(2)(I)

This Court has subject matter jurisdiction to do this, under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334(b), 157(a) and 157(b)(1), and Local Rule 83.50(a) (E.D. Mich.), and to the extent of making the foregoing dischargeability determination, this is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(J) classifies objections to discharge as core proceedings.

Kathryn Jane Spearman - Adversary Proceeding · filed 2020-06-18(b)(2)(J)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J).

Section 157(b)(2) treats requests concerning the administration of a bankruptcy estate as core proceedings.

H2D Motorcycle Ventures, LLC · filed 2020-06-18(b)(2)

Each of the instant requests for relief are core proceedings insofar as they concern the administration of the estate. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2)(H) treats proceedings to determine, avoid, or recover fraudulent transfers as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Maxwell, Trustee v. United States · filed 2020-06-19(b)(2)(H)

As a proceeding to determine, avoid or recover fraudulent transfers pursuant to section 548 of the Bankruptcy Code is a matter arising under the Bankruptcy Code, the Adversary Proceeding is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(H).

Section 157(b)(2) treats matters concerning estate administration and determinations of debt dischargeability as core proceedings.

Bryan Starling · filed 2020-06-19(b)(2)(A), (I)

This is a “core proceeding” under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2) (A) (“matters concerning the administration of the estate”) and (I) (“determinations as to the dischargeability of particular debts”).

Section 157 treats a motion to approve a bankruptcy sale and a motion to enforce the sale order as core proceedings arising under title 11.

Kimmel's Coal and Packaging, Inc. · filed 2020-06-01(b)(1), (b)(2)(N)

Both a motion to approve a sale of property and a motion seeking to enforce that order are proceedings “arising under title 11” and, therefore, are core proceedings. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1), (b)(2)(N).

Section 157(b)(2)(A), (L), and (O) covers contested matters concerning conditional dismissal, plan modification, and dismissal as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Robert Andrew Simpson and Tay Simpson · filed 2020-06-01(b)(2)(A), (L), and (O)

The issues before are the Court are core proceedings arising under Title 11 of the United States Code as described in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (L), and (O). Therefore, this Court has constitutional authority to enter a final order deciding these three contested matters.

Section 157(b)(2)(L) identifies confirmation of bankruptcy plans as a core proceeding entrusted to bankruptcy judges.

Bennett v. Jefferson County, Alabama · filed 2020-06-29(b)(2)(L)

In fact, “confirmations of plans” are expressly mentioned on the “list of ‘core proceedings’ statutorily entrusted to bankruptcy judges.”

Section 157(b)(2) treats confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Sorenson Media, Inc. · filed 2020-07-02(b)(2)

Confirmation of the Plan is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2), and this Court has exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether the Plan complies with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and should be confirmed.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (O) treats this involuntary bankruptcy proceeding as a core proceeding.

Anita S. Gutierrez · filed 2020-07-06(b)(2)(A), (O)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and/or (O).

Section 157 treats a proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a debt as a core bankruptcy matter.

Omar Weaver Rosales - Adversary Proceeding · filed 2020-07-09(b)(2)(I)

This Court determines that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), this is a core matter as it “concern[s] the administration of the estate.”

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats proceedings to allow or disallow claims as core bankruptcy proceedings.

CARLOS A. DILLON, SR. · filed 2020-07-14(b)(2)(B)

This proceeding is core under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

A sanctions motion for violations of the automatic stay and discharge injunction is a core proceeding that the bankruptcy court may hear and determine under § 157(b).

Lori Jayne Kimbler · filed 2020-07-15(b)(2)(A)

This matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) which the court has the authority to hear and determine pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1).

A proceeding to determine whether a particular debt is dischargeable is a core proceeding in which the bankruptcy court may enter a final order.

Obed Saul Barragan Reyes - Adversary Proceeding · filed 2020-07-15(b)(2)(I)

This matter seeking a determination of an objection to the dischargeability of a particular debt is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) over which this Court has authority to enter a final order.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) and (J) classifies proceedings involving dischargeability as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Z Constructors Nationwide, LLC v. Hadley, II · filed 2020-07-01(b)(2)(I) and (J)

This matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) and (J) as ZCN’s claims against Defendant involve issues of dischargeability.

Section 157(b)(2)(A), (I), and (O) classifies proceedings involving estate administration, dischargeability, and certain other estate matters as core proceedings.

Clay v. Whitten · filed 2020-07-10(b)(2)(A), (I), and (O)

This matter constitutes a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (I), and (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(G) treats motions to modify the automatic stay as core proceedings in which a bankruptcy judge may enter a final order.

D/C Distribution, LLC · filed 2020-07-21(b)(2)(G)

Motions to terminate, annul, or modify the automatic stay are core proceedings arising under the Bankruptcy Code in which the bankruptcy court is empowered to enter final orders.

A proceeding to assert a claim against the bankruptcy estate is core under § 157(b), allowing the bankruptcy court to hear and determine it.

Joseph A. Palsa, in his Capacity as Trustee Under v. McClinch · filed 2020-07-22(b)

The Plaintiff's complaint does not seek to augment the estate; rather, the Plaintiff's complaint appears to be an effort to assert a claim against the estate (whether or not the confirmation order is revoked under 11 U.S.C. § 1144). For this reason, the Court concludes that this is a core proceeding, see 28 U.S.C. § 157(b), and there is no Constitutional impediment to the entry of judgment.

A request for attorneys’ fees incurred to obtain dismissal of a bankruptcy petition is a core proceeding when the right to those fees arose from the bankruptcy.

Rosalina Lizardo Harris · filed 2020-07-23(b)(2)

Similar to the situation in Yochum, Holmes’ right to attorneys’ fees did not exist independently of the bankruptcy, because Holmes’ entitlement to the fees arose only in connection with her efforts to obtain dismissal of the petition. Therefore, the issue of whether Holmes is entitled to attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 is a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(H) classifies fraudulent conveyance claims as core proceedings.

LaMonica, as Chapter 7 Trustee of the Estate of JV v. Harrah's Atlantic City Operating Company, LLC · filed 2020-07-24(b)(2)(H)

The fraudulent conveyance claims are core proceedings. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(H).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats objections to exemptions as core proceedings in which the bankruptcy court may enter final orders.

Robert A. Shirley and Susan R. Shirley · filed 2020-07-27(b)(2)(B)

This is a core proceeding and the court has authority to enter final orders. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2) classifies discharge and dischargeability matters as core proceedings in which the bankruptcy court may enter a final judgment.

The Barbknecht Firm, P.C. v. Keese · filed 2020-07-27(b)(2)

This Court has authority to enter a final judgment regarding all discharge and dischargeability issues presented in this adversary proceeding since those matters statutorily constitute a core proceeding as contemplated by 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), (J), and (O) and meet all constitutional standards for the proper exercise of full judicial power by this Court.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (B) treats an objection to a proof of claim as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Phyllis Adele Johnson · filed 2020-07-27(b)(2)(A), (B)

This Court further concludes that this matter is a “core” bankruptcy proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (B).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies proceedings to determine the dischargeability of debts as core proceedings.

Welch v. Welch · filed 2020-07-28(b)(2)(I)

This adversary proceeding is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2) treats confirmation of a bankruptcy plan as a core proceeding.

Treeside Charter School · filed 2020-07-29(b)(2)

Confirmation of the Plan is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2), and this Court has exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether the Plan complies with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and should be confirmed.

Section 157(b)(2) treats objections to discharge and matters concerning the dischargeability of debts as core proceedings that bankruptcy judges may hear and determine.

KAR v. ORR · filed 2020-08-03(b)(2)

Here, there is no doubt that the Bankruptcy Court had jurisdiction to enter both the Default Judgment and the Dismissal Order. See 28 U.S.C. §157(b)(2) (included in the list of “core proceedings” which bankruptcy judges may hear and determine are matters relating to the “dischargeability of particular debts” and “objections to discharge”).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Professional Garage Door Systems, Inc. v. Rishel, Jr · filed 2020-08-04(b)(2)(I)

This case is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(I) and 157(b)(2)(J).

Section 157(b)(2)(F) treats proceedings to avoid and recover preferential transfers as core proceedings.

Gould v. Falcon Strategic Partners IV, LP · filed 2020-08-06(b)(2)(F)

Proceedings to avoid and recover preferential transfers are core proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(F).

Section 157(b)(2)(G) places automatic stay proceedings within a bankruptcy court’s core jurisdiction.

OGGUSA, Inc. · filed 2020-07-02(b)(2)(G)

Ultimately, the Violating Shareholders ignored the automatic stay, which is also a proceeding within a bankruptcy court’s core jurisdiction.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies determinations of debt dischargeability as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Ford, Jr. v. Landon · filed 2020-08-11(b)(2)(I)

Determination as to the dischargeability of a debt is a “core” proceeding as that term is defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies determinations of debt dischargeability as core proceedings.

Kanaga v. Landon · filed 2020-08-11(b)(2)(I)

Determination as to the dischargeability of a debt is a “core” proceeding as that term is defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b) treats an adversary proceeding seeking to avoid a transfer as a core proceeding within the bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction.

Elliott v. Pacific Western Bank · filed 2020-08-12(b)

We agree this adversary proceeding constitutes a core proceeding over which the bankruptcy court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b).

Section 157(b)(2)(J) classifies proceedings objecting to a debtor’s discharge as core proceedings.

US TRUSTEE v. Ravasia · filed 2020-08-13(b)(2)(J)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §157(b)(2)(J).

Section 157(b)(1) permits a bankruptcy court to enter final judgment in a proceeding to enforce the discharge injunction because it is a core proceeding.

Ajasa v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. · filed 2020-08-14(b)(1)

This Court may also adjudicate these claims to final judgment. Enforcement of the discharge injunction is a core proceeding arising under the Bankruptcy Code.

Section 157(b)(2)(N) treats a motion to enforce an order approving a property sale as a core proceeding.

TWC Liquidation Trust, LLC · filed 2020-08-17(b)(2)(N)

Sartraco’s Motion constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(N) because the Motion seeks to enforce an “order approving the sale of property.” 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(N).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats objections to claims as core proceedings that bankruptcy courts may hear and determine.

Texaz South Plaza, LLC · filed 2020-08-20(b)(2)(B)

An objection to a claim is a core proceeding which this Court may hear and determine as provided in 28 U.S.C.§ 157(b)(2) (B).

Section 157(b) treats a decision on whether to permit rejection of an executory contract as a core proceeding.

Ultra Petroleum Corp. and Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors · filed 2020-08-21(b)

The issue of whether to permit the rejection of an executory contract is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b).

Section 157(b)(2) classifies plan confirmation disputes as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Denice Patricia Madrid-Baskin · filed 2020-08-25(b)(2)

The plan confirmation dispute is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(A) (matters concerning administration of the estate), (b)(2)(L) (confirmation of plans), and (b)(2)(O) (other proceedings affecting the liquidation of the assets of the estate or the adjustment of the debtor-creditor or the equity security holder relationship).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) classifies proceedings to allow or disallow claims against a bankruptcy estate as core proceedings.

Rosebud Farm, Inc. · filed 2020-08-25(b)(2)(B)

This contested matter, concerning the allowance or disallowance of a claim against the bankruptcy estate, is expressly a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b) classifies proceedings concerning dischargeability of debts and objections to general discharge as core proceedings.

Trumley v. Kubik · filed 2020-08-27(b)

As this is a proceeding regarding a determination of the dischargeability of debts and an objection to the general discharge, this is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) covers a decision on sanctions related to the administration of a bankruptcy case as a core proceeding.

Marilyn Ann Finn · filed 2020-08-28(b)(2)(A)

The decision on whether to sanction Attorney Homa under the circumstances presented relates to the administration of the case and is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. §157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a decision whether to sanction a debtor’s attorney for conduct relating to case administration as a core proceeding.

Gale Ray Custer and Joyce Annette Custer · filed 2020-08-28(b)(2)(A)

The decision on whether to sanction Attorney Homa under the circumstances presented relates to the administration of the case and is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. §157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a debtor’s eligibility for a particular type of Bankruptcy Code relief as a core proceeding.

Parking Management, Inc. · filed 2020-08-28(b)(2)(A)

The resolution of the debtor’s eligibility to qualify for a particular type of relief under the Bankruptcy Code is a statutorily core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §157(b)(2)(A), and a constitutionally core proceeding under the standards of Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. 462, 131 S. Ct. 2594 (2011).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies proceedings concerning the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings.

Goodvin v. Department of Education · filed 2020-09-01(b)(2)(I)

An adversary proceeding concerning “the dischargeability of particular debts” is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), over which this Court may exercise subject matter jurisdiction.