South Dakota: Anti-SLAPP Laws

verified against the statute 2026-07-05 6 statute sources

The short answer

Yes, but only since July 1, 2026. South Dakota enacted its first-ever anti-SLAPP statute, the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (UPEPA), codified at SDCL Chapter 15-40 (§§ 15-40-1 to -13), which just took effect. A defendant sued over a communication in a government proceeding or over speech, press, petition, or association activity on a matter of public concern can file a special motion for expedited relief within 60 days of being served. Filing automatically stays discovery. The court must dismiss the claim with prejudice unless the plaintiff establishes a prima facie case on every element. A prevailing movant gets mandatory fees, and a losing movant can appeal the denial as of right within 30 days.

Governing lawSDCL Chapter 15-40, Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (UPEPA), enacted by 2026 Senate Bill 137 (SL 2026, ch. 91), signed by the Governor March 16, 2026, effective July 1, 2026 (South Dakota's standard default effective date for acts without an emergency clause). South Dakota had NO prior anti-SLAPP statute of any kind; this is a wholly new chapter, not a replacement or amendment
What speech/conduct is protectedStandard broad UPEPA scope (§ 15-40-1): a communication in a governmental proceeding, a communication on an issue under review in such a proceeding, or the exercise of the right of free speech, press, assembly, petition, or association guaranteed by the U.S. or South Dakota constitution, on a matter of public concern
Special motion to strike/dismissA 'special motion for expedited relief to dismiss' (§ 15-40-3), filed within 60 days of service (or later for good cause). Filing automatically stays discovery and nearly all other proceedings (§ 15-40-4); the stay continues through any appeal; limited court-ordered discovery is available on a showing of specific necessity; the court must hold a hearing within 60 days of filing and rule within 60 days of the hearing (§§ 15-40-7, -10)
Burden of proofCodified two-step test (§ 15-40-9): the court must dismiss with prejudice if the moving party establishes the chapter applies, the responding party fails to show an exemption applies, AND either the responding party fails to establish a prima facie case as to each essential element of its claim, or the moving party separately shows failure to state a claim or entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Decided on a summary-judgment-type record (§ 15-40-8)
Attorney's feesMandatory to a prevailing moving party ('the court shall award' court costs, attorney fees, and litigation expenses related to the motion, § 15-40-12(1)). Reciprocal fees to a prevailing responding party only if the court finds the motion frivolous or filed solely to delay (§ 15-40-12(2))
Appeal rightsExpress statutory right: the moving party may appeal as a matter of right from an order denying the motion in whole or in part, within 30 days of entry of the order (§ 15-40-11). Only the moving party gets this express interlocutory right; the statute does not create a parallel express right for a responding party to immediately appeal a grant
ExemptionsThree carve-outs (§ 15-40-2): claims against a governmental unit or its employee/agent acting in an official capacity; claims BY a governmental unit or employee, in an official capacity, to enforce a law, rule, regulation, or ordinance protecting against an imminent threat to public health or safety; and claims against a person primarily in the business of selling or leasing goods or services, arising from a communication (or lack of communication) related to that person's own sale or lease — this exemption does not reach the advertisement, creation, dissemination, or exhibition of an artistic, dramatic, journalistic, literary, musical, or political work

Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →

The short answer

South Dakota has an anti-SLAPP law, but it's brand new — its first ever.
Before July 1, 2026, South Dakota had no anti-SLAPP protection at all. The
2026 legislature enacted the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act
(UPEPA), now SDCL Chapter 15-40, and it took effect on the state's
standard date for new laws without an emergency clause. A defendant sued
over a communication in a government proceeding or over speech, press,
petition, or association activity on a matter of public concern can file
a special motion for expedited relief within 60 days of being served.
Filing the motion automatically pauses discovery. The court must dismiss
the claim with prejudice unless the plaintiff can show a real case on
every element, or the defendant separately proves the claim fails as a
matter of law. A prevailing defendant gets mandatory fees, and a
defendant who loses the motion can appeal immediately, as a matter of
right, within 30 days.

Requirements one by one

Governing law

South Dakota's anti-SLAPP statute is the Uniform Public Expression
Protection Act (UPEPA), SDCL Chapter 15-40 (§§ 15-40-1 to -13), enacted
by 2026 Senate Bill 137 (Session Laws 2026, chapter 91). The Governor
signed it in March 2026, and it took effect July 1, 2026 — South
Dakota's standard effective date for a new law that doesn't carry an
emergency clause. There was no earlier South Dakota anti-SLAPP statute
of any kind; this is an entirely new chapter, not a replacement for
something older.

What speech or conduct is protected

The statute covers a lawsuit based on: a communication in a legislative,
executive, judicial, administrative, or other governmental proceeding; a
communication on an issue under consideration or review by such a
proceeding; or your exercise of the right to free speech, free press,
assembly, petition, or association on a matter of public concern. This
is the standard, broad UPEPA scope used by most states that have adopted
the model act.

The special motion procedure

The vehicle is a "special motion for expedited relief to dismiss." You
must file it within 60 days of being served with the complaint, or later
if you can show good cause. Filing it automatically stays discovery and
nearly all other proceedings between you and the plaintiff. That stay
continues through any appeal of the ruling on the motion. A court can
still allow narrow, specifically-justified discovery during the stay if
a party shows the information is genuinely necessary and not otherwise
available. The court must hold a hearing within 60 days of the filing
and rule within 60 days after that hearing.

Burden of proof

The court must dismiss the claim with prejudice if three things are all
true: the moving party shows the chapter applies to the claim; the
responding party fails to show one of the chapter's exemptions applies;
and either the responding party fails to establish a prima facie case on
every essential element of its own claim, or the moving party separately
shows the claim fails to state a claim at all, or that there's no real
factual dispute and the moving party wins as a matter of law. The court
decides this using the same kind of record it would use on a
summary-judgment motion.

Attorney's fees

A prevailing moving party is entitled to mandatory fees: the statute
says the court "shall award" court costs, attorney fees, and reasonable
litigation expenses related to the motion. A responding party who wins
the motion only gets fees if the court separately finds the motion
itself was frivolous or filed solely to delay the case.

Right to appeal

A losing moving party can appeal a denial — in whole or in part — as a
matter of right, without waiting for the rest of the case to finish. The
appeal must be filed within 30 days of the order. Only the defendant who
files the special motion gets this express, guaranteed interlocutory
appeal; the statute doesn't spell out a parallel right for a plaintiff to
immediately appeal if the motion is granted against them.

Exemptions

Three kinds of claims fall outside the chapter no matter how
speech-related they look: a claim against a government unit or its
employee or agent acting in an official capacity; a claim brought BY a
government unit or employee, in an official capacity, to enforce a law,
rule, regulation, or ordinance protecting against an imminent threat to
public health or safety; and a claim against someone primarily in the
business of selling or leasing goods or services, when the claim arises
from a communication (or lack of one) tied to that person's own sale or
lease. That last, commercial-speech exemption doesn't reach the
advertisement, creation, dissemination, or exhibition of an artistic,
dramatic, journalistic, literary, musical, or political work, so media
and creative content stay protected even when the speaker is in a
"selling" business.

What trips people up

This law only took effect July 1, 2026 — very recently. A lawsuit
filed or a claim asserted before that date isn't covered by this
chapter, since South Dakota had no anti-SLAPP protection at all before
then.

There's essentially no South Dakota case law yet interpreting this
statute.
Because it's brand new, courts haven't had the chance to
apply its burden-of-proof language to real disputes yet — expect that to
develop over the next few years.

Only the movant gets an express appeal-as-of-right. If you're the
plaintiff and the motion is granted against you, the statute doesn't
spell out the same guaranteed immediate-appeal path that a losing
defendant gets.

Common questions

Does this cover a lawsuit over a comment I made at a public hearing
opposing a local zoning decision?
Yes — that's a communication in or
connected to a governmental proceeding, squarely within the statute's
scope.

How long do I have to file the special motion? 60 days after you're
served with the complaint or other pleading, unless the court allows a
later filing for good cause.

If my motion is denied, do I have to wait until the whole case is over
to appeal?
No. You can appeal a full or partial denial as a matter of
right, within 30 days, and that appeal keeps the discovery stay in place
while it's pending.

Statutes and sources

  • SDCL 15-40-1 — "the provisions of this chapter apply to a cause of
    action against a person based on the person's protected public
    expression... (3) Exercise of the person's right of freedom of speech
    or of the press, the right to assemble or petition, or the right of
    association... on a matter of public concern." Source:
    https://sdlegislature.gov/api/Statutes/15-40-1.html (accessed
    2026-07-05).
  • SDCL 15-40-2 — "The provisions of this chapter do not apply to a
    cause of action asserted: (1) Against a governmental unit or an
    employee or agent of a governmental unit acting or purporting to act
    in an official capacity... (3) Against a person primarily engaged in
    the business of selling or leasing goods or services, if the cause of
    action arises out of a communication or lack of communication related
    to the person's sale or lease of the goods or services." Source:
    https://sdlegislature.gov/api/Statutes/15-40-2.html (accessed
    2026-07-05).
  • SDCL 15-40-3 — "No later than sixty days after a party is served
    with a complaint... the party may file a special motion for expedited
    relief to dismiss the cause of action or part of the cause of action."
    Source: https://sdlegislature.gov/api/Statutes/15-40-3.html (accessed
    2026-07-05).
  • SDCL 15-40-9 — "the court shall dismiss with prejudice a cause of
    action, or part of a cause of action, if... (3) Either: (a) The
    responding party fails to establish a prima facie case as to each
    essential element of the cause of action; or (b) The moving party
    establishes that... there is no genuine issue as to any material fact
    and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law..."
    Source: https://sdlegislature.gov/api/Statutes/15-40-9.html (accessed
    2026-07-05).
  • SDCL 15-40-11 — "A moving party may appeal as a matter of right
    from an order denying, in whole or in part, a motion under § 15-40-3.
    The appeal must be filed no later than thirty days after entry of the
    order." Source: https://sdlegislature.gov/api/Statutes/15-40-11.html
    (accessed 2026-07-05).
  • SDCL 15-40-12 — "The court shall award court costs, reasonable
    attorney fees, and reasonable litigation expenses related to a motion
    filed under § 15-40-3: (1) To the moving party, if the moving party
    prevails on the motion; or (2) To the responding party, if the
    responding party prevails on the motion and the court finds that the
    motion was frivolous or filed solely with intent to delay the
    proceeding." Source: https://sdlegislature.gov/api/Statutes/15-40-12.html
    (accessed 2026-07-05).

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

SDCL 15-40-1 · accessed 2026-07-05
SDCL 15-40-2 · accessed 2026-07-05
SDCL 15-40-3 · accessed 2026-07-05
SDCL 15-40-9 · accessed 2026-07-05
SDCL 15-40-11 · accessed 2026-07-05
SDCL 15-40-12 · accessed 2026-07-05
This page is general legal information about a state's anti-SLAPP statute and its special motion procedure, not legal advice about your lawsuit. Whether specific speech or conduct qualifies for protection, and whether a motion will succeed, depends on case-specific facts and the state's case law interpreting the statute, neither of which this page covers. This is also one of the fastest-moving areas of state law right now, with several states enacting or amending an anti-SLAPP statute within the last two years. Verified against the official statute text on the date shown; confirm current law or consult a licensed attorney in the state before relying on it.