Anti-SLAPP Laws in South Carolina

Short answer No. South Carolina has no anti-SLAPP statute, special early-dismissal motion, automatic discovery stay, SLAPP-specific burden shift, fee award, or interlocutory appeal. A litigant must use ordinary civil procedure, while the general Frivolous Civil Proceedings Sanctions Act may support sanctions for a frivolous filing; the two anti-SLAPP proposals from the 2025-2026 session died when the regular session adjourned sine die on May 14, 2026.
State
South Carolina
Statute checked
July 16, 2026
Sources
7 statutes

At a glance

Governing lawNone enacted. The official current Title 15 index contains no anti-SLAPP chapter, and current Chapter 3 contains Articles 1, 2, 3, and 5 — not the proposed Article 7. The only nearby statewide scheme is the general South Carolina Frivolous Civil Proceedings Sanctions Act, S.C. Code § 15-36-10. H.3305/S.43 and H.5420 did not become law before the 2025-2026 regular session adjourned sine die on May 14, 2026
What speech/conduct is protectedN/A No South Carolina anti-SLAPP statute defines protected petitioning, speech, press, assembly, or association activity
Special motion to strike/dismissN/A No anti-SLAPP special motion, filing deadline, expedited hearing, ruling deadline, or automatic discovery stay. Ordinary civil-procedure motions apply
Burden of proofN/A No SLAPP-specific burden shift or evidentiary screen. Ordinary pleading and summary-judgment standards apply; § 15-36-10 separately uses a reasonable-attorney/frivolousness standard for sanctions
Attorney's feesNo SLAPP-specific fee shifting. Under the general sanctions act, a court may impose a just sanction for a violating filing, and sanctions may include the prevailing party's reasonable costs and attorney's fees (§ 15-36-10(B)(2), (G)(1))
Appeal rightsN/A No anti-SLAPP interlocutory appeal or expedited appeal exists. Ordinary appellate rules govern
ExemptionsN/A There is no anti-SLAPP statute and therefore no statutory exemptions list

Requirements one by one

What applies without an anti-SLAPP statute

South Carolina has no special statutory procedure for a claim based on speech, petitioning, press, assembly, or association. The official current Title 15 index contains no anti-SLAPP chapter, and Chapter 3 has no Article 7 of the kind the failed bills proposed. A defendant therefore uses the ordinary civil rules; there is no anti-SLAPP filing deadline, automatic discovery stay, special evidentiary screen, mandatory prevailing-movant fee award, or special interlocutory appeal.

The closest statewide statute is the general Frivolous Civil Proceedings Sanctions Act, S.C. Code § 15-36-10. It applies to civil litigation generally, not only to speech cases. A signature certifies that a reasonable attorney would view the filing as legally supportable, not intended merely to harass, and not frivolous or interposed for delay. A violation can produce a sanction the court considers "just, equitable, and proper," including reasonable costs and attorney's fees (§ 15-36-10(B)(2), (G)(1)). That is a sanctions mechanism, not an early anti-SLAPP motion.

What trips people up

  • Old bill trackers can still make H.3305 or H.5420 look pending. H.3305 stopped after a second Senate reading in May 2025; H.5420 never left House Judiciary. The regular session adjourned sine die on May 14, 2026, so both proposals died and would need to be introduced again in a later General Assembly.
  • General sanctions are not anti-SLAPP protection. Section 15-36-10 can penalize a frivolous filing, but it does not create an automatic stay, expedited hearing, special burden shift, or speech-specific right to fees and appeal.

Common questions

Does filing a motion to dismiss automatically stop discovery? No. South Carolina has no anti-SLAPP automatic stay. Any stay must come from the ordinary civil rules or a court order applicable to the case.

Can H.3305 still become law without being reintroduced? No. It did not complete Senate passage before the 2025-2026 regular session ended. The official Senate Journal records sine die adjournment on May 14, 2026.

Can a court award fees for a frivolous speech-related lawsuit? Potentially under the general sanctions act. Section 15-36-10(G)(1) allows reasonable costs and attorney's fees as a sanction, but only under that general statute's standards — not through a special anti-SLAPP prevailing-party rule.

Statutes and sources

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

S.C. Code tit. 15 chapter index · accessed 2026-07-16
S.C. Code § 15-36-10 · accessed 2026-07-16
S.C. Code § 15-36-10 · accessed 2026-07-16
S.C. Code § 15-36-10 · accessed 2026-07-16
2025 S.C. H.3305 (failed) · accessed 2026-07-16
2026 S.C. H.5420 (failed) · accessed 2026-07-16
S.C. Senate Journal, May 15, 2026 · accessed 2026-07-16
This page is general legal information about a state's anti-SLAPP statute and its special motion procedure, not legal advice about your lawsuit. Whether specific speech or conduct qualifies for protection, and whether a motion will succeed, depends on case-specific facts and the state's case law interpreting the statute, neither of which this page covers. This is also one of the fastest-moving areas of state law right now, with several states enacting or amending an anti-SLAPP statute within the last two years. Verified against the official statute text on the date shown; confirm current law or consult a licensed attorney in the state before relying on it.

What does South Carolina law mean for your facts?

You just read the general rule. Ask your own question and see which parts of current South Carolina law apply to your situation, with citations you can check.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Starts from the statutes this survey is built on
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace