State Bar Association of North Dakota Ethics Opinions

Free plain-English summaries of legal ethics opinions issued by the State Bar Association of North Dakota, with full citations and source links on every page.

195 opinions · Updated October 27, 2026
195 opinions

No State Bar Association of North Dakota opinions match these filters

Try a different search term or clear the filters.

When could a child support enforcement investigator who was also a private lawyer represent parents in support matters?

The committee could not decide the proposed representations on the facts supplied. It identified checks for personal government participation, actual knowledge of confidential government…

February 4, 1994

May a divorce lawyer use a contingent fee to collect spousal support arrearages already awarded by a court?

The committee said Rule 1.5(d)(1)'s domestic-relations contingent-fee ban did not apply to post-divorce collection of court-awarded spousal support arrearages. The arrangement remained subject to…

January 27, 1994

When may a possibly discharged lawyer contact the client, and may the lawyer retain client papers as security for unpaid fees?

The committee allowed contact until the client notified the lawyer of discharge, including contact to confirm it. A retaining lien was not automatically unethical, but Rule 1.16(e) could require…

November 17, 1993

Could a lawyer represent the wife after drafting proposed divorce papers naming the husband as plaintiff and initially saying she represented him?

The committee said the described lack of reliance and privileged communications suggested no attorney-client relationship with the husband, so the lawyer could continue for the wife. It reserved a…

August 17, 1993

May a lawyer continue at trial when a partner may testify, and must the lawyer report possible witness conflicts of opposing counsel?

The committee said the lawyer could continue if no conflict existed, but a partner's conflict would also affect the lawyer. It declined to decide whether opposing counsel had a conflict or whether…

August 17, 1993

Could a firm sue another law firm after representing that firm's former partner in a separate case where the firm was also a defendant?

The committee found no violation on the stated facts. The former partner, not the other firm, had been the lawyer's client, and the second lawsuit was separate, with the former partner absent and no…

July 13, 1993

May a prosecutor discuss a pending criminal case with a represented defendant who requests the meeting against counsel's advice?

The committee said the defendant's request did not dispense with Rule 4.2's requirement for defense counsel's consent to a communication about the pending matter. It applied the rule to prosecutors…

July 13, 1993

May a lawyer oppose future agency rules for one client after advising another client about related proposed rules?

The committee expressed concern that the proposed representation might violate the conflict rules. It identified possible concurrent-client adversity under Rule 1.7 and a substantially related…

June 28, 1993

How did the committee address contacting inmates as prospective clients and a settlement offer that waived attorney fees?

The committee applied Rule 7.1's restrictions to inmate contact without deciding whether incarceration itself made contact improper. It said the lawyer had to explain the fee-waiver settlement offer…

June 28, 1993

What conflicts arise when a lawyer sells title insurance as the insurer's agent in a transaction involving a legal client?

The committee identified potential conflicts among the lawyer's clients and the insurer, especially when the lawyer would receive a commission. It said some conflicts might be resolved under Rules…

June 4, 1993

Could a part-time city prosecutor or firm defend unrelated charges in county court?

The committee said Rule 1.8(j)(1) barred defending prosecutions of the city’s ordinances in any court, but did not bar defense of unrelated state or other-city charges merely because they were heard…

June 4, 1993

When does a lawyer have to report another lawyer's possible conflict misconduct, and how does client confidentiality affect reporting?

The committee left the knowledge determination to the requesting lawyer but said a knowing continuation of representation despite conflict violations raised a substantial question under Rule 8.3. It…

May 5, 1993

Could a lawyer whose practice was not limited to divorce use a Yellow Pages advertisement saying 'DIVORCE ONLY'?

The committee said the word 'only' might mislead readers and recommended deleting it. With that word removed, the proposed advertisement appeared permissible under the North Dakota conduct rules.

February 26, 1993

Could a North Dakota lawyer form a firm with a lawyer admitted in another state and North Dakota federal court, but not admitted to North Dakota state practice?

The committee said Rule 5.4(b) did not bar the partnership because both people were lawyers. Their public communications had to comply with Rules 7.1 and 7.2 and indicate the other lawyer's…

February 26, 1993

Must a lawyer withdraw as an expert for plaintiffs whose unrelated lawsuit names a corporation represented by the lawyer's firm?

On the stated facts, the committee found no Rule 1.7 conflict requiring withdrawal as an expert. It said the lawyer should disclose the firm's representation to the plaintiffs and obtain their…

February 16, 1993

Could a lawyer pay a suspended lawyer a referral fee for former tax clients, or employ her to help with their returns?

The committee rejected the proposed referral or fee split while the referring lawyer was suspended. It said she could instead receive a salary as a paralegal in the lawyer's office under direct…

February 9, 1993

Could the lawyer mail similarly situated judgment debtors about a judgment he had obtained for a client?

The committee said North Dakota Rule 7.1 permitted direct mail, but asked the lawyer to remove a named law firm and a prediction of success from the proposed letter. It did not endorse or verify the…

December 21, 1992

May two lawyers in the same firm separately represent spouses in an agreed default divorce involving custody and support?

The committee concluded that the firm should not proceed with both spouses' representation on the stated facts because of the likelihood of adversity. The firm should withdraw from one or both…

December 21, 1992

Could a lawyer destroy or release a disputed bill of sale after one transaction party objected?

On limited facts, the committee said the lawyer was not bound by a request to destroy the file and should retain it. It said a copy should not be released contrary to the party's direction without…

December 21, 1992

Could a county prosecutor continue juvenile defense in another county after a special prosecutorial appointment there?

The committee treated the special assistant state's attorney appointment as a prosecutorial appointment under Rule 1.8(j) and found a conflict in the described juvenile defense. It also applied…

November 23, 1992

Could a North Dakota lawyer mail former and prospective clients about new licensure and an expanded firm?

The committee said the targeted mailings described were not prohibited by North Dakota's conduct rules so long as they were not false or misleading. Its analysis relied on Shapero and the state's…

November 23, 1992

Did North Dakota Rule 4.2 bar contact with a represented corporation's former employees?

The committee said Rule 4.2 did not extend to former employees. It cautioned against inducing disclosure of the corporation's privileged communications and required the lawyer to identify the…

October 15, 1992

Could a creditor-firm lawyer interview and advise legal aid clients who might later face collection actions?

The committee allowed the volunteer interview absent an actual conflict, but required screening for existing collection matters. Later action against that client involving financial information…

October 15, 1992

Could closing lawyers turn old client files over to a successor lawyer without client consent?

The committee said transfer of closed files to another lawyer appeared to require each client's consent. It recommended file-review, notice, retention, and confidentiality guidelines drawn from…

September 16, 1992

What did the committee say about disclosure when a lawyer believed a client might imminently die by suicide?

Under the then-current Rule 1.6(a), the committee said the lawyer was required to disclose information believed necessary to prevent imminent death or substantial bodily harm, while limiting…

September 3, 1992

Could a North Dakota law firm list family mediation among its advertised services?

The committee found no prohibition in the professional-conduct rules against listing mediation as a firm service. It declined to decide whether other statutes or administrative rules restricted the…

June 22, 1992

Could a firm collect part of a departed associate's fees on new client matters without work or joint responsibility?

The committee said an employment-contract provision dividing fees on the former associate's new matters violated Rule 1.5(e) where the firm did no work, assumed no joint responsibility, and the…

June 17, 1992

What work and file access did the committee allow a suspended lawyer after transferring clients' matters?

The committee permitted supervised paralegal work and certain nonlawyer occupations, but said the suspended lawyer could not do legal work for a corporation. It directed transfer of the entire file…

May 29, 1992

Could a lawyer rely on the client to report another lawyer's conduct, and did the lawyer need to investigate further?

On the stated facts, the committee found a reporting duty that the client's own report would not satisfy. It said Rule 1.6 protected confidential information and the lawyer need not investigate…

May 28, 1992

Did one lawyer's conflict disqualify a legal aid organization, and could the affected client consent?

The committee said a legal aid organization could be treated as a firm under Rule 1.10, with a unit-specific inquiry where relevant. Rule 1.10(d) allowed waiver through the affected client's consent…

April 3, 1992

Could a claimant's lawyer contact an insurer's claims representative directly after defense counsel was appointed?

The committee said Rule 4.2 barred direct contact with the insurer's representative without prior approval from the appointed defense counsel.

March 12, 1992

Could a lawyer represent a father seeking visitation after the lawyer's firm handled a prior matter involving the mother?

The committee said any conflict imputed to the firm also reached the newly joined lawyer. Representation was possible only if the firm met Rules 1.6 and 1.9 or obtained the mother's consent under Rule 1.9.

March 12, 1992

May a lawyer distribute standard living-will and health-care power-of-attorney forms without an individual consultation?

The committee identified no rule directly governing the plan, but warned that a lawyer's broad distribution of standard forms could imply they were sufficient for everyone and could raise…

January 29, 1992

Does a child-support IV-D attorney have a conflict when reviewing an obligor's request after prosecuting that obligor, and what must the attorney tell unrepresented parties?

The committee saw no conflict under the statutes identifying the state as the IV-D attorney's client, but required advance disclosure of that role to unrepresented obligors and obligees under Rule 4.3.

January 13, 1992

What concerns did the committee identify for a lawyer's proposed combined real estate brokerage and law practice?

The committee expressed concern that the proposed combined corporation might violate the conduct rules, citing the lawyer's own-interest conflicts and Rule 5.4's limits on fee sharing and nonlawyer…

1992

Could a North Dakota lawyer also hold an insurance license and operate both businesses from one office?

The committee found no prohibition on holding both licenses and allowed the businesses to share an office, but said their letterhead and other communications must keep them separate.

September 26, 1991

Could a lawyer serve as a city prosecutor while taking county felony defense assignments?

The committee said Rule 1.8(j) permitted both roles, but barred a defense likely to require an appearance in the court of the prosecutorial appointment and required case-specific conflict review.

August 15, 1991

Could a lawyer seek an ex parte domestic-relations interim order after opposing counsel had appeared?

The committee found no professional-conduct bar to seeking an ex parte interim order authorized by North Dakota court rule, even when opposing counsel had appeared.

May 8, 1991

To whom did the lawyer return an unused retainer paid by a third party?

On the stated facts, the committee said to return the funds to the third party who paid, less earned fees and costs, unless that payer directed otherwise.

May 8, 1991

Did a lawyer have to report another lawyer's misconduct when reporting would reveal protected client information?

The committee said Rule 1.6 protection took priority over disclosure under Rule 8.3. It advised encouraging client consent unless disclosure would substantially prejudice the client's interest.

April 12, 1991

Could a part-time state’s attorney defend criminal cases in another county?

The committee said Rule 1.8(j) allowed criminal defense in counties outside the prosecutor’s appointment, provided the defense did not involve parties or issues the lawyer had handled as a state’s…

March 22, 1991

Could a law firm list legal assistants and their certification on its letterhead?

Yes. The committee saw no professional-conduct bar to listing legal assistants or their certification, provided the letterhead clearly identified them as legal assistants and distinguished them from…

November 28, 1990

Could a lawyer release privileged material from a deceased client’s divorce file in response to a subpoena?

The committee said privileged information from the deceased client’s file could not be released without consent from the estate’s personal representative or a court order. It cited North Dakota Rule…

September 25, 1990

What did the committee say about client notice and significant original documents in a letter about file disposition?

The committee called for reasonable efforts to contact clients and review files. Significant originals should be returned to clients; if return is not possible, the committee assumed they would go…

June 27, 1990

Must a lawyer report a serious violation even when another lawyer is expected to report it?

Yes. The committee said the lawyer had a reporting duty despite confidence that someone else would report, provided the known conduct raised a substantial question about the other lawyer’s honesty,…

June 27, 1990

As this later-overturned opinion originally held, could a city prosecutor defend state-charge cases in county court?

As issued, the committee said the city prosecutor could not defend in county court if the appointment included prosecuting transferred city cases there. It said excluding those transferred cases…

May 9, 1990

Could a lawyer run for the legislature while the lawyer’s firm lobbied that body for clients?

The committee said candidacy itself was not barred. If elected, the firm’s lobbying would generally be disqualified unless a qualifying constitutional, statutory, or formally adopted legislative…

February 7, 1990

What duties applied when a person claimed a firm represented him in a matter the firm had declined?

The committee could not decide whether an attorney-client relationship existed. If it did, withdrawal had to satisfy Rule 1.16; if it did not, the committee saw nothing more the firm could do on the…

January 26, 1990

When must a lawyer report another lawyer’s serious rule violation under Rule 8.3?

The committee said reporting was required once the lawyer knew of a violation raising a substantial question about the other lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness. It said pending court…

1990

Could one firm represent two criminal defendants if defending one would require attacking the other as a witness?

No. The committee unanimously found a clear conflict because defending one client required attacking the other as a witness and might use information gained in that other client’s criminal case. It…

December 26, 1989

Did the professional-conduct rules bar a lawyer serving on the Racing Commission from a hearing involving a firm with which the lawyer shared fees?

The committee found no problem under the North Dakota Rules of Professional Conduct on the stated facts. It expressly left state appointee rules and possible judicial-conduct requirements outside…

November 27, 1989

Could a firm take a contingent fee through a nonlawyer transportation specialist representing employee claimants?

The committee found the proposed contingent payment through the nonlawyer agent impermissible fee sharing under Rule 5.4. It said a different arrangement paid by the specialist to represent…

September 15, 1989

Could a lawyer receive a share of a real estate commission for work tied to legal services on a purchase?

For the proposed purchase transaction, the committee said the fee arrangement was permissible if it complied with Rule 1.5 generally and Rule 1.5(c) particularly. The short response did not decide…

May 2, 1989

May a lawyer who is also an accountant advertise both professional roles?

The committee said the new rules did not prohibit cross-advertising as the former DR 2-102(E) had. It allowed the lawyer to advertise both roles if the advertising complied with North Dakota Rule 7.1.

May 2, 1989

Could a lawyer represent a second will contestant after settling another contestant’s claim?

On the stated nonadverse claims and second client’s consent, the committee perceived no conflict. It said former-client consent under Rule 1.9(b) would be required if the second client’s interests…

May 2, 1989

May a lawyer collect for another firm and later handle a case against a lawyer from that firm?

The committee declined blanket approval or disapproval. It said Rule 1.7 governed each situation, discussed written consent from the firm and client consent after full consultation if a conflict…

December 5, 1988

Could a law firm mail its newsletter to North Dakota recipients who were not clients?

The committee saw no ethical problem with the described mailing if it followed Colorado Formal Opinion 74. It said North Dakota Rule 7.1 permitted communications to clients and nonclients so long as…

June 2, 1988

What should a lawyer do when a client rejects a settlement offer and the lawyer doubts the client’s ability to decide?

The committee presumed client competence and said a reasonable client request must be honored. If counsel believed the client could not make the decision, it identified seeking a guardian,…

June 2, 1988

Could a municipal judge also serve as a state’s attorney in another county or an assistant state’s attorney in the same county?

The committee found no ethical problem with judging in one county while serving as state’s attorney in another. It found no categorical bar to the same-county assistant role, but said the lawyer…

June 2, 1988

Could a city’s lawyer continue as trial advocate if likely to be a necessary witness?

Assuming the lawyer was likely to be a necessary witness, the committee said Rule 3.7 generally barred acting as trial advocate unless an exception applied. It lacked enough facts to decide whether…

January 28, 1988

Browse State Bar Association of North Dakota opinions by topic

Legal ethics opinions from the State Bar Association of North Dakota interpret the rules of professional conduct for working lawyers, in response to inquiries from members and committees. Under North Dakota Rule for Lawyer Discipline 1.2(B), a lawyer who acts in good faith and in reasonable reliance on a written opinion of the association's ethics committee is not subject to sanction for the conduct the opinion addresses. Source. Every opinion above has a plain-English question and short answer, plus a link to the original source on the bar's site.

Ethics opinions from other bars

Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct of the District of Columbia Courts (15) Alabama Judicial Inquiry Commission (967) Alabama State Bar (139) Alaska Bar Association (146) American Bar Association (150) Arkansas Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee (120) Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee (203) Colorado Bar Association (113) Colorado Judicial Ethics Advisory Board (82) Connecticut Bar Association (73) Disciplinary Board of the Hawaii Supreme Court (19) District of Columbia Bar (182) Illinois Judicial Ethics Committee (185) Illinois State Bar Association (389) Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission (13) Kentucky Bar Association (380) Los Angeles County Bar Association (100) Louisiana State Bar Association (22) Maine Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics (57) Maine Board of Overseers of the Bar (217) Maryland Judicial Ethics Committee (256) Massachusetts Bar Association (127) Minnesota Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board (26) Mississippi Judicial Election Oversight Committee (9) Nebraska Judicial Ethics Committee (122) Nebraska Supreme Court Lawyers' Advisory Committee (279) New Hampshire Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics (24) New Hampshire Bar Association (35) New Jersey Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics (558) New Mexico Advisory Committee on the Code of Judicial Conduct (193) New York City Bar (180) New York State Bar Association (932) North Carolina State Bar (578) Office of Legal Ethics Counsel & Advisory Committee of the Supreme Court of Missouri (930) Ohio Board of Professional Conduct (453) Oklahoma Bar Association (328) Orange County Bar Association (17) Oregon State Bar (196) Pennsylvania Bar Association (21) Rhode Island Supreme Court Ethics Advisory Panel (700) South Carolina Bar (505) South Dakota Special Committee on Judicial Election Campaign Intervention (20) State Bar of Arizona (304) State Bar of California (189) State Bar of Georgia (65) State Bar of Michigan (245) State Bar of Montana (78) State Bar of Nevada (61) State Bar of New Mexico (90) State Bar of Wisconsin (263) Texas Professional Ethics Committee (707) The Florida Bar (543) The Mississippi Bar (162) Utah Courts Ethics Advisory Committee (19) Utah State Bar Ethics Advisory Opinion Committee (102) Vermont Bar Association (315) Vermont Judicial Ethics Committee (23) Virginia State Bar (299) Washington State Bar Association (1104) West Virginia Judicial Investigation Commission (773) West Virginia State Bar (Lawyer Disciplinary Board) (104) Wyoming Supreme Court Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee (18)