Could a lawyer serve as a city prosecutor while taking county felony defense assignments?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1991. Ask about yours and see what the current North Dakota Rules of Professional Conduct say for your facts, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A lawyer holding a county felony-defense contract asked whether the lawyer could also become a city prosecutor. The committee said Rule 1.8(j) permitted the two roles on the described facts.
The committee limited that conclusion: the rule did not permit representation likely to require a pleading or appearance in the court of the prosecutorial appointment. It also quoted the rule comment that a matter in another court could still be barred if it “involved parties or issues with which the part-time official had any involvement as a judge or prosecutor.”
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 1991, before North Dakota's 2006 revisions to its Rules of Professional Conduct. The later North Dakota Opinion 06-05 states: “On August 1, 2006, material changes to N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.10(a) will take effect.” Subsequent rule amendments or later opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance. Verify against current rules before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or requirement.
Common questions
Q: Could the lawyer combine the city prosecutor job with county felony defense?
A: The committee said Rule 1.8(j) allowed that combination on the stated facts.
Q: What defenses remained outside that permission?
A: A case likely to require an appearance in the court served as prosecutor, or a matter involving parties or issues from prosecutorial work, remained barred under the committee's analysis.
Background and rules framework
The letter applies North Dakota Rule 1.8(j) and its comment to a part-time municipal prosecutor who also holds felony-defense assignments.
Citations and references
Rules of Professional Conduct:
- Rule 1.8(j), part-time prosecutor and defense limits.
See also
Source
- Landing page: https://www.sband.org/page/ethics_opinions
- Original PDF: https://web.archive.org/web/20250000000000id_/https://www.sband.org/resource/resmgr/docs/for_lawyers/91-09.pdf
Original opinion text
Full opinion text unavailable from the official source; see the linked source above for the complete text.
What do the rules say today, for your facts?
This opinion is from 1991. Ezel checks the current North Dakota Rules of Professional Conduct against your situation and cites the rules it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace