28 U.S.C. § 157

Section 157(b)(2)(F) and (H) classify preference and fraudulent transfer proceedings as core matters that bankruptcy courts may finally adjudicate.

Burtch v. Seaport Capital, LLC (In re Direct Response Media, Inc.) · filed 2012-01-12(b)(2)(F), (H)

The preference and fraudulent transfer claims arise both under Title 11 and in a case under Title 11 and are by definition “core” issues under § 157(b)(2)(F) & (H) for which a bankruptcy court has authority to enter final adjudications.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies claims to determine the dischargeability of debts as core proceedings.

Tweedie v. Hermoyian (In re Hermoyian) · filed 2012-02-14(b)(2)(I)

Tweedie’s non-dischargeability of debt claims under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), (4), and (6) are core proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(O) covers restructuring debtor-creditor relations under the Bankruptcy Code; a state-law claim to enforce a loan modification is not a core proceeding under that provision.

Garner v. BANKPLUS · filed 2012-02-29(b)(2)(O)

Moreover, plaintiffs’ demand herein for enforcement of an alleged modification of the terms of their loan agreements with BankPlus, a creditor in bankruptcy, is not a “proceedings affecting ... the adjustment of the debtor-creditor relationship” within § 157(b)(2)(0), as that provision refers to the restructuring of debtor-creditor relations under the Bankruptcy Code, which is distinct from the “adjudication of state-created private rights.”

Section 157(b)(2) treats a bankruptcy dispute over lien priority and the secured status of claims as a core proceeding.

Frazer v. Property Owners Ass'n (In Re Frazer) · filed 2012-03-05(b)(2)

This particular dispute is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(A), (B), (C), (K), (O), and the general “catch-all” language of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2)(k) treats a challenge to the validity of a lien as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Washington v. Saxon Mortgage Services (In Re Washington) · filed 2012-03-07(b)(2)(k)

Debtor is challenging the validity of a lien which is a core matter. See 28 U.S.C. § 157(2)(k).

Section 157 treats entry of a discharge order and a request to set it aside as core proceedings.

In Re Smith · filed 2012-03-08(b)(2)(O)

The entry of a discharge order is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(0), and a request to set aside such an order is also a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(B), (E), and (O) do not cover a dispute over abandoned funds that no longer involves claim allowance, turnover, or liquidation of estate property.

In re Vanhook · filed 2012-02-21(b)(2)(B), (E), (O)

The resolution of the dispute does not involve allowance of a claim, and no longer involves turnover or potential liquidation of property of the estate. See 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B), (E) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(J) treats objections to discharges as core proceedings.

Cago, Inc. v. Slade (In Re Slade) · filed 2012-03-15(b)(2)(J)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies determinations regarding the dischargeability of a debt as core proceedings.

First Horizon Home Loan Corp. v. Apostle (In Re Apostle) · filed 2012-03-16(b)(2)(I)

This adversary proceeding is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) (determinations regarding dischargeability of a debt).

Section 157(b)(2)(E) classifies proceedings seeking orders to turn over property of the bankruptcy estate as core proceedings.

Burns v. Dennis (In Re Southeastern Materials, Inc.) · filed 2012-03-27(b)(2)(E)

The Court starts with the plain language of Section 157(b)(2)(E), which states that orders to turn over property of the estate are core. ... The Trustee has thus stated a claim for turnover under Section 542(b). The matter is therefore core under Section 157(b)(2)(E).

Section 157(b) defines core proceedings as matters a bankruptcy judge may hear, determine, and dispose of by appropriate orders and judgments, subject to appellate review.

Miller v. Grosso (In Re Miller) · filed 2012-03-30(b)

The term “core proceeding” is used in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b) to refer to those matters a bankruptcy judge may hear, determine, and dispose of by appropriate orders and judgments, subject only to appellate review.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats matters concerning administration of the bankruptcy estate as core proceedings.

Grant, Konvalinka & Harrison, P.C. v. Still (In re McKenzie) · filed 2012-03-30(b)(2)(A)

This core jurisdiction is based on the rulings that have found that actions against a trustee for malicious prosecution and abuse of process affect the administration of the bankruptcy case. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (O) classify matters involving estate administration and liquidation of estate assets as core proceedings.

Grant, Konvalinka & Harrison, P.C. v. Banks (In re McKenzie) · filed 2012-03-30(b)(2)(A) and (O)

This matter is a core proceeding as it involves the administration of the estate and the liquidation of assets of the estate. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (O). Specifically, malicious prosecution and abuse of process actions against a trustee are core proceedings.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and its catch all provision identify core bankruptcy proceedings that a bankruptcy court may decide.

In re Bechuck · filed 2012-04-04(b)(2)(A)

This matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and the general “catch-all” language of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2) identifies matters that are core proceedings in bankruptcy cases.

In Re Kaplan · filed 2012-03-26(b)(2)(A), (B), (K), and (0)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B), (K), and (0).

Section 157(b)(2)(A), (B), and (O) identifies certain bankruptcy matters as core proceedings.

Oxford Expositions, LLC v. Hyland (In Re Oxford Expositions, LLC) · filed 2012-04-20(b)(2)(A), (B), and (O)

The court is of the opinion that the above captioned adversary proceeding is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B), and (0).

Section 157(b)(2) treats determining the dischargeability of a debt as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Joyce v. Wish (In re Wish) · filed 2012-04-20(b)(2)

The question of discharge-ability of a debt is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2)(C) treats counterclaims by the estate against persons filing claims against the estate as core proceedings.

McElwee v. Scarff Bros. (In re McElwee) · filed 2012-05-03(b)(2)(C)

28 U.S.C. § 157(a) provides that bankruptcy cases shall be referred to the bankruptcy judges in the respective district. ... Included among the enumerated core proceedings are “counterclaims by the estate against persons filing claims against the estate”. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(C). ... Under Stern v. Marshall, do I have the authority to render a final judgment on the Claim Objection, which included the paragraph 11 “counterclaim”? I answer this question in the affirmative because I conclude that the defensive counterclaim which was plead is necessarily resolved by ruling on the allowability of Claim 11-2.

Section 157(b)(2)(H) classifies a fraudulent-transfer avoidance action as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Mann v. Brown (In re Knight) · filed 2012-05-04(b)(2)(H)

This matter constitutes a core proceeding, over which this Court has subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(H), 1334.

Section 157(b)(2) includes estate administration, credit, and certain property sale matters among core proceedings within a bankruptcy judge’s authority.

In Re American Consolidated Transportation Companies, Inc. · filed 2012-05-11(b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(D), and (b)(2)(N)

Refinancing and sale of assets would be considered core proceedings under parts (D) and (N) respectively, as well as potentially under (A). A future proceeding that requires the bankruptcy judge to approve refinancing or a sale would thus fall within the judge’s authority under 28 U.S.C. § 157. Therefore, reservation of jurisdiction post-confirmation to rule on such issues is authorized by that provision.

Section 157 classifies specified bankruptcy matters as core proceedings and permits bankruptcy judges to enter final judgments in them.

Stoebner v. Ritchie Capital Management, L.L.C. (In re Polaroid Corp.) · filed 2012-04-30(b)(1), (b)(2)(B), (b)(2)(E), (b)(2)(H), and (b)(2)(O)

These counts are statutorily classified as core proceedings. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(H). So are the counts for relief that would follow under the Bankruptcy Code’s governance after the avoidance as a fraudulent transfer. 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(B) and (0). The last substantively-oriented count, toward the invalidation of liens as unenforceable under state law, is also a core proceeding — this time under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E). As such, a bankruptcy judge may order final judgment on all of these counts when that is substantively and procedurally appropriate. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1).

Section 157(b)(2)(K) treats a contested matter involving avoidance of a judicial lien as a core proceeding.

In re Young · filed 2012-05-15(b)(2)(K)

This is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(K) (2006).

Section 157(b)(2) does not classify a title insurer crossclaim as a core proceeding when it arises neither in nor under Title 11.

Ricchi v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (In Re Ricchi) · filed 2012-05-17(b)(2)

This is not a core claim under § 157(b)(2). The claim does not arise in or under Title 11.

Section 157(b)(2) governs whether a bankruptcy proceeding is core; the bankruptcy court classified this proceeding as core and stated that it could generally enter a final order.

Autobacs Strauss, Inc. v. Autobacs Seven Co. (In re Autobacs Strauss, Inc.) · filed 2012-05-21(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2). Except as set forth below, this Court has the judicial power to enter a final order.

Section 157(b)(2) treats plan confirmation as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

In re Barnwell County Hospital · filed 2012-05-23(b)(2)

Confirmation of the Plan constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2), and the Bankruptcy Court has exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether the Plan complies with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and should be confirmed.

Section 157(b)(2) does not make a state-law tort suit a core proceeding merely because it involves an uncontested lien on bankruptcy-estate assets.

Johnson v. Fifth Third Bank, Inc. · filed 2012-05-25(b)(2)(E)

Defendant contends that this case is actually one seeking a determination of the validity, extent, or priority of liens, and is thus an enumerated “core” proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E). The Court disagrees. Plaintiffs are not seeking a determination of the validity or priority of Defendant’s first priority lien on the assets of the .Debtor’s estate.

Section 157 treats a debtor’s motion to redeem collateral as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

In re Airhart · filed 2012-05-31(b)(2)

This particular dispute is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(G) and (0).

Section 157 treats a contempt proceeding for violating the discharge injunction as a core proceeding because it arises from a provision of title 11.

Holley v. Kresch Oliver, PLLC (In re Holley) · filed 2012-06-01(b)(2)

This proceeding is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(0). This proceeding is also “core” because a contempt proceeding based on a violation of the § 524(a)(2) discharge injunction is an action “created or determined by a statutory provision of title 11.”

Section 157(b)(2) treats preference avoidance proceedings as core proceedings in which a bankruptcy court may enter final judgment.

Siegel ex rel. Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Russellville Steel Co. (In re Circuit City Stores, Inc.) · filed 2012-06-01(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B), (C), (F), and (O), in which final orders or judgments may be entered by a bankruptcy court.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (N) treats a motion to sell estate property as a core proceeding.

In re Efoora, Inc. · filed 2012-06-06(b)(2)(A) and (N)

The sale motion is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (N).

Section 157(b)(2) defines which bankruptcy proceedings are core proceedings.

Barkley v. West (West) · filed 2012-06-06(b)(2)

The court finds that this is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B), (E), (F), (H), and (0).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) and (B) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and finally adjudicate core proceedings involving dischargeability and claims allowance.

Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. Schupbach (In re Schupbach) · filed 2012-06-07(b)(2)(I) and (B)

Furthermore, this Court may hear and finally adjudicate this matter because it is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) and (B).

Section 157 treats confirmation of a proposed bankruptcy plan as a core matter; the district court reviews the bankruptcy court’s factual findings for clear error and legal conclusions de novo.

In re W.R. Grace & Co. · filed 2012-06-11(b)(2)(L)

Review of the Joint Plan is the type of proceeding “that would only arise in bankruptcy.” ... As such, the Court will review the Bankruptcy Court’s findings of fact for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo.

Section 157(b)(2)(J) classifies objections to discharge as core proceedings.

Fraleigh v. Fraleigh (In re Fraleigh) · filed 2012-06-12(b)(2)(J)

This is a “core proceeding” under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J) (objections to discharge).

Section 157(b)(2)(C) and (K) treat counterclaims to an estate claim and determinations of the validity and extent of liens supporting that claim as core proceedings.

Paloian v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'n (In re Doctors Hospital of Hyde Park, Inc.) · filed 2012-06-06(b)(2)(C), (K)

Each Count implicated by the pending Motion comprise counterclaims to the LaSalle Claim against the Bankruptcy Estate seeking determination of the extent and validity of liens supporting that Claim, statutory “core” authority lies under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(C) and (K) to adjudicate finally those Counts.

Section 157 treats matters concerning estate administration and disposition of estate property as core proceedings in which the bankruptcy court may enter final orders and judgments.

In re Darden · filed 2012-05-25(b)(1), (b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(E)

As these matters concern the administration of this case and the disposition of property of the estate, they are core proceedings over which this Court has jurisdiction to enter final orders and judgments. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1), (b)(2)(A) and (E).

Section 157(b)(2)(P) treats a proceeding to enforce a foreign reorganization order under Chapter 15 as a core proceeding.

Vitro, S.A.B. de C.V. v. ACP Master, Ltd. (In re Vitro, S.A.B. de C.V.) · filed 2012-06-13(b)(2)(P)

The proceeding is core, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(P).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats proceedings involving the allowance or disallowance of exemptions as core proceedings.

In re Hanh Hieu Dang · filed 2012-06-13(b)(2)(B)

This is a core proceeding because it involves the allowance or disal-lowance of exemptions. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats determinations of the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings.

Basile v. Spagnola (In re Spagnola) · filed 2012-06-18(b)(2)(I)

This is a “core proceeding” under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) (determinations as to the dischargeability of particular debts).

Section 157 treats an application to employ bankruptcy counsel as a core proceeding.

In re SBMC Healthcare, LLC · filed 2012-06-18(b)

Additionally, this dispute is a core proceeding under the general “catch-all” language of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b).

Section 157(b)(2) treats proceedings concerning estate administration, claims allowance, and lien validity as core proceedings in which a bankruptcy court may enter a final judgment.

Old Cutters, Inc. v. City of Hailey (In re Old Cutters, Inc.) · filed 2012-06-18(b)(2)

These adversary proceedings are core proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B), (K), and/or (0). The Court is statutorily authorized to enter a final judgment in the adversary proceedings, and also has the constitutional authority to do so.

Section 157(b)(2) treats a trustee’s objection to a proof of claim as a core proceeding.

In re Stout · filed 2012-06-29(b)(2)

This contested matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B), and (O), and the general “catch-all” language of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) and (C) treats proceedings involving allowance of a landlord’s proof of claim and the estate’s counterclaims against that landlord as core matters.

Center Operating Co. v. Base Holdings, LLC (In re Base Holdings, LLC) · filed 2012-07-03(b)(2)(B) and (C)

This Adversary Proceeding, as explained above, essentially involves a landlord’s proof of claim; requests for declarations by the landlord regarding its lease with the debtor; and counterclaims by the bankruptcy estate back against the landlord. These are squarely “core” matters, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) and (C).

Section 157(b)(2)(J) treats an adversary proceeding to deny discharge as a core proceeding.

Manning v. Watkins (In re Watkins) · filed 2012-07-06(b)(2)(J)

This adversary proceeding is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J).

Section 157(b)(1) permits a bankruptcy judge to finally adjudicate a referred motion to enforce the automatic stay because it is a core proceeding.

In re Williams · filed 2012-07-11(b)(1)

A bankruptcy judge to whom a case has been referred may enter final judgment on any “core proceedings” arising under the Bankruptcy Code. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1). The automatic stay in bankruptcy cases arises under § 362(a) of the Code, and its enforcement arises under §§ 105(a) and 362(k). The debtor’s motion for enforcement of the automatic stay therefore gives rise to a core proceeding, which the bankruptcy court may finally adjudicate.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) and (K) make a dispute over a mortgage securing a filed proof of claim a core proceeding when resolving the dispute necessarily determines the creditor’s claim.

Pulaski v. Dakota Financial, LLC (In re Pulaski) · filed 2012-07-13(b)(2)(B), (K)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) and (K), and the Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1334. ... Unlike the claims in Stem or Ortiz, these claims will necessarily be resolved in the claims adjudication process and this Court may enter a final judgment upon them.

Section 157(b)(2)(L) treats confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan as a core proceeding.

In re Murchek · filed 2012-07-17(b)(2)(L)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(L).

Section 157(b) treats proceedings determining whether property belongs to the bankruptcy estate as core matters.

Velo Holdings Inc. v. Paymentech, LLC (In re Velo Holdings Inc.) · filed 2012-07-18(b)

The determination whether something is property of the estate is a core matter.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Hancock Bank v. Harper (In re Harper) · filed 2012-07-18(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157 treats preference and fraudulent transfer claims as core proceedings and gives bankruptcy courts statutory authority to enter final orders in them.

Lain v. V3 Construction Group, Ltd. (In re Erickson Retirement Communities, LLC) · filed 2012-07-19(b)(2)(F) and (H)

Such claims are squarely “core,” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(F) and (H). Thus, pursuant to statute, the bankruptcy court has authority to enter final orders in this Adversary Proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(F) and (K) treat preference avoidance and lien status disputes as core matters in which the bankruptcy court may enter final judgment.

Ciprian Ltd. v. Oxford Development Co. Grant Street L.P. (In re Ciprian Ltd.) · filed 2012-06-21(b)(2)(F), (K)

This is a core matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(F), (K), and the Court will enter final judgment in this adversary proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2) classifies matters involving estate administration, stay relief, lien validity, and plan confirmation as core proceedings.

Acceptance Loan Co. v. S. White Transportation, Inc. (In re S. White Transportation, Inc.) · filed 2012-06-14(b)(2)(A), (G), (K), and (L)

The Court concludes that this appeal implicates matters which constitute core proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (G), (K), and (L).

Section 157(b)(2) does not classify this adversary proceeding as a core proceeding.

TXCO Resources, Inc. v. Peregrine Petroleum, L.L.C. (In re TXCO Resources, Inc.) · filed 2012-07-26(b)(2)

This is a not a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies proceedings to determine the dischargeability of debts as core bankruptcy matters.

Gaussa v. Crawford (In re Crawford) · filed 2012-07-26(b)(2)(I)

This is a core matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(H) treats a fraudulent transfer avoidance proceeding as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Le v. Krepps (In re Krepps) · filed 2012-08-03(b)(2)(H)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(H).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats adjudication of a claim arising in a bankruptcy proceeding as a core matter.

In re G-I Holdings, Inc. · filed 2012-08-13(b)(2)(B)

Adjudication of a claim arising in a bankruptcy proceeding is a core matter. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats motions to transfer venue as core proceedings.

Zazzali v. 1031 Exchange Group (In re DBSI, Inc.) · filed 2012-08-14(b)(2)(A)

Motions to transfer venue are core proceedings.

Section 157 treats proceedings concerning dischargeability and denial of discharge as core proceedings.

Hulsing Hotels Tennessee, Inc. v. Steffner (In re Steffner) · filed 2012-08-17(b)(2)(I) and (J)

This is a core proceeding. See 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) and (J).

Section 157(b)(2) identifies proceedings concerning estate administration, liens, and plan confirmation as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Yaryan-Parks Trust v. Martinez (In re Martinez) · filed 2012-07-30(b)(2)(A), (K), (L)

The Court has subject matter and personal jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 157(b); this is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (K) and/or (L); and this Memorandum Opinion constitutes findings of fact and conclusions of law as may be required by Rule 7052 F.R.B.P.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a motion to approve a bankruptcy settlement under Rule 9019(a) as a core proceeding.

In re Brown · filed 2012-08-24(b)(2)(A)

This matter arising under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9019(a) constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b) does not classify state-law claims to rescind nondebtors’ insurance coverage, arising independently of bankruptcy, as core proceedings.

Triad Guaranty Insurance v. American Home Mortgage Investment Corp. (In re American Home Mortgage Holding) · filed 2012-08-27(b)

Triad’s claims are neither enumerated nor non-enumerated core proceedings under Section 157(b) of the Judicial Code.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine whether a particular debt is dischargeable as a core proceeding.

Citizens Bank v. Cramer (In re Cramer) · filed 2012-08-27(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), and this court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1334.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) permits a bankruptcy judge to hear and determine a motion for contempt for violating the discharge injunction as a core proceeding.

In re Lunt · filed 2012-08-31(b)(2)(A)

A motion for contempt for violation of the discharge injunction is a core proceeding which this Court may hear and determine as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157(b) treats claims against a bankruptcy estate and counterclaims brought on its behalf as core proceedings.

United States v. Bond · filed 2012-09-17(b)

The tax disputes at issue here consist of claims against the estate, and, as explained in greater detail below, counterclaims by the Trustee on behalf of the estate. Accordingly, the matters before the Bankruptcy Court are core proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats a timely objection to a debtor’s claimed exemption as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

In re Gillenwater · filed 2012-09-18(b)(2)(B)

Determination of the validity of a Debt- or’s claim of exemption of property from the bankruptcy estate when challenged, as is the case here, by a duly and timely filed objection is defined as a “core” ...bankruptcy proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats determinations regarding dischargeability of a debt as core proceedings.

First American Title Insurance v. Gaskill (In re Gaskill) · filed 2012-09-18(b)(2)(I)

This adversary proceeding is a statutory core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(l) (determinations regarding dischargeability of a debt).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as a core proceeding.

Dean v. Hunter (In re Hunter) · filed 2012-09-21(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding. See 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) and (J) treat determinations of debt dischargeability and requests to revoke a discharge as core proceedings.

Blackstone Financial Group Business Trust v. Myler (In re Myler) · filed 2012-08-31(b)(2)(I) and (J)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) and (J), because it involves a determination of the dischargeability of a particular debt and an objection to discharge in the form of a request for revocation of discharge.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) and (J) treats dischargeability and objections to discharge as core proceedings in which the bankruptcy court may enter final judgment.

Enterprise Bank v. Hannan (In re Hannan) · filed 2012-08-24(b)(2)(I) and (J)

This is a core matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) and (J), and the Court will enter final judgment in this adversary proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings in which a bankruptcy court may enter final orders and judgments.

Wolph v. U.S. Department of Education (In re Wolph) · filed 2012-09-27(b)(2)(I)

A proceeding, such as this, brought to determine the dischargeability of particular debts is deemed to be a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I). Accordingly, as a core proceeding, this Court has the jurisdictional authority to enter final orders and judgments in this matter.

Section 157(b)(2)(J) treats the granting or denial of a discharge as a core proceeding.

NJL Investments, LLC v. Smart (In re Smart) · filed 2012-09-27(b)(2)(J)

The granting or denial of a discharge is a “core” proceeding as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J).

Section 157(b)(2) defines core bankruptcy proceedings, including the disputes the court classified under its listed categories and catch-all provision.

Tow v. Henley (In re Henley) · filed 2012-09-28(b)(2)

The particular disputes in this adversary proceeding are core proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (C), (I), and (O), and the general “catch-all” language of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b) treats proceedings concerning a debtor's claimed exemptions as core proceedings.

In re McFarland · filed 2012-09-29(b)

These are core proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b) and the Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334.

Section 157 treats a proceeding to interpret and enforce a prior core sale order as a core proceeding.

White v. Kubotek Corp. · filed 2012-10-02(b)(2)(N)

The Bankruptcy Court had statutory authority to rule because interpreting and enforcing an order resulting from a prior “core proceeding” also constitutes a “core proceeding.”

Section 157 permits a bankruptcy judge to enter final orders in core matters involving the determination of a claim’s secured status.

Porst v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. (In re Porst) · filed 2012-10-04(b)(2)(E)

Furthermore, count I of the complaint (determination of secured status under § 506(d)) is a core matter for which I may enter final orders pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E).

Section 157(b)(1) authorizes a bankruptcy court to enter final judgment in a referred core proceeding.

In re Hutchens · filed 2012-10-04(b)(1)

This proceeding arises in a case referred to this Court by the Standing Order of Reference entered in this District and is determined to be a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1), (b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(B), (b)(2)(I), (b)(2)(0) and § 1334(b). The Court is authorized to enter final judgment in this proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a debt as a core proceeding.

Lawson v. Conley (In re Conley) · filed 2012-10-05(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157 treats confirmation of a reorganization plan that includes a § 524(g) injunction as a core proceeding.

Fireman's Fund Ins. v. Plant Insulation Co. · filed 2012-10-09(b)(2)(L)

As the Bankruptcy Court correctly noted, confirmation of a reorganization plan that entails issuance of an injunction under § 524(g) is a “core” proceeding.

Section 157 treats a turnover proceeding based on a substantive right under federal bankruptcy law as a core proceeding.

Porretto v. Nelson (In re Porretto) · filed 2012-10-09(b)(2)(E)

The Court has jurisdiction over this adversary proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E). ... This contested matter is a core proceeding because it is a substantive right created under federal bankruptcy law.

Section 157(b)(2)(L) treats a dispute over confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan as a core proceeding.

In re Johnson · filed 2012-10-10(b)(2)(L)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(L).

Section 157(b)(2)(H) classifies fraudulent transfer actions as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Bachrach Clothing, Inc. v. Bachrach (In re Bachrach Clothing, Inc.) · filed 2012-10-10(b)(2)(H)

Section 157(b)(2)(H) declares fraudulent transfer actions to be core proceedings.

Section 157(b)(2) treats proceedings involving turnover of estate property, claims allowance, lien validity, and liquidation of estate assets as core proceedings.

Trauner v. State Bank & Trust Co. (In re Solid Rock Development Corp.) · filed 2012-09-27(b)(2)

2. This matter is a core proceeding because it involves the turnover of property of the estate, the construction of an order modifying the automatic stay, the allowance of claims against the estate, the determination of the validity and extent of SB & T’s lien, and also is a proceeding affecting the liquidation of the assets of the estate. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) and (J) treats dischargeability determinations and objections to discharge as core proceedings.

Thompson v. Barbee (In re Barbee) · filed 2012-09-25(b)(2)(I) and (J)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) and (J) and jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1334.

Section 157(b)(2)(E) does not make a debtor’s prepetition state law constructive trust claim a core proceeding when ownership of the property is genuinely disputed.

Drauschak v. VMP Holdings Ass'n (In re Drauschak) · filed 2012-11-01(b)(2)(E)

In other words, where, as in this proceeding, issues of ownership of property interests are subject to bona fide dispute, a prepetition, state law claim by a debtor or bankruptcy trustee that the disputed property should be impressed with a constructive trust is classified as a non-core matter, just like a turnover action involving disputed property.

Section 157 permits a bankruptcy court to enter final judgment in a core proceeding.

Brown v. Bank of America (In re Brown) · filed 2012-11-01(b)(2)(O)

This is a core matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(0), and the Court will enter final judgment.

Section 157(b)(1) permits a bankruptcy judge to enter final judgment on a referred debtor eligibility matter because it arises under the Bankruptcy Code.

In re Payton · filed 2012-11-05(b)(1)

Under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1), a bankruptcy judge to whom a case has been referred may enter final judgment on “core proceedings arising under” the Bankruptcy Code. Eligibility to be a debt- or in a bankruptcy case arises under the Code and is therefore a matter as to which a bankruptcy judge may enter final judgment.

Section 157(b)(2) treats proceedings to recover fraudulent conveyances and assets of a bankruptcy estate as core proceedings.

Ch Holding Co. v. Miller Parking Co. · filed 2012-11-06(b)(2)

The defendants argue that the present lawsuit is a core proceeding because it is a proceeding to set aside a fraudulent transfer of property belonging to the Miller Parking Detroit bankruptcy estate. The Court agrees. ... Mandatory abstention does not apply.

Section 157(b)(2) treats matters concerning estate administration, automatic-stay motions, and orders approving the use, lease, or sale of property as core proceedings.

In re Qimonda AG · filed 2012-11-07(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding, within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) (matters concerning the administration of the estate), (G) (motions to terminate, annul, or modify the automatic stay), (M) (orders approving the use or lease of property) and (N) (orders approving the sale of property).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) classifies matters affecting the administration of a bankruptcy estate as core proceedings.

In re McDowell · filed 2012-11-16(b)(2)(A)

This dispute is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) because it is a matter affecting the administration of the Chapter 7 estate.

Section 157(b) permits a bankruptcy court to enter final judgment when it determines that a proceeding is core.

Rafool v. Evans (In re Central Illinois Energy, L.L.C.) · filed 2012-11-20(b)(2)(O)

The Court determines that this matter is a core proceeding, both statutory and constitutional, under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(0). A final judgment may be entered that is appealable to the district court. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1).

Section 157 treats claims arising from a trustee’s administration and liquidation of estate assets as core proceedings.

Lunan v. Jones (In re Lunan) · filed 2012-11-21(b)(2)(A), (O)

Even if the facts as alleged by the Plaintiff are true, all of the actions taken by the Defendants of which the Plaintiff complains were in the context of administering the estate and liquidating the estate’s assets. Accordingly, the Plaintiffs claims against the Defendants constitute a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a matter affecting the administration of a Chapter 7 estate as a core proceeding.

In re Jackson · filed 2012-12-05(b)(2)(A)

This matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) because it affects the administration of this Chapter 7 estate.

Section 157(b)(2)(L) treats Chapter 13 plan confirmation disputes as core proceedings.

In re Bruce · filed 2012-12-11(b)(2)(L)

Chapter 13 plan confirmation disputes are core proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(L).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats an objection to a proof of claim as a core proceeding.

Acme Security, Inc. v. CLN Properties, LLC ( In re Acme Security, Inc.) · filed 2012-12-11(b)(2)(B)

Acme Security’s objection to CLN’s proof of claim is a core proceeding as described in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) over which the District Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) and that has been referred to this bankruptcy judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(a) and Local Rule 83.7, N.D. Ga.

An adversary proceeding challenging a prepetition foreclosure sale can be related to a bankruptcy case without being a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2).

Kapla v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n (In re Kapla) · filed 2012-12-14(b)(2)

The complaint alleges that this is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2). The Court finds that it is not a core proceeding, but instead is related to a case under title 11.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Woodward v. Ehrler-Nugent (In re Nugent) · filed 2012-12-20(b)(2)(I)

This dispute is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) because it is a matter concerning whether a particular obligation owed by the Debtor is dischargeable.

Section 157(b)(2)(F) classifies proceedings to recover preferential transfers as core proceedings.

Gonzales v. Sun Life Insurance (In re Furr's Supermarkets, Inc.) · filed 2012-12-20(b)(2)(F)

This is a core proceeding to recover preferential transfers.

Section 157(b)(2) treats proceedings determining the allowance of a creditor’s claim and the validity of its lien as core proceedings.

Old Cutters, Inc. v. City of Hailey (In re Old Cutters, Inc.) · filed 2012-12-31(b)(2)

Rejecting Hailey's arguments to the contrary, in a Memorandum of Decision entered on June 19, 2012, Dkt. No. 30, the Court determined that it has subject matter jurisdiction over these adversary proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) because they "arise in” Old Cutters’ bankruptcy case, that the adversary proceedings are core proceedings for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2), and that the Court has the statutory and constitutional authority to enter final judgments and orders in these actions. As the Court explained in its decision, Hailey is a creditor in this bankruptcy case, and these actions seek to determine whether Hailey's creditor’s claim should be allowed, and whether the lien Hailey claims in the Property is valid and enforceable. ... Accordingly, the Court hereby reaffirms its prior conclusions about its jurisdiction and constitutional authority to enter a final order and judgment for purposes of this decision.

Section 157(b)(2) does not classify state-law claims based on prepetition conduct as core proceedings when they do not arise in the bankruptcy case.

Calvert ex rel. Meridian Investors Trust v. Zions Bancorporation (In re Consolidated Meridian Funds) · filed 2013-01-03(b)(2)

Nor do the causes of action arise in the Meridian Bankruptcy such that they are “core” proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2)(H) does not make state-law claims concerning property outside the bankruptcy estate core proceedings merely because they allege fraudulent transfers.

Joyner v. S.F.L. & S.I.L., LLC · filed 2013-01-04(b)(2)(H)

As such, we further find that this is not a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(H) because the state law claims are not estate property — but allegedly involve transactions that fraudulently conveyed Dr. Joyner’s stolen property.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats approval of a compromise as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

In re Gordon · filed 2013-01-04(b)(2)(A)

The approval of a compromise constitutes a core proceeding as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

Section 157 treats proceedings concerning the administration of a bankruptcy estate and disposition of its assets as core proceedings.

Springs East Land Co. v. Goss (In re Ellicott Springs Resources, LLC) · filed 2013-01-09(b)

This is a core proceeding, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1)(A), and (0), because this matter pertains to the administration of this estate and disposition of assets of the estate.

Section 157(b)(2) treats preference actions as core proceedings because they arise under the Bankruptcy Code.

Shurn v. Gilbert (In re Gulf Coast Glass & Erection Co.) · filed 2013-01-10(b)(2)

This particular dispute is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(F) and (O), and the general “catch-all” language of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2). ... This proceeding is core because a preference action only arises under the Code.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a proceeding arising from conduct in a matter central to administering a bankruptcy case as core.

In re Stomberg · filed 2013-01-10(b)(2)(A)

This proceeding is core because the acts leading to the issuance of the Second Show Cause Order occurred in a matter central to the administration of the Debtor’s bankruptcy case.

Section 157(b)(2) does not make a state law malpractice claim a core proceeding merely because the alleged negligence occurred during a bankruptcy reorganization and involved attorneys for the bankruptcy estate.

Mickler v. Trujillo · filed 2013-01-22(b)(2)

Core proceedings are described in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2), and generally concern the administration of the bankruptcy estate, management of claims and assets of the estate, and matters related to the reorganization plan. ... The Court cannot find that the dispute with regard to Appellants’ alleged agreement to represent Appellee in a criminal case was a core proceeding, arose out of the bankruptcy case, or was related in such a way as to require this Court to conclude that the Bankruptcy Court’s finding of lack of jurisdiction was error.

Section 157(b)(2) treats a motion to designate votes and a request to confirm a plan as core proceedings.

In re Indianapolis Downs, LLC · filed 2013-01-31(b)(2)

Consideration of the Motion to Designate constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (L), and (O). Consideration of the request for confirmation of the Plan constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(L).

Section 157(b)(2) identifies estate administration, turnover, fraudulent conveyance, and estate liquidation matters as core proceedings.

Henderson v. Legal Helpers Debt Resolution, L.L.C. (In re Huffman) · filed 2013-02-06(b)(2)

A non-exhaustive list of core proceedings is provided in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2), which includes “matters concerning the administration of the estate,” “orders to turn over property of the estate,” “proceedings to determine, avoid, or recover fraudulent conveyances,” and “other proceedings affecting the liquidation of the assets of the estate.”

Section 157(b)(2)(A) covers a dispute affecting estate property and the assets available for distribution as a core proceeding.

Quinlan v. AFI Services, LLC (In re AFI Services, LLC) · filed 2013-02-07(b)(2)(A)

This proceeding is core because the issues affect the property of the estate and the amount of assets available for distribution.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats show cause matters concerning a debtor’s conduct in a bankruptcy case as core proceedings.

In re David · filed 2013-02-21(b)(2)(A)

The particular matters set forth in the First Show Cause Order and the Second Show Cause Order constitute core proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), and the general “catch-all” language of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (B) treats proceedings concerning estate administration and the allowance or disallowance of exemptions as core proceedings.

In re Sharp · filed 2013-02-22(b)(2)(A) and (B)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (B), because this matter concerns the administration of the estate and allowance or dis-allowance of exemptions from the estate.

Section 157(b)(2) treats determinations of dischargeability and of the validity, extent, or priority of liens as core proceedings.

Brinson v. United States (In re Brinson) · filed 2013-01-28(b)(2)(I), (K)

Determination as to the discharge-ability of particular debts and the determination of the validity, extent, or priority of liens are core proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) and (K), respectively.

Section 157(b)(2) treats estate administration and Chapter 11 plan confirmation as core proceedings.

In re Elinoff · filed 2013-03-07(b)(2)(A), (b)(2)(L)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (L) as it involves the administration of the estate and confirmation of the Debtor’s Chapter 11 Plan.

Section 157(b)(2) treats proceedings affecting estate property and assets available for distribution as core proceedings.

Cage v. GDH International, Inc. (In re Great Gulfcan Energy Texas, Inc.) · filed 2013-03-08(b)(2)

This particular dispute is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (H) and (O) and the general “catch-all” language of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2). ... Indeed, this proceeding is core because the issues affect the property of the estate and the amount of assets available for distribution.

A proceeding involving neither an objection to discharge nor the dischargeability of a debt falls outside the core proceeding categories in § 157(b)(2)(I) and (J).

McNiff v. Shanahan (In re Shanahan) · filed 2013-03-12(b)(2)(I), (J)

First, this adversary proceeding involves neither an objection to Patrick’s discharge nor to the dischargeability of any debt and thus does not fall within the scope of core proceedings set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) or (J).

Section 157(b) permits a bankruptcy court to enter final judgment on an automatic-stay violation claim as a core matter.

Kimber v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC (In re Residential Capital, LLC) · filed 2013-04-08(b)

Count I of the Complaint alleges that Defendants violated the automatic stay created by the Bankruptcy Code, so the claim is a core matter over which the bankruptcy court may enter final judgment.

An action concerning a debtor’s eligibility for discharge is a core proceeding.

Jahn v. Hughes (In re Hughes) · filed 2013-04-12(b)(2)(J)

The Trustee’s action regarding the Debtors’ eligibility for a discharge is a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)’s core proceeding categories do not cover a state-law dispute over the post-sale enforcement of employment covenants.

Manty v. Helal (In re Fifty Below Sales & Marketing, Inc.) · filed 2013-04-12(b)(2)

The counts as a whole do not fall within any of the specific categories of legal proceeding given statutory “core” status in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2)(O) treats proceedings that adjust debtor-creditor or equity security holder relationships as core proceedings.

NTP Marble, Inc. v. Papadopoulos (In re NTP Marble, Inc.) · filed 2013-04-17(b)(2)(O)

Because this matter involves the adjustment of the debtor-creditor or the equity security holder relationship, it constitutes a "core” proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) makes the allowance of a creditor’s proof of claim a core proceeding that a bankruptcy court may hear and finally determine.

Schmid v. Bank of America, N.A. (In re Schmid) · filed 2013-04-24(b)(2)(B)

There is no question that the allowance of a creditor’s proof of claim is a core matter under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) that this Court may hear and finally determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies proceedings to determine the dischargeability of a debt as core proceedings.

Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Cowin (In re Cowin) · filed 2013-04-25(b)(2)(I)

These suits are core proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) because each suit is a proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a debt, and these suits are also core under the general “catch-all” language of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2) because each suit is the type of proceeding that can only arise in the context of a bankruptcy case.

Section 157(b)(2)(O) covers motions for sanctions for violating the automatic stay as core proceedings.

In re Martin · filed 2013-04-26(b)(2)(O)

This matter is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(0).

Section 157(b)(2) classifies specified bankruptcy matters as core proceedings.

Cini v. Viscomi & Gersh, PLLP (In re Cini) · filed 2013-05-03(b)(2)

The remaining claims to determine the validity and priority of liens and interests, seeking a judgment of contempt against Carroll for violation of the automatic stay, and approval of compromise settlement, are core proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

A claim under 11 U.S.C. § 525(a) can be a core proceeding under § 157.

Ellis v. United States Department of Homeland Security (In re Ellis) · filed 2013-05-13(b)(2)(A)

The Court has jurisdiction over this claim for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) and this is a core proceeding consistent with 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(a), (b)(1), and (b)(2)(A).

Section 157 treats an accounting claim arising under bankruptcy law as a core proceeding and the other claims here as non-core proceedings.

Sheils v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In re Fleming) · filed 2013-05-14

I find that only Count IV (Accounting) of the underlying adversary proceeding presents this Court with a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157. All other Counts are non-core proceedings of which this Court retains jurisdiction.

Section 157(b)(2) authorizes a bankruptcy court to hear and determine core proceedings.

Clean Burn Fuels, LLC v. Purdue BioEnergy, LLC (In re Clean Burn Fuels, LLC) · filed 2013-05-16(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(A), (K), and (M), which this Court has the jurisdiction to hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats allowance or disallowance of claims against the estate as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

In re Hardy · filed 2013-05-16(b)(2)(B)

No party disputes and the Court finds that this is a core proceeding over which the Court has jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(B), 1334(b).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats matters concerning administration of a bankruptcy estate as core proceedings.

In re Triumph Christian Center, Inc. · filed 2013-05-24(b)(2)(A)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) because it concerns the administration of the Debtor’s estate; and it is also core pursuant to the general “catchall” language of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2)(E) and (O) identify matters that qualify as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Henderson v. Community Bank (In re Evans) · filed 2013-04-26(b)(2)(E) and (O)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(G) treats a motion to terminate, annul or modify the automatic stay as a core proceeding.

In re Batista-Sanechez · filed 2013-05-31(b)(2)(G)

This matter concerns a motion to terminate, annul or modify the automatic stay and is therefore a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G).

Section 157(b)(2)(H) classifies fraudulent transfer proceedings as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Richardson v. Checker Acquisition Corp. (In re Checker Motors Corp.) · filed 2013-06-10(b)(2)(H)

This is also a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(H).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a complaint to determine the dischargeability of student loans as a core proceeding.

Erbschloe v. U.S. Department of Education (In re Erbschloe) · filed 2013-06-13(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) because the complaint requests that the Court determine the dischargeability of the Debtor’s student loans under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8).

Section 157(b)(2)(F) classifies proceedings to avoid or recover preferential transfers as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Compton v. Mustang Engineering Ltd. (In re MPF Holding U.S. LLC) · filed 2013-06-18(b)(2)(F)

This is also a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E) and (F) because it is a proceeding to determine, avoid, or recover a preference and the remedy sought is turnover of property of the estate.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) classifies the adjudication of a claim objection as a core proceeding.

In re 1555 Wabash LLC · filed 2013-06-19(b)(2)(B)

This matter involves the adjudication of a claim objection, which is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2) treats estate administration, claim allowance, and proceedings to avoid or recover transfers as core proceedings.

Weinman v. Walker (In re Adam Aircraft Industries, Inc.) · filed 2013-06-21(b)(2)(A), (B), (F)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B) and (F) as it concerns the administration of the ...estate, the allowance or disallowance of claims against the estate, and a proceeding to determine, avoid or recover transfers.

Section 157 permits a bankruptcy judge to enter final judgment on a motion to reconsider an order concerning relief from the automatic stay because the motion arises in a bankruptcy case.

In re Morrow · filed 2013-06-27(b)

It follows that a motion to reconsider an order regarding such a motion for relief from stay also arises in a case under title 11.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) and (B) treats estate administration and the allowance or disallowance of claims against the estate as core proceedings.

In re Brock · filed 2013-06-28(b)(2)(A) and (B)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (B), as it involves the administration of a bankruptcy estate and the allowance or disal-lowance of claims against the estate.

Section 157(b)(2)(G) does not limit core proceedings involving the automatic stay to the motions it lists; a stay violation action is also a core proceeding.

Calderon v. Bank of America Corp. (In re Calderon) · filed 2013-07-01(b)(2)(G)

The prefatory language “not limited to” indicates that subsection (b)(2)(G) does not purport to list the exclusive core proceedings involving the automatic stay.

Section 157(b)(2)(I)-(J) classifies objections to discharge and proceedings to determine the dischargeability of a debt as core proceedings.

Bank of North Georgia v. McDowell (In re McDowell) · filed 2013-06-03(b)(2)(I)-(J)

As this matter arises from a complaint objecting to the Debtor’s discharge and to the dischargeability of a particular debt, it constitutes a core proceeding, over which this Court has subject matter jurisdiction.

Section 157 treats a motion to dismiss a bankruptcy case and deny a Chapter 7 discharge as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

In re Riggs · filed 2013-07-09(b)(2)(J) and (O)

Determination of a motion to dismiss a particular bankruptcy case and thereby deny a Chapter 7 discharge to a debtor is a “core” bankruptcy proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J) and (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(H) classifies fraudulent-transfer proceedings as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Jansen v. LaMarca (In re Bifani) · filed 2013-07-12(b)(2)(H)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(H).

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats matters concerning the administration of the estate as core proceedings in which the bankruptcy court may enter a final order.

In re Doug Wilson Insurance Agency, Inc. · filed 2013-07-16(b)(2)(A)

The proceeding before the Court is a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and the Court may issue a final Order in this case.

Section 157(b)(2)(A) treats a proceeding concerning the administration of a debtor’s bankruptcy case as a core proceeding.

In re Bradley · filed 2013-07-16(b)(2)(A)

This proceeding is core pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) because the acts leading to the issuance of the SCO concerned the administration of the Debtors’ bankruptcy case.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a particular debt as a core proceeding.

Dudley v. Southern Virginia University (In re Dudley) · filed 2013-07-23(b)(2)(I)

This matter is a core proceeding under the Bankruptcy Code because it is a proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a particular debt. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies proceedings to determine the dischargeability of a debt as core proceedings.

Taylor v. Davis (In re Davis) · filed 2013-07-26(b)(2)(I)

This adversary proceeding is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157 treats a motion for relief from the bankruptcy stay as a core proceeding on which a bankruptcy judge may enter final judgment.

In re Bovino · filed 2013-07-26(b)(2)(G)

A motion for relief from stay arises in a case under title 11 and is specified as a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(G).

Section 157 classifies confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan as a core proceeding.

In re Jensen · filed 2013-07-26(b)(2)(D)

The confirmation of a chapter 13 plan is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(D).

Section 157(b)(2) treats proceedings arising under title 11 or arising in a bankruptcy case as core proceedings.

McKinney v. JP Morgan Chase Bank (In re McKinney) · filed 2013-07-26(b)(2)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(E), 157(b)(2)(L), and 157(b)(2)(0). ... Matters falling within either of these categories in § 1334(b) are deemed to be core proceedings.

Section 157(b)(2)(L) treats confirmation of a bankruptcy plan as a core proceeding.

In re Waterford Hotel, Inc. · filed 2013-08-01(b)(2)(L)

This confirmation matter is a core proceeding under, among other possible provisions, 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(L).

Section 157(b)(2)(J) authorizes a bankruptcy court to determine matters in a core adversary proceeding.

CIB Marine Capital, LLC v. Herman (In re Herman) · filed 2013-08-06(b)(2)(J)

This is a core proceeding for which the Court is authorized to determine all matters regarding this Adversary Proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats an adversary proceeding to determine whether student loans are dischargeable as a core proceeding that the bankruptcy court may decide.

Von Kiel v. Department of Health & Human Services (In re Von Kiel) · filed 2013-08-08(b)(2)(I)

An adversary proceeding seeking to discharge a debtor’s student loans under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8) is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I); therefore, the Bankruptcy Court had jurisdiction under this section to consider and decide the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment in the underlying adversary proceeding.