28 U.S.C. § 157

Section 157(b)(2) treats a complaint to determine the dischargeability of a debt as a core proceeding.

Tolbert v. Clay (In Re Clay) · filed 1986-08-25(b)(2)

The Court finds this matter to constitute a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157 treats a proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a debt as a core proceeding.

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. McCraney (In Re McCraney) · filed 1986-07-11(b)(2)(I), (b)(3)

As required by 28 U.S.C. Section 157(b)(3), this is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. Section 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of a debt as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may finally determine.

Caffal Bros. Forest Products, Inc. v. Braun (In Re Braun) · filed 1986-08-07(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding susceptible of final determination by this Court. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) makes a proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a debt a core proceeding that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Barnett v. Barnett (In Re Barnett) · filed 1986-08-25(b)(2)(I)

This is “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157 treats determinations of the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may decide.

Deel v. United States/Internal Revenue Service (In Re Deel) · filed 1986-09-23(b)(2)(I)

In § 157, there is vested in the Bankruptcy Courts jurisdiction to determine core proceedings. In § 157(b)(2)(B)..., a core proceeding includes allowance or disallowance of claims, and (2)(I)... includes jurisdiction to determine the dischargeability of particular debts.

Section 157(b)(2) treats a proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a debt as a core proceeding.

Seibels, Bruce & Co. v. England (In re England) · filed 1986-07-15(b)(2)

Plaintiff filed the above-styled adversary complaint to determine the dischargeability of a debt pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4). It is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court finds this matter to constitute a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies complaints to determine dischargeability as core proceedings.

Citizens Bank of Byhalia v. Byrd (In Re Byrd) · filed 1986-08-05(b)(2)(I)

The complaints to determine dischargeability are core proceedings as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157 treats this dischargeability proceeding as core and permits the bankruptcy judge to hear and determine it and enter judgment after referral.

Wade v. Jones (In re Wade) · filed 1986-08-07(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I); pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1), the Bankruptcy Judge for this district may hear and determine all core proceedings arising in a case under Title 11 referred under 28 U.S.C. § 157(a), and the Bankruptcy Judge may enter appropriate orders and judgments.

Section 157(b) treats a proceeding to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as a core proceeding.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wright (In Re Wright) · filed 1986-10-08(b)

This adversary proceeding is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as a core proceeding that the bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Horton v. Horton (In Re Horton) · filed 1986-10-22(b)(2)(I)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies dischargeability determinations as core proceedings.

Shearson Lehman/American Express v. Reilly (In Re Reilly) · filed 1986-11-17(b)(2)(I)

The question of dischargeability is a “core proceeding” as defined in 28 U.S.C. Section 157(b)(2)(I); thus this court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties of the above-entitled adversary proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies determinations of a debt’s dischargeability as core proceedings.

Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,535 in Re Brian Tibbetts Yeates, Debtor. Paulette B. Yeates v. Yeates · filed 1986-12-19(b)(2)(I)

However, because deciding whether a debt is dischargeable is within the “core proceedings” of the bankruptcy court under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) (Supp.III 1985), Marathon does not require the district court to conduct a de novo review of the bankruptcy court’s decision.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as core proceedings.

Columbus Municipal Employees Federal Credit Union v. Barthol (In Re Barthol) · filed 1987-03-10(b)(2)(I)

This matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of a debt as core proceedings.

Security Pacific Finance Corp. v. Grove (In Re Grove) · filed 1987-05-15(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157 treats a proceeding to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as a core proceeding that the bankruptcy court may decide.

McNamara v. Austin (In re Austin) · filed 1987-05-27(b)(2)(I)

This Court has jurisdiction to determine the dischargeability of a debt under Bankruptcy Code Section 523 as a “core proceeding” arising under Title 11. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) and (2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) makes a proceeding to determine dischargeability of a debt a core proceeding that the bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Brookman v. Gibson (In re Gibson) · filed 1987-09-21(b)(2)(I)

This is a “core proceeding”, which the court may hear and determine pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of a particular debt as core proceedings.

Greenwood Trust Co. v. Barger (In Re Barger) · filed 1988-01-05(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as core proceedings.

Credithrift of America v. Greene (In Re Greene) · filed 1988-04-26(b)(2)(I)

This is an action seeking the Court’s determination that an obligation of Debtor is not dischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sec. 523(a)(2)(B). This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 157(b)(2)(I).

A complaint to determine dischargeability is a core proceeding under § 157.

Pioneer General Insurance Co. v. Midkiff (In Re Midkiff) · filed 1988-05-03

This matter constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157 and this Court recognizes jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) permits a bankruptcy court to determine dischargeability but does not authorize it to determine the amount of the nondischargeable debt.

United States v. Stelweck (In Re Stelweck) · filed 1988-06-06(b)(2)(I)

The reference in § 157(b)(2)(I) is to only "determinations” of dis-chargeability, not determination of the amount of the nondischargeable debt.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats the determination of a debt’s dischargeability as a core proceeding.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Wright (In Re Wright) · filed 1988-06-24(b)(2)(I)

Consideration of this motion is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) makes a proceeding to determine dischargeability of a debt a core proceeding that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Computer Products, Inc. v. Nahabedian (In Re Nahabedian) · filed 1988-06-30(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding in which the Court is authorized to hear and determine all matters relating to this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies determinations of dischargeability as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Baker v. Tadych (In Re Tadych) · filed 1988-07-19(b)(2)(I)

A determination of dischargeability is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) gives the bankruptcy court authority to determine whether debts are dischargeable.

National Labor Relations Board v. Goodman · filed 1988-08-31(b)(2)(I)

The bankruptcy court has jurisdiction to determine the dischargability of debts. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157 treats dischargeability actions as core proceedings that bankruptcy courts may hear and determine.

Skaggs v. Skaggs (In Re Skaggs) · filed 1988-09-19(b)(2)(I)

This dischargeability action is a core proceeding which the Court may hear and determine. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1), and (2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as core proceedings.

Norwest Bank Des Moines, N.A. Card Services Division v. Stewart (In Re Stewart) · filed 1988-09-26(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies proceedings to determine dischargeability of a debt as core proceedings.

Christensen v. New Jersey, Division of Motor Vehicles (In Re Christensen) · filed 1988-10-17(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157 treats a debt’s dischargeability as a core proceeding that a bankruptcy judge may decide even when the underlying personal injury action is non-core.

Boscia v. Donnelly (In Re Donnelly) · filed 1988-10-17(b)(2)(I)

The fact that the personal injury action itself may be a non-core proceeding is not relative to a determination of its dischargeability, which is a core proceeding under the Code.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats an adversary proceeding to determine a debt’s dischargeability as a core proceeding.

Zaera v. Raff (In Re Raff) · filed 1988-11-18(b)(2)(I)

Accordingly, an adversary proceeding to determine the dis-chargeability of a debt, as distinguished from its allowability, is a core proceeding over which this court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a debt as a core proceeding that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Household Finance Corp. v. Herke (In Re Herke) · filed 1988-11-21(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding in which the Court is authorized to hear and determine all matters relating to this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a dischargeability proceeding as a core proceeding that the bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Integrated Computer Solutions, Inc. v. Daniels (In Re Daniels) · filed 1988-12-13(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding in which the Court is authorized to hear and determine all matters relating to this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Dunn (In Re Dunn) · filed 1988-12-20(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157 treats an action to collect a debt that accrued after the bankruptcy petition as a core proceeding.

Eastern Elec. Sales Co., Inc. v. General Elec. Co. · filed 1989-01-09(b)(1)

Hence, an action to recover on a debt which accrued after the bankruptcy petition was filed is core because it “aris[es] in a case under title 11,” 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1); it was not already “owned by the debtor” at the time the' bankruptcy petition was filed.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of a debt as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Bear, Stearns & Co. v. Powell (In Re Powell) · filed 1989-01-17(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding in which the Court is authorized to hear and determine all matters relating to this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157 treats determinations of debt dischargeability as core proceedings, for which the district court reviews legal conclusions de novo and factual findings for clear error.

Perrin v. Meyer (In Re Meyer) · filed 1989-02-24(b)(2)(I)

Included in the definition of core proceeding are “determinations as to the dischargeability of particular debts.” 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I). There is no doubt that the matter before the court is a determination regarding dischargeability. Accordingly, the bankruptcy court’s conclusions of law will be reviewed de novo and its conclusions of fact will be overturned only if clearly erroneous.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a debt as a core proceeding.

Standard Federal Bank v. Compton (In Re Compton) · filed 1989-03-28(b)(2)(I)

While the parties by their complaint and answer do not admit or deny the court’s jurisdiction over this matter, the court finds that the matter before it concerns a complaint to determine the dischargeability of a debt and as such is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2) treats a motion for relief from a bankruptcy judgment concerning dischargeability as a core proceeding.

Standard Bank & Trust Co. v. Iaquinta (In Re Iaquinta) · filed 1989-03-29(b)(2)(A), (J), (O)

The motion constitutes a core pro-céeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (J), (O).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of debts as core proceedings.

First State Bank of Alsip v. Iaquinta (In Re Iaquinta) · filed 1989-04-28(b)(2)(I)

This adversary proceeding constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) makes determinations of debt dischargeability core proceedings that bankruptcy courts may hear and determine.

ITT Consumer Financial Corp. v. Judge (In re Judge) · filed 1989-04-06(b)(2)(I)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of a particular debt as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Hoffman v. Hoffman (In Re Hoffman) · filed 1989-05-19(b)(2)(I)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies proceedings to determine the dischargeability of a debt as core proceedings.

Hayton v. Eichelberger (In Re Eichelberger) · filed 1989-06-08(b)(2)(I)

The proceeding which plaintiff initiated to resolve the dispute between the parties is a core proceeding as that term is used under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) and (b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of a debt as core bankruptcy matters.

Allstate Insurance v. Humphrey (In Re Humphrey) · filed 1989-06-23(b)(2)(I)

This matter concerns the determination of the dischargeability of a debt owed by Defendant to Plaintiff and is, therefore, a core matter under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2) treats determinations of dischargeability and objections to discharge as core proceedings.

Ernst v. Walton (In Re Walton) · filed 1989-06-30(b)(2)(I), (b)(2)(J)

These related adversary proceedings, which arise under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) in a case referred to this Court by the Standing Order of Reference entered in this district July 30, 1984, are determined to be core proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) — determinations as to the dis-chargeability of particular debts, and (b)(2)(J) — objections to discharge.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) authorizes bankruptcy courts to hear and determine debt dischargeability disputes as core proceedings.

Sears v. Garritano (In re Garritano) · filed 1989-08-25(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding in which the Court is authorized to hear and determine all matters relating to this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. Section 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies proceedings to determine the dischargeability of a debt as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Wright v. Menendez (In Re Menendez) · filed 1989-12-01(b)(2)(I)

The Court finds that the subject matter of the complaint is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

A proceeding to determine whether a particular debt is dischargeable is a core matter under § 157(b)(2)(I).

Colorado, Division of Central Services, Central Collection Service v. O'Brien (In Re O'Brien) · filed 1990-01-18(b)(2)(I)

This is a core matter under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2) treats determination of nondischargeability as a core proceeding distinct from allowance or disallowance of a claim against the bankruptcy estate.

Nickens v. Perry (In Re Perry) · filed 1990-03-01(b)(2)

This distinction is made plain in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2), the statute that lists which proceedings are core and are central to the bankruptcy court’s exercise of jurisdiction. Therein, Congress has treated as separate and distinct the determination of nondis-chargeability and the allowance and disal-lowance of claims asserted against the bankruptcy estate.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats determinations of dischargeability as core proceedings.

Putnam County National Bank of Carmel v. Hough (In Re Hough) · filed 1990-03-14(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats dischargeability determinations as core proceedings and does not limit that authority to timely filed complaints.

Schunck v. Santos (In Re Santos) · filed 1990-04-10(b)(2)(I)

11 U.S.C. § 523(c) allows a bankruptcy court to determine the dischargeability of a debt of the type at issue in this appeal and 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) provides that such determinations involve “core proceedings.” Neither the text nor the legislative history of these provisions conferring jurisdiction over dischargeability matters purport to limit jurisdiction to those cases where the complaint is timely filed.

Section 157 treats proceedings involving a debtor’s discharge, dischargeability of a debt, and adjustment of the debtor-creditor relationship as core proceedings.

Brantley v. Weeks (In Re Brantley) · filed 1990-05-04(b)(2)(I), (J) and (O)

Further, this is a core proceeding since it involves the debtor’s discharge, dis- ■ chargeability of a debt, and the adjustment of the debtor-creditor relationship.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) and (J) allows a bankruptcy court to hear and determine core proceedings concerning dischargeability of a debt and objections to discharge.

James v. McCoy (In Re McCoy) · filed 1990-05-10(b)(2)(I) and (J)

This is a core proceeding which the Court may hear and determine in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) and (J).

Section 157 treats dischargeability proceedings as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and finally decide.

Ndosi v. Minnesota (In Re Ndosi) · filed 1990-07-23(b)(2)(I)

Moreover, this Court may hear and finally adjudicate these motions because their subject matter renders such adjudication a “core” proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(b)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a debt as a core proceeding that the bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

First Bank v. Colvin (In Re Colvin) · filed 1990-08-02(b)(2)(I)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats determinations of the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings.

Foreman v. Higher Education Assistance Foundation (In Re Foreman) · filed 1990-08-29(b)(2)(I)

This matter is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) — determinations as to the dischargeability of particular debts.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats controversies over the dischargeability of a debt as core proceedings for the bankruptcy court to hear and determine.

Applebaum v. Henderson (In Re Henderson) · filed 1991-12-10(b)(2)(I)

We begin by noting that all controversies concerning the dischargeability of a debt are core proceedings, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), and therefore a bankruptcy court must hear and determine such matters.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats dischargeability determinations as core proceedings even when there is no estate for a trustee to administer.

Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois v. Betts (In Re Betts) · filed 1992-06-16(b)(2)(I)

Thus, it is logical and at the heart of bankruptcy jurisprudence to conclude that discharge-ability determinations are core proceedings, regardless of whether there is an estate for a trustee to administer.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) permits a bankruptcy court to determine whether a debt is dischargeable.

Somma v. United States (In re Somma) · filed 1992-07-22(b)(2)(I)

The court clearly has jurisdiction over matters of dischargeability pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) permits a bankruptcy court to determine the dischargeability of a debt independently of its authority to administer the main case.

In Re Higgins · filed 1993-12-01(b)(2)(I)

This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) to determine the dischargeability of particular debts independent of its jurisdiction to administer the main case.

Section 157 authorizes a bankruptcy court to enter a money judgment when determining that a debt is nondischargeable.

Harris v. United States Fire Insurance · filed 1994-01-11(b)(1), (b)(2)(I)

Furthermore, 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) grants bankruptcy judges the power to “hear and determine all cases under title 11 and all core proceedings arising under title 11, or arising in a case under title 11, ... and [to] enter appropriate orders and judgments_” (emphasis added). One such core proceeding is “determinations as to the dischargeability of particular debts.” 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I). Accordingly, in the instant action, the Bankruptcy Court was authorized to enter an appropriate order and judgment. ... Accordingly, the Court finds that the Bankruptcy Court does have jurisdiction to enter a money judgment in a dischargeability proceeding.

Section 157(b)(1) permits a bankruptcy court to render a money judgment in a dischargeability proceeding.

Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Fisher (In Re Fisher) · filed 1995-08-18(b)(1)

This Court, therefore, believes that it has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) to render a money judgment in a dischargeability proceeding.

Section 157 authorizes a bankruptcy court deciding dischargeability to determine the existence and validity of the debt and enter a money judgment on the underlying state law fraud claim.

Dorian v. Cornner (In Re Cornner) · filed 1995-08-18(b)(1), (b)(2)(I)

The Court specifically finds that it has the requisite jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1) and (2)(I) to determine not only the dischargeability of the debt owed by Cornner to Dorian, but also to determine the existence and validity of the debt and to render a money judgment based upon Dorian’s state law fraud claim.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats determinations of debt dischargeability as core proceedings, including those outside 11 U.S.C. § 523.

LTV Steel Co. v. Union Carbide Corp. (In Re Chateaugay Corp.) · filed 1996-03-18(b)(2)(I)

But nothing in § 157(b)(2)(I) limits itself to or even refers to 11 U.S.C. § 523, and defendants have not cited, nor have I found any case or legislative history that so confines that section. Instead, the language of the statute refers to the discharge of debts generally.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) makes a dischargeability determination a core proceeding but does not authorize a bankruptcy court to enter a money judgment for damages on the underlying debt.

First Omni Bank, N.A. v. Thrall (In Re Thrall) · filed 1996-05-28(b)(2)(I)

An award of damages does not fall within the express language of § 157(b)(2)(I) “determinations as to the dischargeability of particular debts”.

Section 157 treats determinations of the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings.

H.P. Marketing Corp. v. Mills (In Re Mills) · filed 1996-11-08(b)(2)(I)

Determinations concerning the dischargeability of partícula!’ debts are core proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157. Thus, this case is a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) gives a bankruptcy court authority to hear a challenge to a state court judgment raised within a debt dischargeability proceeding.

Lake v. Capps (In Re Lake) · filed 1996-11-04(b)(2)(I)

A bankruptcy court clearly has jurisdiction over matters concerning the discharge-ability of a debt pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I). This negates the possibility that this could be construed as an "independent action" despite the debtors’ characterization of their requested relief.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats an objection to dischargeability as a core proceeding on which a bankruptcy court may enter judgment.

First Suttgart Bank & Trust Co. v. Jackson (In re Jackson) · filed 1996-11-05(b)(2)(I)

The objection to dischargeability is a “core proceeding” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b) as exemplified- by 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) such that the Bankruptcy Court may enter judgment on the discharge-ability claim.

Section 157 treats determinations concerning the dischargeability of a debt as core proceedings.

Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. v. Ferrell (In Re Ferrell) · filed 1996-11-13(b)(2)(I)

Determinations concerning the discharge-ability of a debt are core proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157. Thus, this case is a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats determinations of the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings within a bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction.

Hasbrook v. Citibank (In Re Hasbrook) · filed 2002-11-06(b)(2)(I)

After reviewing the record, the court determines that the matter before it is a core proceeding within the meaning of § 157(b)(2)(I) over which the court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(1) and 1334.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats determinations of the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings that the bankruptcy court may finally decide.

Hollins v. United States Department of Education (In Re Hollins) · filed 2002-11-22(b)(2)(I)

The determination of the discharge of a debt raises a core matter over which this court has jurisdiction to enter a final order or judgment. .28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(I) and 1334.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings.

Bryant v. Tilley (In Re Tilley) · filed 2002-11-25(b)(2)(I)

A proceeding to determine dischargeability of a particular debt is a core proceeding, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats determinations of the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

McKinnis v. McKinnis (In Re McKinnis) · filed 2002-12-06(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies determinations about the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings.

Monsanto Co. v. Trantham (In Re Trantham) · filed 2002-12-18(b)(2)(I)

By virtue of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), this is a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies determinations of the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings.

Mitcham v. U.S. Dep't of Ed. (In Re Mitcham) · filed 2003-01-15(b)(2)(I)

Under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), a determination as to the dischargeability of a particular debt is a core proceeding. Thus, this matter is a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats dischargeability actions as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may finally decide.

Graffice v. Grim (In Re Grim) · filed 2003-02-05(b)(2)(I)

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), this type of action is deemed a core proceeding over which this Court has been conferred with the jurisdictional authority to enter final orders.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies determinations of the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings.

Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Blair (In Re Blair) · filed 2005-05-27(b)(2)(I)

Determinations regarding the dischargeability of particular debts are core proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) and considered matters of administration of the bankruptcy case.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies actions to determine the dischargeability of debts as core bankruptcy proceedings.

In re Sasson · filed 2005-09-13(b)(2)(I)

Actions seeking a determination of nondischargeability are core bankruptcy proceedings, see 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), and are not subject to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies proceedings to determine the dischargeability of a debt as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Sasson v. Sokoloff · filed 2005-08-24(b)(2)(I)

Actions seeking a determination of ...nondischargeability are core bankruptcy proceedings, see 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), and are not subject to the Rooker- Feldman doctrine.

Section 157 permits a bankruptcy judge to hear and determine a dischargeability proceeding when a state court has already liquidated the underlying wrongful death damages.

Birdsall Ex Rel. Estate of Birdsall v. Tulloch (In Re Tulloch) · filed 2007-08-28(b)(1)

Exception-to-discharge adversary proceedings are “core proceedings” arising under title 11 and, as such, bankruptcy judges may “hear and determine” such matters and “enter appropriate orders and judgments” therein. ... This court thus has jurisdiction to hear and determine this adversary proceeding as to the dischargeability of the Birdsall debt, given that the state court has already liquidated the wrongful death damages.

Section 157(b) treats debt dischargeability determinations as core proceedings in which a bankruptcy court may enter final orders and judgments.

Gregory v. U.S. Department of Education (In Re Gregory) · filed 2008-04-01(b)(1), (b)(2)(I)

Determinations concerning the dischargeability of particular debts are deemed to be “core proceedings.” 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I). And as a “core proceeding,” Congress has conferred upon this Court jurisdiction to enter final orders and judgments. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a nondischargeability proceeding as core even when it includes a state law cause of action.

Gradco Corp v. Blankenship (In Re Blankenship) · filed 2009-06-08(b)(2)(I)

A state law cause of action does not change the substance of the proceeding from a core nondischarge-ability proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) does not cover a dispute solely about liability for a debt when the debt’s nondischargeability is undisputed.

Swain v. United States Department of Treasury (In Re Swain) · filed 2010-09-27(b)(2)(I)

Viewing the case in this light, the Court concludes that Ms. Swain is not seeking a “determination[ ] as to the dischargeability of [a] particular debt[ ]” within the meaning of § 157(b)(2)(I). Rather, in substance, Ms. Swain is seeking only a determination that she does not owe a debt to the IRS at all.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) and (J) treats proceedings to determine dischargeability of a debt and objections to discharge as core proceedings.

Farm Service Agency v. Jackson (In Re Jackson) · filed 2011-05-10(b)(2)(I), (J)

FSA’s complaint to determine dischargeability of its debt and objecting to Debtors’ discharge are core proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) & (J).

Section 157 treats claims concerning the dischargeability of debts as core bankruptcy proceedings.

In Re Demarco · filed 2011-06-28(b)(2)(I)

The Plaintiffs' nondischargeability claims are squarely within this Court's core jurisdiction.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) makes dischargeability determinations core proceedings in which a bankruptcy judge may enter a final judgment or order.

Nash-Bone v. Ramey (In Re Ramey) · filed 2011-06-27(b)(2)(I)

A determination of dischargeability is a core proceeding in which a final judgment or order may be entered by a bankruptcy judge. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) places claims concerning the dischargeability of particular debts within a bankruptcy court’s core jurisdiction.

Barnhart v. DeMarco (In re DeMarco) · filed 2011-06-28(b)(2)(I)

The Plaintiffs’ nondischargeability claims are squarely within this Court’s core jurisdiction.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of a debt as core proceedings in which the bankruptcy court may enter final judgment.

Bello Paradiso, LLC v. Hatch (In re Hatch) · filed 2012-02-12(b)(2)(I)

This adversary proceeding is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) in which the court may enter final judgment.

Section 157 treats proceedings to determine whether a creditor’s claim is dischargeable as core proceedings in which a bankruptcy judge may enter a final judgment.

Swimmer v. Moeller (In Re Moeller) · filed 2012-03-05(b)(2)(I)

The Court, however, independently evaluates the scope of its power and determines that such authority exists here. Under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1), bankruptcy judges can hear and enter final judgments in core proceedings arising under Title 11 or arising in a bankruptcy case. A case seeking to determine the dischargeability of a creditor’s claim is core; it arises under the Bankruptcy Code and can arise only in a bankruptcy case.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies determinations of debt dischargeability as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Collins v. Ryckman · filed 2012-04-19(b)(2)(I)

Thus, the matter currently before this Court is nondischargeability, a determination which is a core matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157 permits a bankruptcy court to issue proposed findings and conclusions for district court review in a core proceeding when it lacks constitutional authority to enter final judgment.

Kirschner v. Agoglia · filed 2012-05-09(b)(1)

To the extent that, as a result of Stern, the power of a bankruptcy court to issue a final judgment in those “core” cases involving “private rights” is no longer permissible, effect should be given to Congress’ clear intent that, whenever a bankruptcy court lacks the power to render a final judgment, it should render a report and recommendation.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of a particular debt as core proceedings.

Frost & Co. v. Smithey (In re Smithey) · filed 2012-07-06(b)(2)(I)

A proceeding brought to determine the dischargeability of a particular debt is deemed to be core proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I). Accordingly, this Court has the jurisdictional authority to enter final orders and judgments in this matter.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats determinations of the dischargeability of particular debts as core bankruptcy proceedings.

Ackerman v. Eber · filed 2012-07-09(b)(2)(I)

Second, in this case, we are not presented with some arbitratable and some non- arbitratable claims; rather, the lower courts concluded cor- rectly that Plaintiffs were trying to arbitrate dischargeability, a core matter which bankruptcy courts have special expertise to decide.

Section 157 treats a proceeding to determine whether a particular debt is dischargeable as a core proceeding in which a bankruptcy judge may enter final judgment after referral.

Quality Food Products, Inc. v. Bolanos (In re Bolanos) · filed 2012-07-30(b)(2)(I)

Under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1), a bankruptcy judge to whom a case has been referred may enter final judgment on any core proceeding arising under the Bankruptcy Code. The determination of the dis-chargeability of a particular debt — the subject of this adversary proceeding— arises under the Bankruptcy Code and is specified as a core proceeding under § 157(b)(2)(I). Accordingly, final judgment is within the scope of the bankruptcy court’s authority.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats determinations of dischargeability as core proceedings.

Infinity Group LLC v. Lucas (In re Lucas) · filed 2012-08-01(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(l). This is a final order.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as a core matter in which the bankruptcy court may enter final judgment.

Rose ex rel. Estate of Lee v. Davis (In re Davis) · filed 2012-08-02(b)(2)(I)

This is a core matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), and the Court will enter final judgment in this adversary proceeding.

A complaint to determine whether a debt is dischargeable is a core proceeding.

Synergeering Group, LLC v. Jonatzke (In re Jonatzke) · filed 2012-08-24(b)(2)(I)

Synergeering’s complaint for a determination of a non-dischargeable debt is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine the dischargeability of debt as core proceedings.

Liewehr v. Klauck (In re Klauck) · filed 2012-12-19(b)(2)(I)

It seeks to determine discharge-ability of debt and is therefore a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies nondischargeability proceedings as core bankruptcy matters.

Commercial Properties, LLC v. Aslansan (In re Aslansan) · filed 2013-04-10(b)(2)(I)

A nondischargeability proceeding “arises in” a bankruptcy case and is a core matter.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as a core bankruptcy matter.

Williams v. American Education Service (In re Williams) · filed 2013-05-13(b)(2)(I)

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff-Debtor’s complaint to determine dischargeability of a debt. This is a core matter within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine whether a particular debt is dischargeable as a core proceeding.

Cowart v. Elias (In re Elias) · filed 2013-07-03(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies proceedings to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as core proceedings.

Maas v. Northstar Education Finance, Inc. (In re Maas) · filed 2013-07-08(b)(2)(I)

This adversary proceeding is a statutory core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(l) (determinations regarding dischargeability of a debt).

Section 157 treats a proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a particular debt as a core proceeding in which a bankruptcy judge may enter final judgment.

Sullivan v. Glenn (In re Glenn) · filed 2013-11-15(b)(2)(I)

A bankruptcy judge to whom a case has been referred may enter final judgment on any core proceeding arising under the Bankruptcy Code or arising in a case under title 11. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1). A proceeding for determination of the dis-changeability of a particular debt arises in a case under title 11 and is specified as a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats determining a debtor’s liability and the amount of a debt in a dischargeability proceeding as a core matter within the bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction.

Wen Jing Huang v. Juan Juan Chen (In re Wen Jing Huang) · filed 2014-01-07(b)(2)(I)

Further, the Court rules that the determination of the amount of the debts, as well as the Debt- or’s liability therefor, which underlie the Plaintiffs’ nondischargeability Complaint, constitute core matters over which this Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334(b) and 157(b).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as core proceedings.

Shears v. Vestal (In re Vestal) · filed 2014-02-11(b)(2)(I)

This adversary proceeding is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157 permits a bankruptcy court to adjudicate a referred nondischargeability claim and enter a final order unless the district court withdraws the reference.

In re Philpott · filed 2014-03-11

Unless the district court withdraws the reference, the bankruptcy court has complete jurisdiction to adjudicate the nondischargeability claims and issue a final order in the case.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats proceedings to determine whether a particular debt is dischargeable as core proceedings.

Andrews v. Chamblee (In re Chamblee) · filed 2014-04-30(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding arising under Title 11 of the United States Code as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157 treats a complaint to determine the dischargeability of a debt as a core proceeding that a bankruptcy court may hear and finally determine.

Hot Shot Kids Inc. v. Pervis (In re Pervis) · filed 2014-05-29(b)(2)(I)

Since this is a request for judgment on a complaint to determine the dischargeability of certain debts, this is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), which the Court has authority to hear and finally determine under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats determinations of the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings in which a bankruptcy judge may enter final judgment.

Stallworth v. McBride (In re McBride) · filed 2014-06-18(b)(2)(I)

It is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) (core proceedings include determinations as to the discharge-ability of particular debts). This court accordingly has authority to enter final judgment in the matter. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats determinations of the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings in which a bankruptcy court may enter a final judgment.

H. Brooks & Co. v. Yerges (In re Yerges) · filed 2014-07-02(b)(2)(I)

Determinations as to the dis-chargeability of particular debts are core proceedings not constitutionally suspect under Stern v. Marshall, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2594, 180 L.Ed.2d 475 (2011). 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I). This Court has both the jurisdiction and the authority to enter a final judgment in this matter.

Section 157 treats actions to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. Ritz · filed 2014-07-14(b)(2)(I)

Actions to determine the dis-chargeability of a debt are core proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B),(I), and (O), and such determinations are exclusively within the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court.

Section 157 treats liquidation of a claim sought to be excepted from discharge as a core proceeding that the bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Harvey v. Dambowsky (In re Dambowsky) · filed 2015-01-07(b)(2)(I)

For the reasons set forth above, the act of liquidating the underlying claims that Plaintiffs seek to have declared nondischargeable is integral to determination of the dischargeability question itself, see, e.g., Van-Voegler v. Myrtle (In re Myrtle), 500 B.R. 441, 446 (Bankr.W.D.Va.2013) (and cases cited therein), and, entering a judgment liquidating the non-dischargeable claims is statutorily “core” under 28 U.S.C. § 157.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats an action to determine the dischargeability of a debt under § 523(a)(2) as a core proceeding.

Treehouse Studio, LLC, a Nebraska Limited Liabilit v. Bonnell · filed 2020-05-28(b)(2)(I)

An action to determine the dischargeability of a debt under section 523(a)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine whether a particular debt is dischargeable as a core proceeding in which the bankruptcy court may enter a final order.

Hutsell v. Allied Interstate · filed 2020-08-19(b)(2)(I)

This matter is a core proceeding and the court has authority to enter final orders. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157 classifies proceedings to determine the dischargeability of a debt as core proceedings that a bankruptcy judge may hear and determine.

Avila v. Long · filed 2020-08-28(b)(2)(I)

As a proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a debt, it is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I). Because it is a core proceeding, this Court has the statutory authority to hear and determine it under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1).

Section 157 permits a bankruptcy judge to hear a proceeding about whether a debt is dischargeable even when the debtor disputes that the debt exists.

Wizenberg v. Wizenberg · filed 2020-12-15(b)(1)

The bankruptcy court obviously had subject-matter jurisdiction to consider Howard’s adversary complaint seeking to exempt a debt from discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a).

Section 157(b) treats a proceeding to determine dischargeability as a core bankruptcy matter within the bankruptcy court’s statutory authority.

Econocare, Inc. v. Spyropoulos · filed 2021-07-19(b)

Regardless of the merits of the claim against CDBG1 or the bankruptcy court’s exercising jurisdiction over it, there is no doubt that Econocare has standing to assert a declaratory claim of nondischargability against Spyropoulos under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), and the bankruptcy court had jurisdiction—indeed, it had both constitutional and statutory authority—over that core bankruptcy matter.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) makes the dischargeability of a particular debt a core proceeding in which the bankruptcy court may enter final judgment.

Oil States Industries, Inc v. Nambakam · filed 2021-08-25(b)(2)(I)

Reference to the Court of this matter is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(a), and this is a core proceeding as contemplated by 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I). ... Debtor’s baffling position is of no consequence; the Court unquestionably has jurisdiction to enter a final judgment as to the dischargeability of his debts.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies proceedings to determine the dischargeability of debts as core proceedings.

Dixon v. Wilkerson, Jr. · filed 2022-09-16(b)(2)(I)

The counts set forth in the Complaint seeking a determination of the dischargeability of debts constitute core proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats a proceeding to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as a core bankruptcy proceeding.

Roth v. Butler Univ. (In re Roth) · filed 2018-11-16(b)(2)(I)

The issue of dischargeability is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), thereby satisfying Anderson and related cases.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) treats determinations of the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings.

Ogle v. Sigler · filed 2023-07-17(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) defines determinations of dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings.

Gabbert v. Stevens · filed 2023-07-21(b)(2)(I)

This matter is a core proceeding as defined under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I)(determination of dischargeability of debt).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) classifies determinations as to the dischargeability of particular debts as core proceedings.

Guse v. Carter · filed 2024-02-08(b)(2)(I)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) relating to this Court’s determination of the discharge of certain debts.

Section 157 treats actions to determine whether a debt is dischargeable as core proceedings in which the bankruptcy court may also liquidate the related claim.

In re: Victoria Marie Coopman · filed 2024-08-27(b)(2)(I)

“Actions seeking a determination that a debt is not dischargeable in bankruptcy are core proceedings.” Cowen v. Kennedy (In re Kennedy), 108 F.3d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1997) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I)). ... That is exactly what the bankruptcy court did in the present case: the bankruptcy court entered a final judgment determining both the amount of CapFlow’s damage claims against Coopman and the dischargeability of those claims.

Section 157(b)(2)(J) authorizes bankruptcy courts to decide defenses to objections to discharge.

Feldman v. American Asset Finance, LLC · filed 2015-07-14(b)(2)(J)

Rather, the Bankruptcy Judge in this ease had jurisdiction to decide Appellant’s defenses under another provision of § 157, specifically § 157(b)(2)(J), which identified “objections to discharges” as core proceedings. The necessary implication of that authority is the power to determine defenses to objections to discharge.

Section 157 treats objections to discharge as decisions by the bankruptcy judge, rather than recommended decisions for the district court.

Riggsby v. Riggsby · filed 1984-10-15(b)(2)(J)

The 1984 amendments--in this respect returning to the older practice--do create a class of matters in which the bankruptcy judge makes a recommended decision, see 28 U.S.C. Sec. 157(c), but objections to discharging the bankrupt are not within the class. They are appealable decisions if themselves final, see 28 U.S.C. Secs. 157(b)(2)(J), 158(a), and cast the district court in an appellate role.

Section 157(b)(2)(J) treats objections to discharge as decisions for the bankruptcy judge, rather than matters on which the judge merely makes a recommendation.

Suburban Bank v. Riggsby · filed 1984-10-15(b)(2)(J)

The 1984 amendments — in this respect returning to the older practice — do create a class of matters in which the bankruptcy judge makes a recommended decision, see 28 U.S.C. § 157(c), but objections to discharging the bankrupt are not within the class. They are appealable decisions if themselves final, see 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(J), 158(a), and cast the district court in an appellate role.

Section 157(b)(2)(J) treats a proceeding to deny discharge as a core proceeding that a bankruptcy judge may hear and determine after referral.

Mac Services of Baton Rouge, Inc. v. Short (In re Short) · filed 1985-02-20(b)(2)(J)

This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J); pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1), the Bankruptcy Judge for this district may hear and determine all core proceedings arising in a case under Title 11 referred under 28 U.S.C. § 157(a), and the Bankruptcy Judge may enter appropriate orders and judgments.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) and (J) authorizes a bankruptcy court to enter final judgment in proceedings concerning dischargeability and objections to discharge.

Skemp v. Michel (In Re Michel) · filed 1985-08-13(b)(2)(I) and (J)

This court is empowered, under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(a) and (b) and General Order 84 of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio to hear the within matter and, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) and (J), to enter á final judgment.

Section 157(b)(2)(J) classifies objections to discharge as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Morrison v. Howard (In Re Howard) · filed 1985-12-03(b)(2)(J)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J), which this court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(J) treats an objection to a debtor’s discharge as a core proceeding.

NCNB Financial Services, Inc. v. Shumate (In Re Shumate) · filed 1985-11-12(b)(2)(J)

The court finds this is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J).

Section 157(b)(2)(J) treats objections to discharge as core proceedings.

Connelly v. Shatkin Investment Corp. · filed 1986-01-10(b)(2)(J)

Objections to discharge are core-proceedings under the Bankruptcy Act, 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J), affording this court appellate jurisdiction over the matter and “castpng] the district court in an appellate court role.” Matter of Riggsby, 745 F.2d 1153, 1155 (7th Cir.1984).

A proceeding to deny a debtor’s discharge is a core proceeding that a bankruptcy judge may hear and determine and in which the judge may enter judgment.

Pietri v. Pietri (In Re Pietri) · filed 1986-02-25(b)(2)(J)

This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J); pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1), the Bankruptcy Judge for this district may hear and determine all core proceedings arising in a case under Title 11 referred under 28 U.S.C. § 157(a), and the Bankruptcy Judge may enter appropriate orders and judgments.

Section 157(b)(2)(J) classifies objections to discharge as core proceedings.

United States Fidelity & Guaranty v. Delancey (In Re Delancey) · filed 1986-03-12(b)(2)(J)

This is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J).

Section 157 treats objections to a debtor's discharge as core proceedings that a bankruptcy judge may hear and determine and in which the judge may enter orders and judgments.

In Re Short · filed 1986-04-17(b)(2)(J)

This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J); pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1), the Bankruptcy Judge for this district may hear and determine all core proceedings arising in a case under Title 11 referred under 28 U.S.C. § 157(a), and the Bankruptcy Judge may enter appropriate orders and judgments.

Section 157 permits a bankruptcy court to hear an objection to discharge as a core proceeding.

Schultz v. Shapiro (In Re Shapiro) · filed 1986-04-18(b)(2)(d)

1. This court has jurisdiction of the subject and the persons of this case as a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(d).

Section 157(b)(2) governs which bankruptcy matters are core proceedings; the court classified this objection to discharge as core.

Scarsdale National Bank & Trust Co. v. Lubin (In Re Lubin) · filed 1986-06-02(b)(2)(d)

This is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(d).

Section 157(b)(2)(J) treats objections to discharge as core proceedings, and a hearing to impose sanctions for conduct in those proceedings is also core.

Chaudhry v. Usoskin (In Re Usoskin) · filed 1986-06-06(b)(2)(J)

Plaintiffs’ objections to the debtors’ discharge constituted a core proceeding squarely covered by 28 U.S.C. 157(b)(2)(J). Therefore, this hearing on sanctions is, likewise, a core proceeding.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) and (J) classify dischargeability determinations and objections to discharge as core bankruptcy proceedings.

First National Bank of Oelwein v. Holtz (In Re Holtz) · filed 1986-06-12(b)(2)(I), (J)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(b)(2)(I) and (J).

Section 157(b)(2)(J) makes objections to discharge core proceedings that bankruptcy judges may hear and determine.

Crawford v. Merino (In re Merino) · filed 1986-07-08(b)(2)(J)

Objections to discharge is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J). The instant case involving a complaint objecting to discharge. The court, therefore, finds that it has jurisdiction over this matter.

Section 157(b)(2)(I) and (J) treats proceedings concerning the dischargeability of a debt and objections to discharge as core proceedings.

Huntington National Bank v. Schwartzman (In Re Schwartzman) · filed 1986-07-17(b)(2)(I) and (J)

These two cases arise under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(a) and having been referred to this court are determined to be core proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I) and (J), in which the plaintiff, The Huntington National Bank (hereinafter Huntington Bank), requests an order of the court excepting from the discharge of defendant-debtor, Arnold I. Schwartzman (hereinafter Schwartzman), pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523 (1982), a debt based on three (3) promissory notes totaling $143,500, and denying a discharge to the defendant-debtor pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727 (1982).

Section 157 treats proceedings concerning dischargeability and objections to discharge as core bankruptcy proceedings.

United Bank of Denver v. Greenwalt (In Re Greenwalt) · filed 1986-07-31(b)(2)(I), (b)(2)(J)

This matter came on for trial before the Court on the complaints filed herein by the United Bank of Denver (“Bank”) and GATX Third Aircraft Corp. (“GATX”) objecting to the Debtor’s discharge herein pursuant to the provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 523 and § 727. This matter is a core proceeding pursuant to and within the meaning of 28 U.S.C., Sections 157(b)(2)(I) and (b)(2)(J).

Section 157(b)(2)(J) classifies objections to discharge as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Great American Insurance v. Nye (In Re Nye) · filed 1986-09-08(b)(2)(J)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J), which this court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats an objection to a creditor’s claim as a core proceeding that the bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

In re Air One, Inc. · filed 1986-11-13(b)(2)(B)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157 treats proceedings concerning dischargeability and objections to discharge as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Colonial Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Routon (In re Routon) · filed 1986-10-15(b)(2)(I), (J)

This is a “core proceeding” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), (J), which the Court may hear and determine.

Section 157(b)(2)(J) treats an objection to discharge as a core proceeding that a referred bankruptcy judge may hear and determine.

ITT Financial Services v. Corban (In Re Corban) · filed 1987-02-24(b)(2)(J)

This is a core proceeding as defined in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J); pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(1), the Bankruptcy Judge for this district may hear and determine all core proceedings arising in a case under Title 11 referred under 28 U.S.C. § 157(a), and the Bankruptcy Judge may enter appropriate orders and judgments.

Section 157(b)(2)(J) treats objections to discharge as core proceedings.

Norwest Bank Nebraska, N.A. v. Tveten (In Re Tveten) · filed 1987-02-27(b)(2)(J)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats objections to exemptions as core proceedings that a bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

In Re Mitchell · filed 1987-04-28(b)(2)(B)

This is a “core proceeding”, which the Court may hear and determine pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2)(B) treats objections to claims as core proceedings.

In Re R. Bastyr and Associates, Inc. · filed 1988-01-14(b)(2)(B)

This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B).

Section 157(b)(2)(J) permits a bankruptcy court to hear and determine an objection to discharge as a core proceeding.

Ledbetter v. Zaidan (In Re Zaidan) · filed 1988-06-02(b)(2)(J)

This is a core proceeding in which the Court is authorized to hear and determine all matters relating to this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J) and 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(3).

Section 157(b)(2)(I) and (J) classifies this adversary proceeding objecting to discharge as a core proceeding.

Soft Sheen Products, Inc. v. Johnson (In Re Johnson) · filed 1988-07-27(b)(2)(I), (J)

This adversary proceeding constitutes a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I), (J).

Section 157(b)(2)(J) treats a proceeding to revoke a debtor’s discharge as a core proceeding that the bankruptcy court may hear and determine.

Roemelmeyer v. Rodriguez (In re Rodriguez) · filed 1988-09-19(b)(2)(J)

This is a core proceeding in which the Court is authorized to hear and determine all matters relating to this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(J).