Templates Tax Law Pennsylvania Sales and Use Tax Protest — Petition for Reassessment / Petition for Refund

Pennsylvania Sales and Use Tax Protest — Petition for Reassessment / Petition for Refund

Ready to Edit

PENNSYLVANIA SALES AND USE TAX PROTEST — PETITION FOR REASSESSMENT / REFUND

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  1. Caption and Filing Information
  2. Petition for Reassessment (72 P.S. § 9701)
  3. Statement of Facts
  4. Issues Presented
  5. Argument — Substantive Tax Issues
  6. Argument — Wayfair / Economic Nexus Defense
  7. Petition for Refund (72 P.S. § 7253) — Alternative Form
  8. Relief Requested
  9. Hearing Request and Certification
  10. Pennsylvania Practice Notes
  11. Sources and References

1. CAPTION AND FILING INFORMATION

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE — BOARD OF APPEALS

PO Box 281021, Harrisburg, PA 17128-1021

Field Entry
Petitioner: [TAXPAYER FULL LEGAL NAME]
Sales Tax License No.: [####]
FEIN: [##-#######]
Tax Type: Sales and Use Tax (Article II)
Reporting Period(s) at Issue: [FROM __/__/____ TO __/__/____]
Notice / Assessment Number: [NOTICE NUMBER]
Mailing Date of Notice: [__/__/____]
Filing Deadline (90 days): [__/__/____]
Tax in Dispute: $[AMOUNT]
Interest / Penalty in Dispute: $[AMOUNT]
Total in Dispute: $[AMOUNT]
Petitioner's Address: [STREET, CITY, STATE, ZIP]
Authorized Representative: [NAME, FIRM, PA BAR NO.]

PETITION FOR REASSESSMENT — 72 P.S. § 9701

(or, in the alternative, PETITION FOR REFUND — 72 P.S. § 7253)


2. PETITION FOR REASSESSMENT (72 P.S. § 9701)

Petitioner, [TAXPAYER NAME], by and through undersigned counsel, hereby petitions the Department of Revenue Board of Appeals for reassessment of the Notice of Assessment identified above, pursuant to 72 P.S. § 9701 and 61 Pa. Code Chapter 7, and avers as follows.


3. STATEMENT OF FACTS

3.1. Petitioner is [a Pennsylvania-domiciled corporation / a Delaware corporation with PA sales tax license / a remote seller located in [STATE]], engaged in the business of [DESCRIBE BUSINESS — e.g., online retail of consumer electronics; SaaS provider; manufacturer of industrial machinery].

3.2. During the audit periods [__/__/____ through __/__/____], Petitioner reported and remitted Pennsylvania sales and use tax of $[AMOUNT] on Pennsylvania-sourced taxable receipts of $[AMOUNT].

3.3. On [__/__/____], the Department issued Notice of Assessment No. [####] asserting additional sales/use tax of $[AMOUNT], interest of $[AMOUNT], and penalty of $[AMOUNT], based on the following adjustments:

  • [Adjustment 1 — e.g., assessment of use tax on out-of-state SaaS purchases];
  • [Adjustment 2 — e.g., disallowance of resale exemption certificates];
  • [Adjustment 3 — e.g., reclassification of "manufacturing equipment" as taxable];
  • [Adjustment 4 — e.g., assertion of economic nexus pre-July 1, 2019];
  • [Adjustment 5 — e.g., disallowance of bad-debt deduction].

3.4. Petitioner timely filed this Petition within ninety (90) days of the mailing date of the Notice as required by 72 P.S. § 9701.

3.5. [ADDITIONAL OPERATIVE FACTS — e.g., audit period sales by month/quarter, exemption certificate detail, nexus computation, prior Department guidance relied upon].


4. ISSUES PRESENTED

4.1. Whether the Department erred in [describe issue, e.g., assessing use tax on the Petitioner's purchases of cloud-based software services].

4.2. Whether the Department erred in disallowing Petitioner's [resale exemption / manufacturing exclusion / dairy/farming exclusion / sale-for-resale] under 72 P.S. § 7201 and 61 Pa. Code § [####].

4.3. Whether Petitioner had nexus with Pennsylvania during the audit periods within the meaning of 72 P.S. § 7237 and the U.S. Constitution as construed in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., 138 S. Ct. 2080 (2018).

4.4. Whether the Department's imposition of penalty was contrary to law where Petitioner acted with reasonable cause and in reliance on Department guidance.


5. ARGUMENT — SUBSTANTIVE TAX ISSUES

A. Tax Reform Code Article II Limits Imposition to Enumerated Sales of Tangible Personal Property and Specifically Enumerated Services

5.1. The Pennsylvania sales tax is imposed by 72 P.S. § 7202 on the sale at retail of tangible personal property and specifically enumerated services. Services not enumerated in § 7201(k) are not subject to tax.

5.2. [Apply to facts — e.g., cloud-based SaaS where the customer accesses software hosted on third-party servers without taking delivery of any tangible medium is not "tangible personal property" within § 7201(m), and was not until amendment].

B. The Resale / Manufacturing / Other Statutory Exclusions Apply

5.3. Under 72 P.S. § 7201(k)(8), purchases for "manufacturing" are excluded from tax. Manufacturing is defined as the performance of an integrated series of operations which transforms or converts tangible personal property by physical or chemical means into a different form, composition, or character (61 Pa. Code § 32.32).

5.4. [Apply facts — e.g., Petitioner's [equipment] is used "predominantly and directly" in manufacturing within the integrated-plant test, and qualifies for the exclusion].

C. Resale Exemption Certificates Were Properly Obtained and in Good Faith

5.5. Vendors who accept a properly completed Pennsylvania Exemption Certificate (Form REV-1220) in good faith are relieved of liability under 72 P.S. § 7237(c) and 61 Pa. Code § 32.2. The Department may not retroactively void exemption certificates absent evidence of bad faith.

5.6. [Apply facts — exemption certificates produced in audit are facially valid and were accepted in good faith].

D. Bad-Debt Deduction

5.7. Under 72 P.S. § 7247.1 and 61 Pa. Code § 33.4, vendors are entitled to a refund or credit for sales tax remitted on accounts subsequently determined to be uncollectible and written off as bad debts for federal income tax purposes.

E. Penalty Abatement

5.8. Penalty under 72 P.S. § 7265 should be abated where the Petitioner acted with reasonable cause. Reliance on a written Department Bulletin (e.g., Bulletin [####]) or on a recognized industry practice constitutes reasonable cause precluding penalty.


6. ARGUMENT — WAYFAIR / ECONOMIC NEXUS DEFENSE

A. Pennsylvania's Economic Nexus Threshold Is $100,000 in PA Sales — and Only $100,000

6.1. Pursuant to PA Sales and Use Tax Bulletin 2019-01 (issued January 8, 2019; effective July 1, 2019) and the Department's authority under 72 P.S. § 7237, a remote seller has economic nexus and an obligation to collect Pennsylvania sales tax only if the seller's Pennsylvania gross sales exceeded $100,000 during the previous twelve calendar months.

6.2. Pennsylvania's threshold is GROSS-RECEIPTS-ONLY. Unlike South Dakota's Wayfair statute and the laws of many other states, Pennsylvania does NOT impose an alternative transactions-count threshold (e.g., 200 transactions). A remote seller below $100,000 in PA sales has no collection obligation regardless of transaction count.

6.3. [Apply facts — e.g., Petitioner's PA sales during the rolling 12-month look-back periods relevant to the audit were as follows: [TABLE]. In none of those periods did Petitioner exceed $100,000, and Petitioner therefore had no obligation to register or collect PA sales tax].

B. Pre-July 1, 2019 Assessments Are Foreclosed by Wayfair and Quill

6.4. To the extent the Department's assessment seeks tax for periods before July 1, 2019, no economic-nexus collection obligation existed under Pennsylvania law before that date. South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., 138 S. Ct. 2080 (2018), overruled Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992), but did not retroactively impose collection duties absent state legislation or formal guidance.

6.5. Pennsylvania's pre-Wayfair "Notice and Reporting" regime (Act 43 of 2017) was repealed and superseded by the Bulletin 2019-01 economic-nexus rule effective July 1, 2019. The Department lacks statutory authority to assert collection liability for periods before the effective date of Bulletin 2019-01 against sellers without physical-presence nexus.

C. Marketplace Facilitator Liability

6.6. Under Act 13 of 2019, marketplace facilitators with $100,000 or more in PA sales must collect on behalf of marketplace sellers (codified at 72 P.S. § 7213.1, § 7213.2, and § 7237). To the extent Petitioner's sales were made through a marketplace facilitator that has separately collected and remitted PA sales tax, double assessment is improper.

D. Constitutional Limits

6.7. Even after Wayfair, the Commerce Clause and Due Process Clause require "substantial nexus" before a state may compel collection. [Apply facts — e.g., Petitioner's de minimis PA contacts cannot support compulsion to collect during the audit periods].


7. PETITION FOR REFUND (72 P.S. § 7253) — ALTERNATIVE FORM

In the alternative, Petitioner petitions the Board of Appeals for refund of $[AMOUNT] in sales/use tax, plus interest at the statutory rate, paid on [__/__/____] for the periods [FROM __/__/____ TO __/__/____], pursuant to 72 P.S. § 7253.

7.1. Petitioner timely filed this Petition for Refund within three (3) years of actual payment of the tax as required by 72 P.S. § 7253.

7.2. The grounds for refund are: [STATE GROUNDS — e.g., tax remitted on transactions later determined to be exempt resale; tax paid on services not enumerated in § 7201(k); tax remitted on bad-debt accounts; tax paid by a non-nexus seller].

7.3. Refund is sought in the amount of $[AMOUNT], broken down by period as follows:

Period Tax Paid Amount Sought Basis
[Q# YYYY] $[####] $[####] [Basis]
[Q# YYYY] $[####] $[####] [Basis]

8. RELIEF REQUESTED

WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board of Appeals:

  • A. Reassess and reduce the liability asserted in Notice No. [####] to $[AMOUNT] or such lesser amount as the evidence supports;
  • B. Grant a refund in the amount of $[AMOUNT] plus statutory interest under 72 P.S. § 806.1;
  • C. Abate all penalty and interest associated with the disputed adjustments;
  • D. Determine that Petitioner had no collection obligation for periods prior to July 1, 2019 / for periods in which PA sales did not exceed $100,000;
  • E. Grant such other and further relief as the Board deems just and proper.

9. HEARING REQUEST AND CERTIFICATION

9.1. Hearing Request. Petitioner ☐ requests an oral hearing (virtual) ☐ waives oral hearing and requests decision on the written record.

9.2. Burden. Petitioner acknowledges the burden of proof under 61 Pa. Code § 7.16, except as to fraud.

9.3. Reservation of Rights to BFR / Commonwealth Court Appeal. Petitioner reserves the right to petition the Board of Finance and Revenue under 72 P.S. § 9702 within ninety (90) days of any adverse BOA decision, and thereafter to appeal to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania under 72 P.S. § 9703 and Pa. R.A.P. 1571 within thirty (30) days of any adverse BFR determination.

9.4. Certification. I, [NAME], certify under penalty of perjury (18 Pa. C.S. § 4904) that the facts stated in this Petition are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that this Petition is not interposed for delay.

Date: [__/__/____]

Signature: [________________________________]

[PETITIONER / AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE NAME]

PA Bar No. / PTIN: [________________________________]


10. PENNSYLVANIA PRACTICE NOTES

  • Two-stage administrative appeal. Sales/use tax disputes follow the same BOA → BFR → Commonwealth Court chain as PIT and CNIT. See state_income_tax_protest.md in this directory for the full procedural narrative. The 90-day BOA and 90-day BFR deadlines (post-Act 123 of 2024) apply to assessments issued on or after January 27, 2025.
  • Threshold = $100,000 only. Pennsylvania's economic-nexus threshold is gross-receipts-only at $100,000 in PA sales over the prior twelve months. PA does NOT use a transactions-count alternative. This is materially different from many other states' Wayfair regimes and is an under-litigated defense.
  • Effective date of nexus rule. Bulletin 2019-01 took effect July 1, 2019. Periods before that date were governed by the pre-Wayfair physical-presence rule plus PA's 2017 "Notice and Reporting" regime (now repealed). Assessments asserting collection liability against pure remote sellers for pre-July 2019 periods are facially defective.
  • Marketplace facilitator. Act 13 of 2019 (effective July 1, 2019) shifted collection obligation to marketplace facilitators meeting the $100,000 threshold (72 P.S. §§ 7213.1, 7213.2, 7237). Marketplace SELLERS may exclude facilitator-collected sales from their own threshold.
  • Resale exemption certificates. Vendors are protected against retroactive disallowance when REV-1220 certificates are accepted in good faith (61 Pa. Code § 32.2). Establish a written exemption-certificate management procedure to support good-faith defense.
  • Manufacturing / processing / mining / dairying / farming exclusions. PA broadly excludes from tax purchases used "predominantly and directly" in these activities (72 P.S. § 7201(c), (d)(8), (k)). These exclusions are heavily fact-dependent and often the largest dollar issue in PA sales/use audits.
  • Local taxes. Philadelphia (1% local sales tax + hotel occupancy) and Allegheny County (1% local sales tax + 7% hotel occupancy) impose additional taxes administered by PA Department of Revenue. Audit assessments may include local components — verify each computation.
  • Refund window. Three years from actual payment under 72 P.S. § 7253. This is the SAME forum (BOA) as a reassessment petition but a DIFFERENT statute, deadline, and burden framework. Track payment dates, not return-due dates.
  • Records retention. Sales/use tax records retained at least three years from end of calendar year (61 Pa. Code § 34.2; 72 P.S. § 7272) and within the Commonwealth absent prior written authorization.
  • Estimated assessments. Where records are inadequate, the Department may estimate liability; the burden then shifts to the taxpayer to disprove the estimate. Records preservation is therefore the foundation of any sales/use tax defense.

11. SOURCES AND REFERENCES

  • 72 P.S. § 7201 et seq. (Tax Reform Code Article II — Sales and Use Tax) — https://codes.findlaw.com/pa/title-72-ps-taxation-and-fiscal-affairs/pa-st-sect-72-7201/
  • 72 P.S. § 7237 (Collection — economic nexus authority)
  • 72 P.S. § 7253 (Petitions for refund — three-year limitation)
  • 72 P.S. § 7258 (Assessment limitations)
  • 72 P.S. § 7271, § 7272 (Records and estimated assessment)
  • 72 P.S. §§ 9701–9703 (Appeals chain)
  • 61 Pa. Code Ch. 31–60 (Sales and Use Tax regulations) — https://www.pacodeandbulletin.gov/
  • PA Sales and Use Tax Bulletin 2019-01 (economic nexus, effective July 1, 2019) — https://www.pa.gov/content/dam/copapwp-pagov/en/revenue/documents/taxlawpoliciesbulletinsnotices/taxbulletins/sut/documents/st_bulletin_2019-01.pdf
  • Act 13 of 2019 (marketplace facilitator legislation)
  • South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., 138 S. Ct. 2080 (2018)
  • Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992) (overruled by Wayfair)
  • PA Department of Revenue, Online Retailers — https://www.pa.gov/agencies/revenue/resources/tax-types-and-information/sales-use-and-hotel-occupancy-tax/online-retailers.html
  • PA Board of Appeals Online Petition Center — https://www.eservices.revenue.pa.gov/FileAnAppeal/
  • BFR Tax Appeal Portal — https://bfrtaxappealportal.patreasury.gov
  • PA Sales and Use Tax Audit Manual — https://www.pa.gov/content/dam/copapwp-pagov/en/revenue/documents/taxlawpoliciesbulletinsnotices/auditmanuals/documents/sut_audit_manual.pdf
  • Form REV-1220 (Pennsylvania Exemption Certificate)

Disclaimer: This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Sales and use tax appeal deadlines are jurisdictional and cannot be waived. A Pennsylvania-licensed attorney must review and customize this document before filing. Verify all citations and the controlling deadline shown on the Notice of Assessment before filing.

Ezel AI
Hi! Want this done for you? Tell me your situation and I'll fill in every section and tailor it to your state.
You get the finished Word & PDF in about 5 minutes. $49 for this document, or $249/mo for ongoing access. Want me to start?
AI Legal Assistant
Ezel AI
Hi! Want this done for you? Tell me your situation and I'll fill in every section and tailor it to your state.
You get the finished Word & PDF in about 5 minutes. $49 for this document, or $249/mo for ongoing access. Want me to start?

Insert Image

Insert Table

Watch Ezel in action (sample case)

All changes saved
Save
Export
Export as DOCX
Export as PDF
Generating PDF...
sales_use_tax_protest_pa.pdf
Ready to export as PDF or Word
AI is editing...
Chat
Review

Get your finished document

Filled in for your situation. Drafting from scratch takes hours; finish yours in about 5 minutes for $49.

  • Deep Legal Knowledge
    Understands case law, statutes, and legal doctrine specific to Pennsylvania.
  • Court-Ready Formatting
    Proper captions and local-rule compliance.
  • AI-Powered Editing
    Tailor every section to your case.
  • Export as PDF & Word
    Ready to file or send.
Secure checkout via Stripe
Need to customize this document?

About This Template

Tax law covers the paperwork that documents income, deductions, disputes, and settlements with the IRS and state tax authorities. Protests, offers in compromise, installment agreement requests, and appeals each have their own forms, supporting documentation, and strict deadlines. Well-prepared tax correspondence is often the difference between a negotiated resolution and an enforcement action with levies, liens, or penalties.

Important Notice

This template is provided for informational purposes. It is not legal advice. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.

Last updated: May 2026

Get your Pennsylvania Sales and Use Tax Protest — Petition for Reassessment / Petition for Refund, done and ready to use

Fill it in for your situation, adjust it for your state, and download the finished Word and PDF. Let the AI do it in about 5 minutes, or finish it yourself in the editor. Drafting this from scratch takes hours. Finish yours in about 5 minutes for $49, one time.