Construction Accident Complaint
CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENT PETITION
Table of Contents
- Caption
- Parties
- Jurisdiction and Venue
- Factual Allegations
- Count I — Negligence
- Count II — Premises Liability
- Count III — OSHA Violations
- Count IV — Product Liability
- Damages
- Jury Demand
- State-Specific Notes
Caption
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF [________________________________] COUNTY, MISSOURI
DIVISION [____]
CASE NO. [____]
| [PLAINTIFF NAME], | |
| Plaintiff, | |
| v. | |
| [GENERAL CONTRACTOR NAME], | |
| [SUBCONTRACTOR NAME], | |
| [PROPERTY OWNER NAME], | |
| [EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER NAME], | |
| Defendants. |
PETITION
Parties
-
Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF NAME] resides at [ADDRESS], [CITY], [COUNTY] County, Missouri [ZIP CODE].
-
Defendant [GENERAL CONTRACTOR NAME] is a [ENTITY TYPE] at [ADDRESS].
-
Defendant [SUBCONTRACTOR NAME] is a [ENTITY TYPE] at [ADDRESS].
-
Defendant [PROPERTY OWNER NAME] is a [ENTITY TYPE/INDIVIDUAL] at [ADDRESS].
-
Defendant [EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER NAME] is a [ENTITY TYPE] at [ADDRESS].
Jurisdiction and Venue
-
This Court has jurisdiction under Mo. Const. art. V, § 14.
-
Venue is proper in [COUNTY] County pursuant to RSMo § 508.010.
Factual Allegations
-
The construction project at [PROJECT ADDRESS], [CITY], Missouri, was managed by Defendant General Contractor.
-
Plaintiff was employed by [EMPLOYER NAME] and performing work on [DATE OF ACCIDENT].
-
On [DATE OF ACCIDENT], Plaintiff was [DESCRIPTION OF WORK ACTIVITY] when [DESCRIPTION OF ACCIDENT].
-
Plaintiff sustained injuries including [DESCRIPTION OF INJURIES].
-
Workers' compensation is the exclusive remedy against Plaintiff's employer (RSMo § 287.120). This action targets third parties under RSMo § 287.150.
Count I — Negligence
-
Plaintiff re-alleges all preceding paragraphs.
-
Defendants owed Plaintiff a duty of reasonable care.
-
Defendants breached their duty by:
☐ Failing to provide fall protection
☐ Failing to maintain scaffolding and platforms
☐ Failing to secure hazardous areas
☐ Failing to provide PPE
☐ Failing to implement safety plans
☐ Failing to train workers
☐ Failing to conduct inspections
☐ Failing to warn of hazards
☐ Failing to coordinate subcontractor work
☐ [OTHER SPECIFIC NEGLIGENCE]
- Defendants' negligence directly caused Plaintiff's injuries.
Count II — Premises Liability
-
Plaintiff re-alleges all preceding paragraphs.
-
Defendant Property Owner owed Plaintiff a duty as a business invitee.
-
Defendant Property Owner breached this duty by:
☐ Failing to maintain safe premises
☐ Failing to warn of hazards
☐ Retaining control over site safety
☐ [OTHER BREACHES]
- The premises condition directly caused Plaintiff's injuries.
Count III — OSHA Violations
-
Plaintiff re-alleges all preceding paragraphs.
-
Federal OSHA standards (29 CFR Part 1926) apply.
- Defendants violated:
☐ 29 CFR 1926.451 et seq. — Scaffolding
☐ 29 CFR 1926.501 et seq. — Fall protection
☐ 29 CFR 1926.1400 et seq. — Cranes and Derricks in Construction (Subpart CC)
☐ 29 CFR 1926.651 et seq. — Excavation
☐ [OTHER VIOLATIONS]
- These violations are evidence of negligence.
Count IV — Product Liability
-
Plaintiff re-alleges all preceding paragraphs.
-
Defendant Manufacturer designed, manufactured, and/or distributed [EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION].
-
The product was defective due to:
☐ Design defect
☐ Manufacturing defect
☐ Inadequate warnings
-
Under RSMo § 537.760 and Missouri common law (strict liability under Keener v. Dayton Electric Mfg. Co.), Defendant is liable.
-
The defective product directly caused Plaintiff's injuries.
Damages
- Plaintiff has suffered:
a. Past and future medical expenses;
b. Past and future lost wages and loss of earning capacity;
c. Physical pain and suffering;
d. Mental anguish and emotional distress;
e. Permanent disability and disfigurement;
f. Loss of enjoyment of life;
g. Loss of consortium (if applicable);
h. Punitive damages where Defendants demonstrated complete indifference to or conscious disregard for the safety of others (RSMo § 510.263);
i. All other compensatory damages.
Jury Demand
Plaintiff demands trial by jury on all issues pursuant to Mo. Const. art. I, § 22(a).
Prayer for Relief
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests judgment against Defendants for compensatory and punitive damages, costs, and such other relief as the Court deems just.
Respectfully submitted,
[________________________________]
[ATTORNEY NAME], Esq.
[BAR NUMBER]
[FIRM NAME]
[ADDRESS]
[CITY], Missouri [ZIP CODE]
[PHONE] | [EMAIL]
Attorney for Plaintiff
Date: [__/__/____]
State-Specific Notes — Missouri
Workers' Compensation Exclusivity (RSMo § 287.120):
- Exclusive remedy against employer; third-party claims under § 287.150
- Construction employers with ONE or more employees must carry workers' comp
- Employer/insurer has subrogation lien on third-party recovery
Comparative Fault (RSMo § 537.765):
- PURE comparative fault — plaintiff may recover even at 99% at fault
- Damages reduced by plaintiff's percentage of fault
Statute of Limitations:
- Personal injury: FIVE YEARS (RSMo § 516.120(4)) — among the longest in the nation
- Wrongful death: THREE YEARS (RSMo § 537.100)
- Workers' comp: TWO YEARS from injury
Damage Caps:
- No cap on compensatory damages in personal injury cases
- Punitive damages: limited and require clear and convincing evidence (RSMo § 510.263)
OSHA:
- Missouri does NOT have a state OSHA plan; federal OSHA applies
Court System:
- Circuit Court is the trial court of general jurisdiction
Sources and References:
About This Template
Personal injury cases are brought by people who were hurt because of someone else's carelessness: car crashes, slip and falls, defective products, and more. Demand letters, settlement agreements, and court filings in these cases have to document the injuries, the medical treatment, the lost income, and the exact legal basis for holding the other side responsible. Well-prepared paperwork is what drives higher settlements and forces insurers to take the claim seriously.
Important Notice
This template is provided for informational purposes. It is not legal advice. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Last updated: May 2026