Premises Liability Complaint
PREMISES LIABILITY PETITION — MISSOURI
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Caption
- Parties
- Jurisdiction and Venue
- Factual Allegations
- Duty of Care — Visitor Status
- First Cause of Action — Negligence (Premises Liability)
- Second Cause of Action — Failure to Warn
- Third Cause of Action — Negligent Maintenance
- Damages
- Jury Demand
- Prayer for Relief
- Verification
- State-Specific Notes
- Sources and References
1. CAPTION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF [COUNTY NAME / CITY OF ST. LOUIS]
STATE OF MISSOURI
| [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME], | Case No. [____________________] |
| Plaintiff, | |
| v. | PETITION |
| [DEFENDANT FULL NAME], | Division [____] |
| Defendant. |
2. PARTIES
-
Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME] ("Plaintiff") is an individual residing in [CITY], [COUNTY] County, Missouri.
-
Defendant [DEFENDANT FULL NAME] ("Defendant") is [an individual residing in / a corporation organized under the laws of / a limited liability company formed under the laws of] [STATE], and at all relevant times was the [owner / lessee / occupier / manager] of the real property located at [PROPERTY ADDRESS], [CITY], [COUNTY] County, Missouri (the "Premises"). Defendant may be served with process at [ADDRESS FOR SERVICE].
3. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
-
This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Mo. Const. art. V, § 14 and RSMo § 478.070.
-
Venue is proper in [COUNTY / CITY OF ST. LOUIS] pursuant to RSMo § 508.010 because [the cause of action arose in this county / Defendant resides in this county / Defendant has a registered agent in this county].
4. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
-
At all relevant times, Defendant [owned / leased / occupied / managed / controlled] the Premises located at [PROPERTY ADDRESS], [CITY], Missouri [ZIP CODE].
-
On or about [DATE OF INCIDENT], Plaintiff was [lawfully present on / entering / exiting] the Premises for the purpose of [PURPOSE OF VISIT].
-
At the time of the incident, there existed on the Premises a dangerous condition that involved an unreasonable risk of harm, specifically: [DESCRIBE DANGEROUS CONDITION IN DETAIL].
-
Defendant had [actual / constructive] knowledge of the dangerous condition because:
☐ Defendant created the dangerous condition.
☐ Defendant had actual knowledge of the condition through [DESCRIBE].
☐ The condition existed for a sufficient period of time that Defendant, by using ordinary care, should have discovered it.
☐ The condition was part of a recurring hazard known to Defendant.
-
Defendant failed to use ordinary care to remove, remedy, or warn of the danger.
-
As a direct result of the dangerous condition, Plaintiff [DESCRIBE INCIDENT] and sustained serious injuries.
5. DUTY OF CARE — VISITOR STATUS
- At the time of the incident, Plaintiff was [an invitee / a licensee] on the Premises.
If Invitee:
- Plaintiff entered the Premises at the express or implied invitation of Defendant for a purpose connected with the business conducted on the Premises. Defendant owed Plaintiff the highest duty of care: to keep the Premises in a reasonably safe condition, to exercise reasonable care to discover dangerous conditions, and to warn or protect invitees from such conditions.
If Licensee:
- Plaintiff entered the Premises with the consent of Defendant but not for a business purpose. Defendant owed Plaintiff a duty to warn of known dangerous conditions that were not open and obvious and to refrain from injuring Plaintiff by willful or wanton conduct.
6. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION — NEGLIGENCE (PREMISES LIABILITY)
(Against [DEFENDANT NAME])
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 13 above.
-
Defendant owed Plaintiff the duties described above.
-
Defendant breached these duties by [failing to maintain the Premises / failing to inspect / failing to repair / failing to warn].
-
Defendant's breach directly and proximately caused Plaintiff's injuries and damages.
7. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION — FAILURE TO WARN
(Against [DEFENDANT NAME])
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
-
Defendant knew or should have known of the dangerous condition.
-
Defendant failed to provide adequate warning to Plaintiff.
-
Defendant's failure to warn was a proximate cause of Plaintiff's injuries.
8. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION — NEGLIGENT MAINTENANCE
(Against [DEFENDANT NAME])
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
-
Defendant had a duty to properly maintain the Premises.
-
Defendant negligently failed to perform required maintenance, specifically [DESCRIBE].
-
Defendant's negligent maintenance was a proximate cause of Plaintiff's injuries.
9. DAMAGES
- As a proximate result of Defendant's negligence, Plaintiff has suffered the following damages:
a. Medical Expenses: Past and future reasonable and necessary medical expenses.
b. Lost Wages and Earning Capacity: Past and future loss of wages and earning capacity.
c. Physical Pain and Suffering: Past and future physical pain and suffering.
d. Mental Anguish: Past and future mental anguish and emotional distress.
e. Physical Impairment: Past and future physical impairment and disability.
f. Disfigurement: Past and future disfigurement.
g. Loss of Enjoyment of Life: Past and future loss of enjoyment of life.
h. Loss of Consortium: [IF APPLICABLE — Loss of consortium.]
i. Punitive Damages: [IF APPLICABLE — Where Defendant's conduct was willful, wanton, or malicious.]
10. JURY DEMAND
- Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues triable by jury.
11. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendant as follows:
- Compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial;
- Punitive damages [IF APPLICABLE] in an amount sufficient to punish and deter;
- Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest;
- Costs of suit;
- Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and equitable.
Respectfully submitted,
[LAW FIRM NAME]
By: ________________________________________
[ATTORNEY NAME], Mo. Bar No. [NUMBER]
[ADDRESS LINE 1]
[ADDRESS LINE 2]
[CITY], Missouri [ZIP CODE]
Telephone: [PHONE]
Facsimile: [FAX]
Email: [EMAIL]
Attorney for Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF NAME]
12. VERIFICATION
STATE OF MISSOURI
COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME]
I, [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME], being duly sworn, state that the facts set forth in the foregoing Petition are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
________________________________________
[PLAINTIFF FULL NAME]
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME on [DATE].
________________________________________
Notary Public
My Commission Expires: [DATE]
13. STATE-SPECIFIC NOTES
Visitor Classifications. Missouri bases premises liability on the status of the entrant: invitees (highest duty), licensees, and trespassers (lowest duty).
Pure Comparative Fault. Missouri follows pure comparative fault for negligence claims — a plaintiff can recover even if 99% at fault. Damages are reduced by the plaintiff's percentage of fault. RSMo § 537.765 codifies this for products liability; case law extends it to all negligence.
Five-Year Statute of Limitations. RSMo § 516.120(4) provides five years from the date of injury for personal injury claims — one of the longest in the country.
No Non-Economic Damages Cap (Negligence). Missouri does not cap non-economic damages in standard negligence cases. Caps apply only to medical malpractice.
Punitive Damages. Punitive damages are available where Defendant's conduct demonstrates willful, wanton, or malicious disregard. Missouri applies a clear and convincing evidence standard.
Government Claims. Sovereign immunity applies to the state and its subdivisions, with limited waivers under RSMo § 537.600 for dangerous conditions of public property and injuries from motor vehicles.
Open and Obvious Doctrine. Missouri recognizes the open and obvious defense, but it does not automatically bar recovery — it is one factor in the comparative fault analysis.
14. SOURCES AND REFERENCES
- RSMo § 516.120 — Five-year statute of limitations
- RSMo § 537.765 — Pure comparative fault
- RSMo § 537.345–537.348 — Recreational use immunity
- RSMo § 537.600 — Sovereign immunity waivers
- Harris v. Niehaus, 857 S.W.2d 222 (Mo. 1993) (premises liability elements)
About This Template
Personal injury cases are brought by people who were hurt because of someone else's carelessness: car crashes, slip and falls, defective products, and more. Demand letters, settlement agreements, and court filings in these cases have to document the injuries, the medical treatment, the lost income, and the exact legal basis for holding the other side responsible. Well-prepared paperwork is what drives higher settlements and forces insurers to take the claim seriously.
Important Notice
This template is provided for informational purposes. It is not legal advice. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Last updated: May 2026