Construction Accident Complaint - Delaware
Before filing: Under Del. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 3(a), file this complaint with a praecipe for issuance of process and the current Superior Court Civil Case Information Statement (CIS) on the court's form.
Spouse's claim: If the injured plaintiff's spouse seeks loss-of-consortium damages, join the spouse as a plaintiff and plead the spouse's claim in a separate count supported by its own facts and prayer for relief.
CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENT COMPLAINT — DELAWARE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Caption
- Parties
- Jurisdiction and Venue
- Factual Allegations
- Count I — Negligence
- Count II — Premises Liability
- Safety Facts Relevant to Negligence
- Scaffolding Facts Relevant to Negligence
- Count III — Third-Party Liability
- Count IV — Negligent Product Design, Manufacture, or Warning
- Damages
- Jury Demand
- Verification and Signature
CAPTION
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, IN AND FOR [COUNTY NAME] COUNTY
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME] | Plaintiff |
| v. | C.A. No. [________________________________] |
| [GENERAL CONTRACTOR NAME] | Defendant |
| [SUBCONTRACTOR NAME] | Defendant |
| [PROPERTY OWNER NAME] | Defendant |
| [EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER NAME] (if applicable) | Defendant |
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES — CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENT
COMES NOW the Plaintiff, [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME], by and through undersigned counsel, and for this Complaint against the Defendants states as follows:
PARTIES
-
Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME] is an individual residing at [PLAINTIFF ADDRESS], [CITY], Delaware [ZIP CODE], who was employed as a [JOB TITLE/TRADE] at the time of the incident described herein.
-
Defendant [GENERAL CONTRACTOR NAME] ("General Contractor") is a [CORPORATION/LLC/PARTNERSHIP] organized under the laws of [STATE OF INCORPORATION], doing business in Delaware, with its principal place of business at [ADDRESS].
-
Defendant [SUBCONTRACTOR NAME] ("Subcontractor") is a [CORPORATION/LLC/PARTNERSHIP] organized under the laws of [STATE OF INCORPORATION], doing business in Delaware, with its principal place of business at [ADDRESS].
-
Defendant [PROPERTY OWNER NAME] ("Property Owner") is [AN INDIVIDUAL RESIDING AT / A CORPORATION WITH ITS PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS AT] [ADDRESS].
-
Defendant [EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER NAME] ("Manufacturer") is a [CORPORATION/LLC/PARTNERSHIP] organized under the laws of [STATE OF INCORPORATION], with its principal place of business at [ADDRESS].
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
-
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action as it involves claims for damages arising from personal injuries.
-
The injury occurred at [PROJECT ADDRESS] in [COUNTY NAME] County, Delaware, and this action is filed in the Superior Court in that county. [STATE ANY ADDITIONAL FACTS AND AUTHORITY SUPPORTING COUNTY VENUE FOR THE DEFENDANTS AND CLAIMS SELECTED.]
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
-
At all times relevant hereto, Defendant General Contractor was engaged as the general contractor for a construction project located at [PROJECT ADDRESS], [CITY], Delaware [ZIP CODE] (the "Project Site").
-
At all times relevant hereto, Defendant Property Owner owned, controlled, and/or maintained the Project Site.
-
At all times relevant hereto, Defendant Subcontractor was engaged by the General Contractor to perform [DESCRIPTION OF SUBCONTRACTED WORK] at the Project Site.
-
Plaintiff was employed by [PLAINTIFF'S EMPLOYER NAME] as a [JOB TITLE/TRADE] and was assigned to work at the Project Site.
-
On or about [DATE OF ACCIDENT], at approximately [TIME], Plaintiff was performing [DESCRIPTION OF WORK ACTIVITY] at the Project Site when [DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ACCIDENT].
-
As a direct and proximate result of the accident, Plaintiff sustained severe and permanent injuries including but not limited to [DESCRIPTION OF INJURIES].
Worksite Safety Conditions
- At the time of the accident, the following worksite conditions existed at the Project Site, as applicable:
☐ Failure to provide adequate fall protection
☐ Unsafe scaffold erection or use
☐ Failure to provide proper safety equipment and/or personal protective equipment
☐ Failure to adequately train workers on safety procedures
☐ Failure to conduct safety inspections
☐ Failure to maintain equipment in safe working condition
☐ Conduct relevant to an identified, applicable construction safety standard: [STANDARD AND COVERED ACTOR]
☐ Other: [DESCRIBE]
COUNT I — NEGLIGENCE
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
-
Defendant [NAME] owed Plaintiff a duty of reasonable care arising from [SPECIFIC CONTROL, UNDERTAKING, OR OTHER BASIS FOR DUTY].
-
Defendant [NAME] breached that duty by the following acts or omissions within its responsibility:
a. Failing to implement and enforce adequate safety measures;
b. Failing to provide proper fall protection and safety equipment;
c. Failing to inspect and maintain the worksite;
d. Failing to warn of known hazards;
e. Failing to supervise construction work in a safe manner;
f. [ADDITIONAL SPECIFIC ACTS OF NEGLIGENCE].
- As a direct and proximate result of the identified defendant's negligence, Plaintiff suffered injuries and damages.
COUNT II — PREMISES LIABILITY
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
-
Defendant Property Owner owed Plaintiff a duty of reasonable care based on [FACTS SHOWING CONTROL OF THE CONDITION OR OTHER BASIS FOR DUTY].
-
Defendant Property Owner knew or should have known of the dangerous conditions and failed to correct, remediate, or warn.
-
As a direct and proximate result of Defendant Property Owner's breach of duty, Plaintiff suffered severe injuries and damages.
SAFETY FACTS RELEVANT TO NEGLIGENCE
-
The following facts supplement Count I only. They do not state a separate claim for damages under federal OSHA.
-
Defendant [NAME] [DESCRIBE SPECIFIC UNSAFE CONDUCT] while responsible for [IDENTIFY THE WORK OR CONDITION]. The applicable safety standard, if pleaded, is [EXACT PROVISION]; it governs [COVERED ACTOR, WORK, AND HAZARD] because [FACTS SHOWING COVERAGE].
-
The conduct described in paragraph 24 bears on the breach of the independent negligence duty alleged in paragraph 16, to the extent permitted by Delaware law. It does not automatically establish negligence or create an OSHA damages claim.
-
This conduct was a direct and proximate cause of Plaintiff's injuries as alleged in Count I.
SCAFFOLDING FACTS RELEVANT TO NEGLIGENCE
-
The following facts supplement Count I only.
-
Defendant [NAME] employed or directed [WORKER] in the erection, repair, alteration, or painting of [STRUCTURE] and furnished or erected [SCAFFOLDING OR OTHER DEVICE]. The facts bringing that conduct within 16 Del. C. § 7701 are [FACTS].
-
Defendant [NAME]'s specific unsafe conduct was:
a. Failure to construct scaffolding meeting statutory safety requirements;
b. Failure to provide a required safety rail on [SUSPENDED SCAFFOLDING / STATIONARY SCAFFOLDING MORE THAN 20 FEET HIGH], where the interior-room exception does not apply;
c. [ADDITIONAL SPECIFIC STATUTORY VIOLATIONS].
-
These facts bear on the independent negligence duty alleged in Count I, to the extent permitted by Delaware law; § 7701 does not itself establish that every named defendant owed the same duty.
-
This conduct was a direct and proximate cause of Plaintiff's injuries as alleged in Count I.
COUNT III — THIRD-PARTY LIABILITY
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
-
While workers' compensation provides the exclusive remedy against an employer under 19 Del. C. § 2304, Plaintiff retains the right to bring an action against third-party tortfeasors.
-
Defendants [NAMES] are third parties outside any employer status applicable to Plaintiff under 19 Del. C. § 2311 because [PLEAD EACH DEFENDANT'S CONTRACTING ROLE, COVERAGE, AND FACTS SUPPORTING THIRD-PARTY STATUS]. A defendant's absence from Plaintiff's direct payroll alone does not establish that status.
-
The workers' compensation carrier may assert subrogation/lien rights pursuant to 19 Del. C. § 2363.
-
As a direct and proximate result of these Defendants' negligent acts and/or omissions, Plaintiff suffered severe injuries and damages.
COUNT IV — NEGLIGENT PRODUCT DESIGN, MANUFACTURE, OR WARNING (IF APPLICABLE)
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
-
Defendant [MANUFACTURER NAME] designed, manufactured, and/or supplied [IDENTIFY EQUIPMENT OR PRODUCT] used at the Project Site. Defendant owed foreseeable users, including Plaintiff, reasonable care in [DESIGN / MANUFACTURE / WARNING] under the circumstances.
-
Defendant breached that duty by [DESCRIBE THE SPECIFIC DESIGN CHOICE, MANUFACTURING ERROR, OR INADEQUATE WARNING AND THE SAFER ALTERNATIVE OR WARNING THAT REASONABLE CARE REQUIRED]. The product was used in [DESCRIBE FORESEEABLE USE] when [DESCRIBE HAZARD AND ACCIDENT].
-
Defendant [KNEW / SHOULD HAVE KNOWN] of the hazard because [FACTS SUPPORTING NOTICE OR FORESEEABILITY, ESPECIALLY FOR A WARNING CLAIM].
-
Defendant's negligent conduct was an actual and proximate cause of Plaintiff's injuries and damages, including [DESCRIBE INJURY AND LOSS].
DAMAGES
- As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' acts and/or omissions, Plaintiff has suffered and continues to suffer the following damages:
a. Medical Expenses: Past and future medical expenses in an amount to be proven at trial;
b. Lost Wages: Past and future lost wages and loss of earning capacity;
c. Pain and Suffering: Physical pain and mental anguish, past and future;
d. Disability: Permanent disability and/or disfigurement;
e. Punitive Damages: Defendants' conduct was so willful, wanton, or reckless as to warrant punitive damages;
f. Other: [ADDITIONAL DAMAGES AS APPLICABLE].
JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment in Plaintiff's favor and against Defendants for:
a. Compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial;
b. Punitive damages as allowed by law;
c. Post-judgment interest as allowed by law and, if Plaintiff made a written settlement demand valid for at least 30 days before trial in an amount below the judgment, interest from the date of injury under 6 Del. C. § 2301(d);
d. Costs of this action;
e. Attorney's fees as allowed by law;
f. Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
VERIFICATION AND SIGNATURE
Respectfully submitted this [____] day of [__________], [________].
[________________________________]
[ATTORNEY NAME], Esq.
[FIRM NAME]
[ADDRESS]
[CITY], Delaware [ZIP CODE]
Telephone: [________________________________]
Email: [________________________________]
Delaware Bar No. [________________________________]
Attorney for Plaintiff
STATE-SPECIFIC NOTES — DELAWARE
Modified Comparative Negligence: Under 10 Del. C. § 8132, recovery is barred if the plaintiff's negligence is greater than the combined negligence of all defendants. Damages are reduced proportionately.
Workers' Compensation Exclusivity: 19 Del. C. § 2304 provides the exclusive remedy against employers. The carrier may assert subrogation/lien rights and join third-party suits (19 Del. C. § 2363). Evidence of employer negligence may be admitted for superseding/intervening cause issues. See Duphily v. Delaware Elec. Co-Op., Inc., 662 A.2d 821 (Del. 1995).
Scaffolding Safety: 16 Del. C. § 7701 contains specific requirements for scaffolding, railings, and construction safety.
Statute of Limitations: Two (2) years for personal injury. 10 Del. C. § 8119. If the defendant furnished construction, design, planning, supervision, or observation of an allegedly deficient nonresidential improvement, analyze § 8127's six-year outside limit and earliest-trigger rules. Section 8127 expressly excludes improvements used or intended primarily for residential purposes.
Safety Standards: Identify the actual covered actor and applicable worksite standard before relying on a regulation. Federal OSHA does not expand or reduce existing state-law rights, duties, or liabilities. 29 U.S.C. § 653(b)(4).
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It should be reviewed and customized by a licensed Delaware attorney before filing. All statutory citations should be verified for current applicability.
About this template
- Last updated
- October 26, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Delaware
- Category
- Personal Injury
Legal authority
- 10 Del. C. § 8119 (Statute of Limitations — 2 years)
- 10 Del. C. § 8132 (Modified Comparative Negligence)
- 19 Del. C. § 2304 (Workers' Comp Exclusivity)
- 19 Del. C. § 2311 (Contractor and contracting-entity employer status)
- 6 Del. C. § 2301(d) (Conditional interest on tort judgments)
- 19 Del. C. § 2363 (Workers' Comp Subrogation / Third-Party Lien)
- 16 Del. C. § 7701 (Scaffolding Safety)
- 10 Del. C. § 8127 (6-year outside limit for covered nonresidential improvements; primarily residential improvements excluded)
Personal injury cases are brought by people who were hurt because of someone else's carelessness: car crashes, slip and falls, defective products, and more. Demand letters, settlement agreements, and court filings in these cases have to document the injuries, the medical treatment, the lost income, and the exact legal basis for holding the other side responsible. Well-prepared paperwork is what drives higher settlements and forces insurers to take the claim seriously.
Not legal advice
This template is provided for informational purposes. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Checked against the law it cites
The statutes this template relies on are listed under Legal authority.
19 Del. C. § 2311(a)(1) (checked October 26, 2026): "Any contractor or subcontractor shall be deemed to be an employer. Any and all rights of compensation of employees of contractors or subcontractors shall be against the employer contractor or subcontractor and not against any other employer."
6 Del. C. § 2301(d) (checked October 26, 2026): "In any tort action for compensatory damages in the Superior Court or the Court of Common Pleas seeking monetary relief for bodily injuries, death or property damage, interest shall be added to any final judgment entered for damages awarded, calculated at the rate established in subsection (a) of this section, commencing from the date of injury, provided that prior to trial the plaintiff had extended to defendant a written settlement demand valid for a minimum of 30 days in an amount less than the amount of damages upon which the judgment was entered."
McGuckin v. PBF Energy, Inc., C.A. No. N25C-01-392 CLS (Del. Super. Aug. 5, 2025) (checked October 25, 2026): "In Delaware the ‘remedies for a sale of products in products liability cases are confined to sales warranty law, with no remedy outside the UCC.’"
Salinardo v. Bear Trap Spirits, Inc., C.A. No. S21C-06-021 RHR (Del. Super. Aug. 17, 2023) (checked October 25, 2026): "To establish a claim of negligence, Salinardo must prove the following: i) IHA owed a duty to her; ii) IHA breached its duty of care; iii) she suffered injuries and; iv) IHA’s breach was the actual and proximate cause of her injuries."
Draft your Construction Accident Complaint in the editor
Answer a few questions, let the AI editor draft each section from your answers, review it, and download Word and PDF. $99 one time, or $249 per month for every document and every Ezel app.