CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENT COMPLAINT — ALABAMA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Caption
- Parties
- Jurisdiction and Venue
- Factual Allegations
- Count I — Negligence
- Count II — Premises Liability
- Count III — OSHA Violations as Evidence of Negligence
- Count IV — Third-Party Liability
- Count V — Product Liability
- Damages
- Jury Demand
- Verification and Signature
CAPTION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF [COUNTY NAME] COUNTY, ALABAMA
[PLAINTIFF FULL NAME],
Plaintiff,
v. Civil Action No. [________________________________]
[GENERAL CONTRACTOR NAME],
[SUBCONTRACTOR NAME],
[PROPERTY OWNER NAME],
[EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER NAME] (if applicable),
Defendants.
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES — CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENT
COMES NOW the Plaintiff, [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME], by and through undersigned counsel, and for this Complaint against the Defendants states as follows:
PARTIES
-
Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME] is an individual residing at [PLAINTIFF ADDRESS], [CITY], Alabama [ZIP CODE], who was employed as a [JOB TITLE/TRADE] at the time of the incident described herein.
-
Defendant [GENERAL CONTRACTOR NAME] ("General Contractor") is a [CORPORATION/LLC/PARTNERSHIP] organized under the laws of [STATE OF INCORPORATION], doing business in Alabama, with its principal place of business at [ADDRESS].
-
Defendant [SUBCONTRACTOR NAME] ("Subcontractor") is a [CORPORATION/LLC/PARTNERSHIP] organized under the laws of [STATE OF INCORPORATION], doing business in Alabama, with its principal place of business at [ADDRESS].
-
Defendant [PROPERTY OWNER NAME] ("Property Owner") is [AN INDIVIDUAL RESIDING AT / A CORPORATION WITH ITS PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS AT] [ADDRESS].
-
Defendant [EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER NAME] ("Manufacturer") is a [CORPORATION/LLC/PARTNERSHIP] organized under the laws of [STATE OF INCORPORATION], with its principal place of business at [ADDRESS].
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
-
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action as it involves claims for damages in excess of the jurisdictional minimum of this Court.
-
Venue is proper in [COUNTY NAME] County pursuant to Ala. Code § 6-3-7 because [SELECT ONE]:
☐ A substantial part of the events giving rise to this action occurred in this County
☐ Defendant [NAME] maintains its principal office in this County
☐ Plaintiff resided in this County at the time of the incident and Defendant(s) do business in this County by agent
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
-
At all times relevant hereto, Defendant General Contractor was engaged as the general contractor for a construction project located at [PROJECT ADDRESS], [CITY], Alabama [ZIP CODE] (the "Project Site").
-
At all times relevant hereto, Defendant Property Owner owned, controlled, and/or maintained the Project Site.
-
At all times relevant hereto, Defendant Subcontractor was engaged by the General Contractor to perform [DESCRIPTION OF SUBCONTRACTED WORK] at the Project Site.
-
Plaintiff was employed by [PLAINTIFF'S EMPLOYER NAME] as a [JOB TITLE/TRADE] and was assigned to work at the Project Site.
-
On or about [DATE OF ACCIDENT], at approximately [TIME], Plaintiff was performing [DESCRIPTION OF WORK ACTIVITY] at the Project Site when [DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ACCIDENT, e.g., a scaffold collapsed, Plaintiff fell from an elevated work surface, was struck by falling materials, etc.].
-
As a direct and proximate result of the accident, Plaintiff sustained severe and permanent injuries including but not limited to [DESCRIPTION OF INJURIES].
Safety Violations
- At the time of the accident, the following safety violations existed at the Project Site:
☐ Failure to provide adequate fall protection
☐ Failure to erect proper scaffolding in compliance with OSHA standards
☐ Failure to provide proper safety equipment and/or personal protective equipment
☐ Failure to adequately train workers on safety procedures
☐ Failure to conduct safety inspections
☐ Failure to maintain equipment in safe working condition
☐ Failure to comply with applicable OSHA regulations (29 CFR 1926)
☐ Other: [DESCRIBE]
COUNT I — NEGLIGENCE
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
-
Defendants owed a duty of reasonable care to Plaintiff to maintain the Project Site in a reasonably safe condition and to conduct construction operations with due care for the safety of workers on the site.
-
Defendants breached their duty of care by:
a. Failing to implement and enforce adequate safety measures;
b. Failing to provide proper fall protection and safety equipment;
c. Failing to inspect and maintain the worksite;
d. Failing to warn of known hazards;
e. Failing to supervise construction work in a safe manner;
f. [ADDITIONAL SPECIFIC ACTS OF NEGLIGENCE].
- As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' negligence, Plaintiff suffered severe injuries and damages.
COUNT II — PREMISES LIABILITY
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
-
Defendant Property Owner, at all relevant times, owned, controlled, and/or maintained the Project Site and owed a duty to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition pursuant to Ala. Code § 6-5-410.
-
Defendant Property Owner knew or should have known of the dangerous conditions existing on the Project Site and failed to correct, remediate, or warn of such conditions.
-
As a direct and proximate result of Defendant Property Owner's breach of duty, Plaintiff suffered severe injuries and damages.
COUNT III — OSHA VIOLATIONS AS EVIDENCE OF NEGLIGENCE
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
-
At all relevant times, Defendants were required to comply with applicable occupational safety and health standards, including but not limited to:
a. 29 CFR § 1926.451 (Scaffolding);
b. 29 CFR § 1926.501 (Fall Protection);
c. 29 CFR § 1926.502 (Fall Protection Systems);
d. 29 CFR § 1926.20 (General Safety and Health Provisions);
e. [ADDITIONAL APPLICABLE OSHA STANDARDS].
-
Defendants violated the above-referenced OSHA standards, which constitutes evidence of negligence and breach of their duty of care owed to Plaintiff.
-
As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' violations of applicable OSHA standards, Plaintiff suffered severe injuries and damages.
COUNT IV — THIRD-PARTY LIABILITY
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
-
Pursuant to Ala. Code § 25-5-11, while workers' compensation provides the exclusive remedy against an employer, Plaintiff retains the right to bring an action against third parties who are jointly liable for Plaintiff's injuries.
-
Defendants [GENERAL CONTRACTOR NAME], [SUBCONTRACTOR NAME], and [PROPERTY OWNER NAME] are not Plaintiff's direct employer and are therefore subject to third-party liability for their negligent acts and/or omissions.
-
Defendants had a duty, independent of Plaintiff's employer, to ensure the safety of the Project Site and all workers thereon.
-
As a direct and proximate result of these Defendants' negligent acts and/or omissions, Plaintiff suffered severe injuries and damages.
COUNT V — PRODUCT LIABILITY (IF APPLICABLE)
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
-
Defendant Manufacturer designed, manufactured, distributed, and/or sold the [DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT/PRODUCT] that was in use at the Project Site at the time of Plaintiff's accident.
-
The [PRODUCT] was defective in its [DESIGN / MANUFACTURE / MARKETING (FAILURE TO WARN)] and was unreasonably dangerous for its intended use.
-
The defect in the [PRODUCT] was a proximate cause of Plaintiff's injuries.
-
At the time of the accident, the [PRODUCT] was being used in a manner reasonably foreseeable by the Manufacturer.
-
As a direct and proximate result of the defective [PRODUCT], Plaintiff suffered severe injuries and damages.
DAMAGES
- As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' acts and/or omissions, Plaintiff has suffered and continues to suffer the following damages:
a. Medical Expenses: Past and future medical expenses including hospitalization, surgeries, rehabilitation, and ongoing treatment in an amount to be proven at trial;
b. Lost Wages: Past and future lost wages and loss of earning capacity in an amount to be proven at trial;
c. Pain and Suffering: Physical pain and mental anguish, past and future;
d. Disability: Permanent disability and/or disfigurement;
e. Loss of Consortium: [SPOUSE'S NAME] has been deprived of the companionship, society, and consortium of Plaintiff;
f. Punitive Damages: Defendants' conduct was so willful, wanton, or reckless as to warrant the imposition of punitive damages pursuant to Ala. Code § 6-11-20;
g. Other: [ADDITIONAL DAMAGES AS APPLICABLE].
JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment in Plaintiff's favor and against Defendants, jointly and severally, for:
a. Compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial;
b. Punitive damages as allowed by law;
c. Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest;
d. Costs of this action;
e. Attorney's fees as allowed by law;
f. Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
VERIFICATION AND SIGNATURE
Respectfully submitted this [____] day of [__________], [________].
[________________________________]
[ATTORNEY NAME], Esq.
[FIRM NAME]
[ADDRESS]
[CITY], Alabama [ZIP CODE]
Telephone: [________________________________]
Email: [________________________________]
Alabama State Bar No. [________________________________]
Attorney for Plaintiff
STATE-SPECIFIC NOTES — ALABAMA
Contributory Negligence: Alabama is one of the few remaining jurisdictions that follows the contributory negligence rule. Any fault attributable to the plaintiff is a COMPLETE BAR to recovery. See Golden v. McCurry, 392 So. 2d 815 (Ala. 1980).
Workers' Compensation Exclusivity: Ala. Code Title 25, Chapter 5 provides that workers' compensation is the exclusive remedy against the employer. However, Ala. Code § 25-5-11 permits actions against third parties jointly liable for the injury.
Statute of Limitations: Two (2) years from the date of injury. Ala. Code § 6-2-38.
Punitive Damages Cap: Ala. Code § 6-11-21 caps punitive damages at the greater of three times compensatory damages or $1,500,000.
OSHA Evidence: OSHA standards are admissible as evidence of negligence but do not establish negligence per se. Renfro v. Georgia Power Co. (Ala. 1992).
Scaffolding/Elevation: Alabama has no specific scaffolding or elevation liability statute comparable to NY Labor Law § 240.
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It should be reviewed and customized by a licensed Alabama attorney before filing. All statutory citations should be verified for current applicability.
Need help customizing this document?
Get 3 days of intelligent editing. Tailor every section to your specific case.