Texas: Prejudgment Interest Rules
The short answer
Yes, but Texas's actual prejudgment-interest statute covers only wrongful death, personal injury, and property damage cases: interest is mandatory, runs at the same rate as postjudgment interest (either the parties' own contract rate or a floating rate tied to the prime rate, between 5% and 15% a year), and starts on the earlier of 180 days after the defendant received written notice of the claim or the date suit was filed. A breach-of-contract claim isn't covered by that statute at all. Texas courts instead award prejudgment interest on a contract claim as a matter of common law, using the same rate mechanism and a similar 180-day-after-breach starting point. Either way, interest is simple and never compounds.
| Governing law | Tex. Fin. Code ch. 304, Subch. B (§§ 304.101-.107, wrongful death/personal injury/property damage only); a contract claim instead gets common-law interest (Johnson & Higgins v. Kenneco Energy) |
|---|---|
| Interest rate | Same as the postjudgment rate: the contract's own rate (capped at 18%/yr) or a floating prime-rate-linked rate, floor 5%/cap 15% (§§ 304.002-.003) |
| When interest starts running | Wrongful death/PI/property damage: earlier of 180 days after written notice of the claim or the date suit is filed (§ 304.104); contract: 6 months after the date of breach (Johnson & Higgins) |
| Contract vs. tort claims | Same rate mechanism and a similar ~180-day deferred start for both, but tort runs on an actual statute (Subch. B) while contract runs on judge-made common law borrowing it by analogy |
| Mandatory or discretionary | Mandatory/as of right for both tracks; not left to a court's or jury's discretion |
| Simple or compound | Simple interest only; never compounds (§ 304.104; Johnson & Higgins expressly rejected daily compounding) |
| Claims against the government | A state contract claim resolved under Gov't Code ch. 2260's dispute process gets the same ch. 304 rate, but capped at 6%/yr (§ 2260.106) |
| Other exceptions | No interest on an award of future damages (§ 304.1045); a rejected written settlement offer can stop interest from accruing on the judgment or the offer amount (§§ 304.105-.107) |
Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →
The short answer
Texas is a genuine two-track state. If you're suing over a wrongful death, a
personal injury, or property damage, an actual statute — Finance Code
Chapter 304, Subchapter B — guarantees you prejudgment interest as a matter
of right, at a rate tied to the state's postjudgment interest rate, starting
well before you filed suit. If you're suing over a breach of contract
instead, that statute doesn't apply to you at all (it says so in its own
first section); Texas courts instead give you prejudgment interest through
judge-made common law, but — in one of the more practical quirks in Texas
law — that common-law rule ends up looking almost identical to the statute
in rate and timing, just without ever being written down as a statute
itself.
Requirements one by one
Governing law
Finance Code Chapter 304 governs "Judgment Interest" generally. Its
Subchapter B (§§ 304.101-304.107) is the ONLY part of Texas law that
directly creates a right to prejudgment interest, and by its own terms it
"applies only to a wrongful death, personal injury, or property damage
case" (§ 304.101). For a breach-of-contract claim, there's no comparable
prejudgment-interest statute — the right instead comes from the Texas
Supreme Court's common-law decision in Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v.
Kenneco Energy, Inc., 962 S.W.2d 507 (Tex. 1998), which borrows Chapter
304's own rate mechanism for a contract claim rather than creating a
separate one.
Interest rate
Both tracks end up at the same number. Under § 304.103, "the prejudgment
interest rate is equal to the postjudgment interest rate applicable at the
time of judgment." That postjudgment rate itself has two paths: if the
judgment is on a contract that itself provides for interest, the rate is
the lesser of the contract's own rate or 18% a year (§ 304.002); if not,
the rate floats with the Federal Reserve's prime rate, published monthly by
the state's consumer credit commissioner, with a floor of 5% a year and a
ceiling of 15% a year (§ 304.003). Johnson & Higgins held that a breach-
of-contract claim's prejudgment interest should be "calculated as simple
interest at the judgment rate provided in" this same statute, so a contract
plaintiff ends up subject to the identical rate rule as a personal-injury
plaintiff, just by a different legal route.
When interest starts running
For a wrongful death, personal injury, or property damage claim, § 304.104
starts the clock "on the earlier of the 180th day after the date the
defendant receives written notice of a claim or the date the suit is
filed," running through "the day preceding the date judgment is rendered."
For a breach-of-contract claim, Johnson & Higgins set a similar but
distinct trigger: prejudgment interest "begins to accrue six months after
the date of the breach" — measured from the breach itself, not from when
the defendant got notice or was sued.
Contract vs. tort claims
The two tracks are built to feel almost the same in practice — same rate
mechanism, simple interest only, and a deferred start date of roughly six
months — but they come from entirely different sources of law. Subchapter B
is an actual statute, and it applies ONLY to wrongful death, personal
injury, and property damage. A breach-of-contract claim gets prejudgment
interest only because the Texas Supreme Court chose, as a matter of
judge-made common law, to import the statute's rate mechanism by analogy.
That distinction matters at the margins — a claim that's neither a
covered tort nor a contract claim (for example, some equitable claims) may
not fit cleanly into either track, and courts resolve that gap case by
case under "general principles of equity."
Mandatory or discretionary
Both tracks are mandatory. Section 304.102 says plainly that "a judgment in
a wrongful death, personal injury, or property damage case earns
prejudgment interest" — not that a court may award it. Texas courts
describe prejudgment interest generally, including on the common-law
contract side, as available to a prevailing party "as a matter of course,"
not something left to a jury's or judge's discretion the way some other
states treat it.
Simple or compound
Both tracks are simple interest, with no compounding, and this was a
deliberate legislative and judicial choice. Section 304.104 says
prejudgment interest "is computed as simple interest and does not
compound." On the contract side, this was actually a change: the older
common-law rule from Cavnar v. Quality Control Parking, Inc., 696 S.W.2d
549 (Tex. 1985) had allowed prejudgment interest to compound daily, but
Johnson & Higgins discarded that approach and matched the statute's
simple-interest rule instead.
Claims against the government
Texas has a separate, dedicated prejudgment-interest rule for a contract
claim against a state agency that goes through the Government Code Chapter
2260 dispute-resolution process (the required pre-suit negotiation and
administrative-hearing track for state contract disputes). Section 2260.106
says that "Chapter 304, Finance Code, applies to a judgment awarded to a
claimant under this chapter, except that the applicable rate of interest
may not exceed six percent" — the same rate mechanism as everyone else, but
with a hard 6%-a-year ceiling that doesn't apply to a private defendant.
Other exceptions
Section 304.1045 flatly bars prejudgment interest "on an award of future
damages" — only past losses earn it. Sections 304.105-304.107 give a
defendant a real incentive to make an early written settlement offer: if
the eventual judgment doesn't beat the offer, prejudgment interest simply
stops accruing on the judgment (or on the offer amount, if the judgment
does exceed it) for as long as the offer remained open to accept.
What trips people up
The single biggest trap is assuming Chapter 304's prejudgment-interest
statute covers a contract dispute. It doesn't — read § 304.101 literally
and it only reaches "a wrongful death, personal injury, or property damage
case." A contract plaintiff who cites Subchapter B directly is citing the
wrong authority; the actual basis is the common-law rule from Johnson &
Higgins, which happens to borrow the same numbers.
The rate itself is a moving target, not a fixed number like several other
states use. Because it floats with the Federal Reserve's prime rate every
month (subject to the 5%/15% floor and ceiling), the "current" rate on the
day suit is filed may not be the rate that actually applies — § 304.103
locks in whatever the postjudgment rate is "at the time of judgment," which
could be years later and a different rate entirely.
The 180-day deferral is easy to miss on both tracks. Prejudgment interest
doesn't start on the date of injury or breach itself (except that the
contract common-law rule literally counts six months FROM the breach) — for
the statutory tort track, it's measured from written notice of the claim or
the filing of suit, whichever comes first, meaning a plaintiff who delays
sending a demand letter can accidentally delay when interest starts
running in their own favor.
Common questions
Does a Texas breach-of-contract judgment get prejudgment interest?
Yes, but not under the Chapter 304 prejudgment-interest statute itself,
which only covers wrongful death, personal injury, and property damage.
A contract claim gets prejudgment interest under a separate common-law
rule that uses the same rate.
What rate applies if my contract doesn't say anything about interest?
A floating rate tied to the Federal Reserve's prime rate, with a floor of
5% a year and a ceiling of 15% a year, published monthly by the Texas
Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner.
Can I get prejudgment interest on damages I haven't incurred yet?
No. Section 304.1045 bars prejudgment interest on an award of future
damages entirely.
Does prejudgment interest compound in Texas?
No. It's simple interest on both the statutory (tort) track and the
common-law (contract) track.
Statutes and sources
- Tex. Fin. Code § 304.101 — "This subchapter applies only to a wrongful
death, personal injury, or property damage case of a court of this
state." Accessed 2026-07-05:
https://codes.findlaw.com/tx/finance-code/fin-sect-304-101/ - Tex. Fin. Code § 304.102 — "A judgment in a wrongful death, personal
injury, or property damage case earns prejudgment interest." Accessed
2026-07-05: https://codes.findlaw.com/tx/finance-code/fin-sect-304-102/ - Tex. Fin. Code § 304.103 — "The prejudgment interest rate is equal to
the postjudgment interest rate applicable at the time of judgment."
Accessed 2026-07-05:
https://codes.findlaw.com/tx/finance-code/fin-sect-304-103/ - Tex. Fin. Code § 304.104 — "Except as provided by Section 304.105 or
304.108, prejudgment interest accrues on the amount of a judgment during
the period beginning on the earlier of the 180th day after the date the
defendant receives written notice of a claim or the date the suit is
filed and ending on the day preceding the date judgment is rendered.
Prejudgment interest is computed as simple interest and does not
compound." Accessed 2026-07-05:
https://codes.findlaw.com/tx/finance-code/fin-sect-304-104/ - Tex. Fin. Code § 304.1045 — "Prejudgment interest may not be assessed or
recovered on an award of future damages." Accessed 2026-07-05:
https://codes.findlaw.com/tx/finance-code/fin-sect-304-1045/ - Tex. Fin. Code § 304.105 — "(a) If judgment for a claimant is equal to
or less than the amount of a settlement offer of the defendant,
prejudgment interest does not accrue on the amount of the judgment
during the period that the offer may be accepted. (b) If judgment for a
claimant is more than the amount of a settlement offer of the defendant,
prejudgment interest does not accrue on the amount of the settlement
offer during the period that the offer may be accepted." Accessed
2026-07-05: https://codes.findlaw.com/tx/finance-code/fin-sect-304-105/ - Tex. Fin. Code § 304.002 — "A money judgment of a court of this state on
a contract that provides for interest or time price differential earns
postjudgment interest at a rate equal to the lesser of: (1) the rate
specified in the contract, which may be a variable rate; or (2) 18
percent a year." Accessed 2026-07-05:
https://codes.findlaw.com/tx/finance-code/fin-sect-304-002/ - Tex. Fin. Code § 304.003 — "(a) A money judgment of a court of this
state to which Section 304.002 does not apply, including court costs
awarded in the judgment and prejudgment interest, if any, earns
postjudgment interest at the rate determined under this section. (b) On
the 15th day of each month, the consumer credit commissioner shall
determine the postjudgment interest rate to be applied to a money
judgment rendered during the succeeding calendar month. (c) The
postjudgment interest rate is: (1) the prime rate as published by the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System on the date of
computation; (2) five percent a year if the prime rate ... is less than
five percent; or (3) 15 percent a year if the prime rate ... is more
than 15 percent." Accessed 2026-07-05:
https://codes.findlaw.com/tx/finance-code/fin-sect-304-003/ - Tex. Gov't Code § 2260.106 — "Chapter 304, Finance Code, applies to a
judgment awarded to a claimant under this chapter, except that the
applicable rate of interest may not exceed six percent." Accessed
2026-07-05:
https://law.justia.com/codes/texas/government-code/title-10/subtitle-f/chapter-2260/subchapter-c/section-2260-106/ - Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc., 962 S.W.2d
507, 532 (Tex. 1998) — holds that "prejudgment interest should be
calculated as simple interest at the judgment rate provided in
Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat. art. 5069-1.05, § 6 [now Finance Code ch. 304], and
that prejudgment interest on a breach of contract claim begins to accrue
six months after the date of the breach." Citation verified via
legalresearch.
Source links
Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.