Anti-SLAPP Laws in Nebraska

Short answer Yes, but Nebraska's statute is narrow. It covers a damages claim by a public permit or license applicant against someone whose speech or conduct relates to that application, and it gives a covered defendant an expedited motion to dismiss or preferred summary-judgment hearing. Costs and fees require a separate statutory claim and additional proof; the six sections provide no automatic discovery stay or special appeal right.
State
Nebraska
Statute checked
October 6, 2026
Sources
6 statutes

At a glance

Governing lawNeb. Rev. Stat. §§ 25-21,241 to 25-21,246, actions involving public petition and participation
What speech/conduct is protectedDamages claim by a public applicant or permittee materially related to the defendant’s reporting, comment, ruling, challenge, or opposition concerning the application or permission (§ 25-21,242)
Special motion to strike/dismissExpedited motion to dismiss or preferred summary-judgment hearing under §§ 25-21,245 to -246; no separately named special motion or automatic discovery stay in these sections
Burden of proofOn a motion to dismiss, plaintiff must show a substantial basis in law or substantial argument for changing law (§ 25-21,245); summary judgment also requires a substantial basis in fact and law, or such an argument (§ 25-21,246)
Attorney's feesDefendant may bring a separate statutory claim for costs and fees on proof the original action lacked a substantial basis in fact and law and a substantial argument for changing law; further damages require malicious purpose (§ 25-21,243(1))
Appeal rightsSections 25-21,241 to -246 state no special interlocutory appeal right
ExemptionsNo separate carve-out list; § 25-21,242 limits coverage to damages claims by a public applicant or permittee tied to the application or permission

Requirements one by one

Covered dispute

Nebraska's Legislature describes the law as protecting participation in government (§ 25-21,241). Its operative definition is precise: the claim must seek damages, be brought by a public applicant or permittee, and materially relate to the defendant's efforts to report on, comment on, rule on, challenge, or oppose the application or permission (§ 25-21,242). A permittee includes someone who sought a zoning change, lease, license, certificate, or another government entitlement.

Motion and proof

A covered defendant may move to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action. The court must grant the motion unless the plaintiff demonstrates a substantial basis in law or a substantial argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law, and the court must expedite the hearing (§ 25-21,245).

Summary judgment has a distinct test: the plaintiff must show a substantial basis in fact and law, or the same substantial argument for changing law. The court gives that hearing preference (§ 25-21,246). These sections specify no automatic discovery stay or special interlocutory appeal route.

What trips people up

Winning the motion does not itself trigger an automatic fee award. Section 25-21,243(1) authorizes the defendant to bring a claim for costs and fees only on a showing that the public-participation action lacked a substantial basis in fact and law and could not be supported by a substantial argument for changing law. Additional compensatory damages require proof that the original action was meant to harass, intimidate, punish, or maliciously inhibit petition, speech, or association rights.

A plaintiff seeking damages on the underlying claim faces another rule: when the truth or falsity of the communication matters, § 25-21,244(1) requires clear and convincing proof of knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard, in addition to the ordinary elements of the claim.

Common questions

Can a defendant seek statutory fees by counterclaim? Yes. Section 25-21,243(1) allows an action, claim, cross-claim, or counterclaim if its additional conditions are met.

Can someone connected to the permit applicant count as a permittee? Yes, if the person's interest, connection, or affiliation is materially related to the application or permission (§ 25-21,242(4)).

Statutes and sources

  • Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-21,241 — “The Legislature finds and declares that: (1) It is the policy of the state that the constitutional rights of citizens and organizations to be involved and participate freely in the process of government must be encouraged and safeguarded with great diligence. The information, reports, opinions, claims, arguments, and other expressions provided by citizens are vital to effective law enforcement, the operation of government, the making of public policy and decisions, and the continuation of representative democracy. The laws, courts, and other agencies of this state must provide the utmost protection for the free exercise of these petition, speech, and association rights; (2) Civil actions for damages have been filed against citizens and organizations of this state as a result of the valid exercise of their constitutional rights to petition, speech, and association. There has been a disturbing increase in such strategic lawsuits against public participation in government; (3) The threat of strategic lawsuits against public participation, personal liability, and burdensome litigation costs significantly chills and diminishes citizen participation in government, voluntary public service, and the exercise of these important constitutional rights. This abuse of the judicial process can and has been used as a means of intimidating, harassing, or punishing citizens and organizations for involving themselves in public affairs; and (4) It is in the public interest and it is the purpose of sections 25-21,241 to 25-21,246 to strike a balance between the rights of persons to file lawsuits for injury and the constitutional rights of persons to petition, speech, and association, to protect and encourage public participation in government to the maximum extent permitted by law, to establish an efficient process for identification and adjudication of strategic lawsuits against public participation, and to provide for costs, attorney's fees, and actual damages.” Source: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,241 (accessed 2026-10-06).

  • Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-21,242 — “For purposes of sections 25-21,241 to 25-21,246: (1) Action involving public petition and participation shall mean an action, claim, cross-claim, or counterclaim for damages that is brought by a public applicant or permittee and is materially related to any efforts of the defendant to report on, comment on, rule on, challenge, or oppose the application or permission; (2) Communication shall mean any statement, claim, allegation in a proceeding, decision, protest, writing, argument, contention, or other expression; (3) Government body shall mean a city, a village, a political subdivision, a state agency, the state, the federal government, or a public authority, board, or commission; and (4) Public applicant or permittee shall mean any person who has applied for or obtained a permit, zoning change, lease, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use or permission to act from any government body or any person with an interest, connection, or affiliation with such person that is materially related to such application or permission.” Source: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,242 (accessed 2026-10-06).

  • Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-21,243 — “(1) A defendant in an action involving public petition and participation may maintain an action, claim, cross-claim, or counterclaim to recover damages, including costs and attorney's fees, from any person who commenced or continued such action. Costs and attorney's fees may be recovered upon a demonstration that the action involving public petition and participation was commenced or continued without a substantial basis in fact and law and could not be supported by a substantial argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law. Other compensatory damages may only be recovered upon an additional demonstration that the action involving public petition and participation was commenced or continued for the purpose of harassing, intimidating, punishing, or otherwise maliciously inhibiting the free exercise of petition, speech, or association rights. (2) The right to bring an action, claim, cross-claim, or counterclaim under this section may be waived only if it is waived specifically. (3) Nothing in this section shall affect or preclude the right of any party to any recovery otherwise authorized by common law or by statute, rule, or regulation.” Source: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,243 (accessed 2026-10-06).

  • Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-21,244 — “(1) In an action involving public petition and participation, the plaintiff may recover damages, including costs and attorney's fees, only if he or she, in addition to all other necessary elements, has established by clear and convincing evidence that any communication which gives rise to the action was made with knowledge of its falsity or with reckless disregard of whether it was false, if the truth or falsity of such communication is material to the cause of action at issue. (2) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit any constitutional, statutory, or common-law protections of defendants to actions involving public petition and participation.” Source: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,244 (accessed 2026-10-06).

  • Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-21,245 — “A motion to dismiss based on a failure to state a cause of action shall be granted when the moving party demonstrates that the action, claim, cross-claim, or counterclaim subject to the motion is an action involving public petition and participation unless the party responding to the motion demonstrates that the cause of action has a substantial basis in law or is supported by a substantial argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law. The court shall expedite and grant preference in the hearing of such motion.” Source: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,245 (accessed 2026-10-06).

  • Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-21,246 — “A motion for summary judgment shall be granted when the moving party has demonstrated that the action, claim, cross-claim, or counterclaim subject to the motion is an action involving public petition and participation unless the party responding to the motion demonstrates that the action, claim, cross-claim, or counterclaim has a substantial basis in fact and law or is supported by a substantial argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law. The court shall grant preference in the hearing of such motion.” Source: https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=25-21,246 (accessed 2026-10-06).

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-21,241 · accessed 2026-10-06
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-21,242 · accessed 2026-10-06
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-21,243 · accessed 2026-10-06
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-21,244 · accessed 2026-10-06
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-21,245 · accessed 2026-10-06
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-21,246 · accessed 2026-10-06
This page is general legal information about a state's anti-SLAPP statute and its special motion procedure, not legal advice about your lawsuit. Whether specific speech or conduct qualifies for protection, and whether a motion will succeed, depends on case-specific facts and the state's case law interpreting the statute, neither of which this page covers. This is also one of the fastest-moving areas of state law right now, with several states enacting or amending an anti-SLAPP statute within the last two years. Verified against the official statute text on the date shown; confirm current law or consult a licensed attorney in the state before relying on it.

What does Nebraska law mean for your facts?

You just read the general rule. Ask your own question and see which parts of current Nebraska law apply to your situation, with citations you can check.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Starts from the statutes this survey is built on
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace