Idaho: Anti-SLAPP Laws

verified against the statute 2026-07-05 9 statute sources

The short answer

Yes. Idaho adopted the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (UPEPA), Idaho Code §§ 6-3901 to 6-3911, effective January 1, 2026 — Idaho had no anti-SLAPP statute before this (an earlier 2024 bill was rejected in the Senate). A defendant sued over a communication in a government proceeding, on an issue under government review, or over speech, press, petition, assembly, or association activity on a matter of public concern can file a special motion for expedited relief within 60 days of being served. Filing automatically stays discovery and other proceedings, the court must hold a hearing within 60 days and rule within 60 days of the hearing, and the court must dismiss the claim unless the plaintiff establishes a prima facie case on every element (or the claim otherwise survives ordinary dismissal/summary-judgment standards). The court must award the prevailing movant its costs, fees, and litigation expenses, a losing movant appeals as of right within 42 days, and an appeal automatically stays the whole case.

Governing lawIdaho Code §§ 6-3901 to 6-3911, the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (added 2025 Idaho Sess. Laws ch. 17 [S.B. 1001], signed 3/10/2025, effective 1/1/2026 — already in force). Idaho had no prior anti-SLAPP statute; an earlier attempt (2024 S. 1352) was rejected 20-15 in the Senate. No pending amendments found for the 2026 session
What speech/conduct is protectedBroad, standard UPEPA scope (§ 6-3902(2)): a communication in a legislative, executive, judicial, administrative, or other governmental proceeding; a communication on an issue under consideration or review in such a proceeding; or the exercise of the right of free speech, free press, assembly, petition, or association guaranteed by the U.S. or Idaho constitution, on a matter of public concern
Special motion to strike/dismissA 'special motion for expedited relief' (§ 6-3903), filed no later than 60 days after being served with the pleading asserting the covered claim (or later on a showing of good cause). Filing automatically stays all other proceedings between the parties, including discovery and any pending hearing or motion (§ 6-3904(1)); limited exceptions let the court hear unrelated motions or public-health-and-safety injunction requests, and let a party still voluntarily dismiss a claim (§ 6-3904(6)-(7)). The court may allow limited discovery only on a showing that specific information is necessary to the motion and not otherwise reasonably available (§ 6-3904(4)). The court must hold a hearing within 60 days of filing (§ 6-3905(1)) and rule within 60 days of that hearing (§ 6-3908)
Burden of proofTwo-step, evaluated on a summary-judgment-type record (§ 6-3906: pleadings, the motion, any response, and admissible evidence). Step one: the movant must show the Act applies (§ 6-3902(2)) and the responding party must fail to show an exemption applies (§ 6-3902(3)). Step two: the court must dismiss with prejudice if EITHER the responding party fails to establish a prima facie case as to each essential element of the claim, OR the movant separately shows the claim fails to state a cause of action or there's no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law (§ 6-3907(1))
Attorney's feesMandatory both ways, limited to costs and expenses 'related to the motion': the court SHALL award court costs, reasonable attorney's fees, and reasonable litigation expenses to the moving party if it prevails on the motion, or to the responding party if the responding party prevails AND the court finds the motion was frivolous or filed solely to delay the proceeding (§ 6-3910)
Appeal rightsThe moving party may appeal as of right from an order denying the motion in whole or in part, within 42 days of the order (§ 6-3909) — longer than the 30-day window some other UPEPA states use, so don't assume a uniform deadline across states. Filing an appeal automatically stays all proceedings between ALL parties in the case until the appeal concludes (§ 6-3904(3))
ExemptionsThree exemptions under § 6-3902(3): (1) a claim against a governmental unit or its employee/agent acting or purporting to act in an official capacity; (2) a claim BROUGHT BY a governmental unit or its employee/agent, acting in an official capacity, to enforce a law protecting against an imminent threat to public health or safety; and (3) a claim against a person 'primarily engaged in the business of selling or leasing goods or services' if the claim arises from a communication related to that person's own sale or lease of goods or services

Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →

The short answer

Idaho has an anti-SLAPP law now, but it's brand new. Idaho Code
§§ 6-3901 to 6-3911, the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act
(UPEPA), took effect January 1, 2026 — before that, Idaho had no
anti-SLAPP statute at all (a 2024 attempt was voted down in the Senate).
A defendant sued over a communication in a government proceeding, on an
issue under government review, or over protected speech, press,
petition, assembly, or association activity on a matter of public
concern can file a "special motion for expedited relief" within 60 days
of being served. Filing automatically pauses discovery and most other
proceedings. The court must hold a hearing within 60 days and rule
within 60 days after that. The claim gets dismissed with prejudice
unless the plaintiff can show a real case on every element, or otherwise
survive an ordinary dismissal or summary-judgment test. Whoever wins the
motion gets their costs, fees, and litigation expenses paid by the other
side. A losing defendant can appeal right away, within 42 days, and
that appeal automatically freezes the whole case.

Requirements one by one

Governing law

Idaho's anti-SLAPP statute is Idaho Code §§ 6-3901 to 6-3911, a version
of the Uniform Law Commission's Uniform Public Expression Protection Act
(UPEPA). The legislature passed it as Senate Bill 1001 in 2025; the
governor signed it March 10, 2025, and it became effective January 1,
2026. Idaho had never had an anti-SLAPP statute before this — an earlier
2024 bill covering similar ground was rejected by the state Senate.

What speech or conduct is protected

The Act covers a lawsuit based on a communication in a legislative,
executive, judicial, administrative, or other governmental proceeding; a
communication on an issue under consideration or review by one of those
bodies; or the exercise of your right to free speech, free press,
assembly, petition, or association on a matter of public concern. This
is the broad, standard UPEPA scope — it isn't limited to statements
addressed to government the way some older state laws are.

The special motion procedure

A defendant files a "special motion for expedited relief" no later than
60 days after being served with the pleading (or later, if the court
finds good cause). Filing the motion automatically stays discovery and
essentially all other proceedings between the parties — the stay isn't
something you have to ask for separately. A court can still hear
unrelated motions, requests for a public-health-or-safety injunction, or
let a party voluntarily dismiss a claim during the stay, and it can
allow limited discovery only if a party shows specific information is
genuinely necessary to the motion and isn't otherwise available. The
court must hold a hearing within 60 days of the filing and must rule
within 60 days after that hearing.

Burden of proof

The court works through two questions. First, the moving party has to
show the Act covers the claim, and the responding party has to fail to
show that an exemption applies. Second, the court must dismiss the claim
with prejudice if EITHER the responding party can't establish a prima
facie case on every essential element of the claim, OR the moving party
separately shows the claim fails to state a cause of action at all, or
that there's no genuine factual dispute and the moving party wins as a
matter of law. The court decides this on the pleadings, the motion
papers, and any evidence that would be admissible on a summary-judgment
motion.

Attorney's fees

Fee-shifting runs both directions, but only for costs tied to the
motion itself. If the moving party wins the motion, the court must award
it court costs, reasonable attorney's fees, and litigation expenses
related to the motion. If the responding party wins the motion instead,
and the court finds the motion was frivolous or filed only to delay the
case, the responding party gets the same kind of award.

Right to appeal

A moving party who loses the motion — in whole or in part — can appeal
as a matter of right, without waiting for the rest of the case to
finish. The appeal must be filed within 42 days of the order, which is
longer than the appeal window some other UPEPA states use, so don't
assume every UPEPA state gives you the same number of days. Filing that
appeal automatically pauses the entire case, for every party, until the
appeal is decided.

Exemptions

Three carve-outs remove a case from the Act's coverage entirely: a claim
against a government body or a government employee/agent acting in an
official capacity; a claim brought BY a government body or employee, in
an official capacity, to enforce a law protecting against an imminent
threat to public health or safety; and a claim against someone
"primarily engaged in the business of selling or leasing goods or
services" where the claim arises from a communication tied to that
person's own sale or lease of goods or services.

What trips people up

This law is brand new — there's essentially no Idaho case law yet
interpreting it.
Courts elsewhere applying the same UPEPA model text
may be persuasive, but Idaho's own appellate courts haven't weighed in.

The 42-day appeal window is longer than in some other UPEPA states —
don't assume a uniform deadline.
Miss your own state's specific
window and you lose the interlocutory appeal right even though the
underlying motion procedure looks identical from state to state.

The automatic discovery stay isn't absolute. A court can still allow
narrow, specifically justified discovery during the stay, and the stay
doesn't block unrelated motions or an emergency public-health-and-safety
injunction request.

Fee-shifting is limited to the motion itself, not the whole
lawsuit.
Win the special motion and you recover costs and fees "related
to the motion" — not necessarily everything you spent defending the
broader case if some claims survive.

Common questions

Does this cover a lawsuit over a comment I posted online criticizing a
local project?
Likely yes, if the comment concerns a matter of public
concern or a proceeding before a government body, and the lawsuit is
based on that comment.

Can I still be sued if I run a business and made a statement about my
own products or services?
The Act's business exemption only applies to
a claim against someone in the business of selling or leasing goods or
services where the claim arises from a communication about that sale or
lease — commentary unrelated to your own commercial transactions isn't
automatically excluded.

If my special motion is denied, do I have to wait until the whole case
is over to appeal?
No — you can appeal right away, within 42 days of
the order, and that appeal pauses the entire case until it's resolved.

Statutes and sources

  • Idaho Code § 6-3902(2)-(3) — "the provisions of this chapter shall
    apply to a cause of action asserted in a civil action against a person
    based on the person's: (a) Communication in a legislative, executive,
    judicial, administrative, or other governmental proceeding... The
    provisions of this chapter shall not apply to a cause of action
    asserted: (a) Against a governmental unit or an employee or agent of a
    governmental unit acting or purporting to act in an official
    capacity..." Source:
    https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title6/T6CH39/SECT6-3902/
    (accessed 2026-07-05).
  • Idaho Code § 6-3903 — "No later than sixty (60) days after a party
    is served with a complaint... that asserts a cause of action to which
    this chapter applies... the party may file a special motion for
    expedited relief to dismiss the cause of action or part of the cause
    of action." Source:
    https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title6/T6CH39/SECT6-3903/
    (accessed 2026-07-05).
  • Idaho Code § 6-3904(1), (3), (4) — "upon the filing of a motion
    pursuant to section 6-3903... All other proceedings between the moving
    party and responding party, including discovery and a pending hearing
    or motion, are stayed... if a party appeals an order ruling on a motion
    pursuant to section 6-3903... all proceedings between all parties in
    the action are stayed." Source:
    https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title6/T6CH39/SECT6-3904/
    (accessed 2026-07-05).
  • Idaho Code § 6-3905(1) — "The court shall hear a motion pursuant to
    section 6-3903... no later than sixty (60) days after filing of the
    motion, unless the court orders a later hearing..." Source:
    https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title6/T6CH39/SECT6-3905/
    (accessed 2026-07-05).
  • Idaho Code § 6-3907(1) — "the court shall dismiss with prejudice a
    cause of action, or part of a cause of action, if... the responding
    party fails to establish a prima facie case as to each essential
    element of the cause of action; or... there is no genuine issue as to
    any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a
    matter of law..." Source:
    https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title6/T6CH39/SECT6-3907/
    (accessed 2026-07-05).
  • Idaho Code § 6-3908 — "The court shall rule on a motion pursuant to
    section 6-3903... no later than sixty (60) days after a hearing
    pursuant to section 6-3905." Source:
    https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title6/T6CH39/SECT6-3908/
    (accessed 2026-07-05).
  • Idaho Code § 6-3909 — "A moving party may appeal as a matter of
    right from an order denying, in whole or in part, a motion pursuant to
    section 6-3903... The appeal shall be filed within forty-two (42) days
    after entry of the order..." Source:
    https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title6/T6CH39/SECT6-3909/
    (accessed 2026-07-05).
  • Idaho Code § 6-3910 — "the court shall award court costs,
    reasonable attorney's fees, and reasonable litigation expenses related
    to the motion: (1) To the moving party if the moving party prevails on
    the motion; or (2) To the responding party if the responding party
    prevails on the motion and the court finds that the motion was
    frivolous or filed solely with intent to delay the proceeding." Source:
    https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title6/T6CH39/SECT6-3910/
    (accessed 2026-07-05).
  • Idaho Code § 6-3911 — "This chapter shall be broadly construed and
    applied to protect the exercise of the right of freedom of speech and
    of the press, the right to assemble and petition, and the right of
    association..." Source:
    https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title6/T6CH39/SECT6-3911/
    (accessed 2026-07-05).

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

Idaho Code § 6-3902(2)-(3) · accessed 2026-07-05
Idaho Code § 6-3903 · accessed 2026-07-05
Idaho Code § 6-3904(1), (3), (4) · accessed 2026-07-05
Idaho Code § 6-3905(1) · accessed 2026-07-05
Idaho Code § 6-3907(1) · accessed 2026-07-05
Idaho Code § 6-3908 · accessed 2026-07-05
Idaho Code § 6-3909 · accessed 2026-07-05
Idaho Code § 6-3910 · accessed 2026-07-05
Idaho Code § 6-3911 · accessed 2026-07-05
This page is general legal information about a state's anti-SLAPP statute and its special motion procedure, not legal advice about your lawsuit. Whether specific speech or conduct qualifies for protection, and whether a motion will succeed, depends on case-specific facts and the state's case law interpreting the statute, neither of which this page covers. This is also one of the fastest-moving areas of state law right now, with several states enacting or amending an anti-SLAPP statute within the last two years. Verified against the official statute text on the date shown; confirm current law or consult a licensed attorney in the state before relying on it.