California: Anti-SLAPP Laws

verified against the statute 2026-08-13 8 statute sources

The short answer

Yes. California's anti-SLAPP law, Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16, lets a defendant move to strike a claim arising from protected speech or petitioning on a public issue, generally within 60 days after service. Filing the motion stays discovery; the plaintiff must show a probability of prevailing, and a prevailing defendant ordinarily receives attorney's fees and costs.

Ask Ezel about your situation

This is the general rule in California. Ask about your specific facts and see which parts of current California law apply, with citations to the statutes.

Governing lawCal. Code Civ. Proc. §§ 425.16-425.18; enacted in 1992; § 425.16 last amended by 2024 Cal. Stat. ch. 444, effective 1/1/2025
What speech/conduct is protectedBroad: statements before an official proceeding, statements about an issue under official review, public-forum statements on an issue of public interest, and other conduct furthering petition or speech rights on a public issue (§ 425.16(e)(1)-(4)); the section directs broad construction
Special motion to strike/dismissSpecial motion to strike within 60 days after service, or later in the court's discretion; hearing generally within 30 days after service of the motion (§ 425.16(f)); discovery automatically stayed on filing, with specified discovery available for good cause (§ 425.16(g))
Burden of proofThe challenged cause of action must arise from protected activity; the plaintiff must then establish a 'probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim,' based on pleadings and affidavits (§ 425.16(b))
Attorney's feesA prevailing defendant ordinarily receives mandatory fees and costs; a prevailing plaintiff receives them if the motion was frivolous or solely intended to delay (§ 425.16(c)); § 425.18 separately defines a SLAPPback action
Appeal rightsA grant or denial is appealable under § 904.1 (§ 425.16(i)); a denial resting on a § 425.17 exemption is excluded from that appeal route (§ 425.17(e))
ExemptionsPublic-prosecutor enforcement actions (§ 425.16(d)); qualifying public-interest actions and certain commercial representations (§ 425.17(b)-(c)), with carve-backs for specified media, expressive works, and government-funded nonprofits (§ 425.17(d))

Compare this rule across all 50 states + DC →

Requirements one by one

What activity can trigger the motion

Under § 425.16(e), four categories are covered: statements in an official proceeding;
statements connected to an issue an official body is reviewing; public-forum
statements on an issue of public interest; and other conduct furthering speech
or petition rights on a public issue. Its opening policy language says the
section “shall be construed broadly.”

Filing, hearing, and discovery

The ordinary filing window is 60 days after service of the complaint, though
the court may permit a later motion on terms it considers proper. The clerk
generally schedules the hearing no more than 30 days after service of the
motion. Filing stays discovery until notice of entry of the ruling; the court
may allow specified discovery on noticed motion and good cause.

Merits screen and fees

The defendant first connects the challenged cause of action to protected
activity. The plaintiff must then establish “a probability that the plaintiff
will prevail on the claim,” using the pleadings and supporting or opposing
affidavits. A prevailing defendant ordinarily receives fees and costs. A
prevailing plaintiff receives them only if the court finds the motion
frivolous or solely intended to cause unnecessary delay.

Appeals and exclusions

A grant or denial normally follows the appeal route in § 904.1. But §
425.17(e) removes that route when the denial rests on a § 425.17 exemption.
The core section also excludes specified public-prosecutor enforcement
actions. Section 425.17 separately excludes qualifying public-interest suits
and certain seller or lessor representations, subject to its media,
expressive-work, and nonprofit carve-backs.

What trips people up

The 2024 amendment matters even though the core procedure did not change.
Effective January 1, 2025, SB 577 updated § 425.16(c)(2)'s public-records
cross-reference. Describing the section as last amended in 2011 or 2014 is
therefore stale.

A SLAPPback uses different timing. Section 425.18 defines a SLAPPback as
a malicious-prosecution or abuse-of-process action arising from a claim
dismissed under § 425.16. Its special motion has a 120-day ordinary deadline,
with a possible six-month period and a narrower extraordinary-case route.

An exemption ruling changes the appeal analysis. A denial based on §
425.17 does not use the ordinary anti-SLAPP appeal provisions, even though
other grants and denials do.

Common questions

Does filing dismiss the claim immediately? No. Filing stays discovery;
the claim remains pending until the court rules.

Can the court permit discovery while the motion is pending? Yes. The
court may order specified discovery on noticed motion and good cause.

Does every losing movant pay the plaintiff's fees? No. The statute
requires a finding that the motion was frivolous or solely intended to delay.

Statutes and sources

  • Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.16(a)-(b) — “To this end, this section shall
    be construed broadly,” and the plaintiff must establish “a probability that
    the plaintiff will prevail on the claim.” Official Legislative Counsel bulk
    code

    (accessed 2026-08-13).
  • Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.16(c)-(g), (i) — fee shifting, the prosecutor
    exclusion, protected-activity categories, the 60-day filing period, 30-day
    hearing rule, discovery stay, and appeal provision. Official Legislative
    Counsel bulk code

    (accessed 2026-08-13).
  • Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.17(b)-(e) — public-interest and commercial-
    representation exemptions, carve-backs, and the exemption-denial appeal
    rule. Official Legislative Counsel bulk
    code

    (accessed 2026-08-13).
  • Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.18(b), (d) — SLAPPback definition and timing.
    Official Legislative Counsel bulk
    code

    (accessed 2026-08-13).

Source links

Every statute quoted above, linked, with the date we checked it.

Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.16 · accessed 2026-08-13
Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.17 · accessed 2026-08-13
Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.18 · accessed 2026-08-13
Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.16(a)-(b) · accessed 2026-08-13
Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.16(c)-(g) · accessed 2026-08-13
Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.17(b)-(e) · accessed 2026-08-13
This page is general legal information about a state's anti-SLAPP statute and its special motion procedure, not legal advice about your lawsuit. Whether specific speech or conduct qualifies for protection, and whether a motion will succeed, depends on case-specific facts and the state's case law interpreting the statute, neither of which this page covers. This is also one of the fastest-moving areas of state law right now, with several states enacting or amending an anti-SLAPP statute within the last two years. Verified against the official statute text on the date shown; confirm current law or consult a licensed attorney in the state before relying on it.

Get the answer for your situation

You just read how California handles this in general. Ask your specific question and see which parts of current California law apply to your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.