B.L. Harbert International, LLC v. Hercules Steel Co.
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
More on how this was screened
All 42 flagged citations have been read, and the confirmed treatment is listed below. Its narrow-review rule and warning about sanctions for baseless challenges remain in use.
42 later cases cite B.L. Harbert International, LLC v. Hercules Steel Co.; 42 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on B.L. Harbert International, LLC v. Hercules Steel Co.?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Abrogated
-
The Eleventh Circuit held that the judicially created grounds for vacating arbitration awards recognized in Harbert were no longer valid after Hall Street.
Frazier v. CitiFinancial Corp., LLC · Eleventh Circuit · filed
Although our prior precedents have recognized these three non-statutory grounds for vacatur, see B.L. Harbert Int’l, 441 F.3d at 910 ... We hold that our judicially-created bases for vacatur are no longer valid in light of Hall Street.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads B.L. Harbert International, LLC v. Hercules Steel Co. and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace