Case Citator › Colleen Macort v. Prem, Inc.

Colleen Macort v. Prem, Inc.

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Eleventh Circuit
Citation
208 F. App'x 781
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
104 of 104
Citing cases (total)
1,676
Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. Colleen Macort v. Prem, Inc. remains good law: every flagged citation has been read, and none adversely treated the decision. The citing opinions applied Macort's rules requiring de novo review of properly objected portions of a magistrate judge's report and clear-error review of unobjected portions.
More on how this was screened

Nearby uses of “overruled” disposed of litigants' objections, while the lone use of “abrogated” concerned state sovereign immunity under the ADA rather than Macort.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

1,676 later cases cite Colleen Macort v. Prem, Inc.; 104 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Colleen Macort v. Prem, Inc.?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 104 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Colleen Macort v. Prem, Inc. and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace