Case Citator › Robin v. Espo Engineering Corp.

Robin v. Espo Engineering Corp.

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Overruled in part
Court
Seventh Circuit
Citation
200 F.3d 1081
Decided
Confirmed treatments
1
Flagged citations read
37 of 37
Citing cases (total)
37
Treatment dates
2016

Status

Overruled in part
A reviewed court has overruled part of this case’s holding. Robin v. Espo Engineering Corp. was overruled in part on the use of a “convincing mosaic” as a required legal test in employment discrimination cases. All 37 flagged citations have been read; the confirmed treatment is listed below.
More on how this was screened

Later courts continue to apply Robin's separate rule that a party opposing summary judgment must offer evidence beyond the pleadings.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

37 later cases cite Robin v. Espo Engineering Corp.; 37 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Robin v. Espo Engineering Corp.?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

Treatments

Overruled in part

  • The Seventh Circuit overruled Robin to the extent it treated a “convincing mosaic” as a governing test for employment discrimination.

    Ortiz v. Werner Enterprises, Inc. · Seventh Circuit · filed

    Robin v. Espo Engineering Corp., 200 F.3d 1081, 1088–89 (7th Cir. 2000). ... We overrule the opinions in the previous paragraph to the extent that they rely on “convincing mosaic” as a governing legal standard.
    Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Robin v. Espo Engineering Corp. and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace