Case Citator › Richard S. Johnson v. Moises Quinones, M.D. Joseph Morris, O.D.

Richard S. Johnson v. Moises Quinones, M.D. Joseph Morris, O.D.

Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.

Good law
Court
Fourth Circuit
Citation
145 F.3d 164
Decided
Confirmed treatments
0
Flagged citations read
38 of 38
Citing cases (total)
38

Status

Good law
Every flagged citation to this case has been read, and none of them overrules, limits, or questions it. Richard S. Johnson v. Moises Quinones, M.D., and Joseph Morris, O.D., remains good law on this review. All 38 flagged citations have been read, and none of the citing opinions adversely treated its rule that medical negligence alone does not establish deliberate indifference without proof of a prison official's subjective awareness of a serious risk.
More on how this was screened

Later courts applied that rule; nearby references to overruling or abrogation concerned other decisions.

Every treatment on this page is written from the citing opinion itself, with a verbatim quote, never copied from a commercial citator. A citation flagged by our screen but not shown here was read and found not to weaken this case.

38 later cases cite Richard S. Johnson v. Moises Quinones, M.D. Joseph Morris, O.D.; 38 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.

Relying on Richard S. Johnson v. Moises Quinones, M.D. Joseph Morris, O.D.?

This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.

No reviewed court has overruled or limited this case.

Every one of the 38 flagged citations was read, and each turned out to be something other than adverse treatment: a routine application, a party's argument the court rejected, or the case itself discussing older law. That reading is the finding this page exists to report.

Does this case still carry your argument?

Describe your facts. Ezel reads Richard S. Johnson v. Moises Quinones, M.D. Joseph Morris, O.D. and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace