Troxel v. Granville
Is it still good law? What later courts have actually done to this case.
Status
6,989 later cases cite Troxel v. Granville; 192 of those citations sat close to treatment language and were flagged for reading, and all of them have been read. Citations that did not sit near treatment language were not flagged and were not read one by one, so a court that weakened this case without using any of that language would not appear here.
Relying on Troxel v. Granville?
This page shows what later courts did to it. Ask about your specific facts and see whether it still carries your argument, with citations you can check.
Treatments
Limited
-
The court declined to extend Troxel's parental-decision right to a parent's decision to waive a child's substantial future tort remedies.
Hojnowski v. Vans Skate Park · Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division · filed
Although we acknowledge that fundamental right to exist, as we must (see, e.g. Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 65-66, 120 S.Ct. 2054, 2060, 147 L.Ed.2d 49, 56-57 (2000)), we do not read the precedent defining that right (as does our colleague) as encompassing a decision such as this to forego substantial tort remedies, a decision that we find to be different from such fundamental concerns as establishment of a home, upbringing and education, religion, or medical care.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
Does this case still carry your argument?
Describe your facts. Ezel reads Troxel v. Granville and the cases that treated it, then tells you whether it still holds for your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace