Statute Annotations › Kansas › Kan. Stat. Ann. § 79-3606

Kan. Stat. Ann. § 79-3606

Sales exempt from retailers' sales tax: the cases that interpreted this section

Jurisdiction
Kansas
Case notes
26
Cited in passing
17
Citing cases indexed
112
Case dates
1973–2020
Screened through
2024-05-30
Checked for later law changes
2026-10-23
Courts' treatment: live
No reviewed case has held this section invalid, preempted, superseded or repealed.
This reflects what the reviewed cases said, not legislative action: a later amendment or repeal by the legislature would not appear here unless a reviewed case discussed it.

43 citing cases reviewed of 112 in the citation index: 26 interpreted the section (annotated below), 17 cited it only in passing. Cases filed after 2024-05-30 may not have been reviewed yet.

Have a situation under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 79-3606?

These notes show how courts have ruled. Ask about your specific facts and see which of these rulings apply, with citations you can check.

Later changes in law

Changes after the earliest notes below. A note stating a rule one of these changed is marked "Law changed since".

  • 2000 L. 2000, ch. 123, § 1 rewrote subsection (kk), replacing the former major-component test with an exemption for machinery integral or essential to an integrated production operation and its repair and replacement parts. Source
  • 2005-12-31 The agricultural-use exemption for natural gas, electricity, and heat delivered through mains, lines, or pipes in subsection (w)(2) expired; the separate farm-machinery exemption remains in subsection (t). Source
  • 2012 By the 2012 codification, subsection (b)(2) no longer listed furnishing water among the businesses excluded from the political-subdivision purchase exemption; the 1992 text applied in the City of Wichita decisions did. Source
  • 2012-01-01 Subsection (cc) changed eligibility for construction purchases from qualifying businesses or retail businesses to businesses meeting § 74-50,115(e); earlier retail-project decisions apply to the prior text. Source
  • 2024 L. 2024, ch. 94, § 5 added subsection (uuuu), exempting qualifying equipment, infrastructure, and services purchased for communications services, including telecommunications. Source
  • 2025 L. 2025, ch. 14, § 6 amended § 79-3602(l)'s educational-institution definition to use accrediting agencies recognized by the U.S. Department of Education instead of the former North Central Association criterion. Source

Political subdivision purchases and projects

Section 79-3606(b) considers the future use of building materials when deciding whether the governmental sales tax exemption applies to purchases for a taxable business.

Board of Park Commissioners v. State ex rel. Arnold · filed 1973-07-14(b)

Application of K. S. A. 1970 Supp. 79-3606 (b) to both consumables and building materials necessitates consideration of their future use as well as immediate use at time of purchase. This was the intent of the 1970 statute, which was clarified by 1971 amendments.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Section 79-3606(d) requires a project exemption certificate for a contractor to purchase materials tax-free for a political subdivision’s project, even when the contractor has no direct contract with the subdivision.

In Re Tax Appeal of Harbour Brothers Constr. Co. · filed 1994-11-04(d)

Neither the statute nor the regulations on project exemption certificates make any distinction among contractors, subcontractors, or repairmen based on whether they have a direct contract with the political subdivision. ... Because Harbour did not have a project exemption certificate for the Sandstone project, it was not entitled to purchase its materials for the project exempt from sales tax.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Law changed since The water-business exception applied in this decision to the 1992 text of § 79-3606(b)(2); water was no longer listed in that exception by the 2012 codification.

Section 79-3606(b)(2) does not allow a political subdivision to prorate the exemption for electricity used in its business of furnishing water to others.

In Re Tax Appeal of City of Wichita · filed 2002-12-06(b)(2)

We consider the language of the “except when” clause as making the entire subsection inapplicable when the political subdivision was in the business of furnishing water to others. The exception is phrased as “except when” not “except to the extent.” When the exception is in effect, “all sales of tangible personal property or service” are not exempt.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Law changed since Same change as noted above.

Section 79-3606(b)(2) denies the exemption when a political subdivision uses equipment in its water business, regardless of why it bought the equipment or whether the water department needed it.

In Re the Appeal of the City of Wichita · filed 2004-03-19(b)(2)

However, the question under K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 79-3606(b)(2) is not whether the computer equipment was purchased for the exclusive use of the political subdivision, but whether the political subdivision used the computer equipment in the business of furnishing water. It does not matter whether the water department actually needed the equipment to successfully bill its customers or for what purpose it was purchased; rather, it matters solely whether the water department used the equipment.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Property consumed or incorporated in production and services

Section 79-3606(m) exempts manufacturing materials that are consumed or dissipated within the time reasonably needed to complete production, including film, lithoplates, and developer used to print directories.

R. L. Polk & Co. v. Armold · filed 1974-11-02(m)

The entire process of manufacture occurs over a relatively short period of time, during which some consumption or dissipation takes place and after which the property or materials are rendered useless for all practical purpose. The manufacture is accomplished within a time reasonably requisite. Accordingly, we hold that the items are shown to have been immediately consumed within the purview of the exemption statute.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Section 79-3606(m)'s component-part exemption covers advertising supplements incorporated into newspapers, including supplements supplied by advertisers.

In Re the Appeal of K-Mart Corp. · filed 1985-12-06(m)

Advertising, whether run of the press, preprinted supplements provided by the newspaper or preprinted supplements provided by the advertiser, is a component part of the newspaper and we so hold.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Section 79-3606(n) does not exempt drill bits that may be reused in another well or casing and cement that remain part of the well.

In Re the Appeal of Angle · filed 1986-01-30(n)

Because drill bits may be used in the drilling of more than one well, this language appears to speak specifically against the application of the exception in this instance. ... It cannot be said, therefore, that the casing and cement were consumed in the drilling process itself. ... For the foregoing reasons, we hold that the district court did not err in finding that drill bits, casing and cement were not exempt from taxation under K.S.A. 79-3606(n).
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Section 79-3606(n) exempts catalysts consumed in refining; regeneration and reuse during the process do not prevent a catalyst from being immediately consumed.

In Re Tax Appeal of Derby Refining Co. · filed 1992-08-28(n)

The statute does not prohibit a finding that a catalyst is “consumed” in the refining process. The statute indicates a decision to exempt “consumables” as a class rather than through a listing of specific items. The general class defined does not exclude “catalyst” if the facts show it to be property which was “consumed” in the process.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Section 79-3606(n) exempts electricity used to blend, clean, dry, and aerate grain as property consumed in processing, refining, or compounding tangible personal property.

In Re Tax Appeal of Collingwood Grain, Inc. · filed 1995-03-10(n)

Electricity used by the taxpayers in blending, cleaning, drying, and aerating again is construed to be exempt from taxation under K.S.A. 79-3606(n) as property consumed in the “production, manufacture, processing, . . . refining or compounding of tangible personal property.”
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Section 79-3606(n) exempts electricity used to pressurize water to pumping stations when that pressurization is an integral part of producing the water for sale.

In Re Appeal of Water Dist. No. 1 of Johnson County · filed 1999-08-13(n)

In short, Collingwood Grain, K.A.R. 28-15-18(g), and the legislative history of K.S.A. 79-3606(n) clearly require the conclusion ... that the electricity used in pressurizing Taxpayer’s water to the pumping stations is tax exempt.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Section 79-3606(m) and (n) do not exempt a health club’s purchases that it consumes to maintain its facilities rather than consuming them in, or making them a component of, the taxable services sold to members.

In Re the Appeals of Genesis Health Clubs · filed 2009-07-02

Genesis Health Clubs (Genesis) appeals a summary judgment entered against it by the Kansas Board of Tax Appeals (BOTA), holding that certain purchases of tangible personal properly were not consumed in the providing of taxable services and therefore not exempt under K.S.A. 2008 Supp. 79-3606(n) and that such purchases also did not become an ingredient or component part of taxable services and therefore not exempt under K.S.A. 2008 Supp. 79-3606(m). We agree with BOTA and affirm the judgment against Genesis.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Section 79-3606(n) exempts electricity used to power dedicated HVAC units when the electricity is essential to and consumed in providing telecommunication services.

In re Tax Appeal of Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. · filed 2020-01-24(n)

In other words, under the plain language of K.S.A. 2018 Supp. 79-3602(dd)(2), the electricity used to power these dedicated units is "essential or necessary to" and "used in the actual process of" providing Southwestern Bell's telecommunication services. Thus, this electricity is exempt from sales tax under K.S.A. 2018 Supp. 79-3606(n).
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Isolated or occasional sales

The isolated or occasional sales exemption does not cover a finance company's recurring retail sales of repossessed property.

Personal Thrift Plan of Wichita, Inc. v. State · filed 1981-06-10(l)

We agree. The repossession of personal property and its subsequent disposal is certainly a part of the business of a finance company. A substantial part of such disposition was through retail sales. These sales cannot be considered to be “nonrecurring.”
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Educational institution exemption

Section 79-3606(c) extends the educational institution sales tax exemption to an association that acts as an extension of its member colleges and universities.

National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Kansas Department of Revenue · filed 1989-10-27(c)

We must conclude that the NCAA is but an extension of the member universities and colleges and there is no legislative intent that the extension should be denied the exemption available to the member colleges and institutions.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Law changed since L. 2025, ch. 14, § 6 replaced the former North Central Association criterion in § 79-3602(l) with recognition by the U.S. Department of Education; the note’s accreditation reference concerns the old text.

Section 79-3606(c) exempts qualifying purchases by a nonprofit educational institution; the institution need not itself be NCA accredited if its classes and courses meet NCA accreditation standards.

In Re the Appeal of Graceland College Center · filed 2008-10-31(c)

The plain language of the statute does not require the entity itself to be accredited by, or be a member of, the NCA. ... In this limited regard, we respectfully disagree with BOTA's overly restrictive interpretation of the operative statutes and conclude that SkillPath meets the criteria established for an educational institution and sales tax exemption under K.S.A.2007 Supp. 79-3602(l) and K.S.A.2007 Supp. 79-3606(c).
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Railroad rolling stock exemption

Section 79-3606(aa) does not exempt materials used to repair railroad work cars that support, but are not themselves used in, interstate commerce.

In re the Tax Appeal of Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. · filed 1993-01-08(aa)

The railroad work cars themselves are not used to transport people or goods in interstate commerce. The cars are used to do work so other ears can be used for such purposes. The materials in question are used to repair the work cars. This is too far removed to include the materials under the definition of “for use in interstate . . . commerce.”
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Agricultural use

Law changed since The agricultural-utility part of this ruling applies to the former exemption, which expired after December 31, 2005; the farm-machinery exemption continues in subsection (t).

Section 79-3606 treats a wholesale greenhouse growing ornamental plants as farming or an agricultural use for its farm machinery and utility exemptions.

In Re Tax Appeal of Alex R. Masson, Inc. · filed 1995-12-22(u), (x)

This case is clearly analogous to Benken in that KDR has attempted to limit the applicability of K.S.A. 79-3606 to only those crops grown for use as a food product or used in textile production. Using the common meaning of “agricultural use” and the definition provided by K.S.A. 79-1476, the terms “agricultural use” and “farming” would include operations such as petitioner’s.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Sales by Indian retailers

Section 79-3606 lists no general sales tax exemption for sales by Indian retailers.

Kaul v. Robert T. Stephan, Attorney General · filed 1996-04-30

Regarding K.S.A. § 79-3615; the provision which enumerates the type of sales that are excluded from the Kansas Retailers’ Sales Tax Act’s provisions nowhere refers to sales by Indian retailers among its scores of exemptions. See K.S.A. § 79-3606(a)-(ss).
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Manufacturing machinery and equipment

Law changed since L. 2000, ch. 123, § 1 replaced subsection (kk)’s former major-component test with the integrated-production-operation exemption and its repair-parts provision.

Under § 79-3606(kk), a machinery component qualifies as a “major component” when it is capitalized for federal income tax purposes.

In Re Tax Appeal of Alsop Sand Co., Inc. · filed 1997-11-14(kk)

The KDR maintains that it has established and published a “rule” which defines the phrase “major component” as those items which are capitalized for federal income tax purposes. ... We conclude that the KDR’s position is rationally related to the legislature’s objective to reduce the impact state taxation has on the production of goods. The KDR’s position and definition provides a bright line for business planning and leaves much of the classification to the taxpayer.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Law changed since Same change as noted above.

A manufacturing machinery component qualifies as a major component if its cost is capitalized and depreciated over several years; an expense deducted in the year incurred does not qualify.

In Re Tax Appeal of Alsop Sand Co., Inc. · filed 1998-07-10(kk)(2)(A)

Expenses that are deducted in the year incurred would not qualify as major components of manufacturing machinery or equipment for sales tax exemption. Capital expenditures that are depreciated over several years of a useful life would.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Section 79-3606(kk) exempts transportation equipment used in manufacturing only when it is used at the plant or facility; equipment used to manufacture elsewhere is taxable.

In Re the Tax Appeal of Geiger Ready Mix Co. · filed 1998-05-08(kk)(3)(C)

In reconciling the various provisions of the statute, we hold that if the manufacturing process takes place at a location other than the plant or facility, then such machinery and equipment is not exempt from sales tax and that only transportation equipment that is used at the plant or facility during the manufacturing process is exempt from taxation.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Law changed since L. 2024, ch. 94, § 5 added a separate communications-services exemption in subsection (uuuu); this decision addresses the earlier manufacturing exemption in subsection (kk).

Section 79-3606(kk) does not exempt equipment used to engineer or process telecommunications because telecommunications are services rather than tangible personal property.

In Re the Appeal of Sprint Communications Co., L.P. · filed 2004-12-17(kk)

Therefore, we conclude that equipment utilized in engineering a telecommunication product or in the process of controlling or measuring the telecommunication process is not exempt from sales taxation under the exemption provision of K.S.A. 79-3606(kk), which applies, in relevant part, to purchases of machineiy and equipment used in the manufacture of tangible personal property.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Section 79-3606(kk) does not exempt machinery and equipment used in a manufacturing process that takes place outside the plant or facility.

In Re Tax Appeal of Western Resources, Inc. · filed 2006-04-28(kk)

K.S.A. 79-3606(kk) must be interpreted strictly because it is a tax exemption statute and, under such an interpretation, if the manufacturing process takes place at a location other than the plant or facility, the sale of machinery and equipment which perform that process is not exempt from sales tax.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Section 79-3606(kk)(2)(D)(i) exempts oil and gas processing equipment only when it treats or prepares oil or gas after extraction from the earth; extraction equipment does not qualify.

In Re the Appeals of Edmiston Oil Co. · filed 2012-01-13(kk)(2)(D)(i)

But the statute includes as such processing only those operations where the oil or gas “that has been extracted from the earth” is subjected to such listed treatments or preparations. Our scrutiny of the uncontroverted facts fails to convince us that oil or gas “has been extracted” before it reaches the earth's surface, or that any of the listed treatments occur prior to the oil or gas actually reaching the surface. Thus, we conclude that the down-hole machinery and equipment, together with the pumping unit and related accessories, fail to satisfy the statutory exemption scheme.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Section 79-3606(kk)(2)(C) includes contiguous areas of a single, fixed manufacturing site where integrated production operations occur within the plant or facility.

In Re the Appeal of LaFarge Midwest/Martin Tractor Co. · filed 2012-03-02(kk)(2)(C)

The legislature obviously intended the defined boundaries of a manufacturing or processing plant or facility to extend beyond the area immediately surrounding the production line if there are contiguous areas at the single, fixed location where integrated production operations are conducted.
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →

Enterprise zone sales tax exemption

Law changed since From January 1, 2012, subsection (cc) uses different eligibility criteria for construction purchases; this decision applies the earlier retail-business provision.

Section 79-3606(cc) did not exempt construction purchases for a retail eye clinic whose sole facility did not qualify as the business headquarters of an enterprise.

In Re the Appeal of Genstler Eye Center & Clinic/Genstler Medical Care Facility · filed 2008-09-26(cc)

In order for a retailer to be considered a nonmanufacturing business, the facihty under construction or remodehng must be “the business headquarters of an enterprise.” ... We conclude BOTA did not err in its interpretation and application of the applicable statutory framework in denying a sales tax exemption to Genstler under K.S.A. 79-3606(cc).
Read the full opinion on CourtListener →
17 more cases cited this section only in passing

These cases mention the section without interpreting it (a string cite, a footnote, background). Listed so you can see the full citation record, not just the annotated rulings.

Sterling Drilling Co. v. Kansas Department of Revenue, the court cites § 79-3606(n) as context for deciding the scope of § 79-3603(p); it does not decide a rule under § 79-3606. opinion →
National Collegiate Realty Corp. v. Board of County Commissioners, this reports an agency determination; the court did not decide a rule under § 79-3606. opinion →
Kansas Power & Light Co. v. Aarens, the court held the § 79-3606(1) exemption argument moot, so it did not decide the section’s rule. Its further discussion begins conditionally, “Even if not moot.” opinion →
Attorney General Opinion No., this is an attorney general opinion, not a court's own decision. opinion →
Unified School District No. 229 v. State, the court describes a transfer under K.S.A. 72-6438 but decides no rule of § 79-3606. opinion →
In Re Tax Appeal of Taylor Crane & Rigging, Inc., the court decides the compensating use tax exemption under K.S.A. 79-3704; it mentions § 79-3606(f) only while describing Taylor’s argument. opinion →
Attorney General Opinion No., this is an Attorney General opinion, not a court's own decision. opinion →
Attorney General Opinion No., this is an attorney general opinion, not a court decision. It cites § 79-3606(b) only as an example while addressing mortgage registration fees. opinion →
Gull Laboratories, Inc. v. Utah State Tax Commission, Auditing Division, the court cites the Kansas provision only in an informational survey; its decision concerns Utah law. opinion →
In Re Tax Appeal of Atchison Cablevision Lp, the court says the § 79-3606(a) exemption argument is irrelevant and decides whether franchise fees are taxable gross receipts under other provisions. opinion →
Jensen v. Bouker, the court cites § 79-3606 only as an analogy while deciding a challenge to the drug tax; it does not decide this section’s rules. opinion →
Attorney General Opinion No., this is an Attorney General opinion, not a court's own decision. opinion →
In Re Tax Application of Lietz Constr. Co., the court uses § 79-3606(t) to interpret § 79-201j(a), without deciding § 79-3606's own rules. opinion →
In Re the Appeal of Goddard, the references to § 79-3606 appear in the taxpayers’ argument and descriptions of earlier decisions; this court decides the exemption under § 79-201j(a). opinion →
Attorney General Opinion No., the opinion expressly declines to decide the sales tax exemption question under § 79-3606(b). opinion →
In re Tax Appeal of Lowe's Home Centers, the citation appears in BOTA's ruling reported by the court, not in this court's own decision about § 79-3606. opinion →
Baker v. Kansas Secretary of State, the court decided federal jurisdiction under the Tax Injunction Act and comity, not the meaning or application of § 79-3606(c). opinion →

Which of these rulings fit your facts?

Describe your situation under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 79-3606. Ezel checks it against the cases on this page and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace