FEPA Discrimination Charge and Right-to-Sue Procedure — Washington
FEPA Discrimination Charge and Right-to-Sue Procedure (WASHINGTON)
Quick-Reference Summary
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Governing statute | RCW 49.60 (Washington Law Against Discrimination — WLAD) |
| FEPA agency | Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) |
| EEOC dual-file | Yes — Workshare Agreement (deferral state; 300-day federal SOL) |
| WSHRC administrative SOL | 6 months from last act (RCW 49.60.230(2)) |
| Pregnancy claim WSHRC SOL | 12 months |
| WLAD court SOL | 3 years from last act (Antonius v. King County, 153 Wn.2d 256 (2004); RCW 4.16.080(2)) |
| Private right of action | Yes — RCW 49.60.030(2); no right-to-sue letter required |
| Employer coverage | 8+ employees (RCW 49.60.040(11)); religious nonprofits excluded |
| Protected classes | Race (incl. hair texture/protective hairstyles), creed (religion), color, national origin, citizenship/immigration status, sex (incl. pregnancy), marital status, age 40+, sensory/mental/physical disability, use of service animal, HIV/AIDS/Hep C, sexual orientation, gender identity/expression, honorably discharged veteran/military status, state-employee/healthcare whistleblower, opposition to discriminatory practice |
| Damages — court | Compensatory (no cap), back pay, front pay, equitable relief, attorney's fees and costs (RCW 49.60.030(2)) |
| Punitive damages | Not available under WLAD (Washington follows compensation-only rule) |
| WSHRC online filing | https://wahum.my.site.com/FileaComplaintOnline/ |
| WSHRC main page | https://www.hum.wa.gov |
| WSHRC phone | (800) 233-3247 |
| Verification requirement | Perfected charge signed by complainant (WAC 162-08) |
| Election doctrine | WLAD permits parallel administrative and judicial proceedings; Currier v. Northland Servs. — careful coordination needed to avoid res judicata/collateral estoppel |
| Court venue | Superior Court — RCW 4.12.025 (county where defendant transacts business or where act occurred) |
| Jury trial | Available in Superior Court |
| EEOC Seattle Field Office | 909 First Avenue, Suite 400, Seattle, WA 98104 — 1-800-669-4000 |
| Key precedent — court SOL | Antonius v. King County, 153 Wn.2d 256 (2004) |
| Key precedent — hostile environment | Glasgow v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 103 Wn.2d 401 (1985) |
Part A — Pre-Filing Eligibility Memo
MEMORANDUM — PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Memo date | [__/__/____] |
| Prepared by | [ATTORNEY / LEGAL TEAM] |
| Client | [CLAIMANT FULL LEGAL NAME] |
| Respondent | [EMPLOYER LEGAL NAME] |
| Last alleged discriminatory act | [__/__/____] |
| 6-month WSHRC deadline | [__/__/____] |
| 12-month WSHRC deadline (pregnancy) | [__/__/____] |
| 3-year WLAD court deadline | [__/__/____] |
| 300-day EEOC deadline | [__/__/____] |
I. Threshold Coverage Analysis
| Issue | Analysis |
|---|---|
| Employer headcount | [____] employees. ☐ 8+ (WLAD covered) ☐ <8 (WLAD NOT covered; consider federal Title VII at 15+, or municipal ordinances such as Seattle) |
| Religious nonprofit | ☐ Yes (excluded from WLAD) ☐ No |
| Employee/applicant status | ☐ Employee ☐ Applicant ☐ Independent contractor (limited WLAD coverage) |
| Protected class | ☐ Race (incl. hair) ☐ Creed ☐ Color ☐ National origin ☐ Citizenship/immigration ☐ Sex/pregnancy ☐ Marital status ☐ Age 40+ ☐ Disability (sensory/mental/physical) ☐ Service animal ☐ HIV/Hep C ☐ Sexual orientation ☐ Gender identity/expression ☐ Veteran/military status ☐ Whistleblower ☐ Retaliation for opposition |
| Adverse employment action | ☐ Failure to hire ☐ Discharge ☐ Demotion ☐ Discipline ☐ Pay differential ☐ Hostile work environment ☐ Failure to accommodate (disability/pregnancy/religion) ☐ Retaliation ☐ Constructive discharge |
| Damages | Lost wages $[________]; emotional distress; medical |
II. Forum Selection
| Factor | WSHRC Administrative | Direct Court (RCW 49.60.030(2)) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | Free | Filing fee + costs |
| Timeline | 6-month SOL; investigation usually 12–18+ months (backlog) | 3-year SOL; longer litigation |
| Discovery | Limited | Full WA Sup. Ct. CR discovery |
| Decisionmaker | WSHRC investigator; ALJ if hearing | Jury or judge |
| Damages | Conciliation; limited remedies | Full compensatory damages, no cap; fees |
| Right-to-sue required | No — WLAD provides direct private right of action | No predicate required |
| Best for | Modest damages, no counsel, agency investigation | Significant damages, represented by counsel |
III. SOL Calculation
| Event | Date |
|---|---|
| First discriminatory act | [__/__/____] |
| Last discriminatory act | [__/__/____] |
| 6-month WSHRC deadline | [__/__/____] |
| 12-month WSHRC deadline (pregnancy) | [__/__/____] |
| 300-day EEOC deadline | [__/__/____] |
| 3-year WLAD court deadline (Antonius) | [__/__/____] |
IV. Damages Estimate
| Category | Estimate |
|---|---|
| Back pay | $[________] |
| Front pay | $[________] |
| Compensatory (emotional distress) | $[________] |
| Attorney's fees and costs | $[________] |
| Total | $[________] |
V. Recommendation
[NARRATIVE — forum recommendation, deadlines, evidence preservation, dual-filing decision]
Part B — Charge of Discrimination (WSHRC Complaint Questionnaire / Perfected Charge)
[DATE: __/__/____]
Filed via WSHRC Online Complaint Portal: https://wahum.my.site.com/FileaComplaintOnline/
COMPLAINT TO THE WASHINGTON STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Complainant | [FULL LEGAL NAME] |
| Address | [STREET, CITY, WA, ZIP] |
| Phone / Email | [________________] / [________________] |
| Date of birth | [__/__/____] |
| Respondent (Employer) | [EMPLOYER LEGAL NAME] |
| Respondent address | [STREET, CITY, STATE, ZIP] |
| Approximate # employees | [____] (must be 8+) |
| Position held | [JOB TITLE] |
| Dates of employment | [__/__/____] to [__/__/____] |
| Date of most recent discriminatory act | [__/__/____] |
| Filing deadline (6 months / 12 months for pregnancy) | [__/__/____] |
| Cross-filing with EEOC | ☐ Yes — request workshare to EEOC ☐ No |
I. Bases of Discrimination (check all that apply)
☐ Race (including hair texture / type / protective hairstyles) ☐ Creed (religion) ☐ Color ☐ National origin ☐ Citizenship or immigration status ☐ Sex ☐ Pregnancy or pregnancy-related conditions ☐ Marital status ☐ Age 40+ ☐ Sensory disability ☐ Mental disability ☐ Physical disability ☐ Use of trained dog guide or service animal ☐ HIV/AIDS or Hepatitis C status ☐ Sexual orientation ☐ Gender identity or expression ☐ Honorably discharged veteran or military status ☐ State employee or healthcare whistleblower ☐ Retaliation/opposition to discriminatory practice
II. Unfair Practice Alleged (RCW 49.60.180)
☐ Refusal to hire ☐ Discharge / barring from employment ☐ Discrimination in compensation or terms and conditions ☐ Discriminatory advertisement, application form, inquiry ☐ Failure to accommodate (disability / pregnancy / religion) ☐ Hostile work environment / harassment ☐ Retaliation
III. Statement of Particulars
-
Hire and Position. Complainant was hired by [EMPLOYER] on [__/__/____] as a [JOB TITLE]. Direct supervisor: [NAME]. Most recent hourly/annual compensation: $[________].
-
Employer Size. On information and belief, Respondent employs approximately [____] persons in Washington, satisfying the 8-employee WLAD threshold under RCW 49.60.040(11).
-
Protected Class. Complainant is a member of the following protected class(es) under WLAD: [____________].
-
Adverse Action. On or about [__/__/____], Respondent [DESCRIBE — discharged / demoted / failed to promote / harassed / denied accommodation / retaliated against] Complainant.
-
Discriminatory Conduct.
- [Incident 1 — date, location, actors, conduct, witnesses, documents]
- [Incident 2 — date, location, actors, conduct, witnesses, documents]
- [Incident 3 — date, location, actors, conduct, witnesses, documents] -
Comparators. Similarly situated employees outside Complainant's protected class were treated more favorably: [NAMES, CIRCUMSTANCES].
-
Notice / Internal Complaint. On [__/__/____], Complainant reported the conduct to [HR / Supervisor / Manager]. Response: [____________].
-
Reasonable Accommodation (if applicable). On [__/__/____], Complainant requested [accommodation] for [disability/pregnancy/religion]. Respondent [denied / failed to engage in interactive process].
-
Retaliation. After protected activity on [__/__/____], Respondent retaliated by [adverse action] on [__/__/____].
-
Damages. Lost wages, emotional distress, medical, reputational harm — amount to be determined.
IV. Relief Requested
☐ Reinstatement
☐ Back pay and front pay
☐ Compensatory damages (no cap under WLAD)
☐ Attorney's fees and costs (RCW 49.60.030(2))
☐ Injunctive relief — policy reform, training, posting of WLAD notices
☐ Expungement of disciplinary records
V. Cross-Filing Request
☐ Complainant requests cross-filing with the U.S. EEOC under the EEOC-WSHRC Workshare Agreement to preserve Title VII / ADA / ADEA / GINA rights.
VI. Signature on Perfected Charge
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on [__/__/____] at [CITY, WA].
______________________________
[COMPLAINANT SIGNATURE]
Part C — Right-to-Sue / Election-to-Withdraw Demand Letter
[DATE: __/__/____]
Via WSHRC Online Portal AND U.S. Mail (Certified, Return Receipt Requested — Article No. [________________])
| To | From |
|---|---|
| Washington State Human Rights Commission | [COMPLAINANT NAME] |
| 711 South Capitol Way, Suite 402 | [STREET ADDRESS] |
| PO Box 42490 | [CITY, WA, ZIP] |
| Olympia, WA 98504-2490 | WSHRC Charge No.: [________________] |
RE: Notice of Election to Pursue Private Right of Action and Request to Withdraw WSHRC Complaint — RCW 49.60.030(2) — WSHRC Charge No. [________________]
Dear WSHRC:
Pursuant to RCW 49.60.030(2) and WAC 162-08-280, Complainant [NAME] hereby provides notice of election to pursue the private right of action available under WLAD and requests that the above-captioned charge be WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PREJUDICE to permit Complainant to file a civil action in the Superior Court of Washington.
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Complainant | [NAME] |
| WSHRC Charge No. | [________________] |
| Date charge filed | [__/__/____] |
| Respondent | [EMPLOYER NAME] |
| 3-year WLAD court deadline | [__/__/____] |
WLAD does not require a right-to-sue letter from WSHRC. Complainant intends to file a Complaint in [____________] County Superior Court within the 3-year statute of limitations established by Antonius v. King County, 153 Wn.2d 256 (2004), and RCW 4.16.080(2).
Please issue written confirmation of the withdrawal without prejudice and close the WSHRC file at the earliest opportunity.
If this matter has been cross-filed with the U.S. EEOC under the EEOC-WSHRC Workshare Agreement, Complainant simultaneously requests an EEOC Notice of Right to Sue under 29 C.F.R. § 1601.28 to preserve Title VII / ADA / ADEA / GINA rights.
Thank you for your prompt attention.
Respectfully,
______________________________
[COMPLAINANT or COUNSEL]
[Firm, Address, Phone, Email, WSBA No.]
cc: [EMPLOYER / COUNSEL]; EEOC Seattle Field Office (if cross-filed)
Part D — Pre-Suit Civil Complaint (Superior Court of Washington)
SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR [____________] COUNTY
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| [PLAINTIFF NAME], | Plaintiff |
| v. | |
| [EMPLOYER LEGAL NAME], and [INDIVIDUAL SUPERVISOR(S)], | Defendants |
No. [________________]
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, AND OTHER RELIEF
Washington Law Against Discrimination — RCW 49.60
Plaintiff [NAME], by counsel, alleges:
I. Parties
1.1 Plaintiff [NAME] is and at all relevant times was a resident of [COUNTY], Washington.
1.2 Defendant [EMPLOYER] is a [corporation/LLC] doing business in [COUNTY], Washington, employing 8 or more persons.
1.3 Defendant [INDIVIDUAL SUPERVISOR] is a Washington resident who personally engaged in or aided unlawful conduct.
II. Jurisdiction and Venue
2.1 Subject-matter jurisdiction is proper under RCW 49.60.030(2) and the Washington Constitution.
2.2 Venue is proper in [COUNTY] under RCW 4.12.025 because Defendant transacts business here and the unlawful acts occurred here.
2.3 This action is timely under the 3-year statute of limitations established in Antonius v. King County, 153 Wn.2d 256 (2004), and RCW 4.16.080(2).
III. Factual Allegations
3.1 [Hire date, position, supervisor, salary, performance]
3.2 [Protected class disclosure and accommodation requests]
3.3 [Discriminatory conduct and incidents]
3.4 [Internal complaint and employer response]
3.5 [Adverse action]
3.6 [Damages]
IV. CAUSES OF ACTION
Count 1 — Discrimination in Violation of WLAD (RCW 49.60.180)
4.1 Plaintiff incorporates the preceding paragraphs.
4.2 Defendant discriminated against Plaintiff on the basis of [protected class] in the terms and conditions of employment in violation of RCW 49.60.180.
Count 2 — Hostile Work Environment / Harassment (Glasgow v. Georgia-Pacific)
4.3 Plaintiff incorporates the preceding paragraphs.
4.4 Plaintiff was subjected to unwelcome conduct, based on a protected class, that was sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the terms and conditions of employment, and that was imputable to Defendant under Glasgow v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 103 Wn.2d 401 (1985).
Count 3 — Retaliation (RCW 49.60.210)
4.5 Plaintiff incorporates the preceding paragraphs.
4.6 After Plaintiff engaged in protected activity, Defendant retaliated against Plaintiff in violation of RCW 49.60.210.
Count 4 — Failure to Accommodate (if applicable)
4.7 Plaintiff incorporates the preceding paragraphs.
4.8 Defendant failed to provide reasonable accommodation for Plaintiff's [disability / pregnancy / religion] without undue hardship, in violation of RCW 49.60.180 and the Washington Pregnancy Accommodation Act (RCW 43.10.005).
Count 5 — Wrongful Discharge in Violation of Public Policy (if applicable)
4.9 Plaintiff incorporates the preceding paragraphs.
4.10 Plaintiff's discharge contravened a clear mandate of Washington public policy.
V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants:
A. Reinstatement and/or front pay;
B. Back pay and lost benefits;
C. Compensatory damages for emotional distress and other harms (no cap under WLAD);
D. Reasonable attorney's fees and costs under RCW 49.60.030(2);
E. Pre- and post-judgment interest;
F. Injunctive and equitable relief including expungement, training, and policy reform;
G. Such other relief as the Court deems just.
JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable pursuant to CR 38.
Respectfully submitted,
______________________________
[COUNSEL NAME], WSBA No. [________]
[Firm, Address, Phone, Email]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Dated: [__/__/____]
Part E — Pre-Filing Checklist
Immediately upon discriminatory act
☐ Calendar 6-month WSHRC deadline (12 months for pregnancy) and 3-year WLAD court deadline.
☐ Preserve all evidence: emails, texts, performance reviews, write-ups, pay stubs, handbook.
☐ Write contemporaneous notes — dates, times, witnesses, words spoken.
☐ Identify and contact potential witnesses.
☐ Request personnel file in writing.
☐ Do not sign any release, separation agreement, or arbitration agreement without counsel review.
Coverage and forum analysis (Part A memo)
☐ Confirm Respondent has 8+ employees in Washington (RCW 49.60.040(11)).
☐ Confirm Respondent is not a religious nonprofit (excluded from WLAD employer definition).
☐ Identify protected classes and adverse actions.
☐ Decide WSHRC vs. direct Superior Court action; note no right-to-sue letter required.
Before filing WSHRC charge (Part B)
☐ Complete WSHRC online complaint questionnaire.
☐ Allow time for WSHRC investigator to draft a perfected charge — questionnaire alone does NOT preserve filing rights.
☐ Review and sign the perfected charge before the 6/12-month SOL expires.
☐ Request cross-filing with EEOC.
☐ Save copy of perfected charge and confirmation.
During WSHRC investigation
☐ Respond promptly to WSHRC investigator information requests.
☐ Consider mediation if offered; preserve litigation rights.
☐ Track any new retaliatory acts and supplement charge.
If electing to withdraw and proceed directly to court (Part C)
☐ Send written withdrawal request via portal + Certified Mail.
☐ Obtain written confirmation of withdrawal without prejudice.
☐ Request EEOC Notice of Right to Sue if dual-filed.
☐ Calendar 3-year Antonius SOL deadline.
Before filing Superior Court Complaint (Part D)
☐ Verify venue under RCW 4.12.025.
☐ Pay filing fee or move in forma pauperis under GR 34.
☐ Comply with Civil Cover Sheet requirements.
☐ Serve summons + complaint under CR 4.
☐ Preserve jury demand under CR 38(b) (filed with complaint or no later than 14 days after last pleading).
Ongoing during litigation
☐ Litigation hold letter on documents and ESI.
☐ Document mitigation: job search log.
☐ Continue mental-health treatment; preserve medical records under HIPAA.
☐ Avoid social media posts about the case.
Sources and References
- WSHRC main page: https://www.hum.wa.gov
- WSHRC employment guidance: https://www.hum.wa.gov/employment
- WSHRC online complaint portal: https://wahum.my.site.com/FileaComplaintOnline/
- RCW 49.60 (WLAD): https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=49.60
- RCW 49.60.030 (private right of action): https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=49.60.030
- RCW 49.60.180 (unfair employment practices): https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=49.60.180
- RCW 49.60.230 (administrative procedures): https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=49.60.230
- RCW 4.16.080 (3-year SOL): https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=4.16.080
- WAC 162 (WSHRC rules): https://apps.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=162
- Antonius v. King County, 153 Wn.2d 256 (2004)
- Glasgow v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 103 Wn.2d 401 (1985)
- EEOC Seattle Field Office: https://www.eeoc.gov/field-office/seattle/location
- EEOC-WSHRC Workshare Agreement: https://www.eeoc.gov/employees/charge.cfm
- Washington Superior Court Civil Rules (CR): https://www.courts.wa.gov/court_rules/?fa=court_rules.list&group=sup&set=CR
About This Template
Employment documents govern the relationship between a company and its workers, from offer letters and employment agreements through handbooks, performance reviews, and separations. Done right, they set clear expectations, protect against wrongful termination and discrimination claims, and give both sides a record to rely on. Done poorly, they invite lawsuits, agency complaints, and costly disputes.
Important Notice
This template is provided for informational purposes. It is not legal advice. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Last updated: May 2026