Motorcycle Accident Complaint - Washington
MOTORCYCLE COLLISION COMPLAINT — WASHINGTON
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
IN AND FOR [________________________________] COUNTY
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| [PLAINTIFF NAME], | Plaintiff |
| v. | |
| [DEFENDANT DRIVER NAME], | Defendant |
No.: [________________________________]
COMPLAINT FOR PERSONAL INJURY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE
JURY DEMAND
PRE-FILING GATE
☐ Confirmed the injury and property claims are timely under RCW 4.16.080(2)
☐ Confirmed filing and service will satisfy RCW 4.16.170's 90-day coordination rule
☐ Confirmed Superior Court jurisdiction and that jurisdiction is not vested exclusively elsewhere
☐ Selected venue under RCW 4.12.020(3); if relying on corporate venue, confirmed the applicable RCW 4.12.025 facts
☐ Verified the defendant's legal name, residence or entity status, service address, and any additional necessary party
☐ Selected only the roadway statutes supported by the collision facts
☐ Preserved medical, wage, property, insurance, witness, photograph, video, and electronic evidence
Plaintiff alleges:
I. PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE
-
Plaintiff [________________________________] resides in [________________________________] County, [STATE].
-
Defendant [________________________________] is [an individual residing in [COUNTY / STATE] / a corporation with the following Washington residence or business facts: ________________________________].
-
This action arises from a motor-vehicle collision on [__/__/____] at [LOCATION], Washington.
-
This Court has original jurisdiction under RCW 2.08.010 because [the demand exceeds $300 / jurisdiction is not vested exclusively elsewhere: ________________________________].
-
Venue is proper in this county under RCW 4.12.020(3) because [the cause arose here / an individual defendant resides here: ________________________________]. If Defendant is a corporation and a separate corporate-venue basis is used, state the RCW 4.12.025 facts: [________________________________].
II. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
-
Plaintiff operated a [YEAR / MAKE / MODEL] motorcycle [DIRECTION] on [ROADWAY].
-
Defendant operated a [YEAR / MAKE / MODEL / TYPE] vehicle [DIRECTION OR MANEUVER].
-
The collision occurred when Defendant [describe the specific movement, signal, sight line, traffic control, and impact: ________________________________].
-
Traffic, lighting, visibility, roadway, and weather conditions were [________________________________].
-
Plaintiff alleges that Defendant failed to use reasonable care by [select and state supported conduct: failing to keep a proper lookout / failing to yield / following too closely / entering from a private road or driveway / other: ________________________________].
-
The collision caused Plaintiff to sustain [identify bodily injuries without exaggeration: ________________________________].
-
Plaintiff incurred or is reasonably expected to incur [medical expense / wage loss / diminished earning capacity / property loss / other supported damage: ________________________________].
III. NEGLIGENCE
-
Defendant owed roadway users, including Plaintiff, a duty to use reasonable care under the circumstances.
-
Defendant breached that duty through the acts and omissions alleged above.
-
Defendant's breach was a proximate cause of the collision and Plaintiff's legally recoverable injuries and losses.
IV. STATUTORY BREACH AS EVIDENCE OF NEGLIGENCE
- The following current roadway duty applies:
☐ RCW 46.61.145(1): A driver must not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, considering speed, traffic, and highway conditions.
☐ RCW 46.61.180(1): When vehicles approach or enter an intersection from different highways at approximately the same time, the driver on the left must yield to the vehicle on the right.
☐ RCW 46.61.185(1): A driver intending to turn left within an intersection or into an alley, private road, or driveway must yield to opposite-direction traffic in the intersection or so close as to constitute an immediate hazard.
☐ RCW 46.61.190(2)-(3): A driver approaching a stop or yield sign must comply with the applicable stop and right-of-way duties.
☐ RCW 46.61.205(1): A driver entering or crossing a highway from a private road or driveway must yield to vehicles lawfully approaching on the highway.
-
Defendant breached RCW [________________________________] by [________________________________].
-
Under RCW 5.40.050, that breach may be considered by the trier of fact as evidence of negligence. Plaintiff does not plead ordinary right-of-way or following-distance violations as negligence per se.
-
The statutory breach was a proximate cause of the collision and Plaintiff's legally recoverable injuries and losses.
V. COMPARATIVE FAULT AND ALLOCATION
-
Plaintiff denies fault. If fault is proved against Plaintiff, RCW 4.22.005 diminishes compensatory damages in proportion to Plaintiff's contributory fault but does not bar recovery.
-
Any allocation among multiple at-fault entities is governed by RCW 4.22.070. Plaintiff does not admit that any nonparty or additional entity was at fault.
VI. DAMAGES
- Plaintiff seeks only damages supported by admissible evidence, which may include:
- Past and future reasonable medical and related care expense
- Past and future lost earnings or diminished earning capacity
- Past and future pain, disability, impairment, disfigurement, and loss of enjoyment
- Motorcycle and other personal-property repair, replacement, loss-of-use, or diminished-value damages
- Other legally recoverable loss proved at trial
VII. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
Plaintiff requests:
- Compensatory damages proved at trial
- Prejudgment and postjudgment interest only as authorized
- Taxable costs and attorney fees only when authorized
- Other relief the Court may lawfully grant
VIII. JURY DEMAND
Under CR 38, Plaintiff demands a jury trial on issues triable by jury, will serve and file the demand, and will pay the required jury fee within the rule's timing.
IX. SIGNATURE
DATED: [__/__/____]
Signature: [________________________________]
Attorney name and WSBA No.: [________________________________]
Firm: [________________________________]
Address: [________________________________]
Email: [________________________________]
Telephone: [________________________________]
Attorney for Plaintiff
About this template
- Last updated
- August 30, 2026
- Citations checked
- August 16, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Washington
- Category
- Personal Injury
Legal authority
- RCW 2.08.010 (Superior Court original jurisdiction)
- RCW 4.12.020(3) and 4.12.025 (personal-injury and corporation venue rules)
- RCW 4.16.080(2) and 4.16.170 (three-year injury period and commencement rule)
- RCW 4.22.005 and 4.22.070 (comparative fault and allocation)
- RCW 5.40.050 (ordinary statutory breach as evidence of negligence)
- RCW 46.61.145 (following distance)
- RCW 46.61.180 (intersection right-of-way)
- RCW 46.61.185 (left-turn right-of-way)
- RCW 46.61.190 (stop and yield signs)
- RCW 46.61.205 (private-road or driveway entry)
- Washington Superior Court Civil Rule 38 (jury demand)
Personal injury cases are brought by people who were hurt because of someone else's carelessness: car crashes, slip and falls, defective products, and more. Demand letters, settlement agreements, and court filings in these cases have to document the injuries, the medical treatment, the lost income, and the exact legal basis for holding the other side responsible. Well-prepared paperwork is what drives higher settlements and forces insurers to take the claim seriously.
Not legal advice
This template is provided for informational purposes. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Checked against the law it cites
A reviewer verified this template's legal citations against the official source on August 16, 2026.
RCW 2.08.010 (checked August 16, 2026): "The superior court shall have original jurisdiction in all cases in equity, and in all cases at law which involve the title or possession of real property, or the legality of any tax, impost, assessment, toll or municipal fine, and in all other cases in which the demand or the value of the property in controversy amounts to three hundred dollars."
RCW 2.08.010 (checked August 16, 2026): "and shall also have original jurisdiction in all cases and of all proceedings in which jurisdiction shall not have been by law vested exclusively in some other court"
RCW 4.12.020(3) (checked August 16, 2026): "For the recovery of damages for injuries to the person or for injury to personal property, the plaintiff shall have the option of suing either in the county in which the cause of action or some part thereof arose, or in the county in which the defendant resides."
RCW 4.12.025(1) (checked August 16, 2026): "An action may be brought in any county in which the defendant resides, or, if there be more than one defendant, where some one of the defendants resides at the time of the commencement of the action."
Draft your Motorcycle Accident Complaint in the editor
Answer a few questions, let the AI editor draft each section from your answers, review it, and download Word and PDF. $99 one time, or $249 per month for every document and every Ezel app.