Motorcycle Accident Complaint
MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENT COMPLAINT — ALASKA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Caption
- Parties
- Jurisdiction and Venue
- General Factual Allegations
- Count I — Negligence
- Count II — Negligence Per Se
- Count III — Negligent Entrustment / Vicarious Liability
- Damages
- Comparative Fault Allegations
- Prayer for Relief
- Separate Jury Demand
- Reservation of Rights
- Verification
- Signature and Certificate of Service
- Alaska Practice Notes
- Sources and References
1. CAPTION
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA
[___] JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT [LOCATION]
CASE NO. [________________]
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| [PLAINTIFF'S FULL LEGAL NAME], | Plaintiff |
| v. | |
| [DEFENDANT DRIVER'S FULL LEGAL NAME], and | Defendant |
| [DEFENDANT OWNER / EMPLOYER'S FULL LEGAL NAME], | Defendant |
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES (MOTORCYCLE COLLISION)
SEPARATE JURY DEMAND PROVIDED BELOW
Plaintiff, by and through undersigned counsel, alleges as follows:
2. PARTIES
-
Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF NAME] ("Plaintiff") is an individual residing at [ADDRESS], [CITY], Alaska, and at all relevant times was the owner and operator of the motorcycle identified herein.
-
Defendant [DRIVER NAME] ("Driver Defendant") is, upon information and belief, an individual residing at [ADDRESS], [CITY / STATE].
a. If a business entity, Defendant is authorized to do business in Alaska and may be served through its registered agent: [REGISTERED AGENT NAME & ADDRESS].
b. If an out-of-state defendant, Defendant is subject to personal jurisdiction in Alaska under AS 09.05.015 and may be served pursuant to Alaska R. Civ. P. 4.
- Defendant [OWNER / EMPLOYER NAME] ("Owner Defendant") is, upon information and belief, the titled or registered owner of the vehicle operated by Driver Defendant and/or the employer of Driver Defendant, and may be served at [ADDRESS / REGISTERED AGENT].
3. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
-
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under AS 22.10.020. The amount claimed against at least one Defendant exceeds $100,000, exclusive of costs, interest, and attorney fees, so this action is outside the District Court's concurrent money-damages and motor-vehicle-tort jurisdiction under AS 22.15.030(a)(1), (8), and (b).
-
Personal jurisdiction exists because Defendants reside in, were served within, and/or committed the tortious acts giving rise to this action within the State of Alaska. See AS 09.05.015.
-
Venue is proper in this judicial district under Alaska R. Civ. P. 3 because the Collision occurred in [CITY / JUDICIAL DISTRICT] and/or a Defendant resides or may be served here.
4. GENERAL FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
-
On [__/__/____] at approximately [TIME], Plaintiff was lawfully operating a [YEAR / MAKE / MODEL] motorcycle traveling [direction] on [ROADWAY / HIGHWAY] near [CROSS STREET / LANDMARK / MILE MARKER], in [CITY], Alaska (the "Collision").
-
At the same time and place, Driver Defendant was operating a [YEAR / MAKE / MODEL] [passenger vehicle / truck / SUV] owned by Owner Defendant.
-
Roadway, lighting, and weather conditions were [describe], and the headlamp of Plaintiff's motorcycle was illuminated.
-
The Collision occurred when Driver Defendant [DESCRIBE THE MANNER — e.g., turned left across Plaintiff's path of travel; failed to yield the right-of-way; made an unsafe lane change into the lane occupied by Plaintiff's motorcycle; followed Plaintiff's motorcycle too closely and struck it from behind; pulled out from a side road or driveway into Plaintiff's path].
-
Although Plaintiff's motorcycle was plainly visible, Driver Defendant "looked but failed to see" Plaintiff's approaching motorcycle, misjudged its speed and distance, and/or failed to maintain a proper lookout for motorcyclists lawfully using the roadway.
-
Plaintiff had the right-of-way and was operating the motorcycle lawfully and carefully at all material times.
-
As a direct and proximate result of the Collision, Plaintiff was thrown from the motorcycle and sustained severe and permanent injuries, including but not limited to [LIST INJURIES — e.g., fractures, traumatic brain injury, spinal injury, internal injuries, road rash, and disfiguring scarring].
-
Because a motorcyclist lacks the structural protection, restraints, and crumple zones of an enclosed vehicle, the Collision caused Plaintiff injuries materially more severe than those typically sustained by occupants of passenger vehicles.
-
Plaintiff received emergency care at [HOSPITAL / EMS] and has undergone [TREATMENT], with future care anticipated.
5. COUNT I — NEGLIGENCE
-
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 15.
-
Duty. Driver Defendant owed Plaintiff a duty to exercise reasonable care in the operation, maintenance, and control of the vehicle, to obey Alaska's traffic laws and regulations, and to keep a proper lookout for motorcyclists lawfully sharing the roadway.
-
Breach. Driver Defendant breached that duty by, among other things:
- Failing to keep a proper and careful lookout for Plaintiff's plainly visible motorcycle;
- Failing to yield the right-of-way to Plaintiff's oncoming or approaching motorcycle;
- Turning left across the path of Plaintiff's oncoming motorcycle when unsafe to do so;
- Making an unsafe lane change into the lane occupied by Plaintiff's motorcycle;
- Following Plaintiff's motorcycle more closely than was reasonable and prudent;
- Misjudging the speed and distance of Plaintiff's approaching motorcycle;
- Operating the vehicle at an excessive or unsafe speed for conditions;
- Driving while distracted, inattentive, careless, or reckless; and
- Failing to maintain proper control of the vehicle.
-
Causation. Driver Defendant's acts and omissions were the actual and proximate cause of the Collision and of Plaintiff's injuries and damages.
-
Damages. As a direct and proximate result, Plaintiff has sustained the damages described in Section 8 below.
6. COUNT II — NEGLIGENCE PER SE
-
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 20.
-
Alaska's traffic regulations, adopted under AS 28.05.011, impose specific duties on Driver Defendant for the protection of persons lawfully using the roadway, including, as applicable:
- 13 AAC 02.125 — a driver intending to turn left at an intersection or into an alley, private road, or driveway shall yield the right-of-way to a vehicle approaching from the opposite direction that is within the intersection or so close as to constitute an immediate hazard;
- 13 AAC 02.130 — a driver approaching a stop or yield sign shall stop or slow and yield the right-of-way to vehicles in or closely approaching the intersection;
- 13 AAC 02.115 — a driver shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent; and
- AS 28.35.400 / AS 28.35.410 — prohibiting reckless and negligent driving.
-
Plaintiff is within the class of persons these provisions were designed to protect, and the Collision is the type of harm they were designed to prevent.
-
Driver Defendant violated [CITE THE SPECIFIC PROVISION(S)], and was cited for [CITATION, IF ANY]. Such violation constitutes negligence per se (or evidence of negligence) under Alaska law and was a substantial factor in causing Plaintiff's injuries and damages.
7. COUNT III — NEGLIGENT ENTRUSTMENT / VICARIOUS LIABILITY
-
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 24.
-
Owner Defendant entrusted the subject vehicle to Driver Defendant when Owner Defendant knew, or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known, that Driver Defendant was an incompetent, inexperienced, reckless, or otherwise unfit driver.
-
Alternatively, at the time of the Collision, Driver Defendant was acting as the agent, servant, or employee of Owner Defendant and within the scope of that agency or employment, rendering Owner Defendant vicariously liable under respondeat superior.
-
Owner Defendant's negligent entrustment and/or vicarious liability was a substantial factor in causing Plaintiff's injuries and damages.
8. DAMAGES
- As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' conduct, Plaintiff has suffered and seeks recovery of:
- Economic damages, including past and future medical expenses; future medical and life-care costs; past lost wages; loss of future earning capacity; property damage to the motorcycle, helmet, and riding gear (including loss of use and diminution in value); and out-of-pocket expenses. See AS 09.17.010(a).
- Non-economic damages, including physical pain, suffering, mental anguish, loss of enjoyment of life, permanent physical impairment, and disfigurement, subject to the limitations in AS 09.17.010(b). Where Plaintiff's injuries constitute "severe permanent physical impairment or severe disfigurement," Plaintiff seeks the higher non-economic recovery authorized by statute.
- Punitive damages. If discovery establishes by clear and convincing evidence that Defendants' conduct was outrageous or made with reckless indifference to the safety of others, Plaintiff seeks punitive damages pursuant to AS 09.17.020, including its bifurcation requirement.
9. COMPARATIVE FAULT ALLEGATIONS
-
Alaska follows pure comparative fault. AS 09.17.060. Plaintiff denies any fault. In the alternative, should any comparative fault be attributed to Plaintiff, Plaintiff's recovery shall be reduced only by the percentage of fault, if any, lawfully assigned to Plaintiff, and shall not be barred.
-
Fault shall be apportioned among all responsible parties pursuant to AS 09.17.080.
10. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants as follows:
- A. Economic damages in an amount to be proven at trial;
- B. Non-economic damages in an amount the jury deems just, subject to statutory limits;
- C. Punitive damages as the law and evidence may allow;
- D. Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as allowed by AS 09.30.070;
- E. Costs and reasonable attorney's fees as allowed by Alaska R. Civ. P. 79 and 82; and
- F. Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and equitable.
11. SEPARATE JURY DEMAND
[COPY COMPLETE CAPTION AND CASE NUMBER HERE]
Plaintiff separately demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable under Alaska Civil Rule 38.
DATED: [__/__/____]
Signature: ________________________________________
Printed name / Alaska Bar No.: [________________________________]
12. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
Plaintiff reserves the right to amend this Complaint to assert additional claims or add parties as discovery proceeds, and to conform the pleadings to the evidence under Alaska R. Civ. P. 15.
13. VERIFICATION
I, [PLAINTIFF NAME], declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Alaska that I have read the foregoing Complaint and that the facts stated therein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.
Executed on [__/__/____], at [CITY], Alaska.
[________________________________]
[PLAINTIFF NAME]
14. SIGNATURE AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Respectfully submitted this [____] day of [MONTH], 20[____].
[LAW FIRM NAME]
By: [________________________________]
[ATTORNEY NAME], Alaska Bar No. [________]
Attorney for Plaintiff
[ADDRESS] — [PHONE] — [EMAIL]
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on [__/__/____] a true and correct copy of the foregoing Complaint was served (or will be served with the summons) upon the following by ☐ U.S. Mail ☐ Process Server ☐ Electronic Service (Alaska R. Civ. P. 5):
[DEFENDANT(S) / DEFENSE COUNSEL — NAME(S) & ADDRESS(ES)]
[________________________________]
[ATTORNEY NAME]
15. ALASKA PRACTICE NOTES
- Statute of limitations. Personal-injury actions in Alaska must be filed within two years of accrual. AS 09.10.070.
- Pure comparative fault — favorable to riders. Under AS 09.17.060, the plaintiff's damages are reduced by the plaintiff's percentage of fault but recovery is never barred, even where the plaintiff is found more than 50% at fault. Insurers nonetheless try to inflate "rider fault" (speed, lane position, conspicuity). Preserve scene evidence early and plead the comparative-fault posture as above. Fault is apportioned among all responsible parties under AS 09.17.080.
- Regulatory rules of the road. Alaska's basic traffic "rules of the road" are largely contained in regulation — 13 AAC 02 — adopted under AS 28.05.011, rather than in the statutes themselves. For negligence per se, cite the specific AAC provision (e.g., 13 AAC 02.125 left turns; 13 AAC 02.130 stop/yield signs; 13 AAC 02.115 following too closely), along with the statutory reckless/negligent-driving provisions (AS 28.35.400 / .410). Confirm the current AAC numbering, as the code is amended by register.
- Helmet law and "biker bias." Alaska requires a helmet only for operators/passengers under 18; an operator 18 or older who holds a motorcycle license or endorsement is not required to wear one. AS 28.35.245. Thus, for most adult riders, helmet non-use is not a statutory violation. The defense may still argue helmet non-use as comparative fault or as a cause of the head-injury component of damages; counsel should retain medical/biomechanical experts to separate crash causation from injury causation and should address potential "biker bias" in voir dire. Verify the current admissibility standard.
- UM/UIM context. Alaska is a fault state with relatively low minimum liability limits (commonly 50/100/25), which serious motorcycle injuries can exhaust quickly. Insurers must offer uninsured/underinsured-motorist coverage. Promptly identify all applicable policies (including household and resident-relative policies), notify the plaintiff's UM/UIM carrier, and comply with consent-to-settle and subrogation requirements before resolving the liability claim.
- Non-economic and punitive caps. Non-economic damages are subject to AS 09.17.010; punitive damages require clear-and-convincing proof and bifurcation under AS 09.17.020. Verify current caps and allocation rules.
- Attorney's fees. Note Alaska's distinctive prevailing-party fee rule (Alaska R. Civ. P. 82), which affects litigation strategy and settlement valuation.
16. SOURCES AND REFERENCES
- Alaska Statutes (Title 9 — Code of Civil Procedure; Title 28 — Motor Vehicles) — https://www.akleg.gov/basis/statutes.asp
- AS 22.10.020 (Superior Court jurisdiction) — https://www.akleg.gov/basis/statutes.asp?media=print&secStart=22.10.020&secEnd=22.10.020
- AS 22.15.030 (District Court civil jurisdiction; $100,000 per defendant) — https://www.akleg.gov/basis/statutes.asp?media=print&secStart=22.15.030&secEnd=22.15.030
- AS 09.10.070 (two-year limitations) — https://law.justia.com/codes/alaska/title-9/chapter-10/section-09-10-070/
- AS 09.17.060 (pure comparative fault); AS 09.17.080 (apportionment) — https://law.justia.com/codes/alaska/title-9/chapter-17/
- 13 AAC 02 (Alaska traffic regulations), authority AS 28.05.011 — https://www.akleg.gov/basis/aac.asp?title=13
- 13 AAC 02.125 (turning left); 13 AAC 02.130 (stop/yield signs) — https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/alaska/13-AAC-02.130
- AS 28.35.245 (motorcycle helmet) — https://codes.findlaw.com/ak/title-28-motor-vehicles/ak-st-sect-28-35-245/
- Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure (Rules 3, 4, 5, 15, 38, 79, 82)
Disclaimer: This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. An attorney licensed in Alaska must review and customize this document before filing. Laws, citations, and court rules change frequently; verify all authorities before use.
About this template
- Last updated
- August 9, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Alaska
- Category
- Personal Injury
Legal authority
- AS 09.10.070 (two-year statute of limitations for personal injury)
- AS 22.10.020 (Superior Court jurisdiction)
- AS 22.15.030(a)(1), (8), (b) (District Court $100,000 per-defendant civil and motor-vehicle-tort limit; concurrent jurisdiction)
- AS 09.17.060 (pure comparative fault)
- AS 09.17.080 (apportionment of damages according to fault)
- 13 AAC 02.125 (vehicle turning left — duty to yield)
- 13 AAC 02.130 (stop signs and yield signs)
- 13 AAC 02.115 (following too closely)
- AS 28.35.400 (reckless driving); AS 28.35.410 (negligent driving)
- AS 28.05.011 (authority for the Alaska traffic regulations, 13 AAC 02)
- AS 28.35.245 (motorcycle helmet — adults 18+ with endorsement exempt)
- AS 09.17.020 (punitive damages)
Personal injury cases are brought by people who were hurt because of someone else's carelessness: car crashes, slip and falls, defective products, and more. Demand letters, settlement agreements, and court filings in these cases have to document the injuries, the medical treatment, the lost income, and the exact legal basis for holding the other side responsible. Well-prepared paperwork is what drives higher settlements and forces insurers to take the claim seriously.
Not legal advice
This template is provided for informational purposes. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Checked against the law it cites
The statutes this template relies on are listed under Legal authority.
Draft your Motorcycle Accident Complaint in the editor
Answer a few questions, let the AI editor draft each section from your answers, review it, and download Word and PDF. $99 one time, or $249 per month for every document and every Ezel app.