Motorcycle Accident Complaint

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES (MOTORCYCLE COLLISION) — DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Caption
2. Parties, Jurisdiction, and Venue
3. General Factual Allegations
4. Count I — Negligence (Against Defendant Driver)
5. Count II — Negligence Per Se (Against Defendant Driver)
6. Count III — Vicarious Liability / Negligent Entrustment (Against Defendant Owner)
7. Damages
8. Prayer for Relief
9. Demand for Trial by Jury
10. Verification
11. Signature and Service Blocks
12. District of Columbia Practice Notes
13. Sources and References

1. CAPTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CIVIL DIVISION

Civil Action No. [____________]

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES (MOTORCYCLE COLLISION) AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Plaintiff, by and through undersigned counsel, complaining of Defendants, alleges and states as follows:

2. PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE

1. Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF NAME] ("Plaintiff") is an adult individual and, at all relevant times, was a resident of [JURISDICTION] and the operator of a [YEAR / MAKE / MODEL] motorcycle (the "Motorcycle").

2. Defendant [DEFENDANT DRIVER NAME] ("Defendant Driver") is an adult individual who, at all relevant times, operated a [YEAR / MAKE / MODEL] motor vehicle (the "Subject Vehicle") and may be served pursuant to D.C. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 4 at [SERVICE ADDRESS].

3. Defendant [DEFENDANT OWNER NAME] ("Defendant Owner") is [an individual / a corporation / an LLC] who/that, at all relevant times, was the titled owner of the Subject Vehicle and may be served at [SERVICE ADDRESS / REGISTERED AGENT].

4. This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction over this civil action pursuant to D.C. Code § 11-921.

5. Personal jurisdiction is proper because Defendants reside in, are organized under the laws of, transact business in, and/or committed a tortious act within the District of Columbia.

6. Venue is proper in this Court because the collision giving rise to this action (the "Collision") occurred within the District of Columbia and/or one or more Defendants reside or regularly conduct business within the District.

3. GENERAL FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

7. On [__/__/____] at approximately [TIME], Plaintiff was lawfully operating the Motorcycle in a [DIRECTION] direction on [STREET / ROADWAY] at or near its intersection with [CROSS STREET / LOCATION] in the District of Columbia.

8. At the same time and place, Defendant Driver was operating the Subject Vehicle, owned by Defendant Owner, in the same vicinity.

9. Defendant Driver negligently [DESCRIBE CONDUCT — e.g., turned left across Plaintiff's lane of travel, failed to yield the right-of-way, failed to keep a proper lookout, misjudged the Motorcycle's speed and distance, opened a door into the path of the Motorcycle], causing the Subject Vehicle to collide with the Motorcycle.

10. Plaintiff was operating the Motorcycle with due care, in a lawful manner, at a reasonable speed, and with the Motorcycle's headlamp illuminated and otherwise visible.

11. As a direct and proximate result of the Collision, Plaintiff was thrown from and/or pinned beneath the Motorcycle and sustained serious bodily injuries, including but not limited to [LIST INJURIES — e.g., fractures, road rash/degloving, traumatic brain injury, spinal injury].

12. The investigating officer of the [Metropolitan Police Department] responded to the scene and [cited Defendant Driver for violation of [TRAFFIC PROVISION] / prepared report No. (____)] (the "Traffic Violation").

13. Plaintiff received emergency care at [HOSPITAL] and has since undergone [MEDICAL TREATMENT SUMMARY], with care continuing.

4. COUNT I — NEGLIGENCE (Against Defendant Driver)

14. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 13 as though fully set forth herein.

15. Defendant Driver owed Plaintiff a duty to operate the Subject Vehicle with reasonable care, to obey the traffic laws and regulations of the District of Columbia, and to keep a proper lookout for motorcyclists and other users of the roadway.

16. Defendant Driver breached that duty by one or more of the following acts or omissions:

• Failing to yield the right-of-way to the oncoming Motorcycle;
• Turning left across Plaintiff's lane of travel when it was unsafe to do so;
• Failing to keep a proper and careful lookout for motorcyclists;
• Operating the Subject Vehicle at an excessive or imprudent speed;
• Failing to maintain control of the Subject Vehicle;
• Operating the Subject Vehicle while distracted and/or inattentive; and/or
• Otherwise failing to exercise reasonable care under the circumstances.

17. Defendant Driver's breaches were the actual and proximate cause of the Collision and of the injuries and damages set forth herein.

18. As a direct and proximate result, Plaintiff has suffered the damages described in Section 7 below.

5. COUNT II — NEGLIGENCE PER SE (Against Defendant Driver)

19. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 18 as though fully set forth herein.

20. At the time of the Collision, the District of Columbia Municipal Regulations and the D.C. Code imposed mandatory duties on Defendant Driver, including the duty to yield the right-of-way and to make turning movements only when safe (18 DCMR § 2208) and to operate with due regard for other users of the roadway.

21. Defendant Driver violated [18 DCMR § ____ / D.C. Code § ____], a safety statute or regulation enacted to protect the class of persons to which Plaintiff belongs (motorcyclists and other roadway users) against the type of harm that occurred.

22. Such violation constitutes negligence per se under District of Columbia law and was a proximate cause of the Collision and of Plaintiff's injuries and damages.

6. COUNT III — VICARIOUS LIABILITY / NEGLIGENT ENTRUSTMENT (Against Defendant Owner)

23. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 22 as though fully set forth herein.

24. At the time of the Collision, Defendant Driver operated the Subject Vehicle with the express or implied permission, and within the scope of any agency or employment, of Defendant Owner, rendering Defendant Owner vicariously liable for Defendant Driver's negligence.

25. In the alternative, Defendant Owner entrusted the Subject Vehicle to Defendant Driver with actual or constructive knowledge of Defendant Driver's incompetence, inexperience, or reckless propensities, and such negligent entrustment was a proximate cause of the Collision and Plaintiff's damages.

26. Accordingly, Defendant Owner is jointly and severally liable for the damages proximately caused by Defendant Driver.

7. DAMAGES

27. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' conduct, Plaintiff has sustained and seeks recovery of:

• Economic damages: past and future medical, hospital, surgical, rehabilitative, and related expenses; past lost earnings; future lost earnings and diminished earning capacity; and property damage to the Motorcycle and personal protective equipment.
• Non-economic damages: past and future physical pain and suffering, mental anguish, disfigurement and permanent scarring (including road-rash scarring), permanent impairment, and loss of enjoyment of life.
• Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and costs as allowed by law.

28. Plaintiff's damages exceed the jurisdictional minimum of this Court and are in an amount to be proven at trial.

8. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court:

• A. Enter judgment against Defendants, jointly and severally, for compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial;
• B. Award pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and costs as allowed by law;
• C. Grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.

9. DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY

Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable as a matter of right pursuant to D.C. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 38.

10. VERIFICATION

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ss:

I, [PLAINTIFF NAME], having been first duly sworn, state that I am the Plaintiff in the foregoing action, that I have read the foregoing Complaint, and that the matters stated therein are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.

[________________________________]

[PLAINTIFF NAME]

Subscribed and sworn to before me this [____] day of [_______________], 20[____].

[________________________________]

Notary Public

My commission expires: [_______________]

11. SIGNATURE AND SERVICE BLOCKS

Date: [__/__/____]

Respectfully submitted,

[LAW FIRM NAME]

By: [________________________________]

[ATTORNEY NAME], D.C. Bar No. [________]

Counsel for Plaintiff

[STREET ADDRESS]

[CITY, STATE ZIP]

Telephone: [NUMBER]

Email: [EMAIL]

12. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PRACTICE NOTES

• Negligence regime — contributory negligence, BUT a motorcyclist is a statutory "vulnerable user." The District generally applies pure contributory negligence (with last clear chance). However, D.C. Code § 50-2204.51(13) expressly defines "vulnerable user" to include a person using a motorcycle or motor-driven cycle, and D.C. Code § 50-2204.52(a) provides that such a plaintiff's recovery in a collision with a motor vehicle is barred only if the plaintiff's negligence is a proximate cause and greater than the aggregated negligence of all defendants — a modified-comparative standard. Plead the vulnerable-user standard as controlling and plead due care / last clear chance in the alternative.
• Statute of limitations — 3 years. D.C. Code § 12-301(8).
• No-fault / PIP. The District has an optional PIP system (D.C. Code § 35-2101 et seq.); confirm the plaintiff's election and threshold status and include a reservation-of-rights paragraph if PIP benefits were elected.
• Helmet law. Helmets are required only for riders under 16 (D.C. Code § 50-1605); there is no universal adult mandate.
• Forum and service. Superior Court, Civil Division (D.C. Code § 11-921); service under D.C. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 4.

13. SOURCES AND REFERENCES

• D.C. Code § 11-921 (Superior Court Civil Division jurisdiction) — https://code.dccouncil.gov/
• D.C. Code § 12-301(8) (3-year personal-injury limitation)
• D.C. Code § 50-2204.51 (Definitions; "vulnerable user" includes motorcycle) — https://code.dccouncil.gov/us/dc/council/code/sections/50-2204.51
• D.C. Code § 50-2204.52 (Contributory-negligence limitation) — https://code.dccouncil.gov/us/dc/council/code/sections/50-2204.52
• Vulnerable User Collision Recovery Amendment Act of 2020, D.C. Law 23-183
• 18 DCMR § 2215 (Riding on motorcycles); 18 DCMR § 2208 (right-of-way / turning movements)
• D.C. Code § 50-1605 (helmet requirement — under 16)
• D.C. Code § 35-2101 et seq. (no-fault / PIP); D.C. Code § 31-2406 (UM/UIM)
• D.C. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 4, 8, 10, 38

Disclaimer: This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. An attorney licensed in the District of Columbia must review and customize this document before filing. Laws, citations, and court rules change frequently; verify all authorities — including the application of D.C. Code § 50-2204.52 to motorcyclists — before use.