Dram Shop Liability Complaint
DRAM SHOP LIABILITY COMPLAINT — PENNSYLVANIA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Caption
- Parties
- Jurisdiction and Venue
- Factual Allegations
- Count I — Dram Shop Liability (47 P.S. § 4-497)
- Count II — Violation of 47 P.S. § 4-493
- Count III — Negligence
- Damages
- Jury Demand
- Prayer for Relief
- Verification
- State-Specific Notes
CAPTION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF [____________________] COUNTY
PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL DIVISION
| [PLAINTIFF NAME], | No. [____________] |
| Plaintiff, | |
| v. | |
| [DEFENDANT LICENSEE NAME], | COMPLAINT — CIVIL ACTION |
| [DEFENDANT INDIVIDUAL OWNER NAME], | (Dram Shop Liability) |
| and | |
| [DEFENDANT INTOXICATED PERSON NAME], | |
| Defendants. |
PARTIES
-
Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF NAME] is an adult individual residing at [ADDRESS], [CITY], [COUNTY] County, Pennsylvania [ZIP CODE].
-
Defendant [LICENSEE NAME] ("Licensee Defendant") is a [corporation/LLC/individual/partnership] holding Liquor License No. [____________] issued by the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (PLCB), operating [ESTABLISHMENT NAME] located at [ADDRESS], [CITY], [COUNTY] County, Pennsylvania [ZIP CODE].
-
Defendant [INDIVIDUAL OWNER NAME] ("Owner Defendant") is an individual who, at all relevant times, owned, operated, managed, and/or controlled the Licensee Defendant and is liable for the acts and omissions of the Licensee Defendant's agents, servants, and employees.
-
Defendant [INTOXICATED PERSON NAME] ("Intoxicated Defendant") is an individual residing at [ADDRESS], [CITY], [COUNTY] County, Pennsylvania [ZIP CODE].
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
-
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 42 Pa. C.S.A. § 931.
-
Venue is proper in [____________________] County pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 1006 because [the cause of action arose in this county / a Defendant regularly conducts business in this county / Defendant's principal place of business is in this county].
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
-
At all relevant times, the Licensee Defendant held a valid liquor license issued by the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board authorizing the sale and service of alcoholic beverages at [ESTABLISHMENT NAME], [ADDRESS], [CITY], Pennsylvania.
-
On or about [DATE], the Intoxicated Defendant was present at the Licensee Defendant's premises.
-
The Licensee Defendant, through its agents, servants, or employees, sold, furnished, or gave alcoholic beverages to the Intoxicated Defendant.
-
At the time of service, the Intoxicated Defendant was visibly intoxicated, exhibiting the following externally apparent signs of intoxication:
- ☐ Slurred speech
- ☐ Unsteady gait, stumbling, or difficulty walking
- ☐ Bloodshot, watery, or glassy eyes
- ☐ Loud, boisterous, or belligerent behavior
- ☐ Inability to pick up change or handle objects
- ☐ Strong odor of alcohol
- ☐ Falling asleep at the bar or table
- ☐ Other: [________________________________]
-
Despite the Intoxicated Defendant's visible intoxication, the Licensee Defendant and/or its agents, servants, or employees continued to sell, furnish, or give alcoholic beverages to the Intoxicated Defendant.
-
On or about [DATE], at approximately [TIME], after leaving the Licensee Defendant's premises, the Intoxicated Defendant [describe injurious conduct, e.g., operated a motor vehicle and caused a collision at ____________________].
-
As a direct and proximate result of the Intoxicated Defendant's intoxication, Plaintiff suffered severe personal injuries, property damage, and other damages.
COUNT I — DRAM SHOP LIABILITY
(47 P.S. § 4-497)
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
-
Pursuant to 47 P.S. § 4-497, a licensee is liable to third persons for damages inflicted upon them off the licensee's premises by customers of the licensee when the customer who inflicts the damages was sold, furnished, or given liquor or malt or brewed beverages while that customer was visibly intoxicated.
-
The Licensee Defendant, through its agents, servants, or employees, sold, furnished, or gave alcoholic beverages to the Intoxicated Defendant while the Intoxicated Defendant was visibly intoxicated.
-
The Intoxicated Defendant subsequently left the Licensee Defendant's premises and, while still under the influence of the alcoholic beverages served by the Licensee Defendant, inflicted damages upon the Plaintiff off the Licensee Defendant's premises.
-
The Licensee Defendant's service of alcohol to the visibly intoxicated Intoxicated Defendant was a proximate cause of the Plaintiff's injuries and damages.
COUNT II — VIOLATION OF SERVICE PROHIBITIONS
(47 P.S. § 4-493)
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
-
47 P.S. § 4-493(1) provides that it is unlawful for any licensee to sell, furnish, or give any liquor or malt or brewed beverages to any person visibly intoxicated, or to any minor, or to habitual drunkards, or persons of known intemperate habits.
-
The Licensee Defendant violated 47 P.S. § 4-493(1) by selling, furnishing, or giving alcoholic beverages to the Intoxicated Defendant while the Intoxicated Defendant was visibly intoxicated [or was under twenty-one years of age].
-
The Licensee Defendant's statutory violation was a proximate cause of Plaintiff's injuries and damages.
COUNT III — NEGLIGENCE
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
-
The Licensee Defendant owed a duty of care to the Plaintiff and the general public not to sell, furnish, or give alcoholic beverages to visibly intoxicated persons.
-
The Licensee Defendant breached this duty by:
a. Serving alcoholic beverages to a visibly intoxicated patron;
b. Failing to properly train employees to recognize visible intoxication;
c. Failing to monitor the consumption and intoxication level of patrons;
d. Failing to refuse service to a visibly intoxicated patron;
e. Failing to take steps to prevent the visibly intoxicated patron from operating a motor vehicle. -
The Licensee Defendant's negligence was a proximate cause of Plaintiff's injuries and damages.
DAMAGES
- As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' conduct, Plaintiff has suffered:
a. Past and future medical expenses in the amount of $[____________];
b. Past and future lost wages and earning capacity in the amount of $[____________];
c. Pain and suffering, both past and future;
d. Emotional distress and mental anguish;
e. Loss of enjoyment of life;
f. Loss of consortium [if applicable];
g. Property damage in the amount of $[____________];
h. Punitive damages for reckless or outrageous conduct;
i. [If applicable] Wrongful death damages pursuant to 42 Pa. C.S.A. § 8301;
j. Such other damages as may be proven at trial.
JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment in Plaintiff's favor and against Defendants, jointly and severally:
a. Compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial;
b. Punitive damages in an amount sufficient to punish and deter;
c. Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest;
d. Costs of suit;
e. Attorney's fees as permitted by law;
f. Such other relief as the Court deems just and equitable.
VERIFICATION
I, [PLAINTIFF NAME], verify that the statements made in the foregoing Complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S.A. § 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
Date: [__/__/____]
[________________________________]
[PLAINTIFF NAME]
SUBMITTED BY:
[________________________________]
[ATTORNEY NAME], Pa. I.D. No. [____________]
[FIRM NAME]
[ADDRESS]
[CITY], Pennsylvania [ZIP CODE]
Telephone: [________________________________]
Email: [________________________________]
Attorney for Plaintiff
STATE-SPECIFIC NOTES
Pennsylvania Dram Shop Law — Key Provisions
Statutory Authority: 47 P.S. § 4-497 (Liquor Code)
Nature of § 4-497: This is a limiting provision — it shields licensees from liability EXCEPT in specified circumstances. It does not create an affirmative cause of action but rather defines when the common law duty applies to licensees.
Key Standard: "Visibly intoxicated" — requires externally apparent signs of intoxication observable to a reasonable person. A high blood alcohol concentration alone is NOT sufficient.
Service Prohibitions: 47 P.S. § 4-493 prohibits selling or furnishing alcohol to:
- Visibly intoxicated persons
- Minors (under 21)
- Habitual drunkards
- Persons of known intemperate habits
Social Host Liability: Limited. Pennsylvania courts have held that social hosts may be liable for serving alcohol to minors, but generally NOT for serving visibly intoxicated adults.
Comparative Negligence: Pennsylvania follows a modified comparative negligence system (51% bar) under 42 Pa. C.S.A. § 7102.
Punitive Damages: Available in dram shop cases upon proof of reckless indifference or outrageous conduct.
Statute of Limitations: Two years from the date of injury under 42 Pa. C.S.A. § 5524.
Key Case Law:
- Congini v. Portersville Valve Co., 504 Pa. 157 (1983) — Social host liability for serving minors.
- Matthews v. Konieczny, 527 A.2d 508 (Pa. 1987) — Defined "visible intoxication" standard.
- Marcano v. Federbusch, 2009 PA Super 208 — Addressed evidence requirements for visible intoxication.
This template is provided for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. Laws change frequently. Always verify citations and consult with a licensed Pennsylvania attorney before filing.
About This Template
Personal injury cases are brought by people who were hurt because of someone else's carelessness: car crashes, slip and falls, defective products, and more. Demand letters, settlement agreements, and court filings in these cases have to document the injuries, the medical treatment, the lost income, and the exact legal basis for holding the other side responsible. Well-prepared paperwork is what drives higher settlements and forces insurers to take the claim seriously.
Important Notice
This template is provided for informational purposes. It is not legal advice. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Last updated: May 2026