Construction Accident Complaint - South Dakota
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Caption
- Parties
- Jurisdiction and Venue
- Factual Allegations
- First Cause of Action — Negligence
- Second Cause of Action — Premises Liability
- Third Cause of Action — Construction Safety Negligence
- Fourth Cause of Action — Statutory Negligence
- Fifth Cause of Action — Third-Party Liability
- Damages
- Comparative Fault
- Jury Demand
- Prayer for Relief
- Verification
- State-Specific Notes
CAPTION
STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA
COUNTY OF [________________________________]
IN CIRCUIT COURT
[____] JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
[PLAINTIFF FULL NAME],
Plaintiff,
v.
[DEFENDANT FULL NAME],
Defendant(s).
Civ. No.: [________________________________]
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES — CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENT
I. PARTIES
-
Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME] ("Plaintiff") is an individual residing at [PLAINTIFF ADDRESS], County of [____], State of South Dakota.
-
Defendant [DEFENDANT — GENERAL CONTRACTOR NAME] ("General Contractor") is a [corporation/LLC/partnership] organized under the laws of [STATE OF INCORPORATION], with its principal place of business at [DEFENDANT ADDRESS], and was at all relevant times the general contractor for the construction project described herein.
-
Defendant [DEFENDANT — PROPERTY OWNER NAME] ("Property Owner") is [an individual/a corporation/an LLC] [with its principal place of business at / residing at] [ADDRESS], and was at all relevant times the owner of the premises where the construction accident occurred.
-
Defendant [DEFENDANT — SUBCONTRACTOR NAME] ("Subcontractor") is a [corporation/LLC/partnership] organized under the laws of [STATE], with its principal place of business at [ADDRESS], and was at all relevant times a subcontractor performing work at the construction site.
II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
-
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction over this action at law under SDCL § 16-6-9(2).
-
Venue is proper in [COUNTY] County under SDCL § 15-5-8 because [damages were inflicted / the cause of action arose] in that county.
-
Plaintiff brings this action at law for damages arising from the accident alleged below.
III. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
-
On or about [DATE OF ACCIDENT], Plaintiff was employed by [PLAINTIFF'S EMPLOYER] as a [JOB TITLE/TRADE] and was performing construction work at a construction site located at [CONSTRUCTION SITE ADDRESS], County of [____], South Dakota (the "Project").
-
The Project involved [BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECT].
-
At the time of the accident, Plaintiff was engaged in [DESCRIPTION OF PLAINTIFF'S WORK ACTIVITY AT TIME OF ACCIDENT].
-
On the date of the accident, [DESCRIBE THE ACCIDENT IN DETAIL].
-
As a direct and proximate result of the accident, Plaintiff sustained the following injuries: [DESCRIBE INJURIES].
-
Defendant [NAME] had responsibility for [DESCRIBE WORK OR SITE CONDITION] and failed to use reasonable care in that work. Identify a safety rule only after confirming that it applied to this Defendant, worksite, and activity on the incident date.
-
Defendants knew or should have known of the dangerous conditions at the construction site and failed to take reasonable steps to remedy or warn of such conditions.
IV. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION — NEGLIGENCE
(Against All Defendants)
-
Plaintiff incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth herein.
-
Defendant [NAME] owed Plaintiff a duty of reasonable care in [DESCRIBE CONTROLLED WORK OR SITE CONDITION].
-
Defendants breached their duty of care by, among other things:
☐ Failing to provide adequate fall protection systems
☐ Failing to properly secure scaffolding and elevated work platforms
☐ Failing to maintain the construction site in a reasonably safe condition
☐ Failing to provide proper safety equipment and personal protective gear
☐ Failing to adequately train and supervise workers
☐ Failing to conduct adequate safety inspections
☐ Failing to warn of known hazardous conditions
☐ Failing to comply with applicable OSHA standards (29 C.F.R. Part 1926)
☐ [OTHER SPECIFIC NEGLIGENT ACTS OR OMISSIONS]
- Defendants' negligence was the direct and proximate cause of Plaintiff's injuries and damages.
V. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION — PREMISES LIABILITY
(Against Property Owner and General Contractor)
-
Plaintiff incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth herein.
-
At all relevant times, Defendant Property Owner owned, controlled, managed, and/or maintained the premises located at [CONSTRUCTION SITE ADDRESS].
-
Defendant General Contractor exercised control over the construction site and the means and methods of the work performed thereon.
-
Defendants had a duty to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition and to warn of known or discoverable hazards.
-
Defendants breached their duty by permitting dangerous conditions to exist on the premises, including but not limited to: [DESCRIBE UNSAFE CONDITIONS].
-
The dangerous conditions were the direct and proximate cause of Plaintiff's injuries and damages.
VI. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION — CONSTRUCTION SAFETY NEGLIGENCE
(Against Defendants with a Supported Duty and Role)
-
Plaintiff incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth herein.
-
Defendant [NAME] controlled [DESCRIBE WORK OR SAFETY RESPONSIBILITY] and failed to use reasonable care in that work.
-
Defendant's alleged safety failures included [SELECT ONLY FACTS SUPPORTED BY EVIDENCE]:
☐ Unsafe scaffolding or platforms: [DESCRIBE]
☐ Missing fall protection: [DESCRIBE]
☐ Unsafe equipment operation: [DESCRIBE]
☐ Unsafe excavation: [DESCRIBE]
☐ Other unsafe conduct: [DESCRIBE]
-
Identify any federal safety standard only after confirming that it governed this Defendant, activity, and worksite on the incident date. A regulatory violation here does not itself establish a private OSHA damages claim or automatic negligence effect. See 29 U.S.C. § 653(b)(4).
-
The safety conduct alleged above supports Plaintiff's negligence claim and directly and proximately caused Plaintiff's injuries and damages.
VII. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION — STATUTORY NEGLIGENCE
(Against All Defendants)
-
Plaintiff incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth herein.
-
If a current safety rule governed Defendant [NAME] and the work at issue, identify it here: [RULE AND EFFECTIVE DATE]. Describe the conduct that breached the applicable duty: [FACTS].
-
Plaintiff was [DESCRIBE PROTECTED STATUS] at the worksite when the unsafe conduct occurred.
-
That conduct directly and proximately caused [DESCRIBE INJURY].
-
The pleaded safety conduct supports the negligence claim above. State a further civil effect only after identifying current South Dakota authority for this Defendant, duty, and injury; no separate OSHA damages remedy is sought. See 29 U.S.C. § 653(b)(4).
VIII. FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION — THIRD-PARTY LIABILITY
(Against Defendants Other Than Plaintiff's Employer)
-
Plaintiff incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth herein.
-
At all relevant times, Plaintiff's direct employer was [EMPLOYER NAME], and Plaintiff was covered by workers' compensation insurance pursuant to SDCL Title 62.
-
Defendants [LIST DEFENDANTS WITH FACTS SUPPORTING A THIRD-PARTY CLAIM] owed duties independent of Plaintiff's employment. For each contractor, identify its role in the contract chain and whether it is liable for compensation as a principal, intermediate, or subcontractor under SDCL § 62-3-10. Allege facts showing why the particular Defendant is subject to a third-party action under § 62-4-38 despite any exclusive-remedy protection under § 62-3-2.
-
These Defendants owed Plaintiff an independent duty of care that was separate and distinct from any duty owed by Plaintiff's direct employer.
-
These Defendants breached their independent duty of care, and such breach was a direct and proximate cause of Plaintiff's injuries and damages.
IX. DAMAGES
- As a direct and proximate result of the Defendants' negligent, wrongful, and unlawful conduct, Plaintiff has suffered and continues to suffer the following categories of damages:
Economic Damages:
☐ Past medical expenses in the amount of $[AMOUNT]
☐ Future medical expenses estimated at $[AMOUNT]
☐ Past lost wages and earnings in the amount of $[AMOUNT]
☐ Future lost wages and diminished earning capacity estimated at $[AMOUNT]
☐ Rehabilitation and therapy costs in the amount of $[AMOUNT]
☐ Property damage in the amount of $[AMOUNT]
☐ Other economic losses: [DESCRIBE]
Noneconomic Damages:
☐ Physical pain and suffering
☐ Mental anguish and emotional distress
☐ Loss of enjoyment of life
☐ Permanent disability and disfigurement
☐ Loss of consortium (if applicable)
Punitive Damages:
☐ Punitive damages where SDCL § 21-3-2 permits them, subject to the hearing and finding required by § 21-1-4.1 before punitive discovery or factfinder submission
X. COMPARATIVE FAULT
-
Plaintiff alleges freedom from contributory negligence or, alternatively, that any negligence attributable to Plaintiff was slight in comparison with Defendant's negligence and does not bar recovery under SDCL § 20-9-2.
-
Plaintiff's damages, if any comparative fault is found, shall be reduced in proportion to Plaintiff's percentage of fault pursuant to SDCL § 20-9-2.
XI. JURY DEMAND
- Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.
XII. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully prays for judgment against Defendants in the shares and manner allowed by law, including SDCL § 15-8-15.1 where joint liability applies, as follows:
- Compensatory damages, both economic and noneconomic, in an amount to be determined at trial;
- Punitive damages if supported by SDCL § 21-3-2 and, before punitive discovery or submission to the factfinder, the hearing and finding required by § 21-1-4.1;
- Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as allowed by law;
- Costs of suit and reasonable attorney's fees as permitted by law;
- Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
XIII. VERIFICATION
STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA
COUNTY OF [________________________________]
I, [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME], being first duly sworn, state that I am the Plaintiff in the above-entitled action, that I have read the foregoing Complaint, and that the facts stated therein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.
_________________________________________
[PLAINTIFF FULL NAME]
Subscribed and sworn to before me this [____] day of [________], [____].
_________________________________________
Notary Public
My Commission Expires: [__/__/____]
Respectfully submitted,
_________________________________________
[ATTORNEY NAME], Bar No. [____]
[LAW FIRM NAME]
[ADDRESS]
[CITY], South Dakota [ZIP]
Telephone: [____]
Email: [____]
Attorney for Plaintiff
STATE-SPECIFIC NOTES — SOUTH DAKOTA
| Topic | Detail |
|---|---|
| Limitations and Repose | Personal-injury actions generally have a three-year period under SDCL § 15-2-14(3). For a claim arising from a deficiency in the design, planning, supervision, inspection, observation, or construction of an improvement to real property, SDCL § 15-2A-3 also bars covered actions against persons who performed or furnished that work more than ten years after substantial completion. Determine the project's substantial-completion date and each defendant's role. |
| Comparative Fault | Plaintiff's negligence must be slight in comparison with defendant's; damages are then reduced proportionally (SDCL § 20-9-2). |
| Workers' Comp | Check each contractor's compensation liability under SDCL § 62-3-10 before pleading a third-party claim; exclusive remedy is governed by § 62-3-2 and third-party actions by § 62-4-38. |
| OSHA | No approved State Plan; federal OSHA covers most private-sector workers, but not state or local government workers |
| Damages Caps | No general cap; medical malpractice cap of $500,000 (SDCL § 21-3-11) not applicable |
| Filing Court | South Dakota Circuit Court |
| Pleading | SDCL § 15-6-8(a) requires a short and plain statement of the claim and a demand for relief. Its current text does not prohibit stating an amount for unliquidated damages; check local practice and the facts before choosing whether to include estimates. |
SOURCES AND REFERENCES
- SDCL § 15-2-14 — Statute of limitations for personal injury
- SDCL § 20-9-2 — Comparative negligence
- SDCL § 21-3-2 — Punitive damages
- SDCL § 21-1-4.1 — Punitive-damages hearing before discovery or factfinder submission
- SDCL § 15-8-15.1 — Limit on some joint liability
- SDCL §§ 62-3-2, 62-3-10, 62-4-38 — Employer remedies, contractor compensation liability, and third-party actions
- SDCL Title 62 — Workers' Compensation
- 29 C.F.R. Part 1926 — Federal OSHA construction safety standards
About this template
- Last updated
- October 30, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- South Dakota
- Category
- Personal Injury
Legal authority
- SDCL § 15-2-14 (Three-year statute of limitations)
- SDCL § 15-2A-3 (Ten-year repose for covered claims involving construction of an improvement to real property)
- SDCL § 20-9-2 (slight-in-comparison comparative negligence)
- SDCL Title 62 (Workers' Compensation)
- 29 C.F.R. Part 1926 (Federal OSHA construction standards)
Personal injury cases are brought by people who were hurt because of someone else's carelessness: car crashes, slip and falls, defective products, and more. Demand letters, settlement agreements, and court filings in these cases have to document the injuries, the medical treatment, the lost income, and the exact legal basis for holding the other side responsible. Well-prepared paperwork is what drives higher settlements and forces insurers to take the claim seriously.
Not legal advice
This template is provided for informational purposes. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Checked against the law it cites
The statutes this template relies on are listed under Legal authority.
OSHA State Plans: South Dakota (checked October 30, 2026): "South Dakota is not an OSHA-approved State Plan, and is under federal OSHA jurisdiction which covers most private sector workers within the state. State and local government workers are not covered by federal OSHA."
SDCL § 15-6-8(a) (checked October 26, 2026): "A short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief"
SDCL § 15-2A-3 (checked October 26, 2026): "more than ten years after substantial completion of such construction"
SDCL § 21-3-2 (checked October 24, 2026): "where the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice, actual or presumed ... the jury, in addition to the actual damage, may give damages for the sake of example"
Draft your Construction Accident Complaint in the editor
Answer a few questions, let the AI editor draft each section from your answers, review it, and download Word and PDF. $99 one time, or $249 per month for every document and every Ezel app.