Construction Accident Complaint - Kansas
CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENT COMPLAINT — KANSAS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Caption
- Parties
- Jurisdiction and Venue
- Factual Allegations
- Count I — Negligence
- Count II — Premises Liability
- Count III — OSHA Violations as Evidence of Negligence
- Count IV — Third-Party Liability
- Count V — Product Liability
- Damages
- Jury Demand
- Verification and Signature
CAPTION
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF [COUNTY NAME] COUNTY, KANSAS
[DIVISION]
[PLAINTIFF FULL NAME],
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. [________________________________]
[GENERAL CONTRACTOR NAME],
[SUBCONTRACTOR NAME],
[PROPERTY OWNER NAME],
[EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER NAME] (if applicable),
Defendants.
PETITION FOR DAMAGES — CONSTRUCTION ACCIDENT
COMES NOW the Plaintiff, [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME], by and through undersigned counsel, and for this Petition against the Defendants states as follows:
PARTIES
-
Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME] is an individual residing at [PLAINTIFF ADDRESS], [CITY], Kansas [ZIP CODE], who was employed as a [JOB TITLE/TRADE] at the time of the incident described herein.
-
Defendant [GENERAL CONTRACTOR NAME] ("General Contractor") is a [CORPORATION/LLC/PARTNERSHIP] organized under the laws of [STATE OF INCORPORATION], doing business in Kansas, with its principal place of business at [ADDRESS].
-
Defendant [SUBCONTRACTOR NAME] ("Subcontractor") is a [CORPORATION/LLC/PARTNERSHIP] organized under the laws of [STATE OF INCORPORATION], doing business in Kansas, with its principal place of business at [ADDRESS].
-
Defendant [PROPERTY OWNER NAME] ("Property Owner") is [AN INDIVIDUAL RESIDING AT / A CORPORATION WITH ITS PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS AT] [ADDRESS].
-
Defendant [EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER NAME] ("Manufacturer") is a [CORPORATION/LLC/PARTNERSHIP] organized under the laws of [STATE OF INCORPORATION], with its principal place of business at [ADDRESS].
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
-
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action as it involves claims for damages arising from personal injuries.
-
Venue is proper in [COUNTY NAME] County pursuant to K.S.A. 60-601 through 60-604 because [SELECT ONE]:
☐ One or more Defendants reside in this County
☐ The cause of action arose in this County
☐ Defendants transact business in this County
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
-
At all times relevant hereto, Defendant General Contractor was engaged as the general contractor for a construction project located at [PROJECT ADDRESS], [CITY], Kansas [ZIP CODE] (the "Project Site").
-
At all times relevant hereto, Defendant Property Owner owned, controlled, and/or maintained the Project Site.
-
At all times relevant hereto, Defendant Subcontractor was engaged by the General Contractor to perform [DESCRIPTION OF SUBCONTRACTED WORK] at the Project Site.
-
Plaintiff was employed by [PLAINTIFF'S EMPLOYER NAME] as a [JOB TITLE/TRADE] and was assigned to work at the Project Site.
-
On or about [DATE OF ACCIDENT], at approximately [TIME], Plaintiff was performing [DESCRIPTION OF WORK ACTIVITY] at the Project Site when [DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ACCIDENT].
-
As a direct and proximate result of the accident, Plaintiff sustained severe and permanent injuries including but not limited to [DESCRIPTION OF INJURIES].
Safety Violations
- At the time of the accident, the following safety violations existed at the Project Site:
☐ Failure to provide adequate fall protection
☐ Failure to erect proper scaffolding in compliance with OSHA standards
☐ Failure to provide proper safety equipment and/or personal protective equipment
☐ Failure to adequately train workers on safety procedures
☐ Failure to conduct safety inspections
☐ Failure to maintain equipment in safe working condition
☐ Failure to comply with applicable OSHA regulations (29 CFR 1926)
☐ Other: [DESCRIBE]
COUNT I — NEGLIGENCE
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
-
Defendants owed a duty of reasonable care to Plaintiff to maintain the Project Site in a reasonably safe condition.
-
Defendants breached their duty of care by:
a. Failing to implement and enforce adequate safety measures;
b. Failing to provide proper fall protection and safety equipment;
c. Failing to inspect and maintain the worksite;
d. Failing to warn of known hazards;
e. Failing to supervise construction work in a safe manner;
f. [ADDITIONAL SPECIFIC ACTS OF NEGLIGENCE].
- As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' negligence, Plaintiff suffered severe injuries and damages.
COUNT II — PREMISES LIABILITY
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
-
Defendant Property Owner owed a duty to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition.
-
Defendant Property Owner knew or should have known of the dangerous conditions and failed to correct, remediate, or warn.
-
As a direct and proximate result, Plaintiff suffered severe injuries and damages.
COUNT III — OSHA VIOLATIONS AS EVIDENCE OF NEGLIGENCE
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
-
At all relevant times, Defendants were required to comply with applicable OSHA standards, including:
a. 29 CFR § 1926.451 (Scaffolding);
b. 29 CFR § 1926.501 (Fall Protection);
c. 29 CFR § 1926.502 (Fall Protection Systems);
d. 29 CFR § 1926.20 (General Safety and Health Provisions);
e. [ADDITIONAL APPLICABLE OSHA STANDARDS].
-
Defendants violated the above-referenced OSHA standards, which constitutes evidence of negligence and breach of the standard of care.
-
As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' violations, Plaintiff suffered severe injuries and damages.
COUNT IV — THIRD-PARTY LIABILITY
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
-
Pursuant to K.S.A. 44-504, while workers' compensation provides the exclusive remedy against an employer, Plaintiff retains the right to pursue a separate civil action against negligent third parties.
-
Defendants [NAMES] are not Plaintiff's direct employer and are therefore subject to third-party liability.
-
As a direct and proximate result of these Defendants' negligent acts and/or omissions, Plaintiff suffered severe injuries and damages.
COUNT V — PRODUCT LIABILITY (IF APPLICABLE)
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
-
Defendant Manufacturer designed, manufactured, distributed, and/or sold the [DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT/PRODUCT] that was in use at the Project Site.
-
The [PRODUCT] was defective in its [DESIGN / MANUFACTURE / MARKETING (FAILURE TO WARN)] and was unreasonably dangerous.
-
The defect in the [PRODUCT] was a proximate cause of Plaintiff's injuries.
-
As a direct and proximate result, Plaintiff suffered severe injuries and damages.
DAMAGES
- As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' acts and/or omissions, Plaintiff has suffered and continues to suffer the following damages:
a. Medical Expenses: Past and future medical expenses in an amount to be proven at trial;
b. Lost Wages: Past and future lost wages and loss of earning capacity;
c. Pain and Suffering: Physical pain and mental anguish, past and future;
d. Disability: Permanent disability and/or disfigurement;
e. Loss of Consortium: [SPOUSE'S NAME] has been deprived of the companionship, society, and consortium of Plaintiff;
f. Punitive Damages: Defendants' conduct was so willful, wanton, fraudulent, or malicious as to warrant punitive damages;
g. Other: [ADDITIONAL DAMAGES AS APPLICABLE].
JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment in Plaintiff's favor and against Defendants for:
a. Economic damages in an amount to be determined at trial;
b. Non-economic damages as allowed by law;
c. Punitive damages as allowed by law;
d. Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest;
e. Costs of this action;
f. Attorney's fees as allowed by law;
g. Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
VERIFICATION AND SIGNATURE
Respectfully submitted this [____] day of [__________], [________].
[________________________________]
[ATTORNEY NAME]
[FIRM NAME]
[ADDRESS]
[CITY], Kansas [ZIP CODE]
Telephone: [________________________________]
Email: [________________________________]
Kansas Bar No. [________________________________]
Attorney for Plaintiff
STATE-SPECIFIC NOTES — KANSAS
Modified Comparative Negligence: K.S.A. 60-258a permits recovery only if the plaintiff's fault is strictly less than the defendants'. Equal fault bars recovery.
Non-Economic Damages Cap: K.S.A. 60-19a02's $350,000 non-economic damages cap was held facially unconstitutional as applied to personal-injury claims tried to a jury, under Kan. Const. Bill of Rights § 5, in Hilburn v. Enerpipe, Ltd., 309 Kan. 1127 (2019) — do not plead or rely on this cap for a jury-tried personal-injury claim. Wrongful death non-economic cap: $250,000 aggregate under K.S.A. 60-1903 (a separate statute, not addressed by Hilburn).
Workers' Compensation / Third-Party Actions: K.S.A. 44-504 expressly permits third-party civil actions. Addresses subrogation and attorney fee allocation.
Statute of Limitations: A qualifying noncontract injury-to-rights action not otherwise enumerated carries two years under K.S.A. 60-513(a)(4), with subsection (b)'s substantial-injury/reasonable-ascertainability accrual and outer-limit rules. Classify the claim and facts before calculating.
OSHA Evidence: Commonly used as evidence of negligence, but not automatically treated as negligence per se.
Scaffolding/Elevation: Kansas has no specific scaffolding or elevation liability statute comparable to NY Labor Law § 240.
Kansas Pleading Note: Kansas uses "Petition" rather than "Complaint" in state practice.
Key Case Law: Davison v. Eby Construction Co., 169 Kan. 256 (1950); Hanna v. CRA, Inc., 196 Kan. 156 (1966).
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It should be reviewed and customized by a licensed Kansas attorney before filing. All statutory citations should be verified for current applicability.
About this template
- Last updated
- September 12, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Kansas
- Category
- Personal Injury
Legal authority
- K.S.A. 60-513(a)(4), (b) (2-year noncontract injury-to-rights period; substantial-injury/reasonable-ascertainability accrual)
- K.S.A. 60-258a (Modified Comparative Negligence)
- K.S.A. 44-504 (Workers' Comp / Third-Party Actions)
- K.S.A. 60-19a02 (Non-Economic Damages Cap — held facially unconstitutional as to personal-injury jury trials, Hilburn v. Enerpipe, Ltd., 309 Kan. 1127 (2019))
- K.S.A. 60-1903 (Wrongful Death Non-Economic Cap)
- K.S.A. 60-601 through 60-611 (Venue)
Personal injury cases are brought by people who were hurt because of someone else's carelessness: car crashes, slip and falls, defective products, and more. Demand letters, settlement agreements, and court filings in these cases have to document the injuries, the medical treatment, the lost income, and the exact legal basis for holding the other side responsible. Well-prepared paperwork is what drives higher settlements and forces insurers to take the claim seriously.
Not legal advice
This template is provided for informational purposes. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Checked against the law it cites
The statutes this template relies on are listed under Legal authority.
K.S.A. § 60-513(a)(4) (checked September 12, 2026): "An action for injury to the rights of another, not arising on contract, and not herein enumerated."
K.S.A. § 60-513(b) (checked September 12, 2026): "Except as provided in subsections (c) and (d), the causes of action listed in subsection (a) shall not be deemed to have accrued until the act giving rise to the cause of action first causes substantial injury, or, if the fact of injury is not reasonably ascertainable until some time after the initial act, then the period of limitation shall not commence until the fact of injury becomes reasonably ascertainable to the injured party, but in no event shall an action be commenced more than 10 years beyond the time of the act giving rise to the cause of action."
Draft your Construction Accident Complaint in the editor
Answer a few questions, let the AI editor draft each section from your answers, review it, and download Word and PDF. $99 one time, or $249 per month for every document and every Ezel app.