For valuing restaurant employee meals, should flat shift pay be divided by eight hours or reduced for the employee's half-hour lunch period?

Short answer The memorandum used the full eight-hour shift. Employees were paid a flat amount for eight hours, so that basis controlled the hourly wage and meal value.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 550.1234
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1977-08-08
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A district auditor asking how to value restaurant employee meals under a flat shift-pay arrangement (taxpayer identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1977. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1977
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This August 8, 1977 internal memorandum addresses only the wage basis used to determine the value attributable to restaurant employee meals. It cites no statute or regulation and does not state the broader tax computation, meal-pricing formula, or a later formal disposition. Current law controls over the annotation. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Restaurant employees had to remain on the premises for an eight-hour shift but could take a half-hour lunch during that shift. They received one flat amount for the eight-hour shift, and overtime also was computed from an allocated portion of an eight-hour workday.

The tax-counsel memorandum concluded that the employees were paid for eight hours. The restaurant therefore should use the full eight-hour payment basis when determining both the hourly wage and the value attributable to employee meals.

The source does not provide the actual shift amount, calculate a dollar meal value, identify a statute or regulation, or explain the rest of the tax treatment.

Common questions

Did the half-hour lunch reduce the paid shift to seven and one-half hours?

No. The memorandum treated the flat payment as compensation for an eight-hour shift.

Did the source calculate the taxable meal value?

No. It only established the hourly-wage basis to use in determining that value.

Citations and references

  • The complete supporting memorandum cites no statute, regulation, or case.

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

550.1234

Memorandum
To:

West Los Angeles – Auditing (AB)Date:

From:

Tax Counsel (WEB) - Headquarters

Subject:

REDACTED TEXT

August 8, 1977

This is with reference to your telephone inquiry relating to the hourly labor charge paid restaurant employees of the above-named taxpayer. We understand that the restaurant employees are required to remain on the business premises for an 8-hour shift period, but are authorized to have one-half hour for lunch during each shift. The employees are paid a flat sum of money for each 8-hour shift. Overtime pay is computed at an allocatable portion of an eight-hour work day. It is our conclusion that the employees are being paid for an 8-hour shift and that this payment basis should be used in determining the hourly wage and the value attributable to employees' meals. WEB/vs

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1977. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace